Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-14 Thread Scott Mazur
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:31:26 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote > Scott Mazur wrote on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:08:22 -0600: > > > AFAIK the DHCP client has no authority to register dynamic dns regardless of > > how the client machines are configured. It's the DHCP server that decides

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Mazur
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:31:19 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote > Craig White wrote on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:45:22 -0700: > > > by default, BIND will ignore attempts by clients to register dynamic dns > > after getting an ip address from dhcp - that is what is being logged. > > so, the > Jan 11 16:38:00 ch

Re: [CentOS] Bind Firewall Rules

2008-07-23 Thread Scott Mazur
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:40:42 -0400, John Hinton wrote > I'm running caching nameservers on almost all of my systems and then > also three nameservers. All are available publicly. I too had hard > coded bind to port 53. I also had specifically opened port 53 > through the firewall. But now, it ap

Re: [CentOS] Re: Ideas for stopping ssh brute force attacks

2008-07-22 Thread Scott Mazur
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:10:14 +1000, Les Bell wrote > Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > Portsentry is still available on sourceforge I believe. > << > > Good call - http://sourceforge.net/projects/sentrytools/ shows they were > uploaded back in 2003 and it looks like nothing has happ