Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CentOS is *not* for users new to Linux or Unix-like operatings
> systems. It isn't. Full stop.
Hopefully what you mean is that it isn't designed specifically for users that
are new to Linux. It is a perfectly fine distribution for those wanting to
learn
"Brian Mathis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The use of port 443 with openvpn is only mentioned as a convenience,
> because many firewalls allow traffic to port 443 to pass
> unrestricted, while they may block other ports.
Absolutely right. I never intended to imply anything else. Sorry if there
"Brian Mathis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest OpenVPN. It's modern, very secure, and had a wide range of
> options and usage scenarios. PPTP / L2TP is a pain to get working,
> and it has some security issues.
I want to second this suggestion. Another strong advantage of OpenVPN is that
i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -
>The WLAN DSL-Router should not be the problem. But which wlan-
>adapter (internally (PCI), USB... whatever) can be recommended for a
>work "out of is the box" with cent OS 5?
The Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG adapter works well. I believe that I had to get
RPMs from a
Bart Schaefer wrote:
Just as a point of interest -- we have one person here who installed
FF2 from the those tarballs on her CentOS 4 machine, and she's been
having problems with it crashing every few days. I on the other hand
I have -- and I'm betting a lot of other folks are -- been running
5 matches
Mail list logo
