Bowie Bailey wrote on 05/25/2012 01:00 PM:
> Is "Fedora Project" EPEL?
Yes.
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Earl Ramirez wrote on 05/25/2012 09:37 AM:
>
> Philippe,
>
> You can try ELRepo, I believe that they have the drivers for boderdom, they
> also have kernel 3.3.x, please read their note about using kernel 3.3.x. I
> have tried it and I did not have any issues with it.
>
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/ker
Philippe Naudin wrote on 05/25/2012 08:39 AM:
> Hello,
>
> The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is
> native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac
> since 2.6.39).
>
> But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ?
>
> Thanks,
>
Chec
Rita wrote on 05/25/2012 06:29 AM:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there
> were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard
> python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas
> would be much appreciate
fred smith wrote on 05/24/2012 07:27 PM:
> Where do you find a Chrome package that works on Centos? Google seems
> to provide only Fedora, not Centos, binaries. All I can find for
> Centos is Chromium.
# yum --disablerepo \* --enablerepo google-chrome list available
Loaded plugins: fastestmirr
Gelen James wrote on 05/22/2012 05:45 PM:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm in a project to program Kerberos with Python.
You will have a much better chance of getting an answer if you do not
hijack threads - in this case "[CentOS] Repositories in CentOS 5.8" - by
replying to an unrelated message. This mes
Kaushal Shriyan wrote on 05/23/2012 09:22 PM:
> Thanks for the explanation. Please help me understand when i install CentOS
> 5.8 on a fresh server, what are the available repositories by default and
> if i need any packages which are not there in the default repos, Do i need
> to enable third part
Rhugga Harper wrote on 05/17/2012 03:58 PM:
> I just installed CentOS 5.6 32-bit
Have you tried installing the current/supported CentOS-5 release 5.8?
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on 05/10/2012 05:56 PM:
> I do not agree with "minor versions are only snapshots in time when
> install media is re-generated". I should have left only part of the
> sentence I disagree with.
What's not to agree with in that? It may be incomplete, but not incorrect.
W
Scott Robbins wrote on 04/22/2012 05:53 PM:
> Do you really need it? I much prefer vpnc.
>
> http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/vpnc.html
>
> The Cisco client has always (in my less than humble opinion), been
> pretty bad. I remember one wouldn't work on any smp, another wouldn't
> work
Mark LaPierre wrote on 04/22/2012 05:51 PM:
> On 04/22/2012 04:40 PM, Steven Buehler wrote:
>> Did you try typing the following into google and then grabing one of the
>> source rpms listed?
>> linux source spice-server-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
Jason Pyeron wrote on 04/22/2012 03:54 PM:
> It seems that the live cd for 5 is no longer in existence. Is this an
> oversight
> or by design?
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.6
Not sure why, but 5.6 was the last CentOS-5 LiveCD built. The ISOs are
still on
http://v
Not strictly a CentOS issue, but users of the Nvidia drivers should be
aware of this. See their announcement[1] for details. Users of the the
manufacturer's driver, or the ELRepo kmod-nvidia driver[2] should update
ASAP to the new version.
Phil
[1] http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.p
Rafał Radecki wrote on 04/12/2012 10:32 AM:
> The system was not rebooted, it just was not responsive (ssh) and has a gap
> in logfiles for 15 minutes. After 15 minutes it started responding.
Then I'd try the smartctl suggestion from mark.
Please do not top-post.
Phil
__
Michael McNulty wrote on 04/11/2012 10:40 PM:
> Will mtrr failing result in stability or performance loss? Is there any
> performance loss disabling memory remap in bios other than losing 600k? thx
>
> Is this happening because the chipset only supports 8gb of memory and
> therefore mtrr cannot
Rafał Radecki wrote on 04/12/2012 03:07 AM:
> Hi All.
>
> I had today a problem with my mail server (2.6.18-274.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue
> Nov 29 13:37:35 EST 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux, CentOS release 5.7
> (Final)). On my Cacti graphs I see that there has been much I/O write on
> the disks and then
Vinay Nagrik wrote on 04/10/2012 12:36 PM:
> How could I build complete 5.7 centos VM with two different Centos DVDs.
>
In addition to other viable suggestions, you can also combine the two
images into one.
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CDtoDVDMedia
Phil
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote on 04/07/2012 05:51 AM:
>
> Any ideas how I can probe/list devices within grub shell? I've done
> the stupid method of root(hd0,x) all the way up to root(hd8,3) without
> luck.
>
Have you tried the grub "find" command?
find /grub/stage1
find /boot/grub/stage1
etc.
http://
Mark LaPierre wrote on 04/07/2012 08:59 PM:
> Hey Y'all
>
> Can someone suggest the appropriate place to report a bug in a Gnome game?
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
Johnny Hughes wrote on 03/28/2012 10:26 AM:
> On 03/28/2012 09:03 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> Timo Neuvonen wrote on 03/28/2012 09:17 AM:
>>> I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
>>> reboot/poweroff system without any admin rights, or withou
carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:53 AM:
> On 03/28/2012 03:51 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:27 AM:
>>> Then, how can I obtain these uuids??
>> blkid
>>
>> Phil
> Doesn't works neither:
>
> [root@newc6srv init.d]# b
Timo Neuvonen wrote on 03/28/2012 09:17 AM:
> I just noticed that CentOS (6.2) by default allows any user to
> reboot/poweroff system without any admin rights, or without any further
> questions, if using commands 'reboot' or 'poweroff'. But 'shutdown' still
> requires admin rights.
>
> What is the
carlopmart wrote on 03/28/2012 09:27 AM:
> Then, how can I obtain these uuids??
blkid
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Lars Hecking wrote on 03/26/2012 01:00 PM:
>
> No replacement needed. Or at least go back to the pre-6 situation and not
> stuff it down our throats as a mandatory requirement.
>
Just because NetworkManager is the default does not mean it is
mandatory. You are free to "yum remove NetworkManag
admin lewis wrote on 03/26/2012 05:45 PM:
> Anyone know if there is a kernel autoconfigure tool to compile from source ?
> thanks
That seems too good to be true, so it probably is. :)
Have a look at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
Or perhaps
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
Someone
Bart Schaefer wrote on 02/15/2012 05:00 PM:
> Didn't get any response to this last time, but it's still happening,
> so I'm trying again. No clues?
Try it on a freshly created account. If it works, then it's something
you did to your account. If it does not then it is a system-level bug
or set
Jobst Schmalenbach wrote on 02/17/2012 07:40 PM:
> "yum list installed | grep clamav"
# yum --showduplicates --noplugins --enablerepo atrpms,epel,rpmforge
list clamav
...
Available Packages
clamav.x86_64 0.96.1-1.el5.rf
rpmforge
clamav.x86_64
cbul...@gmail.com wrote on 02/09/2012 12:05 AM:
> I used a DVD.
> The command was:
> cp -ar/path/DVD/. /var/www/html/inst
DVD1 or LiveDVD?
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
> What is RAID0+1?
Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combined into multiple level 0 RAIDs
that are themselves treated as single drives to be combined into a
single RAID 1.
Phil
_
fakessh @ wrote on 02/03/2012 05:43 PM:
> but possible
> or I may strongly advises against
I would strongly advise against blindly overwriting /var and /etc (or
anything else, with the possible exception of /home) from a CentOS-6
install with CentOS-5 versions. Compare the files and make changes
Fajar Priyanto wrote on 01/28/2012 09:49 PM:
> ...
> But I see this:
>
> DESCRIPTION
> sfdisk has four (main) uses: list the size of a partition,
> list the partitions on a device, check the partitions on a device, and
> - very dangerous - repartition a
> device.
Since the device
Keith Wilkinson wrote on 01/28/2012 07:58 PM:
> ...
> but wonder if anyone knows if this problem (of graphical
> install freezing) has been fixed in CENTOS 6.2
Why not try it and see. Obsolete releases should not be installed anyway.
> , or (if not) if RedHat is aware of it.
Don't see it in the
Pardon the top-post and cross-post, but this apparently should have gone
to centos-v...@centos.org
Phil
chris procter wrote on 01/27/2012 03:29 PM:
> Hi,
>
> Its ages since I came across this problem so my memory is a little hazey but
> something is obviously holding on to the lv so you'll need
Dotan Cohen wrote on 01/23/2012 08:39 AM:
> There is a CentOS 5.2 machine ...
I'd have a look at why an apparently Internet-facing server is 5 point
releases, plus a lot of subsequent errata, behind the current 5.7
release level; and what resultant vulnerabilities might have been exploited.
Phi
wwp wrote on 01/20/2012 09:56 AM:
> Hello there,
>
>
> I'm looking at different desktop activity types (in Desktop Settings),
> and on my CentOS 6, I only have "desktop". No folderview, for instance.
>
> Does anybody know how to install/enable other types?
I have Desktop (default) and Folder View.
Mark LaPierre wrote on 01/15/2012 09:57 PM:
> I enabled both epel and rpmforge.
Neither of the above. You need http://elrepo.org.
# yum --disablerepo \* --enablerepo elrepo\* list \*nvidia\*
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached
fred smith wrote on 12/25/2011 05:33 PM:
> I managed to get an account set up on the centos bugzilla, after futzing
> with it for a half hour, but for the life of me I cannot get to the
> page where I would enter a new one. my browser just says "transferring
> data from bugs.centos.org" and sits th
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote on 12/22/2011 03:14 PM:
> Had to increase the memory size, so it would go into a graphics install.
> This caused it to prompt me for the type of Linux installation and
> provide network (interface) information.
>
> Wouldn't do this in text mode.
Upstream has severely lobot
Phil Schaffner wrote on 11/17/2011 01:18 PM:
> Have you replaced samba packages with samba3x packages?
P.S.
Just noticed I am an accessory to a thread hijacking. This thread is
about CentOS-6. Sorry.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Ron Young wrote on 11/17/2011 01:11 PM:
> I just installed win 7 pro @home in order to be more compatible with
> my new @work environment. I am likewise having a problem with samba
> shares. The samba shares are on a C5.7 server and were readily
> available from the same machine running XP for th
Alan McKay wrote on 11/14/2011 09:56 PM:
>> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility
>> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither
>> is perfect.
> That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1
> (and so long ago at that
Always Learning wrote on 09/21/2011 02:33 PM:
...
> I'm on 5.7
But the OP is on 6.
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Drew wrote on 07/21/2011 11:09 AM:
>> From the sounds of it it's fake raid. M$ doesn't leave any signatures
> on their raid system that linux will detect. dm/md raid can see
> fakeraid signatures in newer versions so the installer may be picking
> up on that.
So, erasing the RAID signatures with "
Kevin Thorpe wrote on 06/14/2011 08:20 AM:
...
> That's exactly what I was trying to do.
> Error: Missing Dependency: openwsman-server>= 2.2.3 is needed by
> package srvadmin-itunnelprovider-6.5.0-1.151.1.el5.x86_64
> (dell-omsa-specific)
It seems to be in the Dell repo:
http://linux.dell.com/rep
Gordon Messmer wrote on 05/23/2011 11:41 AM:
> What was it about Patrice's work
> that you found unsatisfactory?
I don't think anyone found Patrice's work unsatisfactory. He just
stated that he did not have much time to work on the CentOS-6 LiveCD/DVD
and asked for someone else to take the lead
Lamar Owen wrote on 05/21/2011 04:25 PM:
>> early in the thread, it was clear from a reply's content that
>> > a locally installed 'ftpd' and not the CentOS vsftpd was
>> > being used
> Looking... don't see that. Perhaps I'm just missing it.
Same here. The OP only replied once, and had the sam
Kaushal Shriyan wrote on 05/20/2011 09:17 PM:
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32319
> CVE : CVE-2008-5161
> BID : 32319
That appears to be a very old bug:
https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2008-5161.html
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
Ian Murray wrote on 05/20/2011 05:13 PM:
> p.s. yes, the thread is broken. Am using digest.
Digest I understand, but consider it evil as it breaks threading, and it
is IMHO more trouble than it is worth. Please do expend the effort to
fix the Subject. Is that also a hanging offense? :-)
I ver
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 05/20/2011 11:35 AM:
...
> And find out why they disappeared.
No indication anything disappeared the way I read it. There was nothing
explicitly there for xferlog because it is in /etc/logrotate.d/vsftpd.log.
Phil
___
CentOS
Patricia A Moss wrote on 05/20/2011 11:16 AM:
> I have the same:
If the size of the logs is problematic perhaps you need to rotate more
frequently, perhaps daily rather than weekly, and specify compress for
old logs.
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
Keith Roberts wrote on 05/20/2011 10:57 AM:
> OK. I am listening to all your comments. My repo would be
> using dependencies probably from the other centos repos,
> like ATrpms, remi, EPEL, et al. If they needed any that is.
In my experience packages that need dependencies from more than one 3rd
Patricia A Moss wrote on 05/20/2011 09:25 AM:
>
> I am not sure how to correctly troubleshoot this. I just noticed that my
> /var/log/xferlog file is huge. There are no files in /etc/logrotate.d/
> for xferlog. This is what leads me to believe that it isnot rotating. Or
> perhaps I do not have it s
Steve Clark wrote on 05/12/2011 10:15 AM:
>> Please note there is a largely silent majority that appreciates very
>> much what the team does, is doing to improve and listening to suggestions
>> Keep up the great work - Thanks
> +1
++1
Please trim your posts. 60+ included lines and >> 2k character
Mathieu Baudier wrote on 05/11/2011 04:59 PM:
>> nothing and apparently today's target date has slipped, and 2) until
>> CentOS admits that there is a problem, nothing will actually change.
>
> Apparently they did admit and it does change:
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_
Steve Clark wrote on 05/11/2011 04:12 PM:
...
> Thanks, but I am already using that kernel. I want to get a vanilla
> kernel.org 2.6.32.xx kernel running
> on 6.0.
>
> In fact following AY directions I was able to rebuild the srpms for
> kernel-2.6.32-71.29.2, but again that
> is not the generic ke
Gilbert Sebenste wrote on 05/07/2011 11:57 AM:
...
> I get a ton of stuff before this, but just info messages. Where should I
> start looking to fix this problem? I use the Redhat experimental kernels
> at http://epople.redhat.com/jwilson/el5/. Running CentOS 5.6,
> fully patched as of this morning
Dave Stevens wrote on 05/05/2011 07:11 PM:
> Thank you. How can I find out who the guys are?
Go to https://www.centos.org/ and look under "Information" on the menu bar.
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
Scott Silva wrote on 05/05/2011 05:03 PM:
> Here is a bit of why the donation button went away (It was back in 2009 or
> so)...
Old news, that does not explain why monetary donations are still not
being accepted.
Phil
P.S. I do wish people would trim their quotes. :-)
_
John R. Dennison wrote on 05/03/2011 04:12 AM:
...
> Having a single location would be a great boon and would allow us to
> point people to one "official" location when the inevitable questions on
> releases come up.
I will leave it to core team members to comment on how "official" it is,
but the
Fajar Priyanto wrote on 05/02/2011 12:39 PM:
> Hi all,
> Somehow I mistakenly install a bunch of 32bit packages in my 64bit Centos 5.6
> How do I remove those 32bit packages?
FAQ #22:
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-357346ff0bf7c14b0849c3bcce39677aaca528e9
Phil
__
Peter Peltonen wrote on 04/30/2011 03:51 AM:
> ... I just clicked my way through the CentOS installation like I
> usually do, and that meant using LVM. And I don't think you are even
> given an option to define the default vg name during the installation?
If you want to use the default setup but h
Robert Nichols wrote on 04/27/2011 01:46 PM:
...
> Quickest solution is to grab the SRPM from Fedora 13 and build it on
> your RHEL 6 machine. I just tried that on Scientific Linux 6.0, and
> "rpmbuild -ba" built everything just fine with no changes whatsoever.
Ditto, except I used
rpmbuild --re
Frank Chang wrote on 04/21/2011 05:36 PM:
> Simon Matter and Ned Slider, Thank you for your answers. This afternoon
> , I installed binutils-devel on Centos Linux 5.5. Then , I installed all
> the QT packages except for the two QT client packages.
> When I ran ./configure --with-kernel-support on t
Leonard den Ottolander wrote on 04/17/2011 01:37 PM:
>...It's a general request that if people are aware of
> breakage in upcoming updates to report it to this list.
Agree. I would advocate posting it to this list and making it part of
the Announcement post as well. This issue was discussed on
Nicolas Ross wrote on 04/16/2011 02:25 PM:
> It's not that urgent, it's just that yum sees that the update from the
> regular repository, and I ended up with no external drive to my backup
> storage server and it took a while to figure it out...
You might want to add an "exclude=kernel*" in [upda
John Beranek wrote on 04/15/2011 07:45 AM:
> On 15/04/11 12:23, John Beranek wrote:
>> [Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one
>> particular machine that I'd also like to upgrade to
Rainer Traut wrote on 04/15/2011 07:55 AM:
...
> Yeah, I had the same problem with missing php_mcrypt. ;)
> I did a full rebuild of php53 with patched spec so that it produces
> php53_mcrypt but that is not very elegant.
> The more elegant way to do it is to make an rpm for only the missing
> modul
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/13/2011 07:22 PM:
...
> I can't think of anything that has been a problem with 64-bit win
> 2003/2008 as production servers and I sort of like the way you can
> decide after-the-fact that you want to convert a disk to software raid.
http://wiki.c
Brunner, Brian T. wrote on 04/13/2011 04:21 PM:
> And this thread is all about something that doesn't exist, and nobody is
> trying to make exist. It's about the web-footed boogeyman in the closet
> that nobody living at the home ever alleged was there.
It may be that no such project exists today
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on 04/13/2011 05:20 PM:
> You should try to search the mailing list first, then ask redundant
> question. This was answered in last 24-48h.
And today on IRC we find:
15:36 <@z00dax> cap_: we will be all caught up with updates today
> Do to the bandwidth constrictions,
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/13/2011 02:22 PM:
> I can't think of anything that has been a problem with 64-bit win
> 2003/2008 as production servers and I sort of like the way you can
> decide after-the-fact that you want to convert a disk to software raid.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CentOS5Conve
Johnny Hughes wrote on 04/13/2011 12:55 PM:
> CentOS is ... right now ... deployed on 29% of web
> servers on the Internet that use Linux.
That 28.9% is down from the high of 33.5% in Oct. 2010 or a 13.8% decrease.
http://w3techs.com/technologies/history_details/os-linux
Phil
Kevin Thorpe wrote on 04/13/2011 11:22 AM:
...
> It's probably something simple I'm missing.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/13/2011 06:54 AM:
> They are definitely in there, just slow.
Must be vanishingly slow. :-)
Just checked half a dozen tier 1 mirrors and none has src.rpm files in
.../5.6/os/SRPMS/ There are some in 5.6/updates/SRPMS/.
Phil
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 AM:
> Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
> going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ).
More like 72 hours and still no 5.6/os/SRPMS/ in evidence. Did the valve
not get turned on?
Phil
___
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/12/2011 04:07 PM:
> suspect this is, at least in some part, down to the fact that we don't
> have a wiki or a web page that could perhaps accumulate some/much of
> whats been said already and point people at that - so if they are new to
> the process, they have a single r
Stanley A. Klein wrote on 04/12/2011 01:55 PM:
> I did the 5.6 update yesterday. When I started the machine today, I did
> not get a login screen -- it was just a blank screen with no cursor or
> anything. I shut down, restarted and when grub came up selected the
> previous kernel. The system ca
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/12/2011 07:43 AM:
> Quite a large part of the functional tests can be automated - specially
> if there are going to be 100's of people offering them up. Wihtout a
> doubt we need more of those.
Agree - whatever can be automated should be. It is the predictive part
I w
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 12:20 PM:
...
> No, re-read what I said. Ownership in the distro is quite a different
> ballgame from userend support.
Yes, but it seems to be rather closely held.
>> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases.
>
> The aim is to solve problems on a
John R. Dennison wrote on 04/11/2011 07:48 PM:
> Your constant drive-by snipes don't do much to give the devs
> additional motivation to correct any of the issues that are
> present.
I don't think anyone with the constant presence Dag has exhibited can be
characterized as a driv
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 PM:
> On 4/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
...
>> It's laborious, it's repetitive, it's boring,
>> sometimes it's time-consuming but it's really NOT difficult.
>
> That depends on where and whether you can find the component(s) that
> were missing or the wr
Dag Wieers wrote on 04/11/2011 07:03 PM:
...
> Anyone from the QA team interested to share some information on what
> happened during QA ?
A very limited group did a lot of work on QA and missed some issues that
might have been caught by a more open process.
"Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are
S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
> Just boot the installer with the "ext4" option and anaconda will be able
> to format ext4, or at least that works in 5.5.
Works just as well on 5.6.
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.ce
Mister IT Guru wrote on 04/09/2011 06:36 AM:
...
> Any ideas? Anyone want to comment?
The Wiki could use a lot of work in many areas including this one;
however, Wiki discussions should be conducted on centos-docs. Please
post there.
Phil
___
CentOS
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/08/2011 05:33 PM:
> Is there some way for yum to know about that?
Only if it errors out on a bad package. There have been (to my
knowledge) two different types of errors. One was a truncated package
on the mirrors that was damaged in transit from the build system. The
Olaf Mueller wrote on 04/08/2011 08:35 AM:
...
> The only little problem happens on the upgrade of my server, since my
> web server doesn't start after reboot. But this was easy to fix since
> this error was known from the RHEL 5.6 upgrade.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669963
You
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 04/08/2011 04:56 PM:
> In a standard install? I'll look, but don't remember that option.
It is present, but easy to overlook.
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote on 04/08/2011 02:32 PM:
> I am trying to install the 64-bit version onto one of our servers. When
> I get to the point
> of loading various software packages, I normally select KDE desktop, and
> also make
> sure that CentOS extras is also selected. Once that is done, I clic
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 04/08/2011 04:10 PM:
..
> What you have to do is tell it no bootloader, then before you reboot at
> the end of the install, use or whatever to get to another screen,
> then... lessee, I forget if it's mounted the install as /mnt/sysimage or
> not, but mount your /boot on
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/08/2011 04:29 PM:
> Why force people to burn two disks when they
> would only need one?
You are welcome to debate that with the LiveCD maintainer, or to roll
your own version including the option, but as a guy who has spent a lot
of time answering the newbies on the foru
William Hooper wrote on 04/08/2011 03:50 PM:
> Forgive me if I've missed it mentioned, but it looks like the option
> is only being removed from the LiveCD. Using the netinstall.iso is
> still available and would be a more efficient way of doing network
> installs anyway (9.5M vs 685M).
Precisely
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/08/2011 02:27 PM:
> None of that applies to NFS installs against locally downloaded isos -
> which is the fastest/easiest approach to a full set of install choices
> unless it is your first machine and you don't have anything to act as
> the server.
Agreed. In my mind tha
Timothy Murphy wrote on 04/07/2011 08:47 AM:
> Network Installation from CentOS Live CD will no longer be available.
> (Why not, as a matter of interest?)
Because network installs tend to be problematic for all but those with
local repositories or flawless broadband network connections. Having i
Cal Sawyer wrote on 03/31/2011 08:13 AM:
> Hi
>
> CentOS 5.4(final) 2.6.18-164el5PAE.
I hope you are aware that you are using a very obsolete OS with a lot of
known (i.e. exploitable) security holes and bugs that have subsequently
been fixed.
...
> I realise this description is kind of a tangle
Timothy Murphy wrote on 03/28/2011 07:24 PM:
> However, when I go towww.centos.org and click on
> Downloads=>Mirrors=>CentOS-5 ISOs=>x86_64
Go to
Downloads / Mirrors / Mirror List
And look at the column headed "Direct DVD Downloads".
Phil
___
CentOS
Larry Vaden wrote on 01/30/2011 08:41 PM:
...
> With apologies for replying to my own post, the final solution
> (possibly regarded as draconian and puerile by others) which seemed to
> work to return to a consistent state was to download Oracle R5U6 and
> invoke 'rpm -ivh' following some rpm which
Jerry Geis wrote on 01/04/2011 09:21 AM:
> Hey - back to work today and just noticed the last status update for
> release 6 ( http://twitter.com/centos ) was way back on Dec 1.
Closest I have seen to a later status update is at
http://twitter.com/kbsingh
> Everyone have a Great New Year! :)
Markandeya wrote on 12/24/2010 07:57 AM:
...
> "do you realize that if any one of those 4 miscellaneous drives fails,
> you lose the whole volume?"
>
> Can anyone confirm this?
Yes.
> 2: can you add(extend) a physical hdd with data to a LV without losing the
> data?
No.
> 3: can you remove on
Ryan Manikowski wrote on 10/11/2010 07:49 PM:
...
> One method to obscure the presence of the ssh daemon would be to use
> port knocking:
>
> http://dotancohen.com/howto/portknocking.html
Somehow I suspect the OP may have seen that one. :-D
Phil
___
Ce
Keith Keller wrote on 10/12/2010 06:35 PM:
> Somewhat related to this, does anybody know (or have links to) what
> work, if any, is happening with the yum security plugin? The only
> information I could find was some posts from Karanbir from last year,
> basically saying it was a low priority beca
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
