On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:00:25 +0100, Frank.Brodbeck-E4aVwrWTXLGELgA04lAiVw
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd try this as a quickshot:
>
> find /etc /root /home -type f -exec grep -l PS3 {} \;
>
> than I'd take a closer look at the files that will show up. And I'd read
> bash(1) closely to learn which files a
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:50:54 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[...]
> No, we're getting closer. What you need to find out is what's setting
> TERM to linux, which is further back than /etc/bashrc. Is the user
> logging directly onto the Linux box, or are they from, say, a WinDoze
> box
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:48:58 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Mike - email ignored wrote:
[...]
>> I get:
>>
>> TERM = linux
>> doing default
>>
>> The mystery remains.
>
> what do you get with these:
> echo $PROMPT_COMMAND
> echo $PS1
>
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:22:44 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:25:48 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw
>> wrote: [...]
>>>
>>> Ah! Permission/ownership problem?
>>>
>> Good suggestion. I found that for myUser .bashrc had the wrong
>> permissions and .bash_pr
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:25:48 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[...]
>
> Ah! Permission/ownership problem?
>
> mark
Good suggestion. I found that for myUser .bashrc had the wrong
permissions and .bash_profile was missing! I am sure that this
happened because I copied /home/myUs
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:11:55 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> Mike - email ignored wrote:
>> How do I format the prompt at level 3? One of my accounts has it
>> right, but not the other. I guessed that it was in .tcshrc which was
>> missing from the bad account so I copied it
How do I format the prompt at level 3? One of
my accounts has it right, but not the other.
I guessed that it was in .tcshrc which was
missing from the bad account so I copied it
from the good account, but it made no
difference.
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:14:14 +, Mike - email ignored wrote:
[...]
PROBLEM SOLVED by shutting off eth0 on the laptop.
This was never necessary before.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I installed an openvpn-2.0.9 server on my new CentOS 5.4 box from
using the same parameters I used on a Fedora box I retired.
Now I have a dual boot laptop that has WinXP and Fedora FC8. Both of
these partitions have openvpn clients installed that have worked well in
the past.
After adjusting th
Where can I get openvpn for Centos 5.4?
"yum list openvpn" doesn't find it.
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:00:28 -0500, B.J. McClure wrote:
>
> This works fine for me on 5.4.
>
> [bmccl...@house ~]$ rpm -q pan
> pan-0.132-1.el5.rf
>
> CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 athlon 04:58:11 up 8:30, 2 users,
> load average: 0.06, 0.13, 0.09
It didn't work for me until I installed
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:41:47 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 03:38 +0000, MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> Does anyone know if the pan news reader works on CentOS 5.4? I am
>> considering installing version 0.132 that I downloaded from
>> pan.rebelbase.com
Does anyone know if the pan news reader works
on CentOS 5.4? I am considering installing
version 0.132 that I downloaded from
pan.rebelbase.com .
Thanks for your advice.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:29:10 -0600, Robert wrote:
> MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:22:02 -0800, John Doe wrote:
>>
>>
>>> From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:22:02 -0800, John Doe wrote:
> From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
>
>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800, John Doe wrote:
>> > From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
>> >> On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some CDs. Now every
>> >> ti
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800, John Doe wrote:
> From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED
>
>> On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some CDs. Now every time I
>> used a CD, I get a popup that asks me to "Select a CDDB entry ...". How
>> can I stop this popup?
&
On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some
CDs. Now every time I used a CD, I get a popup
that asks me to "Select a CDDB entry ...".
How can I stop this popup?
Thanks,
Mike,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailma
On my new CentOS 5.4 box I cannot get -j QUEUE to
work. I am using the same setup I used on a CentOS
5.2 box. Is there anything new I should know?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:42:11 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:31:20PM +0000, MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> As mentioned in my previous thread, I can't get my Video card: NVIDIA
>> C73 [GeForce: 7100/ nForce 630i] to display 1440x900 on my CentOS 5.4
>&
As mentioned in my previous thread, I can't get my
Video card: NVIDIA C73 [GeForce: 7100/ nForce 630i]
to display 1440x900 on my CentOS 5.4 on my HP
Pavilion with monitor Dell E198WFPV.
Googing around, I see that others have had this problem
with the NVIDIA card. In one case, it was solved by
gai
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:33:08 -0500, mark wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> Has anyone put Centos 5.4 (or ant version on aHP Pavilion box? I'm
>> having some problems. For example, I can't get my Dell E198WFPV
>> 1440x900 monitor to work correc
Has anyone put Centos 5.4 (or ant version on aHP Pavilion box?
I'm having some problems. For example, I can't get
my Dell E198WFPV 1440x900 monitor to work correctly.
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:51:35 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:04:50 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>>>My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is
>>>plenty of d
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:03:49 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is
>> plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked in the past.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>
> Are you
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:04:50 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>>My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is
>>plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked in the past.
>>
>>Any suggest
My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a
long tar -x. There is plenty of disk available.
This is new; it worked in the past.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:28:13 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>>
>>> If I really want to know what is different between two boxes, I'll do
>>> something like NFS mount one into the other or rsync their /etc trees
>>> somewh
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:58:17 -0700, nate wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> Except that nscd was not set to run, it is probably not specifically a
>> CentOS problem. Perhaps I made a wrong choice in setup?
>
> Something I like to do when troubleshooting apache relate
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:55:01 -0400, Matty wrote:
[...]
> If you are uncertain where the DNS lookups are originating from, you
> could always add an interposer between Apache and glibc. When the
> culprit calls one of the get* routines, you could log a backtrace to a
> file. Summarizing the backtr
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:23:04 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>>
[...]
>>
>> Until now, for a long time, mine wasn't doing it either.
>>
>> Part of the problem
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:22 + (UTC):
>
>> Please refer to my thread "excessive DNS slows httpd"
>
> Why don't you keep posting in there then?
Because the new title ref
Please refer to my thread "excessive DNS slows httpd" in which
I discuss a very slow response from my httpd server on my
CentOS box after modifying httpd.config .
I have "solved" the problem by blocking all DNS in iptables
on my CentOS box. As it happens, this is not a problem in
my present confi
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:23:18 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
[...]
> Are you doing any proxy passthrough's or rewrites resulting in a proxy?
> Or client access permissions based on hostnames. These things might be
> specified in a .htaccess file. Also, remember that all the
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/*.co
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:11:09 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
> What did you revise in your httpd.conf file? My guess is that you
> enabled DNS lookups for the connecting clients.
>
HostnameLookups Off
The changes were largely the removal of a lot of common
code for s and s to other files
and the ad
My web server is a CentOS box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
Linux mbrc21 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue
Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
root ~]# rpm -q httpd
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2
My development and standby is on a Fedora box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
L
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:25 -0500, Robert wrote:
[...]
> Don't you just hate it when you know something and can't remember it!?!
Yes, and it happens more often as time passes.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/m
Could someone please remind me what
file controls automatic updates?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:41:26 +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl schrieb:
>> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:07:59 + (UTC):
>>
>>
>>> If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks it as a spy
>>> site. I wonder why i
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:23 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:07:59 + (UTC):
>
>> If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks it as a spy
>> site. I wonder why it thinks so.
>
> And I wonder why you use
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:45:36 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>>
>>new.mydomain.net - - [11/Feb/2009:14:34:58 -0500] "GET /
>> HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) (internal dummy
>> connection
On my Centos 2.5 web server, in /var/log/httpd/access_log,
I saw several occurrences of:
new.mydomain.net - - [11/Feb/2009:14:34:58 -0500] "GET /
HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)
(internal dummy connection)"
I have never seen anything like this before over many
years of
I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive
and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I am redoing it with script, and it is
working well.
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:18:37 +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
[...]
>
> This suggests that yum is not flushing output, possibly because it
> doesn't think it's stdio is on a tty.
>
> 1. Were you running yum update locally on the console, or remotely via a
> network connection of some kind, e.g. ss
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:31:20 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[...]
>> I installed a fresh Centos 5.2
>
> that means exactly what?
>
> Kai
I have a DVD image of CentOS 5.2 downloaded
a few months ago. It is installed on an ftp
server on a nearby machine. I booted the
netinstall disk and did a comp
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:25:06 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
> wrote:
>> This is a continuation of the thread:
>> "yum update fails: CentOS 5.2".
>>
>> I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update.
This is a continuation of the thread:
"yum update fails: CentOS 5.2".
I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update.
It ran correctly, except for these issues:
1. As previously mentioned, after deciding what it
is going to do, It doesn't ask if its ok. But
if I type y it reports:
It gets as far as telling me:
Total download size: 207 M
It doesn't ask if its ok. But
if I type y it reports:
Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages:
Then it does nothing. I can't kill it
with CRTL-C, but I killed the yum process
with kill -9 from another window.
I retried it several times
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:18:37 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> I have Capture NX 1. Is it worth spending money to get Capture NX 2?
> Why?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike.
Sorry, wrong group. Please ignore.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
I have Capture NX 1. Is it worth spending money
to get Capture NX 2? Why?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:47:36 -0500, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 15:26, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
> wrote:
>> If I do a vi on the secure file and write it from vi, it stops
>> recording.
>
> Yes, that's the expected behaviour,
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:25:17 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> Further examination shows numerous log lines that were detected on Dec
> 12 by swatch using tail on the secure file but do not presently appear
> in the secure file. However, they do appear in the messages file.
>
&
Further examination shows numerous log lines that were detected on
Dec 12 by swatch using tail on the secure file but do not presently
appear in the secure file. However, they do appear in the messages
file.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:33:06 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
On my Centos 5 server, the secure file has not updated since Dec 10.
This despite the fact that I run an sshd server that I access many
times per day. Most peculiar is the fact that a swatch monitor that
I run on the secu
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:43:46 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> On my Centos 5 server, the secure file has not updated since Dec 10.
>> This despite the fact that I run an sshd server that I access many
>> times per day. Most peculiar is the fact that a swatch monitor that I
>> run on the secure file
On my Centos 5 server, the secure file has not updated
since Dec 10. This despite the fact that I run an
sshd server that I access many times per day. Most
peculiar is the fact that a swatch monitor that I run
on the secure file catches plenty of lines. It is
as if when swatch catches a line in
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:59:35 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:27:45 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
>> Is there a reason why you don't want your machine updated?
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:07, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> Yes indeed! [...]
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:52:33 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:07, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes indeed! I do some complicated things, and I can do without the
>> wonderful surprises that updates sometimes del
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:01:24 +0930, admin wrote:
>> Have you run several Virtual Hosts with the same IP address?
>
> Yes, I run multiple Virtual Hosts on my development server and they all
> look like this:
>
> NameVirtualHost *:80
>
>
>DocumentRoot /var/www/html/site1
>ServerName site
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:27:45 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:03:41 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>> Or it's yum-updatesd in action.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>> [...]
>>
>&g
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:03:41 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
[...]
>
> Or it's yum-updatesd in action.
>
> Ralph
[...]
It looks like this is it; I shut it down.
I don't remember being offered a choice about
this on install; maybe I didn't recognize it.
I would think it should be made obvious.
Is
Since I put my new Centos box on the net, it frequently
tr1es to make ftp contact with IP address 64.90.181.77 .
Why is this, and does anyone recognize this IP address?
Is it spyware?
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:03:13 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
>> Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:09:54 -0500:
>>
>>> You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that
>>> contains Servername entries.
>>
>> No, that's perfectly ok and recommended. His problem was that he w
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:42:06 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[...]
>
> I still don't see the purpose of that virtual host. If it is for
> "catching" IP only accesses there are several methods to do this. Look
> for
> "default virtualhost" in the apache documentation (and in the config
> template comi
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:43:24 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:28:39 + (UTC):
>
>> In other words, ServerName alone fails to distinguish two named virtual
>> hosts.
>
> Oh, it sure does. If it is present in both - which i
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:31:19 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> what's the purpose of that whole confusing configuration? If you want to
> use IP-based virtualhosts *any* of them needs a servername. And why do
> you enclose the Location statement in a virtualhost? Why don't you
> simply specify the real
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:07:08 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
[...]
I have additional information that ServerName is not working.
My system requires two virtual hosts with different values of
ServerName. If they share an IP address, the system fails.
But if each virtual host has a unique IP
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:14:54 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
[...]
> What do you get in the error_log?
I found the CGI problem (mia culpa), and the CGI
is now working, but the NameVirtualHost still has
a problem.
NameVirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80
NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80
...
Order allo
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:54 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
[...]
> Don't we all like puzzles? All those hundreds of pieces which look
> similar? Is that blue one there sky or is it the water? The green one
> over there - is it a tree? Is it a part of that house which has been
> painted green?
>
>
On: Centos 5.2, with httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3
I tried to bring up a web server using an
httpd.con that runs well
on: Fedora 8, with httpd-2.2.8-1.fc8
as well as several earlier versions, going
back to Fedora 4.
On the Centos version, I cannot successfully:
run a NameVirtualHost;
exec
I am thinking of trying centos (I am now using Fedora).
Does centos support libipq?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
71 matches
Mail list logo
