Re: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories

2009-06-17 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of R P Herrold > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 5:37 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Joshua

Re: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories

2009-06-17 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
I assume you mean this? http://www.redhat.com/legal/legal_statement.html Sorry the for spam... Joshua Bahnsen -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joshua Bahnsen Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:15 PM To: CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories

2009-06-17 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
What I mean is, is there a specific Red Hat web page that defines what is acceptable and what is not? Joshua Bahnsen -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joshua Bahnsen Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:14 PM To: CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories

2009-06-17 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
What exactly do you mean by "breaching the rhn aup's"? Joshua Bahnsen -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:59 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS]

Re: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories

2009-06-17 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
Is there an alternate location (other than the mailing list archive) where a list of the advisories can be found? Joshua Bahnsen -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 2:52 AM

Re: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories

2009-06-17 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
> The tricky situation is also for the updates when a new iso set is > released, eg 5.2 -> 5.3, upstream tend to publish a report for each > package that is out there, we havent done that 'traditionally'. Given > time and resources, I am sure we can revisit that, if anyone is really > intereste

Re: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories

2009-06-16 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
That's really my question. Is there any particular reason why not all Red Hat advisories (RHEA, RHBA and RHSA) have a CentOS counterpart? Is this due to time constraints, demand, or some other legal reason? Joshua Bahnsen, Software Developer O : 480.663.8787  |  joshua.bahn...@lumensio

[CentOS] CentOS security advisories

2009-06-15 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
? Also, is there an alternate location to find all Errata information for CentOS? Joshua Bahnsen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos