Re: [CentOS] problem with 5.4 x86_64 DVD iso?

2009-10-29 Thread Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)
Turned out to be a download problem, not a mirror problem. --Joe From: centos-boun...@centos.org on behalf of Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) Sent: Thu 10/29/2009 10:46 AM To: CentOS Mailing List Subject: [CentOS] problem with 5.4 x86_64 DVD iso? Hi all, I

[CentOS] problem with 5.4 x86_64 DVD iso?

2009-10-29 Thread Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)
Hi all, I downloaded the 5.4 x86_64 DVD ISO this morning (CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso). However, the md5sum and sha1sums both don't match what's in the md5sum.txt or the release notes (http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4). I downloaded two ISOs from two different mirrors

Re: [CentOS] question about top output

2009-03-24 Thread Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)
> Can you swap the disk drives with a node that works OK? i will try that when i get back to the data center and can swap the nodes. > Have you compared BIOS setups? Something tells me this is like > interrupts related. Could even be poorly seated hardware: memory, power > or data cables, video,

Re: [CentOS] question about top output

2009-03-23 Thread Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)
> Hm, another thing: Have you used the I toggle > in top (IRIX vs. Sun)? toggling "I" doesn't give me anything that would explain my confusion. I have a few dozen systems with exactly matching hardware and exactly matching OS installations (image based installs). This one system is the only o

Re: [CentOS] question about top output

2009-03-23 Thread Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)
> > below is the output of top off a machine i have, sorted by CPU > > utilization. > > > > my question is, how can all 8 CPUs say they're pegged at 100% user > > utilization, when there are just these 8 processes saying they're > > using 25% of a CPU each, and no other processes showing up taking

[CentOS] question about top output

2009-03-23 Thread Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)
hi all, below is the output of top off a machine i have, sorted by CPU utilization. my question is, how can all 8 CPUs say they're pegged at 100% user utilization, when there are just these 8 processes saying they're using 25% of a CPU each, and no other processes showing up taking any resour