Il 2023-05-17 01:12 Chris Adams ha scritto:
The package was orphaned in Fedora, so there's no maintainer to create
and manage builds.
Hi, I did not know that.
Thanks for sharing.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it
GPG
Il 2022-09-23 19:06 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:
Hi all,
the EPEL repository for CentOS7 contains httpd-itk, an apache module
for running different vhosts under specific user/group ID.
For RHEL8 I can find it only in 3rd party repos, while I misses it
entirely for RHEL9.
Is the module deprecated
Il 2023-01-12 23:01 Josh Boyer ha scritto:
There have been many discussions on modularity, both on this list and
on lists like the epel and fedora devel lists, but I'll give a brief
subset.
Modularity provides parallel availability but not parallel
installatability. Some software needs or perha
Il 2023-01-12 16:10 Josh Boyer ha scritto:
Modules are one of several packaging formats we have. With CentOS
Stream 9/ RHEL 9, we took user and customer feedback on how the
default versions of software are packaged and determined that the
defaults should be normal RPMs. Newer and alternative ve
Il 2023-01-12 09:00 Simon Matter ha scritto:
That's a huge improvement especially on very large disks.
Hi, not-ancient versions of Linux MD RAID cope with these issues via two
different means:
- a write bitmap to track dirty disk regions;
- an embedded bad list sector to remap such sectors wh
Hi all,
the EPEL repository for CentOS7 contains httpd-itk, an apache module for
running different vhosts under specific user/group ID.
For RHEL8 I can find it only in 3rd party repos, while I misses it
entirely for RHEL9.
Is the module deprecated? Can it be re-included into EPEL?
Regards.
Il 2022-01-19 01:52 Fred ha scritto:
Just tried to check for updated chkrootkit and it appears there haven't
been any since 0.53, 3 1/2 years ago.
Anybody know if it is now accessible somewhere other than
www.chkrootkit.org
??
Thanks in advance!
Wikipedia reports its latest version at 0.54,
Il 2022-01-17 06:30 Thomas Stephen Lee ha scritto:
Hi,
I downloaded, extracted, and ran 0.8.0
https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/releases
After running, I submitted the file to virustotal
with the below result.
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/f4bce23c11c3919c1b20bcb0f206f6b44c44e26f2b
Il 2022-01-14 15:30 Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
No .. none of the CentOS Kernels were EVER binary compatible with any
RHEL kernel.
CentOS Linux has always been (now also including CentOS Stream 8 and
9) a completely separate 'closed' build system.
We use the SAME source code to build things, modi
Il 2022-01-14 13:17 Josh Boyer ha scritto:
RHEL's kernel live patching uses upstream open source kpatch. The
sources to the kpatches are delivered in customer facing CDN repos at
the same time as the kpatch itself. We do not use proprietary code to
produce or apply the kpatches.
I can only spe
Il 2022-01-07 19:07 Brian Stinson ha scritto:
There are 2 things to note here about kernel live patching:
- We do not provide patch files in CentOS Stream (or previously in
CentOS Linux, for that matter). We've always recommended RHEL as a
better fit for folks that have hard requirements on this
Dear all,
is kernel live patching working for CentOS Stream 9?
I know that I can enable it via cockpit or the command line, but are
kernel patch files really available or do they require an active RHEL
subscription?
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
e
Il 2021-12-28 15:06 TE Dukes ha scritto:
Hello,
Just upgraded from CentOS 7 to CentOS 8 Stream and there is no rpm for
roundcubemail.
Could I get the SRPM for CentOS 7 and re-do it for CentOS 8? I really
hate
installing a non-RPM package.
If not a good idea, what is available for webmail in
Il 2021-12-10 22:20 Leon Fauster via CentOS ha scritto:
Am 10.12.21 um 22:15 schrieb Gionatan Danti:
Hi all,
I recently updated a CentOS 8 machine to roundcubemail-1.4.12 (from
1.4.11) using remi's repo. I needed to explictly exclude the 1.5.0
packages because it was "shadowing&q
Hi all,
I recently updated a CentOS 8 machine to roundcubemail-1.4.12 (from
1.4.11) using remi's repo. I needed to explictly exclude the 1.5.0
packages because it was "shadowing" the latest 1.4.12 release.
But now I can not see the 1.4.12 packages anymore - only 1.5.x are
provided. Does anyon
Il 2021-12-03 16:22 Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
Rich Bowen has posted a blog entry "Introducing CentOS Stream 9"
https://blog.centos.org/2021/12/introducing-centos-stream-9/
More details here:
https://centos.org/stream9/
Have we an official upgrade path from Stream-8 to Stream-9?
From what I c
Il 2021-12-03 15:46 Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
sssd-client-1.16.5-10.el7_9.11.i686.rpm exists and is here:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.9.2009/updates/x86_64/Packages/
Not sure why you are not seeing it in your update.
It is an Azure CentOS instance, which is pre-configured for using
ex-
Dear list,
I have an issue updating a CentOS 7.9 machine.
A simple "yum update" exists with this error:
# yum update
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7 will be erased
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
ERROR: update failed. Check the log file for deta
Il 2021-11-16 02:15 Markus Falb ha scritto:
Rocky 8.5 has gained support for secure boot
https://rockylinux.org/news/rocky-linux-8-5-ga-release/
Oh, good to know!
Thank you.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it
GPG publi
Il 2021-11-15 16:03 Simon Matter ha scritto:
These figures are interesting but they can not be compared directly.
Oracle has its own EPEL repo and therefore I guess that the number here
shows only those who are using the official EPEL instead of the one
provided by Oracle. That said, I expect tha
Il 2021-10-07 23:24 Alexander Dalloz ha scritto:
Am 07.10.2021 um 15:06 schrieb Gionatan Danti:
Il 2021-10-07 12:40 Rob Kampen ha scritto:
mydestination = localhost localhost.localdomain
mydomain = example.org
myhostname = mx.example.org
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, [::1]/128
Not that I expect
Il 2021-10-07 12:40 Rob Kampen ha scritto:
mydestination = localhost localhost.localdomain
mydomain = example.org
myhostname = mx.example.org
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, [::1]/128
Not that I expect it to be the cause, but you need a coma between
"localhost" and "localhost.localdomain" in mydesti
Il 2021-10-07 07:18 Rob Kampen ha scritto:
Hi, not sure this is the best place to go for my problem, but hoping
someone can point me to the correct or better place.
I have two currently working CentOS 7 based email servers that host a
number of virtual domains and users and delivers mail just fi
Il 2021-07-24 20:12 Simon Matter ha scritto:
Maybe redirecting only stderr to /dev/null is enough?
No, it really goes to stdout.
Anyway, masking all error redirecting them to /dev/null would be too
heavy-handed.
Regards.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
emai
Hi all,
I noticed that "yum -q" (or "dnf" -q) on CentOS 8 is not really quiet
anymore. For example (notiche the "upgraded" line):
[root@localhost cron.d]# yum upgrade -y -q
Upgraded:
python3-perf-4.18.0-305.10.2.el8_4.x86_64
While yum historically had issue with the quiet option [1], this
Il 2021-07-19 21:38 Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
Sure .. but just like you are using EL8 right now .. EL9 will be
released before the 8-Stream EOL. Again .. Have no issues using
whatever, but there will be plenty of time to get Stream 9 up and going
for most loads before Stream 8 EOL.
Any news ab
Il 2021-07-10 20:10 H ha scritto:
I want to install open-source software on my hosted CentOS 7 server to
monitor the system in general, as well as logs, apache webserver,
MySQL and PostgreSQL to begin with.
I know there are a multitude of packages available and would be
interested in hearing if
Il 2021-07-09 13:57 Nikolaos Milas ha scritto:
On 9/7/2021 1:14 μ.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote:
While I fully understand & agree on the motivation for keeping Rocky
(and other clones) 1:1 with Red Hat, it should be understood that
current RHEL packages selection itself is drifting away
Il 2021-07-08 23:21 J. Adam Craig ha scritto:
Well said. It is worth pointing out also that, while Kurtzer and other
Rocky community leads are devoted to keeping Rocky 1:1 with upstream,
they
are also committed to engaging with the CentOS Stream community
themselves
(if they find a bug in ups
Il 2021-07-08 16:46 Leon Fauster via CentOS ha scritto:
Maybe "we" could fill this gap? Describe this state of EPEL? Did you
requested such missing packages? From the early on (EL8.0) I requested
such EPEL packages, some fedora maintainers branched there packages
into
EPEL8. Even a request for
Il 2021-07-08 13:22 Nikolaos Milas ha scritto:
If some people want to leave the RHEL ecosystem for Debian or FreeBSD,
that's OK. But for those who want to stay in the RHEL world, Rocky
Linux stands as a rock-solid solution. This opinion does not reject
other CentOS clones, but emphasizes the fact
Il 2021-07-07 11:44 Nikolaos Milas ha scritto:
I re-visit this thread, since it is crucial for CentOS 8 users.
RESF / Rocky Linux is gaining worldwide recognition and sets itself as
the primary organization / platform to become the CentOS 8 heir /
successor in the future.
Google and Microsoft b
Il 2021-07-02 20:26 Christopher Wensink ha scritto:
What steps would you go through to migrate the file systems over?
Would you set up a duplicate VM and rsync data over? Expand the
capacity of the existing VM, add a new partition then move data over
from one partition to another from within the
Il 2021-06-22 02:34 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
CentOS Stream is not a rolling release. It gets "rolling updates,"
but that just means that there are no point releases within a major
release, and that updates aren't delayed in order to group rebased
packages together at 6 month intervals.
Hi Go
Il 2021-06-21 13:34 Pete Biggs ha scritto:
CentOS does not provide the metadata to allow the --security flag to
work.
Right.
It doesn't provide it because that information from Redhat is
proprietary and not open source.
This is not my understanding. From what I can see, updates which patche
Il 2021-05-16 16:54 Alexander Dalloz ha scritto:
cyrus-sasl provides the sql auxprop mechanism, which I would prefer
over pam_mysql.
https://blog.sys4.de/cyrus-sasl-sql-man-page-en.html
I second this.
However, if you really need a pam_mysql RPM, you can try using a third
party repository [1]
Il 2021-04-30 21:16 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
Critics of Stream often argue that CentOS users are losing support
that CentOS never had to begin with. Their argument implies that
CentOS has aspects of RHEL that it does not. They are not correct.
From here [1]:
"Since March 2004, CentOS Linux
Il 2021-04-30 16:26 Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
On 4/30/21 4:32 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Il 2021-04-30 06:55 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
Why do you think that? Are RHEL (and CentOS) point releases backward
compatible or not? If you trust point releases to work, why would
you
hesitate to
Il 2021-04-30 06:55 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
Why do you think that? Are RHEL (and CentOS) point releases backward
compatible or not? If you trust point releases to work, why would you
hesitate to trust a distribution that resembles an upcoming point
release?
Because it very often break kABI
Il 2021-04-27 15:05 J Martin Rushton via CentOS ha scritto:
The traditional rebuild of RHEL will continue under other guises.
There has been a long standing release at Springdale. Since RH's
announcement Cloud have produced the Alma release. There is also a
new project called Rocky that hasn't
Il 2021-04-16 14:35 Nikolaos Milas ha scritto:
On 16/4/2021 10:10 π.μ., Felix Kölzow wrote:
you may take a look at _rear_ (it is that easy how it looks like)
You may also want to check mondo:
http://www.mondorescue.org/about.shtml (the website is not updated
regularly!)
I am using it
Il 2021-03-31 14:41 Nicolas Kovacs ha scritto:
Hi,
Up until recently I've hosted all my stuff (web & mail) on a handful of
bare
metal servers. Web applications (WordPress, OwnCloud, Dolibarr, GEPI,
Roundcube) as well as mail and a few other things were hosted mostly on
one big
machine.
Back
Il 2021-02-25 22:35 Stephen John Smoogen ha scritto:
Mainly because customers don't want to pay for that work which is
considerable. If Red Hat builds it, it is expected to have all kinds of
'promises' equivalent to its other products and that is expensive in
terms
of QA, engineering, documenta
Il 2021-02-25 14:27 Simon Matter ha scritto:
EL on the other side has a very limited, supported package set and
therefore a lot of packages needed to build a lot of packages are just
missing.
Yeah, same impressions here. EPEL really is a key package repository for
RHEL - and I always wondered
Il 2021-02-05 01:41 Kenneth Porter ha scritto:
I'm setting up a CentOS 7 box as a BackupPC 4 server to back up
Windows boxes on my LAN. I'm using an external 1.5 TB USB drive for
the "pool". BackupPC deduplicates by saving all files in a pool, a
directory hiearchy with each file named for the che
Il 2021-01-28 19:17 James Pearson ha scritto:
I don't know of another way of testing if this build fixes the issue ?
According to Qualys blog, sudoedit -s '\' `perl -e 'print "A" x 65536'`
should core-dump on vulnerable versions.
I just tried on stock 6.10 and it core-dumps, indeed. Upgradin
Il 2021-01-27 09:34 Walter H. ha scritto:
is that what you expect to find?
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0227
Yes, something similar...
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A
Hi all,
do you know if a fix for sudo CVE-2021-3156 is available for CentOS 6?
While CentOS 6 is now supported anymore, RedHat has it under its
payedsupport agreement (see:
https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2021-002).
So I wonder if some community-packaged patch exists..
Il 2021-01-22 13:43 Nikolaos Milas ha scritto:
I think we can expect Rocky Linux to provide a real solution to CentOS
future. We shall know very soon, so let's just wait for a short while.
Hi, there are any specific reasons to not use Spingdale Linux?
As far I know, it already ships a RHEL 8.3
Il 2021-01-08 10:01 Fabian Arrotin ha scritto:
With my SysAdmin hat on, I'd say that the only real impacting bit is
the
shorter lifetime (5y instead of 10), but with overlap between stream
versions, so one would have time to have a look, reflect in automation,
reinstall/migrate, enjoy
One key
Il 2020-12-14 13:07 Nicolas Kovacs ha scritto:
Hi,
Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
tl;dr: Communication about Stream was BAD, but Stream itself
Il 2020-12-12 15:54 Leon Fauster via CentOS ha scritto:
EOL in 2024!
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2020-December/352340.html
https://centos.org/distro-faq/#q13-can-i-start-up-a-sig-that-will-maintain-centos-stream-8-after-rhel8-reaches-the-end-of-full-support
https://lists.centos.o
Il 2020-12-11 23:53 Pete Biggs ha scritto:
Somewhere in amongst the vast number of posts, someone said that the
release cadence for point releases was 6 months with the final release
being 8.10 in 2024. After that RHEL 8 goes into maintenance mode and
there will be no more content added to 8-stre
Il 2020-12-11 19:26 Walter H. ha scritto:
with CentOS Stream there are only updates till 2024(!) not 2029 as it
be expected ...
Is that officially confirmed? If RHEL 8 is expected to have an 8.10
release sometime in the 2028-2029 timeframe, and if any updates should
really hit Stream-8 before
ropped the centos-devel list. I'll reply quoting the
entire conversation to let others read your useful information.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 9:26 AM Gionatan Danti
wrote:
Il 2020-12-10 14:35 Brendan Conoboy ha scritto:
- are you going to keep stable ABI between Stream kernel
releases
Il 2020-12-10 04:55 Brendan Conoboy ha scritto:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:07 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/9/20 12:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> While I'm not sure how we'll get there, it seems like the
> mutually satisfying end result would be one where third party binary
> drivers work with Ce
Il 24-12-2019 11:30 John Pierce ha scritto:
on the other hand, 99% of those security updates are things that
probably
don't affect most centos deployments.
It does not only affect security, but also *functional* updates.
For an example of a quite important, but not fixed bug in current CentOS
Il 03-07-2018 15:39 Nux! ha scritto:
Watch out, ZFS on Linux is not as good as on FreeBSD/Solaris.
Just recently there was an issue with data loss.
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7401
I know; I was on the very same github issue you linked.
While the bug was very unfortunate, ZFS remai
Il 25-06-2018 23:59 Yves Bellefeuille ha scritto:
I think the simplest solution would be to add this (which I haven't
tried):
http://zfsonlinux.org/
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS
to the Available Repositories for CentOS wiki page:
https://wiki.centos.org/fr/AdditionalR
Hi list,
we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its
CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license.
I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter.
However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially
considering BTRFS s
60 matches
Mail list logo
