Re: [CentOS] Postfix dropping settings CentOS4.5

Johnny Massengill wrote: My company is using Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Suite 7.0 for linux. This setup uses Postfix as a mail gateway for MS Exchange. The problem I'm having is ever so often Postfix 2.2.11 will lose the Transport mapping lookup tables setting. When this happens, ma

Re: [CentOS] How to export X displays

umair shakil wrote: Salam, Well, i have only used RDP as windows to linux (desktop), there should be no issue... I really want to say LIAR! for linux to linux, well x11 forwrding through ssh seems to be issue with that not used if i try i will let u know No thanks, many of us here ha

Re: [CentOS] How to export X displays

John R Pierce wrote: umair shakil wrote: Why dont u enable RDP on centOS (running GUI), and then using ubunto with this path RDP is a Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Protocol. what good would that be for linux to linux ??!? Well if Linux did have a RDP server then it might be good.

Re: [CentOS] How to export X displays

One other question. If a program is already running on the remote machine and you want to move the display to the local machine, can that be done? No. i.e. I have Thunderbird already running on the remote machine, and would like to move it to the local machine. Would that work? Or would

Re: [CentOS] ssh X11 forwarding not working

James A. Peltier wrote: I'm having problems with ssh.com and X11 forwarding ssh: SSH Secure Shell 3.2.0 (non-commercial version) on i686-pc-linux-gnu I am in the process of testing some of my machines with CentOS 5 x86/x86_64 and have run into a bit of a snag. X11 Forwarding is not working.

Re: [CentOS] How to export X displays

Any suggestions? Run 'echo $DISPLAY' on your laptop. Are you using ssh or telnet? If you are using ssh, it can handle that for you automatically. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] DNAT rule for vsftp --(PASSIVE FTP)

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: Hi all, I want to run vsftp behind a firewall.(i.e DMZ zone) . It is runnig as passive ftp. Do you have ip_nat_ftp loaded too? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

What's the best multi-threaded / multi-process io-benchmark utility that works with filesystems instead of raw devices? and can read/write multiple files at once.. http://untroubled.org/benchmarking/2004-04/ No raw numbers but... ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Simon Banton wrote: At 07:46 +0800 24/9/07, Feizhou wrote: ... plus an Out of Memory kill of sshd. Second time around (logged in on the console rather than over ssh), it's just the same except it's hald that happens to get clobbered instead. Are you saying that running in RAID0

Re: [CentOS] Re: Central file server advice please

William Warren wrote: actually it'll perform WORSE in many cases than Linux software raid. Used to (bar buggy firmware, incompatibilities). Most hardware raid cards nowadays not only have sufficient processing power, they also come with decent sizes of RAM cache which helps swing things a lot

Re: [CentOS] Disk De-Fraging in Linux

Mark Weaver wrote: umair shakil wrote: Dear Salam, Well i have used the command on shell "updatedb" it will allow you to make fast searching. Regards, Umair Shakil ETD um... what? Peace, peace. He appears to have read between the lines and come to conclusion the OP was trying to impr

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Simon Banton wrote: At 17:34 +0800 14/9/07, Feizhou wrote: .ohdo you have a BBU for your write cache on your 3ware board? Not installed, but the machine's on a UPS. Ugh. The 3ware code will not give OK then until the stuff has hit disk. Having now installed BBUs, it'

Re: [CentOS] Disk De-Fraging in Linux

umair shakil wrote: Dear Salam, Well i have used the command on shell "updatedb" it will allow you to make fast searching. and slow down the whole box during updatedb :-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] Disk De-Fraging in Linux

Al Sparks wrote: Al Sparks wrote: A couple of questions. Are there any linux tools that can de-frag an ext2/3 partition? ext2, yes. ext3, no. And it is called a filesystem. A partition is a completely different thing. none for ext3 because it was not really necessary for ext2 and so the too

Re: [CentOS] Postfix Questions

John Hinton wrote: I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time. 1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters? Yes but different version with varying levels of milter support. 2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound vs. outbound? Yes

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Is there any way to tell the card to forget about not having a BBU and behave as if it did? Short of modifying the code...I do not know of any. Well, I've now got BBUs on order for the three identical machines to see if that does anything to improve matters - I'll report back when I've fitted

Re: [CentOS] Software Raid 6

Feizhou wrote: Juan C. Valido wrote: How slow and how reliable is software raid 6 on CentOS 5. The system I'm going to use is A socket 939 dual core Athlon, 4 gigs of ram and a 3ware 7506-8 controller. Its mostly going to be used for storage (Movies, MP3s etc.). Thanks. Argh...just rea

Re: [CentOS] Software Raid 6

Juan C. Valido wrote: How slow and how reliable is software raid 6 on CentOS 5. The system I'm going to use is A socket 939 dual core Athlon, 4 gigs of ram and a 3ware 7506-8 controller. Its mostly going to be used for storage (Movies, MP3s etc.). Thanks. The 7506 does not have any cache. Its

Re: [CentOS] mailq.postfix manpage

Stefano Biagiotti wrote: Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After I also removed the sendmail package. man mailq --partial content-- SENDMAIL(1) SENDMAIL(1) NAME sendmail - Postfix to Sendmail compatibility interface What do "ls -al /usr/share/man/man1/se

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

ms to be what you and Feizhou are saying. Is there any way to tell the card to forget about not having a BBU and behave as if it did? Short of modifying the code...I do not know of any. The main problem here is the latency when under IO load not the throughput (or lack of). I don't care i

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Simon Banton wrote: At 17:34 +0800 14/9/07, Feizhou wrote: .ohdo you have a BBU for your write cache on your 3ware board? Not installed, but the machine's on a UPS. Ugh. The 3ware code will not give OK then until the stuff has hit disk. I see where you're going with larg

Re: [CentOS] Very strange problem i have faced in my 2 years carrier

Bill Campbell wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2007, Karanbir Singh wrote: Bill Campbell wrote: Unfortunately that isn't much use if you're running the default system with prelink as it changes large numbers of executables rendering the RPM verify close to useless. unless you are using a very old versio

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Simon Banton wrote: Hmm, how are you creating your ext3 filesystem(s) that you test on? Try creating it with a large journal (maybe 256MB) and run it in full journal mode. The filesystem was created during the initial CentOS installation, and I've tried it with ext2 which made no difference.

Re: [CentOS] mailq.postfix manpage

Stefano Biagiotti wrote: Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefano Biagiotti wrote: On CentOS 4 I can't view the mailq man page. I installed postfix and removed sendmail. # LANG=en_US man mailq fopen: No such file or directory Cannot open man page /usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.g

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Simon Banton wrote: At 20:52 +0800 13/9/07, Feizhou wrote: Well, the first thing I noted was that the H8DA8 was not on the list of compatible motherboards on the 3ware website. I challenged the vendor about that quite early on and was told that they've used this combo before with no tr

Re: [CentOS] mailq.postfix manpage

Stefano Biagiotti wrote: On CentOS 4 I can't view the mailq man page. I installed postfix and removed sendmail. # LANG=en_US man mailq fopen: No such file or directory Cannot open man page /usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz No manual entry for mailq # zcat /usr/share/man/man1/mailq.postfix.

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Simon Banton wrote: Dear list, I thought I'd just share my experiences with this 3Ware card, and see if anyone might have any suggestions. System: Supermicro H8DA8 with 2 x Opteron 250 2.4GHz and 4GB RAM installed. 9550SX-8LP hosting 4x Seagate ST3250820SV 250GB in a RAID 1 plus 2 hot spare

Re: [CentOS] ASTERISK BOX behind a filewall

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I can enjoy dropped calls as I transfer from one open WAP to the next while driving? Or no service when I'm out in the boonies? Yeah... Maybe the day I move to nyc and never leave nyc I'll go for a wifi phone, but until then I'll stick with my trusty GSM based bl

Re: [CentOS] ASTERISK BOX behind a filewall

I know of an H.323 filter, but haven't explored SIP as we aren't running any SIP application here yet. Another possibility would be a SIP proxy installed on the firewall, but it is not as secure as a filter. asterisk IS a sip proxy. Yes, well what I was hinting at was a dumbed-down install of

Re: [CentOS] ASTERISK BOX behind a filewall

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm only using the wonderful *bleh* email client that rim put on this blackberry. If anyone knows of a better email client for a blackberry please show me the way. Geoff Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. Ah! I failed to notice this line. How about getting

Re: [CentOS] ASTERISK BOX behind a filewall

Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Feizhou wrote: asterisk <-> nat <-> nat <-> sip client = big pain in the neck. I have never managed to get this to work. Getting the below was trouble enough. Forget about trying to get an asterisk box behind a nat to work with clients outside.

Re: [CentOS] ASTERISK BOX behind a filewall

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just spit balling (since it has been a good number of years since I've used asterix), but why not have two asterix boxes (one your side, one client side) connected via aix (you'll have to setup the fw rules to make the aix go to the asterix box (on both sides) and

Re: [CentOS] Very strange problem i have faced in my 2 years carrier

Bill Campbell wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2007, Feizhou wrote: I have seen vi do this action when it didn't understand a keycode on teh terminal you are using properly... change the case of a few letters next to the cursor. But IIRC that was busybox vi. Is it crazy to propose someone opened

Re: [CentOS] Very strange problem i have faced in my 2 years carrier

I have seen vi do this action when it didn't understand a keycode on teh terminal you are using properly... change the case of a few letters next to the cursor. But IIRC that was busybox vi. Is it crazy to propose someone opened /etc/passwd in vi, and saved it out without noticing this had hap

Re: [CentOS] ASTERISK BOX behind a filewall

asterisk <-> nat <-> nat <-> sip client = big pain in the neck. I have never managed to get this to work. Getting the below was trouble enough. Forget about trying to get an asterisk box behind a nat to work with clients outside. asterisk <-> nat <-> sip client. Yes, you will need a spe

Re: [CentOS] ASTERISK BOX behind a filewall

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: Hi All, I want to put a ASTERISK BOX bend a Firewall. So I have given below rules. Sure. So long as it is NOT a natting firewall. iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -d 192.168.101.30 -m multiport --dports 3478,4569,5060 -m state --state NEW -j AC

Re: [CentOS] Centos Router

Graham Johnston wrote: With the current discuss of "Performance of CentOS as a NAT gateway", I am curious how many people out there are using CentOS as a Router/Firewall in an enterprise or service provider environment. For myself I am not really concerned about NAT just a stateful firewall.

Pinging Les Mikesell Re: [CentOS] Mail Restrictions with sendmail and mimedefang

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: On 9/3/07, Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, I can find some files @ /etc/mail below are files. mimedefang-filter sa-mimedefang.cf <http://sa-mimedefang.cf> sa-mimedefang.cf.example I first want to block Bcc and limit Cc to about 5 users. I google

Re: [CentOS] Mail Restrictions with sendmail

Now, I can find some files @ /etc/mail below are files. mimedefang-filter sa-mimedefang.cf sa-mimedefang.cf.example I first want to block Bcc and limit Cc to about 5 users. I googled a lot. But, I am still not be able to achieve this task. will I have to edit /etc

Re: [CentOS] OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2SATA drivesin DellPowerEdge SC

For 2 SATA hard disks used for the OS I think HW RAID is overkill. Depends. HW RAID + BBU CACHE vs SW RAID vs SW RAID + NVRAM...You cannot say overkill in certain cases. I only say that because if one is really looking for high performance then more spindles then 2 will be the first thing to

Re: [CentOS] OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drivesin DellPowerEdge SC

Another route you can go is getting a PCI/PCIe/PCI-X BBU RAM/NVRAM card to put an external journal on to speed up fsync performance for filesystems like ext3 over software raid since these cards can go beyond 1GB of memory unlike hardware raid cards that usually max out at 256MB. What are

Re: [CentOS] OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drives in DellPowerEdge SC

About 10 seconds after I started this thread, I remembered a long discussion about RAID, SATA, etc., 2 or 3 months ago. I think that Feizhou (?) strongly recommended going with Software RAID in CentOS. I will search for that and do a lot of reading. RAID 1 for mirroring is what I want. Lanny

Re: [CentOS] grep

Old geek statement: If you think perl is the answer to a simple filter question then think twice. You might be right, but it's likely smaller faster tools already exist. And I say this as someone who has written 1000 line shell scripts and even bigger perl scripts; perl is good for complicated

Re: [CentOS] Blackberry Bounces [was Fwd: Delivery Status Notification(Failure)]

Ruslan Sivak wrote: Sorry everyone. That was me. The bounces should stop now. Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Blackberry Bounces [was Fwd: Delivery Status Notification(Failure)]

Good point. If it is the address they subscribed with, there is no evidence of posts. Could be hard to track if it is relayed to that address. Did you get bounce message[s] from your recent post[s]? I've had 4 so far today - only in response to my own posts. Maybe the culprit will own-up an

Re: [CentOS] Blackberry Bounces [was Fwd: Delivery Status Notification(Failure)]

Phil Schaffner wrote: Is everyone else posting to this list getting one of these after each-and-every post? If so, someone please un-subscribe this person: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The whole blackberry.net should be blacklisted. X( I have same problem with another user on another list. The problem

[CentOS] external sata cages that use port multipliers

Hello, Has anyone got such a setup working with Centos? thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Anyone out there know the THEOS OS

Nigel Kendrick wrote: Hi Guys, I am polling my 'guru' resources to find out if I can get in touch with anyone (UK based, ideally) with support experience of the THEOS operating system. We have one group of sites running a legacy system based on THEOS - an OS that seems to have 'borrowed' the be

Re: [CentOS] How to size an email server to handle 5 million emailsperday

Right, actually the box will run an AV engine with antispam then delivered to a ms exchange 2003 server (local lan), so no local mailbox is being used. oh okay. Do you plan to build the system? (the software involved) You needs will vary on how emails are dwelt with at the smtp level. How di

Re: [CentOS] How to size an email server to handle 5 million emails perday

are you trying to say spam bot? ;-) where? WHERE? and where is my flame thrower? Boy, am I glad that I do not fight spammers anymore... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to size an email server to handle 5 million emailsperday

Mike Kercher wrote: Well, of the 5M, how many would be real emails? I handle over 1M on a quad xeon, but only a fraction of those are good. Heh. Yeah, I count emails as stuff that will be delivered, stuff that will hit the queue. I guess my definitions have got in the way of this one. _

Re: [CentOS] How to size an email server to handle 5 million emails perday

Mike Kercher wrote: On second thought, are mails being delivered locally or are you relaying to Exchange (or similar)? It cannot possibly be used for local delivery. Do you have any idea what it takes to handle 5 million local deliveries daily? I spent over three years managing a system tha

Re: [CentOS] "Site down for maintenance" - How is this accomplished?

Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote: Hello everyone, Although we use CentOS primarily on our servers, this query is actually more of a general networking question than something specific to CentOS. In the next week or so, we shall be migrating our in-house servers to a data center. Whi

Re: [CentOS] How to size an email server to handle 5 million emails per day

Erick Perez wrote: I have no idea as to how to size an email server. I was approached by a customer that wanted a single server with RAID 1 disks to handle about 5 million emails a day. In general terms, what parameters should I take into account to size the hardware specs when the average email

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Feizhou wrote: You only need the tcp rule if you plan on serving up zone transfers, not if plan on only requesting them. Well, very rare but answers that are over 512 bytes will have to be sent over tcp since the rfc 1035 mandates maximum 512

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

You only need the tcp rule if you plan on serving up zone transfers, not if plan on only requesting them. Well, very rare but answers that are over 512 bytes will have to be sent over tcp since the rfc 1035 mandates maximum 512 bytes for the udp payload. So tcp is not just for zone transfers

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references) ugh. I absolutely detest the tool behind this. This is what I do. Trusted interfaces like lo and networks go first and then packets belonging to established connections are shorted which leaves connection requests to be branched out into tcp, udp an

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

You only need the tcp rule if you plan on serving up zone transfers, not if plan on only requesting them. Well, very rare but answers that are over 512 bytes will have to be sent over tcp since the rfc 1035 mandates maximum 512 bytes for the udp payload. So tcp is not just for zone transfer

Re: [CentOS] BIND issues, server not responding

Hello Ray, Appears to be listening how I expected it to be, unless I'm not reading this right. Running 'dig www.swhi.net @64.135.16.15' ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> www.swhi.net @64.135.16.15 ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached Robert

Re: [CentOS] 8 port serial card

Thanks Matt! And there are specs at http://www.lavalink.com/index.php?id=707 How did it cost you/your company? We're education, but at the time (last April) I paid < $90 US for it. Looks like it normally goes for about $120. Nice. Too bad I cannot get it in Hong Kong... Matt P.S.

Re: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS

Binary drivers from Dell? The HBA that connects to the MD3000 is just an mptsas driver which is part of the stock kernel, but you can download the latest version from Dell's website as a dkms source package. Thank you Ross for the information. ___

Re: [CentOS] 8 port serial card

How did it cost you/your company? How much, how much...sigh, fingers don't listen to brain properly anymore... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 8 port serial card

Matt Hyclak wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:51:21PM +0800, Feizhou enlightened us: Has anybody got Centos to work with multi-port serial cards? Or does anybody have multi-port serial or fax cards to recommend? I've got a 4 port card that works nicely. It's a Lava Quattro PCI/LP

Re: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS

Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS drives, 2GB ram and standard other features. If going down this road, why not look into getting one of those fancy new storage enclosures where the RAID is built into the enclosure and can allow 2 servers to simultaneously access the arr

Re: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS

Bowie Bailey wrote: Feizhou wrote: Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS drives, 2GB ram and standard other features. If going down this road, why not look into getting one of those fancy new storage enclosures where the RAID is built into the enclosure and can allow 2

Re: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS

Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS drives, 2GB ram and standard other features. If going down this road, why not look into getting one of those fancy new storage enclosures where the RAID is built into the enclosure and can allow 2 servers to simultaneously access the ar

[CentOS] 8 port serial card

Hello, Has anybody got Centos to work with multi-port serial cards? Or does anybody have multi-port serial or fax cards to recommend? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Hot swap SATA?

Would it have to smarts to live partition type FD alone? s/live/leave/ note to self: Don't go to bed at 2AM, get up at 7AM and post on mailing lists later. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Hot swap SATA?

Lamar Owen wrote: On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Feizhou wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Jim Perrin wrote: Should it be possible to hot-swap SATA drives with Centos5? Depends on the SATA controller, but yes. If the controller allows, you can hotswap sata drives. How are the names supposed to

Re: [CentOS] Hot swap SATA?

Les Mikesell wrote: Jim Perrin wrote: Should it be possible to hot-swap SATA drives with Centos5? It doesn't seem to work on my system. Removing an unmounted drive locked the system up, and leaving one out at bootup makes the devices change names and keeps grub from finding /boot on a scsi dr

Re: [CentOS] postfix - killed by signal 11 - debug help

John Thomas wrote: Feizhou said the following on 08/19/2007 07:22 PM: Debug with gdb. Enable in main.cf This sounds interesting. The "crash" happens very rarely, once every day or two, and I have not seen a pattern with domain, etc. Will your suggestion help given this randomne

Re: [CentOS] postfix - killed by signal 11 - debug help

John Thomas wrote: Any suggestions to help me troubleshoot a "killed by signal 11" problem with Postfix? I've Googled and fiddled, but cannot figure it out. I have no idea where to look/start. Debug with gdb. Enable in main.cf debugger_command = PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:

Re: [CentOS] Correlate i/o with a process

Mag Gam wrote: Hello: I have a server with 2 HBAs, and the users keeps complaining about performance problems. My question is, how can I relate the process with high I/O wait? Also, is it possible to see how much data is being pushed thru by my 2 HBAs? atop http://oldwww.atconsultancy.nl/ato

Re: [CentOS] Mail Restrictions with sendmail

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: Hi, Thanks once again, ONE MORE THING IS NEEDED. I want to limit mail sizes for both incoming and outgoing mails. Let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED] can send mails up to 5MB, but can receive up to 2MB [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CentOS] Mail Restrictions with sendmail

I will have to edit /etc/fstab . I will have to add usrquota,grpquota Good research. Now, my question is to which partition should I have to add usrquota,grpquota. Is it to /var partion should I have to add quota as All incoming mail will be stored as /var/spool/mail/username Acco

Re: [CentOS] Mail Restrictions with sendmail

> > And also enabling quota. > > What is the best way to add quota? > Filesystem quotas? quotas to limit the mailbox size e.g /var/spool/mail/username * * I thought you might be using mbox...so...will filesystem quotas do it for you then? If it will, just ena

Re: [CentOS] Mail Restrictions with sendmail

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: Hi all, I am running sendmail with MailScanner on CentOS. I want to enable some restrictions. Restrictions are given below. All clients Currently can send Bcc from their workstations as usual. I want to disable (block Bcc) that feature. Can I do it from the Sendma

Re: [CentOS] hw raid 10 with 4 disc, recomended partitiontable

kai wrote: I am familiar with centos and this forum, and have some rhel / centos questions. Therefore I'm asking the question here I am about to install rhel4.5 on a hp dl380 with 4 disc's. The standard rhel installation installers all in one partition? Will there be any advantage of splittin

Re: [CentOS] Postfix smtp freezing

Jason Ross wrote: Hey all, For the last 8 months I have been running a postfix / mail scanner setup based on Johnny Hughes' excellent tutorial. For the firs 7 months I have had no issues. This past month I have been having instances where the user gets an smtp error while trying to send email

Re: [CentOS] Will this work? centOS5 server+100users?

I need to also mention that this server will be the only server in this domain, so there will NOT be any Microsoft servers here. Then go for NT Domains in Samba PDC mode. The Microsoft solution for the this function is too expensive, so we want to install centOS5 and configure the centOS

[CentOS] Re:

wrote: Since neither anaconda nor system-config-kickstart can give a list of all packages that has been installed, waht is the recommended way to replicate one system for another new installation (without using hd cloning) ? Is it possible to simply do 'rpm -qa >> my-ks.cfg' ? When running

Re: [CentOS] problems with sendmail

Relaying denied. Proper authentication required. Any idea of the error? Logs are very bad. They are always telling and everybody hates tellers. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] HotPlug, eSATA, and /media

Lamar Owen wrote: Ok, got a quickie. I have an eSATA drive, a 750GB Seagate in an eSATA external enclosure, and a Silicon Image sil3132 ExpressCard controller for my laptop. The disk and controller work great in CentOS 5 (or F7, for that matter), if I specifically mount it. This is not how

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Ken Price wrote: I'm coming in late to this thread. We too are a hosting provider (small time), hosting approximately 1600 live domains. Not to say tinydns is a bad alternative, as it has it's strengths, but we moved away from [outgrew] it 2 years ago. I used to work for a messaging ser

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

I'm coming in late to this thread. We too are a hosting provider (small time), hosting approximately 1600 live domains. Not to say tinydns is a bad alternative, as it has it's strengths, but we moved away from [outgrew] it 2 years ago. I used to work for a messaging service provider and th

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Ray Leventhal wrote: Tomasz Napierała wrote: Apart from installation, I would suggest using PowerDNS as a secondary DNS. It's not only robust, fast and secure, but also has very interesting capability of automated zones depolying (espacially usefull for secondary NS). I'm using it on all my s

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Ray Leventhal wrote: Feizhou wrote: As it will be a production server and this is my first foray into CentOS/SELinux in a production environment I was hoping to get a recommended list of what to include and, more specifically, what *not* to include from the distro CDs I will be doing a text

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

As it will be a production server and this is my first foray into CentOS/SELinux in a production environment I was hoping to get a recommended list of what to include and, more specifically, what *not* to include from the distro CDs I will be doing a text based install, hoping to avoid the inst

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

If we can't even get all the repostories to use a simple repotag, we'd never get them to compile with non-standard paths! If everyone is going to fight over the same space it again becomes a matter of authority - or a free-for-all. So adding a tag to indicate where the claim comes from s

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

I thought once upon a time some repo had a package named xmms-mp3 which was different from the core version for obvious reasons. I can't recall a problem and I didn't have to know which repo I had to manage to get or exclude it. How are we supposed to know whether or not that is a sub-packa

Re: [CentOS] Allocating 64 kbits/s out of 256 kbits/s for one LAN behing firewall

Is it possible to acheive this task on firewall running iptables and iproute2 (CentOS 4.5) ? If so, How can I do such thing? If I do such thing, what will happen to the people behind LAN1 ? Will they get whole 256 kbits/s as before or will they get 256 kbit/s - 64 kbit/s for their internet

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Repo priorities and includes But wouldn't it be easier if the packages had different names so you could just install the one(s) you want from the command line? Try your own custom postfix with a different name and see what breaks. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

That's not what I meant. Obviously we need additional packages in other repositories and that will be true as long as there is any policy that might exclude any contribution to a centrally managed repository. The question is, why do we need/want different versions of the same-named packages

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Les Mikesell wrote: Feizhou wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: You may argue that that is a good thing. But Fedora is a different beast than RHEL. People may want stable packages, or current packages and a single repository (with the tools we have today) cannot provide this

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Les Mikesell wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: You may argue that that is a good thing. But Fedora is a different beast than RHEL. People may want stable packages, or current packages and a single repository (with the tools we have today) cannot provide this. But people may want _both_ the stable pa

Re: [CentOS] Re: Best way to have Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4?

beast wrote: On 27/07/07 09:42 +0200, M. Fioretti wrote: Greetings, I would like to install Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 (I need support for SASL authentication via Dovecot) on a Centos 4.4 server. I have already found rpm packages at http://postfix.wl0.org/en/available-packages/ and pages about using t

Re: [CentOS] Centos and DS300

mario salcedo wrote: Hi, I have a server linux whith a system storage DS300. The server run ok, transfer file no problem. My problem is than when i restart the DS300 this begin to syncronizing again, but the data not is lost. I can work whith the DS300 while this is syncronizing. Is this normal

Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

beast wrote: On 26/07/07 17:57 +0800, Feizhou wrote: If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone has real experiences on upgrading OS? You really want apt and deb based distros like ubuntu if

Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

beast wrote: On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote: CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications current. I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO version is 3.1.1, today OO in Centos5 is 2.0.4,

Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos as a desktop, advisable?

beast wrote: On 25/07/07 10:38 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: They are kept functional and secure. I think that is enough in many cases. If someone really needs a special app they can always compile it and/or install it in their $HOME. Are you saying that you predict users will not need an

  1   2   >