Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2.x

2009-11-02 Thread CentOS List
> Are there reliable repositories for PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5? Try epl. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] the ongoing wait for centos 5.4

2009-10-18 Thread CentOS List
> i've checked a couple dozen random mirrors, and have yet to find > it. i'm almost tempted to ask, "any idea on when 5.4 will be > available?", but i just *know* that would get me in trouble. If you had try harder and try them all, you should be able to find these mirrors with 5.4 in them. htt

Re: [CentOS] the ongoing wait for centos 5.4

2009-10-18 Thread CentOS List
>> >> at the risk of picking at that scab a bit longer, i'm going to toss >> out a comment regarding people still waiting for the public >> availability of centos 5.4. >> >> here: >> >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083743.html >> >About ten minutes after your email, I got

Re: [CentOS] Status of RPMForge || RPMRepo

2009-09-21 Thread CentOS List
> Are the websites for RPMForge or RPMRepo off line for anyone else? Am too having the same problem ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] iptables

2009-09-16 Thread CentOS List
> Never (if you aren't guru) edit your iptables by directly editing your > config. Always use iptables binary. > > It is said there... -t option shouldn't be on that line. The line should > be only > -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 26 -j REDIRECT --to-port 25 > because you're already in the *nat s

Re: [CentOS] iptables

2009-09-16 Thread CentOS List
> *nat # Manipulate nat table > > :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] > :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] > :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] > -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp --dport 26 -j REDIRECT --to-port 25 > > COMMIT Thanks Christopher, I had updated my rules to *nat :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROU

[CentOS] iptables

2009-09-15 Thread CentOS List
Hi, I have an existing iptables as follows:- # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
> I did a yum -y install tomcat5 and tomcat got installed with >> openjdk. > But > somehow if I goto http://localhost:8080 > I am unable to get to the tomcat default site. >> > Correction. I got to a blank page. >>> Do a 'yum search tomcat' and no

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
>>> I did a yum -y install tomcat5 and tomcat got installed with openjdk. >>> But >>> somehow if I goto http://localhost:8080 >>> I am unable to get to the tomcat default site. >>> Correction. I got to a blank page. > Do a 'yum search tomcat' and note that there are

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
> I did a yum -y install tomcat5 and tomcat got installed with openjdk. > But > somehow if I goto http://localhost:8080 > I am unable to get to the tomcat default site. >> > Correction. I got to a blank page. >> >>> Do a 'yum search tomcat' and note that there are several p

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
>>> I did a yum -y install tomcat5 and tomcat got installed with openjdk. But >>> somehow if I goto http://localhost:8080 >>> I am unable to get to the tomcat default site. >> Correction. I got to a blank page. > Do a 'yum search tomcat' and note that there are several packages. If > you want

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
> Is SELinux running? Have you checked /var/log/messages > or /var/log/audit/audit.log if you have it? Is there anything in your > tomcat logs? Do you get an error when you try to pull up the website? SElinux is setup to disabled. There is no log or anyting related. I do have a folder tomca

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
> I did a yum -y install tomcat5 and tomcat got installed with openjdk. But somehow if I goto http://localhost:8080 > I am unable to get to the tomcat default site. Correction. I got to a blank page. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://li

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
I did a yum -y install tomcat5 and tomcat got installed with openjdk. But somehow if I goto http://localhost:8080 I am unable to get to the tomcat default site. Any insight? >>> Does netstat show anything listening on 8080? Do you have a firewall that >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
>> I did a yum -y install tomcat5 and tomcat got installed with openjdk. But somehow if I goto http://localhost:8080 I am unable to get to the tomcat >> default site. >> >> Any insight? > Does netstat show anything listening on 8080? Do you have a firewall that > hasn't been adjusted to allow

Re: [CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
>> Is there any yum repo which contains tomcat 6 and java 1.6? >CentOS 5.3 ships java-1.6.0-openjdk. thanks I did a yum -y install tomcat5 and tomcat got installed with openjdk. But somehow if I goto http://localhost:8080 I am unable to get to the tomcat default site. Any insight? Regards WL

[CentOS] Tomcat 6 and Java 1.6

2009-08-25 Thread CentOS List
Hi, Is there any yum repo which contains tomcat 6 and java 1.6? Thanks Regards WL ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Clamav engine updates

2009-04-14 Thread CentOS List
> Is there a yum URL I should add to get 0.95.1 (and onwards) from CentOS or Redhat, > or must I "roll my own" ? Use rpmforge. The package is clamav ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] realtime backup

2009-02-18 Thread CentOS List
>> >>> For a speedy backup, could put the db on LVM. Then your procedure would >> >>> be shutdown/freeze db, make lv snapshot, startup/unfreeze db, >> >>> rsync/backup data, remove snapshot. >> >> That's what I'd suggest too, but be warned that performance on that >> >> database (if gets to be of

[CentOS] realtime backup

2009-02-17 Thread CentOS List
Hi, I had a cfml application running on mysql database. Can some suggest a realtime backup solution via ftp say every 5mins without damaging the database? Thanks regards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi

RE: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

2008-05-14 Thread CentOS List
>> No. I am on a few lists and each list with a different email address >> so that I can sort them out correctly. If you people don’t wish to >> help out, its fine, just ignore my mails. It will be nice to stop making fun >> of me. > Looks like this week has been a rough one for many people. >

RE: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

2008-05-14 Thread CentOS List
> People are so afraid that someone will be able to identify them through > newsgroup postings or harvest their address > for spam. > So what if someone googles my name and finds out I help people on a few lists! > Makes me look real bad, doesn't it? No. I am on a few lists and each list with

[CentOS] tar spanning

2008-05-14 Thread CentOS List
Hi, I have a directory with 18GB worth of files and I would like to tar span and burn it into a few DVDs after that. How can I do this in command line? Thanks Regards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

[CentOS] libkeyutils.so

2008-04-19 Thread CentOS List
Hi, I had setup yet another qmail toaster on a centos 5 x64. While trying to send a test email, I encountered this error. @40004809bc511c396914 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd: error while loading shared libraries: libkeyutils.so.1: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory

[CentOS] stunnel

2008-04-16 Thread CentOS List
Dear all, I had notice that my logwatch has a heap of stunneling like the one below. Is there a security breech? **Unmatched Entries** (1) LOG5[6504:3086657232]: Connection closed: 29433 bytes sent to SSL, 62 bytes sent to socket (1) LOG5[9516:3086649040]: stunnel 4.15 on i686-redhat-linux-gnu

RE: [CentOS] Securing SSH

2008-04-15 Thread CentOS List
>> Tim Alberts wrote: >>> So I setup ssh on a server so I could do some work from home and I >>> think the second I opened it every sorry monkey from around the >>> world has been trying every account name imaginable to get into the >>> system. >>> >>> What's a good way to deal with this? I use

Re: [CentOS] denyhosts

2007-10-03 Thread CentOS List
Sorry for asking the obvious - what is the output from: - /sbin/service denyhosts status DenyHosts is running with pid = 25005 - /sbin/chkconfig --list denyhosts denyhosts 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on4:off 5:off 6:off You could also try to reset the configuration by copying

Re: [CentOS] denyhosts

2007-10-02 Thread CentOS List
b. http://www.howtoforge.com/preventing_ssh_dictionary_attacks_with_denyhosts Since taking care of these things I've had no more trouble and since installing DenyHosts I haven't had to spend anywhere the amount of time making adjustments to my firewall either. Thanks. I just cant figure ou

[CentOS] denyhosts

2007-10-02 Thread CentOS List
Hi, My denyhosts stop working. How do i check why isnt it working anymore for me? Thanks Oct 2 22:59:17 beyond sshd[15690]: Failed password for root from 221.7.37.142 port 49836 ssh2 Oct 2 22:59:17 beyond sshd[15692]: Received disconnect from 221.7.37.142: 11: Bye Bye Oct 2 22:59:18 beyo

Re: [CentOS] mail server

2007-09-25 Thread CentOS List
what can you recommend for mail server. I'll be needing mail server with tls,ssl and virtual domains with web ui management, im doing this for a client of mine. I have been using Qmail. http://www.qmailrocks.org/ This site has everything you will need.

Re: [CentOS] Re: IBM X3200

2007-08-30 Thread CentOS List
We dont have that brand in my country. you do realize, "CentOS List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" doesn't let us know what country you're in, who you are, or much of anything else. I kinda doubt your name is Mr. CentOS List I think you are abit too slow. I fou

Re: [CentOS] IBM X3200

2007-08-30 Thread CentOS List
>> I am getting a IBM x3200.. This machine can only support up to 4 x 250GB >> SATA. I need to have a usable space of 500GB and mirror it to other >> 500GB. >> IBM proposed me to get 2 RAID cards. Do you guys think i can do raid 0 on >> the first 2 x 250GB HDD and raid 0 on the second 2 x 250G

Re: [CentOS] Re: IBM X3200

2007-08-30 Thread CentOS List
CentOS List spake the following on 8/29/2007 7:47 PM: Hi ppl . I am getting a IBM x3200.. This machine can only support up to 4 x 250GB SATA. I need to have a usable space of 500GB and mirror it to other 500GB. IBM proposed me to get 2 RAID cards. Do you guys think i can do raid 0 on the

Re: [CentOS] Re: IBM X3200

2007-08-29 Thread CentOS List
Can you recommend a good raid card which is able to do raid 10/1+0 and very well supported by CentOS 5? Like shooting fish in a barrel: 3Ware. We dont have that brand in my country. Checked with some distributors and shops. Any other favorites? __

Re: [CentOS] IBM X3200

2007-08-29 Thread CentOS List
I am getting a IBM x3200.. This machine can only support up to 4 x 250GB SATA. I need to have a usable space of 500GB and mirror it to other 500GB. IBM proposed me to get 2 RAID cards. Do you guys think i can do raid 0 on the first 2 x 250GB HDD and raid 0 on the second 2 x 250GB hdd, both on h

Re: [CentOS] Re: IBM X3200

2007-08-29 Thread CentOS List
The card IBM recommended is only 0,1 and they will not warranty any parts which are not from IBM. is this machine available with a simple JBOD non-raid 4 channel SATA card? use linux native software raid 0+1... it probably performs better than their raid cards anyways. As I am not confident

Re: [CentOS] Re: IBM X3200

2007-08-29 Thread CentOS List
Hi ppl . I am getting a IBM x3200.. This machine can only support up to 4 x 250GB SATA. I need to have a usable space of 500GB and mirror it to other 500GB. IBM proposed me to get 2 RAID cards. Do you guys think i can do raid 0 on the first 2 x 250GB HDD and raid 0 on the second 2 x 250GB hdd,

Re: [CentOS] Re: IBM X3200

2007-08-29 Thread CentOS List
CentOS List spake the following on 8/29/2007 11:31 AM: Hi ppl . I am getting a IBM x3200.. This machine can only support up to 4 x 250GB SATA. I need to have a usable space of 500GB and mirror it to other 500GB. IBM proposed me to get 2 RAID cards. Do you guys think i can do raid 0 on the

[CentOS] IBM X3200

2007-08-29 Thread CentOS List
Hi ppl . I am getting a IBM x3200.. This machine can only support up to 4 x 250GB SATA. I need to have a usable space of 500GB and mirror it to other 500GB. IBM proposed me to get 2 RAID cards. Do you guys think i can do raid 0 on the first 2 x 250GB HDD and raid 0 on the second 2 x 250GB hdd,

Re: [CentOS] Changing IRQ

2007-08-25 Thread CentOS List
Is there a way to change IRQ of PCI devices? PCI is designed to share IRQs between cards, and to automatically configure. all PCI device drivers should be designed to cope properly with this. I have a Digium card which is conflicting with all the other PCI cards and even the onboard NIC.

[CentOS] Changing IRQ

2007-08-25 Thread CentOS List
Hi, Is there a way to change IRQ of PCI devices? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 openssl conflict

2007-08-22 Thread CentOS List
> While yumming some packages, I keep getting the errors below. How to > overcome it? > > Transaction Check Error: > file /usr/share/man/man1/asn1parse.1ssl.gz from install of > openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5 conflicts with file from package > openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5 try a 'yum remove openssl.i386' th

[CentOS] x86_64 openssl conflict

2007-08-22 Thread CentOS List
Hi, While yumming some packages, I keep getting the errors below. How to overcome it? Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/asn1parse.1ssl.gz from install of openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5 conflicts with file from package openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5 file /usr/share/man/man1/nseq.1ssl.gz fr

Re: [CentOS] NFS / DNS problem

2007-08-14 Thread Peter (CentOS List)
The first thing that popped in my head was reverse lookup, but as I kept reading and saw your test with web3 it could ave been a sync problem between the two nameservers. By restarting ns1 all the zones were synced again and your initial problem isn't there anymore and so your test with web3 was su

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
Around 12:22am on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 (UK time), CentOS List scrawled: Line 35 COMMIT What are the few lines before that? Thanks, I saw the error on my iptables and fixed it up. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
Line 35 COMMIT What are the few lines before that? -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 -m state --dport 139 --state NEW -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m udp -i eth0 -m state --dport 139 --state NEW -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth1 -m state --dport 139

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
I applied a set of iptables rules and started iptables without any trouble. But after i edited the rules and restarting it, it gives me "Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 35 failed". I looked into /etc/sysconfig/ for the mentioned file and it was not found. I did a qu

[CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
Hi, I applied a set of iptables rules and started iptables without any trouble. But after i edited the rules and restarting it, it gives me "Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 35 failed". I looked into /etc/sysconfig/ for the mentioned file and it was not found. I did a q

Re: [CentOS] Centos openssl-devel

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
Well, it does the trick for openssl-devel.. But there are other packages which still require openssl i386. What should i do? It really depends if you need 32 bit compatibility. I tend to do "yum remove glibc.i686" to get rid of it entirely. I did that and yet it getting the same error. Transa