This issue is documented in Red Hat Bugzilla Bug 1346427
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346427
There is also a case opened with Red Hat Support: CASE 01652429
There are two workarounds:
1. Downgrade to:
brasero.x86_64 2.28.3-6.el6
brasero-libs.x86_64
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 10:35 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Environment
> >
> > Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHEL) 6.3
> > autofs-5.0.5-54.el6.x86_64
> > --
> >
> > This leads me to believe that upstream is aware of this issue and
> > someone
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:11 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 08:09 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster wrote:
> >> Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
> >> way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of
> >
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 02:09 +0100, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster wrote:
> > Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
> > way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of
> > the question. RHEL 4 updates must be painstakingly
4 matches
Mail list logo
