Thank you, I'll be trying this on a spare machine here before I try it in
production. Carefully reading the directions, although I see where bridge-br0
is created, I don't see where bridge-slave-em1 is defined?
On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 8:25:37 PM PST Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time,
On 12/14/2021 1:15 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
The only php SCL on that page that isn't EOL yet is php 7.3
Supported multi php installations seems difficult with that (maybe
there is more behind yourwww.softwarecollections.org link?), although
it would be possible to have the original non SCL php 5.4
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 18:26, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
>
> Am 15.12.21 um 00:24 schrieb Chris Adams:
> > I'm starting to look at CentOS 9-stream... what is the CRB repo? It
> > appears to be a lot of development libraries and such, but I didn't see
> > a definition or "CRB" anywhere.
>
> ht
Am 15.12.21 um 00:24 schrieb Chris Adams:
I'm starting to look at CentOS 9-stream... what is the CRB repo? It
appears to be a lot of development libraries and such, but I didn't see
a definition or "CRB" anywhere.
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/11/15/introducing-codeready-linux-builde
I'm starting to look at CentOS 9-stream... what is the CRB repo? It
appears to be a lot of development libraries and such, but I didn't see
a definition or "CRB" anywhere.
--
Chris Adams
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.or
On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 09:57 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> On 12/14/2021 9:38 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
> > Been trying to get multiple versions of PHP on a CentOS 7 machine,
> > off and
> > on for the past couple months. I have followed 5 or 6 different
> > howtos but
> > none work. They are very simila
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 07:42 -, Steve Clark via CentOS wrote:
> I see on CentOS 7 it has log4j-1.2.17...
> Is ok 2 use. I know the CVE was against 2.0 fwd but not knowing if something
> was backported to 1.2 ?
According to https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2021-009
Redha
On 12/14/2021 9:38 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
Been trying to get multiple versions of PHP on a CentOS 7 machine, off and
on for the past couple months. I have followed 5 or 6 different howtos but
none work. They are very similar and they seems to be done on a fresh
install as most do an apache install i
Hello,
Been trying to get multiple versions of PHP on a CentOS 7 machine, off and
on for the past couple months. I have followed 5 or 6 different howtos but
none work. They are very similar and they seems to be done on a fresh
install as most do an apache install is the steps. I setup two virtualh
On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 14:31 +0100, Steve Meier wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> Am 2021-12-14 14:14, schrieb Steve Clark:
> > This is the standard version that comes with CentOS 7 and is the
> > latest available as of a yum update just now.
> > log4j-1.2.17-16.el7_4.noarch
>
> yes, that's correct, but
> Hello Steve,
>
> Am 2021-12-14 14:14, schrieb Steve Clark:
>> This is the standard version that comes with CentOS 7 and is the
>> latest available as of a yum update just now.
>> log4j-1.2.17-16.el7_4.noarch
>
> yes, that's correct, but it is abandoned nonetheless.
>
> According to the RPM's cha
On 2021-12-14 08:31, Steve Meier wrote:
Hello Steve,
Am 2021-12-14 14:14, schrieb Steve Clark:
This is the standard version that comes with CentOS 7 and is the
latest available as of a yum update just now.
log4j-1.2.17-16.el7_4.noarch
yes, that's correct, but it is abandoned nonetheless.
Ac
Hello Steve,
Am 2021-12-14 14:14, schrieb Steve Clark:
This is the standard version that comes with CentOS 7 and is the
latest available as of a yum update just now.
log4j-1.2.17-16.el7_4.noarch
yes, that's correct, but it is abandoned nonetheless.
According to the RPM's change log, Red Hat
On 12/14/21 8:07 AM, Steve Meier wrote:
Hello Steve,
Am 2021-12-14 13:42, schrieb Steve Clark via CentOS:
Hi List,
I see on CentOS 7 it has log4j-1.2.17...
Is ok 2 use. I know the CVE was against 2.0 fwd but not knowing if
something was backported to 1.2 ?
Thanks,
Steve
log4j Version 1.2
Hello Steve,
Am 2021-12-14 13:42, schrieb Steve Clark via CentOS:
Hi List,
I see on CentOS 7 it has log4j-1.2.17...
Is ok 2 use. I know the CVE was against 2.0 fwd but not knowing if
something was backported to 1.2 ?
Thanks,
Steve
log4j Version 1.2 is definitely *NOT* OK to use.
The Apache
Hi List,
I see on CentOS 7 it has log4j-1.2.17...
Is ok 2 use. I know the CVE was against 2.0 fwd but not knowing if something
was backported to 1.2 ?
Thanks,
Steve
--
Stephen Clark
NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.
Sr. Applications Architect
Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contai
16 matches
Mail list logo
