Hi,
Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data?
Here are some important factors to consider:
1. Personal/non-commercial use.
2. Must be affordable, since I am unemployed most of the time and have
super low levels of income for the past 12 years since I graduated
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:30:40PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> Do a text install: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/361935/138
If you think he's frustrated now... The text installer is garbage and
has been since EL5 days, the only reason it even exists is because
it's part of the kickstart framew
On Feb 14, 2019, at 1:47 PM, mark wrote:
>
> Any suggestions?
Do a text install: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/361935/138
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Feb 14, 2019, at 18:23, rong zhao wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
> I am not sure if I should put my question here, I have googled long
> time, no explicit information found.
>
> Background:
> We need to support KVM encryption and decided to use LUKS.
>
> Refer to:https://libvirt.org/forma
Hi Team,
I am not sure if I should put my question here, I have googled long
time, no explicit information found.
Background:
We need to support KVM encryption and decided to use LUKS.
Refer to:https://libvirt.org/formatsecret.html#VolumeUsageType
libvirtd and KVM should
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:58 PM Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:32 PM Steve Gomez
> wrote:
> >
> > However, the bug lists seem to refer only to issues with VirtualBox. I
> > have experienced the same symptom when installing on a "hardware" system
> > (no hypervisor). The same c
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:32 PM Steve Gomez wrote:
>
> Ran into this rather frustrating bug when working with VBOX on a Windows 10
> host. It should come as no surprise that I would hit this bug when
> installing CentOS, and also with RHEL 7 Server with GUI (since you get the
> same kernel). Ba
Ran into this rather frustrating bug when working with VBOX on a Windows 10
host. It should come as no surprise that I would hit this bug when
installing CentOS, and also with RHEL 7 Server with GUI (since you get the
same kernel). Based on information from your bug list, I was fortunately
able
This sounds really weird, bear with me.
I've put together a custom install CD derived from
CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1810.iso.
I've added my RPMs in the mix, and have my dependencies lined up.
The installation of the RPMs fail, from packaging.log:
...
15:42:35,741 INFO packaging: libwbclient-
> Am 14.02.2019 um 20:19 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen :
>
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 13:25, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 12:47, H wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/14/2019 05:58 PM, Tate Belden wrote:
FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable
>>
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 15:18, H wrote:
>
> On 02/14/2019 08:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 13:25, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 12:47, H wrote:
> >>> On 02/14/2019 05:58 PM, Tate Belden wrote:
> FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1
I've got an old server, that I'm *trying* to rebuild from C6. Our regular
key, with the kickstarts, etc, simply won't boot. Just a blank screen, and
it never goes anywhere.
So I'm trying to build it from a year-old regular installer.
100% of the time, the graphical screen is screwed. Resolution's
On 02/14/2019 08:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 13:25, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 12:47, H wrote:
>>> On 02/14/2019 05:58 PM, Tate Belden wrote:
FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable
anything other
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 13:25, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 12:47, H wrote:
> >
> > On 02/14/2019 05:58 PM, Tate Belden wrote:
> > > FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable
> > > anything other than the default repositories. So, it'd appear
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 12:47, H wrote:
>
> On 02/14/2019 05:58 PM, Tate Belden wrote:
> > FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable
> > anything other than the default repositories. So, it'd appear to at least
> > be in the stream.
> >
> > geany-1.34.1-2.fc29.x86_64
>
On 02/14/2019 05:58 PM, Tate Belden wrote:
> FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable
> anything other than the default repositories. So, it'd appear to at least
> be in the stream.
>
> geany-1.34.1-2.fc29.x86_64
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:53 AM H wrote:
>
>> On 01
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:04:11AM -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> I think I can do this in two steps.
> 0) backup, backup, backup!
This is already running and you've tested the restore process, right?
> 1) On the server - use "find" to find all files owned by UID=500. Chown
> them to UID=1000. Repeat
Hello everyone -
I have a question regarding UID and GID numbers. First, a bit of background:
Yesterday I suffered a complete power failure. My UPS batteries ran everything
for an hour, but that was not long enough. My CentOS6 server shut itself down,
just like it should. When the power cam
FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable
anything other than the default repositories. So, it'd appear to at least
be in the stream.
geany-1.34.1-2.fc29.x86_64
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:53 AM H wrote:
> On 01/04/2019 04:17 AM, H wrote:
> > Does anyone know if Geany
On 01/04/2019 04:17 AM, H wrote:
> Does anyone know if Geany 1.34 is headed to one of the repositories? I am
> running version 1.31 and interested in the 1.33+ since the markdown plugin
> has apparently been updated.
>
I raised this issue on the bugtracker for Fedora EPEL several weeks ago but
h
20 matches
Mail list logo
