Le 06/12/2018 à 23:41, Frank Cox a écrit :
> (Did you forget to install audacious-plugins?)
No, it's installed. See the result of rpm -qa | grep audacious in the
initial post.
Niki
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microli
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:23 PM Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 17:45, david wrote:
> >
> > Folks
> >
> > I have two USB connected drives, configured as a mirrored-pair in ZFS.
> > It's been working fine UNTIL I updated Centos
> > from 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64
> > to 3.10.0-95
On Dec 6, 2018, at 17:45, david wrote:
>
> Folks
>
> I have two USB connected drives, configured as a mirrored-pair in ZFS. It's
> been working fine UNTIL I updated Centos
> from 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64
> to 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64
>
> The import of the pools didn't happen at boot. Whe
Folks
I have two USB connected drives, configured as a mirrored-pair in
ZFS. It's been working fine UNTIL I updated Centos
from 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64
to 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64
The import of the pools didn't happen at boot. When I tried executing:
zpool list
I got the diagnostic su
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 17:21, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looks like the Audacious audio player from EPEL (which has worked fine
> in previous versions) is broken under CentOS 7.6. It refuses to start,
> and when I try to start it from the command line, here's what I get.
>
> [microlinux@bern
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:20:57 +0100
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Any idea what's wrong here ?
(Did you forget to install audacious-plugins?)
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Hi,
Looks like the Audacious audio player from EPEL (which has worked fine
in previous versions) is broken under CentOS 7.6. It refuses to start,
and when I try to start it from the command line, here's what I get.
[microlinux@bernadette:~] $ rpm -qa | grep audacious
audacious-3.9-1.el7.x86_64
au
Le 06/12/2018 à 18:54, John Hodrien a écrit :
>
> Do you remember just how bad Gnome3 was in RHEL 7.0? It was unstable
> and insecure, certainly when used with nvidia drivers. I can't see
> how you could justify the effort it would have required to
> effectively support an unsupported version of
I have a number of updates to C7.6
but now I am getting
Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo base/7/x86_64
Did something happen? What do I do ?
This machine has internet access and appears to resolve other sites. I get
a list when trying to access mirrorlist...
Thanks,
Jerry
___
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:59:22AM -0500, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> In addition, there is a bugzilla report for this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644519
I think I'm going to just lie low for a while until the upgrade to
7.6 stabliizes a bit.
I have several machines, mostly perso
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018, Alice Wonder wrote:
I don't understand why Red Hat makes these kind of changes in point releases
- yet they won't update OpenSSL or PHP or Postfix in a point release.
Rebasing Gnome3 regularly I think has been one of Red Hat's best decisions,
and one I can easily imagine a
On 12/06/2018 08:10 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 06/12/2018 à 15:24, James Pearson a écrit :
I suspect it might be something that has been left out in the rebase to
GDM 3.28.1 - an earlier change log for GDM has:
On a side note, I've now spent a day and a half trying to recover my
wrecked desk
Le 06/12/2018 à 15:24, James Pearson a écrit :
> I suspect it might be something that has been left out in the rebase to
> GDM 3.28.1 - an earlier change log for GDM has:
On a side note, I've now spent a day and a half trying to recover my
wrecked desktop profiles, with only a partial success. As
Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>> Now with CentOS 7.6 this doesn't work anymore. The /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d
>> directory is nowhere to be found, and I'm currently mildly cursing the
>> GNOME developers' (and Red Hat's) policy of releasing
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Now with CentOS 7.6 this doesn't work anymore. The /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d
> directory is nowhere to be found, and I'm currently mildly cursing the
> GNOME developers' (and Red Hat's) policy of releasing moving targets.
> Until now, the
wow Great thank you
Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 à 19:23, Alexander Dalloz a écrit :
> Am 04.12.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Ilyass Kaouam:
> > . And of corse log activity users
> >
> > For me, In resume I want :
> > 1. One acces point to all my servers
> > 2. log activity user (login with active directory)
>
I have just done a yum update for the first time in a while, and as part of
that I believe Firefox got upgraded.
After the reboot I restarted Firefox which had been closed down with the
option to retain all open tabs/windows.
However, when I restarted Firefox it had three new tabs, one being th
Hi Fabian,
I was affected by this. After an update, one Dell R710 server that I
maintain, failed to boot. The error I saw was the same as someone else
who also posted here. I didn't know how to fix it, and needed the server
to be running, so I just reinstalled it, and switched to biosboot while
at
We got some reports from people unable to reboot their nodes after
updating to 7.6.1810, and basically to newer shim (v15).
It seems to affect only nodes in UEFI mode, but without SecureBoot.
We wrote that in the ReleaseNotes, including a link to the bug report :
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?
Lke many people I have received the message from Dropbox about their changes
including the non-support for the old Linux RPM.
As I no longer use Dropbox I thought I would just remove the nautilus-dropbox
RPM.
However, I am still receiving the warning every time I log in. Can anyone
tell me wh
Hi,
It looks like the upgrade to CentOS 7.6 has been unusually disruptive
with the GNOME desktop version bump and a series of moving targets under
the hood. The result is some wreckage at my client's desktop
installations, which I've been busy to repair since yesterday. First
things first.
I have
21 matches
Mail list logo
