Re: [CentOS] PostgreSQL port accessible even though it should be blocked by firewall

2018-10-31 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/30/18 8:31 AM, Frank Thommen wrote: I am still puzzled that it is possible to circumvent firewalld so easily.  Basically it means, that firewalld is not to be trusted as soon as containers with port forwarding are running on a system. It's hard to see this as a security or trust proble

Re: [CentOS] netinstall problem -- corrupt alsa-utils-1.1.0-10.el6.i686.rpm?

2018-10-31 Thread Alain . Cochard
Hello. In short: I cannot help concluding that there is something wrong with at least some centos mirrors. -- First, as I did not get any answer to the email below (about 3 weeks ago), I ask one question: is this list not the prope

Re: [CentOS] Would RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora Remain Open Source/Free Software After IBM Buys Red Hat for $34 Billion?

2018-10-31 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 10/30/18 9:44 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: Good morning from Singapore, This is of paramount importance. Would Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS, and Fedora remain open source/free software after IBM buys Red Hat for $34 Billion? Remember that the sources to Fedora, RH

Re: [CentOS] Would RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora Remain Open Source/Free Software After IBM Buys Red Hat for $34 Billion?

2018-10-31 Thread Mark Rousell
On 31/10/2018 13:55, Leroy Tennison wrote: > My real fear is that a certain un-named company is going to feel pressured to > buy Canonical. I originally thought that this unnamed company (if we're thinking of the same one) would be an ideal buyer for Red Hat (or, more correctly, that RH would be

Re: [CentOS] IBM buying RedHat

2018-10-31 Thread Mark Rousell
On 30/10/2018 19:57, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Found something: > > https://www.nextplatform.com/2018/02/15/ins-outs-ibms-power9-zz-systems/ > > > That’s the entry-level, I presume? Thanks for that. Those were the kinds of prices I was vaguely remembering. Not totally out of whack compared to high e

Re: [CentOS] Would RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora Remain Open Source/Free Software After IBM Buys Red Hat for $34 Billion?

2018-10-31 Thread mark
Leroy Tennison wrote: > If I heard/remember correctly, AT&T's UNIX was proprietary but they > released it to academic institutions under NDA and were lax in > enforcement. We all know what happened. In this case it's obviously open Well, also that AT&T was forbidden by law from competition in tha

Re: [CentOS] Would RHEL, CentOS, and Fedora Remain Open Source/Free Software After IBM Buys Red Hat for $34 Billion?

2018-10-31 Thread Leroy Tennison
If I heard/remember correctly, AT&T's UNIX was proprietary but they released it to academic institutions under NDA and were lax in enforcement. We all know what happened. In this case it's obviously open source, we know what will happen if someone tries something. My main concern is future dev

[CentOS] kiwi-ltsp - slave printer setup

2018-10-31 Thread Michel Donais
On a Suse server I'm trying to setup an USB slave printer to a work station here below are my configuration files. When I boot a station, i can see on the lower right  the identification of the station as localhost(192.168.0.101) +time  stamp The printer is configured in cups as ipp://192.168.0

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7.6 released

2018-10-31 Thread Pete Biggs
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 14:14 -0700, Yan Li wrote: > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html-single/7.6_release_notes/ > > They silently rebased GNOME to 3.28, which wasn't in the 7.6 beta nor in > the release notes. Can't wait to see it on my desktop. Too bad

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7.6 released

2018-10-31 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 31/10/2018 06:47, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > I am eagerly waiting to download CentOS 7.6 as well. I am still > seeing CentOS 7.5 on CentOS download mirrors in my region, Singapore. It'll take some time for CentOS to rebuild all the packages, probably 4-6 weeks. You'll have to be