Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-13 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/13/2017 03:01 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Thu, April 13, 2017 1:38 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like eclipse,

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-13 Thread Cameron Smith
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Thu, April 13, 2017 1:38 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote: > >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >>> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of th

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-13 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Thu, April 13, 2017 1:38 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote: >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor. >

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-13 Thread m . roth
Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote: >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor. mark "my

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-13 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like >>> eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor. >>> >>>mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!"

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-13 Thread m . roth
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like >> eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor. >> >>mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!" > > And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Ge

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

2017-04-13 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 4/12/2017 4:17 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: Oh I understand now what is happening. The subject is coming in as three lines. Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY HUMIDITY ALARM I'm not get

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-13 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/13/2017 12:11 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 13.04.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Valeri Galtsev : On Thu, April 13, 2017 3:05 am, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. I have mine running that

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-13 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 13.04.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Valeri Galtsev : > > > On Thu, April 13, 2017 3:05 am, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : >>> But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. >>> >>> I have mine running that way. >> >> I bluntly admit

Re: [CentOS] Excel shared spreadsheets on Samba share

2017-04-13 Thread Nux!
Hi Try something like this, see if it helps http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2011-November/009042.html -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Dante F. B. Colò" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Friday, 7 A

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-13 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Thu, April 13, 2017 3:05 am, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : >> But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. >> >> I have mine running that way. > > I bluntly admit not using SELinux, because until now, I mainly used more > bone-

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-13 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor. mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!" And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Geany. Using a editor that und

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

2017-04-13 Thread Leroy Tennison
Speaking of vi, I'm amazed at just how powerful it is. (And I'm not being sarcastic, there's not much I've searched for in regard to its capabilities that I haven't found). No thread drift here... - Original Message - From: "m roth" To: "centos" Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:08:2

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-13 Thread Lamar Owen
On 04/09/2017 12:39 AM, Anthony K wrote: So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? So, the hornets are swarming. But to answer your question: None of the above. If I want to run CentOS

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-13 Thread mark
On 04/12/17 22:02, Always Learning wrote: On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 22:45 +0200, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit: On my Slackware servers (no systemd, no funny network interface names), I just edit /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and switch eth0 and eth1 (and eth2 etc.) if needed. Keep It Simple

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-13 Thread Steve Clark
On 04/10/2017 05:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/10/2017 1:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> In what universe are those "consistant" device names, as opposed to >> eth[0...]? And how could it help automated scripts that you can run on >> *any* system you're administering? > if I have a Intel gi

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-13 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/13/2017 03:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 04/13/2017 04:23 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/13/2017 01:05 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. I have mine running that way. I

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-13 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/13/2017 04:23 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/13/2017 01:05 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. I have mine running that way. I bluntly admit not using SELinux, because until no

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-13 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/13/2017 04:05 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. I have mine running that way. I bluntly admit not using SELinux, because until now, I mainly used more bone-headed systems that

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-13 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/13/2017 01:05 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. I have mine running that way. I bluntly admit not using SELinux, because until now, I mainly used more bone-headed systems that

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

2017-04-13 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : > But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. > > I have mine running that way. I bluntly admit not using SELinux, because until now, I mainly used more bone-headed systems that didn't implement it. Maybe this is the right