> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: den 26 oktober 2016 08:25
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?
>
> On 10/25/2016 10:41 PM, Sorin Srbu wr
On 10/25/2016 10:41 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Never mind. Found this to start with.
Additionally, see the man page for "md".
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 26 oktober 2016 07:42
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?
>
> On 10/25/2016 11:54 AM, Gordon Messmer wr
On 10/25/2016 11:54 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
If you built a RAID0 array of RAID6 arrays, then you'd fail a disk by
marking it failed and removing it from whichever RAID6 array it was a
member of, in the same fashion as you'd remove it from any other array
type.
FWIW, what I've done in the p
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> > Sent: den 25 oktober 2016 20:54
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?
> >
> > That's not really a sh
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: den 25 oktober 2016 20:54
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?
>
> On 10/25/2016 05:41 AM, Sorin Srbu wr
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Larry Martell
> wrote:
>> The machines are on a local network. I access them with putty from a
>> windows machine, but I have to be at the site to do that.
>
> So that means when you are offsite there is no w
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster
wrote:
> Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellström :
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200
>> Christian Anthon wrote:
>>
>>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
>>> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6
Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:18 PM, wrote:
>
>> My manager just told me that upstream has released a patched kernel for
>> 7:
>> CentOS package kernel-3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
>> see http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2098.html
>>
>> I'm hoping Johnny can get us tha
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:18 PM, wrote:
> My manager just told me that upstream has released a patched kernel for 7:
>
> CentOS package kernel-3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
> see http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2098.html
>
> I'm hoping Johnny can get us that, hopefully before the end of t
On 10/25/2016 05:41 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
I found a shortcut for creating a software RAID 10 ("--level=10"), device in
CentOS 6.
That's not really a shortcut, per se. RAID10 in Linux is not
necessarily similar to RAID1+0. The default, "near" layout is the
classic 1+0 layout, but other modes
My manager just told me that upstream has released a patched kernel for 7:
CentOS package kernel-3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
see http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2098.html
I'm hoping Johnny can get us that, hopefully before the end of the week.
mark
_
Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellström :
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200
> Christian Anthon wrote:
>
>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
>> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to
>> attacks using ptrace.
>
> I can confir
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
> The machines are on a local network. I access them with putty from a
> windows machine, but I have to be at the site to do that.
So that means when you are offsite there is no way to access either
machine? Does anyone have a means to access
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:29:33 -0400
> "Phelps, Matthew" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
> > > officially patched? As far
On 25-10-2016 15:39, Peter Kjellström wrote:
I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel
(local build) using a rhel6 adaptation of the upstream fix.
Ask off-list if you want an src.rpm
Thanks,
the srpm would be very helpful, I'll reply off-list.
Cheers, Christian.
_
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200
Christian Anthon wrote:
> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to
> attacks using ptrace.
I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel
(local
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:29:33 -0400
"Phelps, Matthew" wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon
> wrote:
>
> > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
> > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to
> > attacks using ptrace.
> >
>
Hello all,
Testing stuff virtually over here before taking it to the physical servers.
I found a shortcut for creating a software RAID 10 ("--level=10"), device in
CentOS 6.
Looking at the below, I don't see anything about a shortcut for RAID 60.
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon wrote:
> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to attacks
> using ptrace.
>
> There is a mitigation described here
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
hi
for more information and test this vulnerability on your server visit this
link :
https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/2706661
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:49 AM, wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Could you please help us to know about the CVE-2016-5195 on CentOs.
>
>
> I have server runni
Hi Team,
Could you please help us to know about the CVE-2016-5195 on CentOs.
I have server running with CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) , will this be
effected?
Thanks
Aswathi
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged,
What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to
attacks using ptrace.
There is a mitigation described here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384344#c13
which doesn't fix the underlying problem, but
23 matches
Mail list logo
