On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Richard Grainger wrote:
>
> ergel (Extra Ruby Gems for Enterprise Linux)
You should call it RIGEL: Ruby Imported Gems for Enterprise Linux.
Much space. So geek.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigel
> epmel (Extra Perl Modules for Enterprise Linux)
CoMPEL: CPA
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Larry Martell wrote:
> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50
> external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously.
>
> We have another system running Centos6 that mounts the partition the files
> are FTP-ed to using
Hi
I've created a couple of new public yum repos suitable for CentOS 7:
ergel (Extra Ruby Gems for Enterprise Linux)
repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/ergel/7/x86_64/
homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/ergel
epmel (Extra Perl Modules for Enterprise Linux)
repo: https://harbottl
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:55 PM, wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, wrote:
>>> Larry Martell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
>> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are
> 50 external
Larry Martell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, wrote:
>> Larry Martell wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, wrote:
Larry Martell wrote:
> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are
50 external machines that FTP files to this server fairly
conti
On 21/10/16 17:02, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, October 21, 2016 10:33 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, October 21, 2016 9:18 am, Brian Mathis wrote:
For the OP:
Did you even try Google before asking the list? Google should always
be
On Fri, October 21, 2016 10:33 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, October 21, 2016 9:18 am, Brian Mathis wrote:
>>> For the OP:
>>> Did you even try Google before asking the list? Google should always
>>> be
>>> your first choice.
>>
>> No, darn, no!! Not google, du
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, wrote:
>>> Larry Martell wrote:
We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50
external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously.
We
Larry Martell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, wrote:
>> Larry Martell wrote:
>>> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50
>>> external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously.
>>>
>>> We have another system running Centos6 that mounts the
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have VMPlayer 12 running a CentOS 7 disk. Works fine.
>
> However I wish to change the disk from UUID booting (fstab) to the old
> style LABEL.
> (so I can export it and use on another machine).
> however when I run:
> e2label /dev/sda1 /
> e2label: Bad magic number in super-
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, October 21, 2016 9:18 am, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> For the OP:
>> Did you even try Google before asking the list? Google should always be
>> your first choice.
>
> No, darn, no!! Not google, duckduckgo should be! Or any other web _search_
> engine...
>
> ;-)
>
There
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:21 AM, wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
>> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50
>> external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously.
>>
>> We have another system running Centos6 that mounts the partition the files
>> are
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:18:49AM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
> For the OP:
> Did you even try Google before asking the list? Google should always be
> your first choice.
> http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/linux-iphone-6.html
>
> For Scott:
> If you install the VLC app on the iPad you can p
Larry Martell wrote:
> We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50
> external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously.
>
> We have another system running Centos6 that mounts the partition the files
> are FTP-ed to using NFS.
What filesystem?
mark
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/21/2016 2:03 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>>
>> My ssds are failing?
>
> SSD's wear out based on writes per block. they distribute those
> writes, but once each block has been written X number of times, they are
> no longer reliable.
>
> they appear to still be working
On Fri, October 21, 2016 9:18 am, Brian Mathis wrote:
> For the OP:
> Did you even try Google before asking the list? Google should always be
> your first choice.
No, darn, no!! Not google, duckduckgo should be! Or any other web _search_
engine...
;-)
Valeri
> http://www.dedoimedo.com/com
For the OP:
Did you even try Google before asking the list? Google should always be
your first choice.
http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/linux-iphone-6.html
For Scott:
If you install the VLC app on the iPad you can probably skip the
transcoding and also having to add the video to iTunes firs
help
2016-10-20 9:00 GMT-03:00 :
> Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
> centos-annou...@centos.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
> or, via email, send a message with subject o
Hi Barry,
It is an XFS file system.
I ran the command:
xfs_admin -L "/" /dev/sda1
and it says /dev/sda1 contains a mounted file system.
fatal error.
Now what?
Thanks
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
However I wish to change the disk from UUID booting (fstab) to the old
style LABEL.
(so I can export it and use on another machine).
however when I run:
e2label /dev/sda1 /
e2label: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sda1
Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
Three qu
I have VMPlayer 12 running a CentOS 7 disk. Works fine.
However I wish to change the disk from UUID booting (fstab) to the old
style LABEL.
(so I can export it and use on another machine).
fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 21.5 GB, 21474836480 bytes, 41943040 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 5
Hello Alessandro,
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 11:03 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
> WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
>1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 100 100 050Pre-fail Always
>- 0/4754882
smartctl -A only show
On 10/21/2016 2:03 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
My ssds are failing?
SSD's wear out based on writes per block. they distribute those
writes, but once each block has been written X number of times, they are
no longer reliable.
they appear to still be working perfectly, but they are beyond
Mark LaPierre wrote:
Thanks for the detailed response. Just a minor error. The file name
must have a .desktop extension like this:
Sorry, a copy-n-paste error when creating the email
In a shell:
[mlapier@peach ~]$ which xdgurl
/usr/bin/xdgurl
[mlapier@peach ~]$ xdgurl
"xdg://install?url=
We have 1 system ruining Centos7 that is the NFS server. There are 50
external machines that FTP files to this server fairly continuously.
We have another system running Centos6 that mounts the partition the files
are FTP-ed to using NFS.
There is a python script running on the NFS client machine
Hi list,
on my workstation I've a md raid (mirror) for / on md1. This raid has 2
ssd as members (each corsair GT force 120GB MLC). This disks are ~ 5
years old.
Today I've checked my ssds smart status and I get:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED
26 matches
Mail list logo
