On Mon, June 20, 2016 19:16, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> Exactly what mindless person or committee of bike-shedders decided
>> that software should be distributed so that copies of it expire?
>
> Expiration is a fundamental aspect of x509 certificates.
Hi,
I have one question about gstreamer. Why gstreamer can't use ffmpeg on centos?
is there some patent issue related to ffmpeg and gstreamer?
Thanks!
B.R.
Andrew
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:13:35PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Fred Smith wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:13:35PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> >> > >
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>> > > >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
>> > >
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> > > >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
> > > >for or at?
> > >
> >
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Alexander Farber
wrote:
>
> However I actually need my Jetty program to run at port 80 - so that users
> behind corporate firewalls can connect too.
>
> The Jetty doc at
> https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/setting-port80-access.html
> suggests
Am 20.06.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Alexander Farber:
Good evening,
on a CentOS 7 LAMP (not gateway) dedicated server I am
using iptables-services with the following /etc/sysconfig/iptables:
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [294:35064]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,E
Good evening,
on a CentOS 7 LAMP (not gateway) dedicated server I am
using iptables-services with the following /etc/sysconfig/iptables:
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [294:35064]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A IN
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> > >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
> > >for or at?
> >
> > Is it trying to hibernate?
>
> gosh, I hope not! I was in the middle o
On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology.
This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's
foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozill
On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 10:47 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> But hey, what is my time worth in comparison to the security those
> certificates provided? SECURITY that was trivially evaded in the end.
> Exactly what mindless person or committee of bike-shedders decided
> that software sh
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:28:48AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote:
> > Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to
> > repair than buy new.
> >
> >> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30
On Mon, June 20, 2016 9:28 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote:
>> Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to
>> repair than buy new.
>>
>>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, ÐлеÐ
On 06/20/2016 09:43 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2016, at 4:39 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>> On 17/06/16 20:04, Warren Young wrote:
>>>
>>> I realize it is in the CentOS project’s best interest if users always use
>>> the fastest mirror when downloading, but I claim that it is a bug to mark
On Jun 18, 2016, at 4:39 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> On 17/06/16 20:04, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>> I realize it is in the CentOS project’s best interest if users always use
>> the fastest mirror when downloading, but I claim that it is a bug to mark
>> any plugin as Requires, particularly when up
On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/18/2016 02:49 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Fri, June 17, 2016 21:40, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html
>> With respect citing another person's or people's opinion in support
>> of
>> your own i
Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote:
> Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to
> repair than buy new.
>
>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
Can anyone of you provide further hints o
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>> >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
>> >for or at?
>>
>> Is it trying to hibernate?
>
> gosh, I hope not! I was in the middle of using it, playing solitaire
> and moving the m
Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to repair
than buy new.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>>> Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
> >for or at?
>
> Is it trying to hibernate?
gosh, I hope not! I was in the middle of using it, playing solitaire
and moving the mouse around a lot.
--
Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
for or at?
Is it trying to hibernate?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 07:02:35AM +0200, anax wrote:
> Try with CTRL-ALT-F2 (go to the console) and CTRL-ALT-F1 (go back to
> the X-Window). This may help...
>
> suomi
oh, sorry, I did try that, but failed to mention it. No, it makes
no visible difference at all.
>
> On 06/20/2016 03:10 AM, Fr
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:29:22PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:10:24 -0400
> Fred Smith wrote:
>
> > I'm running an up to date Centos-7 on my Acer Aspire One netbook. have
> > been for, well, ever since C7 was released.
>
> I'm typing this on my Acer Aspire One netbook runnin
hi all,
after i upgraded a physical server (SUN FIRE X4170) from CentOS 6.8 to 7.2
i am not able to get the same iSCSI read performance.
the server is connected to HP P2000 Storage via 2 x 1GbE Ethernet.
CentOS 6.8 gives me full read performance on raw iSCSI devices /dev/sdxx at
115MB/s.
CentOS
25 matches
Mail list logo
