On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:31:18PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 02:55 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Oops - I should have mentioned that I'm running C6
> > (I do need to upgrade at some point).
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:54:06PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >>> Goo
On 05/06/2016 07:02 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 08:15 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Nux! wrote:
>>
>>> Direct links
>>>
>>> https://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29588#p132726
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-3714
On 05/04/2016 08:15 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Nux! wrote:
>
>> Direct links
>>
>> https://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29588#p132726
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-3714
>>
>> Mitigation:
>>
>> As a workaround the /etc/Imag
On 05/06/2016 02:55 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Oops - I should have mentioned that I'm running C6
> (I do need to upgrade at some point).
>
> Jeff
>
>> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:54:06PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> Good afternoon,
>>>
>>> Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
On 2016-05-06, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> Agree. But I would say the same about all command line interface utilities
> for all RAID brands I ever used. LSI likely is the worst.
The old Adaptec AAC/AFA syntax was also awful, I'd say just as bad as
LSI. (I have suspected that LSI copied most of the
> I agree with what John said about their command line interface MegaCli.
It's not that bad, the cli is incredibly detailed so it's just vast. It's not
any
different in complexity from hpacu in my opinion.
> One thing I have noticed about LSI MegaRaids is: if you hot replace bad
> drive with goo
On Fri, May 6, 2016 4:19 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:36 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the
>>> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43
>>> or 45TB). Th
Dear Experts,
one of the RAID threads today prompted me ask everybody.
Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come
in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming part of LSI and
getting boug
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:36 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the
>> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43
>> or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and
>> rebooted
On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:36 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the
> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 or
> 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted the
> system.
>
> And the stup
On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:54 pm, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
> that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking.
I've found that about Firefox in general some 5 years ago. Or rather
"releases" that seem never have been de
Nux! wrote:
> Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might not
> like the old ffmpeg I ship.
Nope.
Yes, I'm on CentOS 6, but as this is a US federal organization (civil
sector), I did ask, and was told no repos Over There. Security issues
Thanks, though.
>
> There is
Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might not like
the old ffmpeg I ship.
There is new and apparently working stuff in my testing repo; try to upgrade
and see if that solves the problem.
Feedback welcome so I can move the testing packages in the main repo sooner,
rath
Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 11:54 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> Good afternoon,
>>
>> Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
>> that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking.
>>
>> For example, I can't use it for Twitter because it crashes.
>> It also crashes when
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/6/2016 11:36 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the
>> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43
>> or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted
>> the syste
Oops - I should have mentioned that I'm running C6
(I do need to upgrade at some point).
Jeff
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:54:06PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
Good afternoon,
Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking.
For e
>
> From: Scott Robbins
> Date: May 06, 2016 12:32:55 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] resize lvm
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:19:35PM +, Wes James wrote:
>
> I have a laptop that I put centos 7 on and I started out with a 30gig
partition. I resized the other part of th
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:54:06PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
> that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking.
>
> For example, I can't use it for Twitter because it crashes.
> It also crashes when I log int
On 05/06/2016 11:54 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
Good afternoon,
Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking.
For example, I can't use it for Twitter because it crashes.
It also crashes when I log into gmail. This happens every
ti
Good afternoon,
Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking.
For example, I can't use it for Twitter because it crashes.
It also crashes when I log into gmail. This happens every
time I try these URL's.
Any suggestions on im
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:42:18AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/6/2016 11:39 AM, Wes James wrote:
> >file -s /dev/dm-0
> >
> >
> >
> >and it says XFS
> >
> >
> >
> >So would I use xfs_growfs?
>
> bingo!xfs_growfs can be used with the file system online, I'm
> pretty sure resize2fs requir
On May 06, 2016, at 12:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/6/2016 11:28 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/6/2016 11:19 AM, Wes James wrote:
sudo resize2fs /dev/lvname/root
I get:
resize2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open
/dev/lvname/root
Couldn't find valid filesyst
- Original Message -
| On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:19:35PM +, Wes James wrote:
| > I have a laptop that I put centos 7 on and I started out with a 30gig
| > partition. I resized the other part of the disk to allow more space for
| > centos. I then created an unformated partition in t
On 5/6/2016 11:39 AM, Wes James wrote:
file -s /dev/dm-0
and it says XFS
So would I use xfs_growfs?
bingo!xfs_growfs can be used with the file system online, I'm pretty
sure resize2fs requires the file system to be offline (unmounted).
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa c
On 5/6/2016 11:36 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the
firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 or
45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted the
system.
And the stupid annoying alarm
On May 06, 2016, at 12:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/6/2016 11:19 AM, Wes James wrote:
sudo resize2fs /dev/lvname/root
I get:
resize2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open
/dev/lvname/root
Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
what file system type is t
On 5/6/2016 11:28 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/6/2016 11:19 AM, Wes James wrote:
sudo resize2fs /dev/lvname/root
I get:
resize2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open
/dev/lvname/root
Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
what file system type is this /dev/lvname
Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the
firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 or
45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted the
system.
And the stupid annoying alarm started up as the system came up.
This time, h
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:19:35PM +, Wes James wrote:
> I have a laptop that I put centos 7 on and I started out with a 30gig
> partition. I resized the other part of the disk to allow more space for
> centos. I then created an unformated partition in the available space, ran
>
>
> pvcr
On 5/6/2016 11:19 AM, Wes James wrote:
sudo resize2fs /dev/lvname/root
I get:
resize2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open
/dev/lvname/root
Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
what file system type is this /dev/lvname/root ?
--
john r pierce, recycling bits
I have a laptop that I put centos 7 on and I started out with a 30gig
partition. I resized the other part of the disk to allow more space for
centos. I then created an unformated partition in the available space, ran
pvcreate /dev/sda4
vgextend lvname /dev/sda4
lvextend -L 184.46G /de
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 06/05/2016 13:50, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
>> Maybe add a:
>>
>> yum groupinstall core
>
> That did add a handful of packages indeed (as was already suggested in
> the previous answer), but the problem still persists.
>
> After rebooting, the system hangs after mounting th
On 05/06/2016 11:18 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 06/05/2016 13:50, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
>> Maybe add a:
>>
>> yum groupinstall core
>
> That did add a handful of packages indeed (as was already suggested in
> the previous answer), but the problem still persists.
>
> After rebooting, the syst
Le 06/05/2016 13:50, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
> Maybe add a:
>
> yum groupinstall core
That did add a handful of packages indeed (as was already suggested in
the previous answer), but the problem still persists.
After rebooting, the system hangs after mounting the /boot partition and
then exits i
After running into several web application that rejected any e-mail
address on the new gTLDs because the apps were badly written to validate
with a hard-coded list of valid TLDs, I wrote a e-mail validation
function that I *think* does things properly.
Free for anyone to use who wants to.
htt
On 05/06/2016 09:18 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Friday 06 May 2016 14:55:33 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> Exactly. As I said in the first post (reply to which happened to hijack
>> the thread - my apologies that was not intended by me), it was only
>> intended to help those who are just about to m
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 8:28 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/06/2016 07:12 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jerry Geis
>>> wrote:
>>>
| What is your graphics card model?
NVIDIA Corporation GK208 [GeForce GT 720] This does 4K
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Right. And I do want to point out, this list is really not the place to
> discuss the positives and negatives of systemd vs. upstart vs. SysV.
> The goal of CentOS is to build RHEL source code with the absolute
> minimum changes required for branding. So, we get the init s
On 05/02/2016 04:43 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 14:06 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/02/2016 01:46 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
>>
>
Anyone else experiencing unstable behaviour of FF 45.1 on C6?
>>>
>>> Day it was out I got the same. Since I already had some di
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This
>>> is
>>> not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them
>>> to
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:18:03PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I do have to concede that the update did update a great deal of RPM's and
> probably some by a number of versions. This no doubt is the reason I now
> have a reasonable sized number of changes I need to deal with (including
> kee
On Friday 06 May 2016 14:55:33 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> Exactly. As I said in the first post (reply to which happened to hijack
> the thread - my apologies that was not intended by me), it was only
> intended to help those who are just about to make this step to really
> think about what it will e
On Fri, 6 May 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
It probably would be better to say "nv" driver in this case.
No, it would be wrong.
My understanding is (someone correct me if I'm wrong here) that nouveay
"driver" is just a wrapper that figures out what video chipset you have and
loads appropriate
On Fri, May 6, 2016 8:28 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 07:12 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jerry Geis
>> wrote:
>>
>>> | What is your graphics card model?
>>> NVIDIA Corporation GK208 [GeForce GT 720] This does 4K
>>>
>>> | Which driver are you using?
>>
On Fri, May 6, 2016 8:46 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 08:38 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>>> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere.
This
>>
On 05/06/2016 08:38 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This
>>> is
>>> not intended to start the new one, but to help someo
On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This
>> is
>> not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them
>> to
>> define their statute.
>>
>
On 05/06/2016 07:12 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> | What is your graphics card model?
>> NVIDIA Corporation GK208 [GeForce GT 720] This does 4K
>>
>> | Which driver are you using?
>> I am using the NOUVEAU at this time
>>
>
>
> I would sugge
On Fri, May 6, 2016 04:36, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2016, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
>> What I didn't expect, and what really threw me was that this has
>> been implemented via a simply 'yum update' of an existing system,
>> not at a major release level.
>
>
> Something like RHEL is stuck
On 05/05/2016 09:15 AM, Marcin Trendota wrote:
Howdy
I'm trying to run FTP server behind firewall. And i can't enable passive
mode from the Internet. There are plenty howtos but there aren't many
with my combination.
For now i have configured port forwarding and ftp server itself.
On the route
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> | What is your graphics card model?
> NVIDIA Corporation GK208 [GeForce GT 720] This does 4K
>
> | Which driver are you using?
> I am using the NOUVEAU at this time
>
I would suggest trying the NVIDIA proprietary driver from the ELRepo
rpm --
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:13:10AM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
> you're probably removing too many packages, eg some key package is a
> dep of MINIMAL but not in MINIMAL, and "yum remove" removes it and
> all its dependants.
Just as an example of this, and one that RH may move into an up
| What is your graphics card model?
NVIDIA Corporation GK208 [GeForce GT 720] This does 4K
| Which driver are you using?
I am using the NOUVEAU at this time
| What connector are you using (DVI, Display Port, HDMI)?
HDMI
| Does it work at 4k with Gnome, or KDE?
Yes has worked under Gnome
The /va
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I installed C7 along with MATE desktop...
>
> My monitor is a 4K unit but when I goto the
> System -> preferences -> hardware -> Displays
> there is selection for the 4K display. It stops at 1920x1080.
>
> The var log x file shows the 4K resolut
On 05/06/2016 06:46 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 06/05/2016 11:13, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg a écrit :
>> you're probably removing too many packages, eg some key package is a dep
>> of MINIMAL but not in MINIMAL, and "yum remove" removes it and all its
>> dependants.
>> Maybe add "yum install $MINIMAL
Le 06/05/2016 11:13, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg a écrit :
> you're probably removing too many packages, eg some key package is a dep
> of MINIMAL but not in MINIMAL, and "yum remove" removes it and all its
> dependants.
> Maybe add "yum install $MINIMAL" after your yum remove command.
> Or replace yum re
On 05/06/2016 05:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 03:30 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> Me again,
>>
>> Another problem I've found since doing my yum update is that EXIM is now
>> showing the following error, on startup, and repeatedly in main.log
>>
>> [root@ollie2 ~]# exim -bt localp..
On 05/06/2016 03:30 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Me again,
>
> Another problem I've found since doing my yum update is that EXIM is now
> showing the following error, on startup, and repeatedly in main.log
>
> [root@ollie2 ~]# exim -bt localp...@example.com
> 2016-05-06 09:27:04 WARNING: purgin
On 05/06/2016 09:33 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 06/05/2016 08:50, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
Now what would be the simple systemd equivalent of doing that? E. g. on
any CentOS installation (be it graphical, "Web Server", "File Server",
whatever), strip down services to the status that they're at
On Fri, 6 May 2016, Gary Stainburn wrote:
What I didn't expect, and what really threw me was that this has been
implemented via a simply 'yum update' of an existing system, not at a major
release level.
journald has been there since you installed C7.
You appear to have seen a change in loggin
Me again,
Another problem I've found since doing my yum update is that EXIM is now
showing the following error, on startup, and repeatedly in main.log
[root@ollie2 ~]# exim -bt localp...@example.com
2016-05-06 09:27:04 WARNING: purging the environment.
Suggested action: use keep_environment a
On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This is
> not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them to
> define their statute.
>
> People split into two groups:
>
> Opponents of systemd (, firew
Le 06/05/2016 08:50, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
> Now what would be the simple systemd equivalent of doing that? E. g. on
> any CentOS installation (be it graphical, "Web Server", "File Server",
> whatever), strip down services to the status that they're at just after
> installing a "Minimal Install"
63 matches
Mail list logo
