Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:22:29AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby
>> making it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not
>> have a paging mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to
>>
On 9 Dec 2015 9:07 p.m., "Lamar Owen" wrote:
>
> No, it seems to me that a suitably motivated CentOS user needs to scratch
this itch; and, no, I am not volunteering, as I've followed Fedora
before..and just simply cannot give the time to it at this point in
time in my life.
>
>
> So who wa
On 12/09/2015 11:45 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm sure it's *far* too much work for, say, the fedora development team to
put out once a quarter a notice to upstream, and maybe CentOS, Scientific
Linux, and whatever other main user groups to inform them of major
changes, and see the feedback
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:22:29AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making
> it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging
> mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say,
> arcane)
On 12/08/2015 07:46 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have been bitten by things done in Fedora that only have any use on
a laptop and that should never have been allowed into a server
distribution. But I cannot see how I would have been aware of them
until they manifested themselves on equipment unde
On 12/09/2015 05:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hundreds of contributors introduces something t
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one
>> of
>> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user
>> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and inv
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:15:56PM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
> I think saying that you can have some say as to what goes into Fedora
> is being a little naive, look at systemd, many people complained
> about its inclusion but the powers to be heard none of it, and the
That's not a historically acc
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of
> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user
> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement.
> So, you're saying
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:54:57AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> > Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
>> > premises" part seems like a good start.
>>
>> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just
On 12/09/2015 09:37 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hund
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:54:57AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
> > premises" part seems like a good start.
>
> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of my
Because of
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:45:55AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I'm sure it's *far* too much work for, say, the fedora development team to
> put out once a quarter a notice to upstream, and maybe CentOS, Scientific
> Linux, and whatever other main user groups to inform them of major
> changes,
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:54:56AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
> premises" part seems like a good start.
Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of my
users yesterday that
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
>> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
>> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
>> hundreds of contr
Thanks, I got swamped after sending this but will get back to it soon.
- Original Message -
From: "Nux!"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 3:16:21 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] tsocks or equivalent for CentOS 7
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/misc/el7/x86_64/tsocks-1.
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:54:56AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
> hundreds of contributor
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:37:33AM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> >So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
> >that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
> >developers and then point out whenever any
After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making
it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging
mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say,
arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with
kerberos? I see
On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hundreds of contributors introduces something t
On Tue, December 8, 2015 11:05, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> I have been bitten by things done in Fedora that only have any use
>> on
>> a laptop and that should never have been allowed into a server
>> distribution. But I cannot see how I would have been aware of them
>> until they manifested the
Hi All,
I'm trying to disable USB storage devices in Centos7.1.1503.
I've setup udev rules to block all usb devices and then additional rules
to allow specific vendors / products to be used (mainly keyboards and
mice). This is all working perfectly.
cat /etc/udev/rules.d/01-usblockdown.rules
# B
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/misc/el7/x86_64/tsocks-1.8-0.14.beta5.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm
Stolen from Fedora 22.
Enjoy
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Leroy Tennison"
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 December,
23 matches
Mail list logo
