Re: [CentOS] Replacing cpu

On 07/07/15 01:01, g wrote: > On 07/06/15 22:22, jd1008 wrote: ooppss. my bad. entered wrong address. -- peace out. -+- If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. -+- CentOS GNU/Linu

Re: [CentOS] Replacing cpu

On 07/06/15 22:22, jd1008 wrote: <<>> > I plan to do both :) > This is why I use AmEx. > They fully refund for merchandise that does not work. > They are able to extract that from the merchant. > Don't ask me how :) They have done it for me before. it is in the 'toa', 'terms of agreement'. cred

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Samba-based Home-Directory

On 07/06/2015 10:00 PM, Meikel wrote: I'll check the cable (not clear how I can do that, probably using another cable and connecting to another outlet). Use a different cable to the same switch port, first. If you change both the cable and the switch port, you won't know if the problem was t

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Samba-based Home-Directory

Am 05.07.2015 um 20:52 schrieb Gordon Messmer: On 07/05/2015 07:57 AM, Meikel wrote: Jul 5 16:36:08 meikel-pc kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready Jul 5 16:36:23 meikel-pc kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready It takes 15 seconds between the two messages un

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Samba-based Home-Directory

Am 05.07.2015 um 21:13 schrieb Steven Tardy: What is the upstream switch? If it is a Cisco switch does the configuration have `spanning-tree portfast` enabled? http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switches/10553-12.html __

Re: [CentOS] 7.1 install with Areca arc-1224

On 7/6/2015 6:11 PM, g wrote: optical drives do not fair well burning a lot of dvd's. thru the years of dealing with cd/dvd burners, i have found the above trouble shooting checks to prove out bad drives due to the increased voltage needed for dvd burning shortens laser's life. good burners wi

Re: [CentOS] 7.1 install with Areca arc-1224

On 07/06/15 18:06, C Linus Hicks wrote: > On 07/06/15, g wrote: >> you might try verifying that system you are getting error message on >> has a good cd/dvd drive. >> >> burn another dvd at at least 4 speeds slower. >> > if runs ok, bad drive. >> > if still fails, bad drive. >> > another way you

Re: [CentOS] ntpd new version

On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:59 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > RedHat/CentOS does not upgrade packages based on version numbers. Please > read https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting Understanding > this is essential to running a RedHat/CentOS server. While this is true, the NTPd web site sa

Re: [CentOS] Prompt for chrooted users

On Jul 6, 2015, at 2:49 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > However, instead of getting the prompt defined in their > .bash_profiles we see this: > > -bash-4.1$ > > when we are expecting this: > > [username@hostname dir]$ > > So, before I go messing around moving files I would some information > from

Re: [CentOS] 7.1 install with Areca arc-1224

On 07/06/15, g wrote: you might try verifying that system you are getting error message on has a good cd/dvd drive. burn another dvd at at least 4 speeds slower. if runs ok, bad drive. if still fails, bad drive. another way you can check is to pull iso on system you are having problem with and

Re: [CentOS] ntpd new version

RedHat/CentOS does not upgrade packages based on version numbers. Please read https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting Understanding this is essential to running a RedHat/CentOS server. ❧ Brian Mathis @orev On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Vijendra Agarwal (vijagarw) < vijag...@c

Re: [CentOS] Prompt for chrooted users

James B. Byrne wrote: > We have a requirement to allow ssh access to a server in order to > provide a secure link to one of our legacy systems. I would like to > chroot these accounts. > > I have this working except for one small detail, the user's prompt in > the ssh session. Each user has their

Re: [CentOS] 7.1 install with Areca arc-1224

On 07/05/15 22:25, C Linus Hicks wrote: <> > Ran the check again, same thing. Took that DVD back to the machine I > burned it on, downloaded the MD5SUM from one of the mirrors and checked > the file I downloaded. That checks. Used cmp to compare the .iso file to > the image on the DVD, they matc

[CentOS] Prompt for chrooted users

We have a requirement to allow ssh access to a server in order to provide a secure link to one of our legacy systems. I would like to chroot these accounts. I have this working except for one small detail, the user's prompt in the ssh session. Each user has their shell set to /bin/bash in /etc/p

Re: [CentOS] ssh -X versus -Y

On 07/06/2015 04:31 AM, John Hodrien wrote: EL6: ssh -X -o ForwardX11Trusted=no somehost xterm X Error of failed request: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) Interesting. On Fedora 22, "-o ForwardX11Trusted=no" seems to have no effect. Copy and paste work normally wi

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Server Forgets IPv6 Address On Reboot

On 07/06/2015 07:36 AM, Dave Cross wrote: Presumably, there's a file somewhere under /etc/sysconfig that should contain this information - does anyone know where it should be stored? https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-networkscripts

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Server Forgets IPv6 Address On Reboot

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Dave Cross wrote: > My Centos 7 server has started to forget its IPv6 address on a reboot. > This causes problems with services being unable to start up. > > It's easy enough to fix each time (ip addr add ...), but it would be > nice to be able to convince it to ret

Re: [CentOS] ntpd new version

On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:04:25AM +, Vijendra Agarwal (vijagarw) wrote: > > Hi All, > Currently CentOS site contains the below version of ntpd. > ntp-4.2.6p5-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm > :- 16 mar 20

[CentOS] Centos 7 Server Forgets IPv6 Address On Reboot

My Centos 7 server has started to forget its IPv6 address on a reboot. This causes problems with services being unable to start up. It's easy enough to fix each time (ip addr add ...), but it would be nice to be able to convince it to retain that information. Presumably, there's a file somewhere u

Re: [CentOS] ntpd new version

On 06/07/15 12:04, Vijendra Agarwal (vijagarw) wrote: > Hi All, > Currently CentOS site contains the below version of ntpd. > ntp-4.2.6p5-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm > :- 16 mar 2015. > > Does anybody h

Re: [CentOS] ssh -X versus -Y

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2015-07-05, Gordon Messmer > wrote: On 07/05/2015 04:51 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: At this point, I don't think it's even possible to set ForwardX11Trusted=no any more. The X SECURITY extension was replaced with "X Access Control Extension" several yea

Re: [CentOS] ssh -X versus -Y

On 2015-07-05, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/05/2015 04:51 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: >> One practical difference I have seen is the improved performance of >> -Y over -X. I have long attributed that to the relaxation of security >> controls in the former case. > > When and how did you measure that?

[CentOS] ntpd new version

Hi All, Currently CentOS site contains the below version of ntpd. ntp-4.2.6p5-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm :- 16 mar 2015. Does anybody have any information about when the new version of ntpd is expected

Re: [CentOS] IPMI/BMC/BIOS

On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:11:09 + (UTC) Chris Olson wrote: ... > My initial recommendation was to use a totally separate network for > any service processors +1 for this. We typically put all management ports for a 'system/project' on a sep. non-routed eth. segment to which only the, for the 's