On 07/05/2015 08:25 PM, C Linus Hicks wrote:
Now I'm thinking, wait, it says "Failed to start media check" is that
a poorly worded message or does it really mean what it says?
I'm not entirely sure, but at this point I'd suggest that you use a
different media type. Maybe a USB drive.
___
On 07/05/15, Gordon Messmer wrote:
That's not the same as checking the media for corruption. You may be
able to read all of the files, but if the data is corrupt, rpm may throw
and IOError.
So, the next thing to do is check your media. The DVD should offer to
do that first when you boot from
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> On 07/03/2015 03:43 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> I've tried this again, and it does not seem to work.
>>> Have you actually tried it?
>
>> I don't have a CentOS system here that I can reboot readily. And it
>> occ
On 07/05/2015 04:38 PM, C Linus Hicks wrote:
anaconda will try to delete an rpm file if it gets an IOError. Your
media may be corrupt. Check that first.
- Above quoted -
No such luck. On the system where I'm doing the install, I used dd to
read the entire DVD and also copied every .rpm
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:38:39 -0500 (CDT)
C Linus Hicks wrote:
> No such luck. On the system where I'm doing the install, I used dd to read
> the entire DVD and also copied every .rpm to /dev/null and didn't get any I/O
> errors.
Did you verify the checksum?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digit
On 07/05/15, Gordon Messmer wrote:
anaconda will try to delete an rpm file if it gets an IOError. Your
media may be corrupt. Check that first.
- Above quoted -
No such luck. On the system where I'm doing the install, I used dd to read the
entire DVD and also copied every .rpm to /dev/
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 03:43 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I've tried this again, and it does not seem to work.
>> Have you actually tried it?
> I don't have a CentOS system here that I can reboot readily. And it
> occurs to me that if I did, I didn't ask if your system boots via B
On 07/05/2015 02:02 PM, C Linus Hicks wrote:
02:40:54,292 DEBUG packaging: File "/usr/libexec/anaconda/anaconda-yum", line
342, in inst_open_file
02:40:54,292 DEBUG packaging: os.unlink(txmbr.po.localPkg())
02:40:54,292 DEBUG packaging: OSError: [Errno 30] Read-only file system:
'/run/install/r
On 07/05/2015 09:17 AM, lin...@verizon.net wrote:
> Someone please tell me what I did to screw this thing up so badly.
On 07/05/15, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Have you looked at the log files in /mnt/sysimage/root/?
- Quoting broken in this mailer
So I looked in /mnt/sysima
On 07/03/2015 03:43 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've tried this again, and it does not seem to work.
Have you actually tried it?
I don't have a CentOS system here that I can reboot readily. And it
occurs to me that if I did, I didn't ask if your system boots via BIOS
or UEFI. If it's BIOS, I
On 07/05/2015 04:51 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
One practical difference I have seen is the improved performance of -Y
over -X. I have long attributed that to the relaxation of security
controls in the former case.
When and how did you measure that?
The -Y change was introduced in Fedora Core 3, i
>
> Jul 5 16:36:08 meikel-pc kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not
> ready
> Jul 5 16:36:23 meikel-pc kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link
> becomes ready
>
> It takes 15 seconds between the two messages until it becomes ready. I
> have no idea why it first says that the link is n
On 07/05/2015 07:57 AM, Meikel wrote:
Jul 5 16:36:08 meikel-pc kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not
ready
Jul 5 16:36:23 meikel-pc kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link
becomes ready
It takes 15 seconds between the two messages until it becomes ready. I
have no idea why it firs
On 07/05/2015 09:17 AM, lin...@verizon.net wrote:
Someone please tell me what I did to screw this thing up so badly.
Have you looked at the log files in /mnt/sysimage/root/?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
I must be doing something horribly wrong and I hope somebody can help.
The Areca arc-1224 is not supported by the Areca driver included driver in 7.1
so I have to supply that when starting the install. Documentation provided by
Areca and in the Red Hat install guide say the same thing, put the d
And for me the advantage is I get to have name resolution on my internal
machines.
On Sunday, July 05, 2015 14:57:22 Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2015-06-22, Timothy Murphy
>
> wrote:
> > What is the advantage, if any, of running one's own DNS server?
> > Surely the link between domain name and IP
Am 02.07.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Gordon Messmer:
Have you yet:
setsebool -P use_samba_home_dirs 1
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No, I didn't set it. Now I've set it and when logging into text c
On 2015-06-22, Timothy Murphy
wrote:
> What is the advantage, if any, of running one's own DNS server?
> Surely the link between domain name and IP address must already have
> been established?
>
As others have said, it depends on your circumstances and what you want
to achieve. In my case I run
On 2015-06-26, Stuart Barkley wrote:
[...]
> The documentation of the practical differences between -X and -Y is
> pretty obscure (mostly defering to the X Security extension
> documentation). I would like to see better clarification of the
> differences.
One practical difference I have seen i
On 2015-06-27, Wes James wrote:
>
>> On Jun 27, 2015, at 11:36 AM, Wes James wrote:
>>
>> I have compiz installed on centos 6.6, and I’ve been testing 7.1, but
>> I can't find any info on installing compiz on 7.1. Is there any info
>> for this or is it not supported yet?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -
20 matches
Mail list logo
