Hello Tim,
On 06/24/2015 07:42 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]:
Broken pipe (32)
rsync: write failed on "/opt/var/log/lastlog": No space left on device (28)
lastlog is a VERY large SPARSE file and when you rsync it it looses the spar
On 06/23/2015 08:25 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
<<>>
> Edit the file:
>
> /etc/sysconfig/clock
>
> make sure to set:
>
> ZONE="America/Chicago"
it was;
ZONE="Etc/UTC"
it is now.
ZONE="America/Chicago"
> then copy /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Chicago to /etc/localtime
done.
> Run the time
- Original Message -
| I was wondering, where is the format and options of files like
| /usr/share/system-config-netboot/pxelinux.cfg/default from
| system-config-netboot-cmd described? There are plenty of PXE tutorials
| with examples out there, but nothing that looks like actual
| documen
Hello All,
I seem to have run into a bug with the new --bridgeslaves= option.
It would seem that if I tell the bridge device to use a virtual interface (like
bond0) rather than a physical interface (em1/em2) that kickstart completely
barfs on it. I have provided my network section below which
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:40:59 -0700
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> > For concreteness, let's say I have a guest machine, with a
> > dedicated physical partition for it, on a single drive. Or, I have
> > the same thing, only the dedicated partition is in
At Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:06:30 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> >> Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
> >> sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the
> >> h
On 6/24/2015 1:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
>>> sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the
>>> hardware has a certain phys
On 06/24/2015 12:35 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Interesting. I wasn't aware that LVM had that option. I've been
looking at bcache and dm-cache. I'll have to look into that as well.
heh. LVM cache *is* dm-cache. Don't I feel silly.
___
CentOS mailin
On 06/24/2015 12:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
LVM snapshots make it easy to get point-in-time consistent backups,
including databases. For example, with MySQL, you can freeze and flush
all the databases, snapshot the LV, and release the freeze.
Exactly. And I mention this from time to time... I'
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 09:42 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> And for some reason when the servers were ordered the large
>> local volume ended up being /usr when the ES rpm likes to
>> store it's indexes on /var.
>>
>> So I'm syncing the contents of both directories to a different place,
>>
On 6/24/2015 2:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, m.r...@5-cent.us said:
Here's a question: all of the arguments you're giving have to do with VMs.
Do you have some for straight-on-the-server, non-VM cases?
I've used LVM on servers with hot-swap drives to migrate to new storage
with
Once upon a time, m.r...@5-cent.us said:
> Here's a question: all of the arguments you're giving have to do with VMs.
> Do you have some for straight-on-the-server, non-VM cases?
I've used LVM on servers with hot-swap drives to migrate to new storage
without downtime a number of times. Add new d
On 06/24/2015 11:06 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Here's a question: all of the arguments you're giving have to do with VMs.
Do you have some for straight-on-the-server, non-VM cases?
Marko sent two messages and suggested that we keep the VM performance
question as a reply to that one. My reply
On 06/24/2015 09:42 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
And for
some reason when the servers were ordered the large local volume ended up
being /usr when the ES rpm likes to store it's indexes on /var.
So I'm syncing the contents of both directories to a different place, and
I'm going swap the large local vol
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
>> sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the
>> hardware has a certain physical speed, regardless of the presence of
>> LVM. Wh
On 06/23/2015 09:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 19:08:24 -0700
Gordon Messmer wrote:
1) LVM makes MBR and GPT systems more consistent with each other,
reducing the probability of a bug that affects only one.
2) LVM also makes RAID and non-RAID systems more consistent with eac
Does anyone have a good guess as to why these 'out of space' failures
are
occurring?
Probaly sparse files or hard links? Try
# rsync -aHASWXv --delete src/ dst/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm
sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the
hardware has a certain physical speed, regardless of the presence of
LVM. What am I missing?
Well, there's b
Hey Carl,
Hi Tim,
> At first glance, I don't see anything obvious, but if it were me, I'd
> do the following:
> a) add the 'n' flag to do a dry run (no actual copying)
> b) increase rsync's verbosity
>(A single -v will give you information about what files are being
>transferred and a bri
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:42:19 -0400
Tim Dunphy wrote:
> how come I am running out of space in doing my rsync?
Are you running out of room for file and directory names, which is a different
thing than simple free disk space?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.c
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:42:19 -0400
Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Does anyone have a good guess as to why these 'out of space' failures
> are occurring?
Hi Tim,
At first glance, I don't see anything obvious, but if it were me, I'd
do the following:
a) add the 'n' flag to do a dry run (no actual copying)
hey guys,
I need to mount a different volume onto /var so we have more room to
breathe. I'll be turning 3 servers into an elasticsearch cluster. And for
some reason when the servers were ordered the large local volume ended up
being /usr when the ES rpm likes to store it's indexes on /var.
So I'
At Wed, 24 Jun 2015 04:10:35 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:42:13 -0700
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >
> > I wondered the same thing, especially in the context of someone who
> > prefers virtual machines. LV-backed VMs have *dramatically* better
> > disk performanc
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, John R Pierce wrote:
While it has the same concepts, physical volumes, volume groups, logical
volumes, the LVM in AIX shares only the initials with Linux. I've heard
that Linux's LVM was based on HP-UX's design.
Sure, and IRIX had a similar concept, although my experience
Once upon a time, Marko Vojinovic said:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:42:13 -0700
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > I wondered the same thing, especially in the context of someone who
> > prefers virtual machines. LV-backed VMs have *dramatically* better
> > disk performance than file-backed VMs.
>
> Ok,
On 06/24/2015 06:31 AM, Gerald Vogt wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I add another problem with todays updates:
>
> Error: Package: fence-agents-all-4.0.11-13.el7_1.x86_64
> (centos7-x86_64-updates)
>Requires: fence-agents-compute
>
>
> fence-agents-compute seems to be missing.
>
> Thanks,
>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 06/23/2015 03:52 PM, g wrote:
On 06/23/2015 02:14 PM, ken wrote:
On 06/23/2015 11:49 AM, g wrote:
hello Ken,
am i correct to presume that you are getting the "Bcc:" of my post
to the fedora list?
g,
I'm already subscribed to that list, so you needn't bcc me. I've read
your post there
Hi all!
I add another problem with todays updates:
Error: Package: fence-agents-all-4.0.11-13.el7_1.x86_64
(centos7-x86_64-updates)
Requires: fence-agents-compute
fence-agents-compute seems to be missing.
Thanks,
Gerald
___
CentOS mail
On 06/24/2015 05:51 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Yes, it is a "known" issue, I'm sure it's going to get fixed ASAP.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Kai Bojens"
>> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>> Sent: Wednesday, 24
Hello,
I somehow missed the announcement, but I just updated and Firefox 38.0.1 put me
back to Dutch.
( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221286 )
greetings, Johan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
Yes, it is a "known" issue, I'm sure it's going to get fixed ASAP.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Kai Bojens"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2015 10:48:22
> Subject: [CentOS] Problem with tod
Hello everybody,
I just tried to run 'yum update' and got this error:
Error: Package: ntp-4.2.6p5-19.el7.centos.x86_64 (@updates)
Requires: ntpdate = 4.2.6p5-19.el7.centos
Removing:
ntpdate-4.2.6p5-19.el7.centos.x86_64 (@updates)
33 matches
Mail list logo
