Le 19/02/2015 05:43, Chris Murphy a écrit :
My personal view on installers is extremely biased toward the user
staying out of trouble, they shouldn't have to read documentation for
a GUI installer.
A *user* never has to even see - or use - an installer. A USER has to
USE a computer, by which
On 2/18/2015 11:06 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
but, is that lvm integrated raid stuff available in RHEL/CentOS 6
or 7 yet ?
/me scribbles postit note to self: google BEFORE hitting send
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Mana
On 2/18/2015 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
You might be a candidate for LVM integrated raid. It uses the md
kernel code on the backend, but it's all LVM tools to create, manage
and monitor. The raid level is defined per LV, instead of all LV's in
a VG inheriting the underlying raid. It supports al
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:25 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> disks -> partition(s) -> mdraid devices -> PVs -> VG -> LV -> file system.
> phew.
You might be a candidate for LVM integrated raid. It uses the md
kernel code on the backend, but it's all LVM tools to create, manage
and monitor. The raid l
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:20 PM, wrote:
> Niki Kovacs wrote:
>> Le 18/02/2015 23:12,
>> close, but then, for mysterious reasons, Red Hat decided to cripple it
>> into oblivion. Go figure.
>
> One word: desktop. That's what they want to conquer next.
OK well there's a really long road to get to
Mark LaPierre writes:
>
> On 02/15/15 22:48, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > Hey Y'all,
> >
> > I though I would resurrect a long dead mail chain.
> >
> > I'm looking for a good replacement for Rhythmbox. I need a pod catcher
> > to catch podcasts and download them to my HD where I can then move the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Well, maybe it's just me. I've started Linux on Slackware 7.1 and used
> pretty much every major and minor distribution under the sun. I know my way
> around Slackware, Debian, CentOS, FreeBSD, Gentoo, Arch and many more, and
> my favourite ins
On 2/18/2015 8:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>>
>>"installer is organized around mount points" is correct, and what gets
>>mounted on mount points? Volumes, not partitions.
>
>
>Says who?
Because it
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>>
>> "installer is organized around mount points" is correct, and what gets
>> mounted on mount points? Volumes, not partitions.
>
>
> Says who?
Because it's ambiguous. A partition might entirely co
Hi Johnny,
This is to enquire as to whether CentOS will be participating in GSOC
this year?
The Mentoring Organization applications are now being accepted for Google
Summer of Code 2015.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.in/2015/02/mentoring-organization-applications-now.html
Regards,
Saket
On 02/15/15 22:48, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Y'all,
>
> I though I would resurrect a long dead mail chain.
>
> I'm looking for a good replacement for Rhythmbox. I need a pod catcher
> to catch podcasts and download them to my HD where I can then move them
> onto my mp3 player that I take to wor
My raid array won't boot, gives a kernel panic - attempt to kill init
message and goes into endless reboots.
MB is a supermicro 2P with opteron 2376 4-core cpus, centos sw raid,
installed C5.3, updated as possible, currently c5.10. 5 seagate 750GB
drives as raid-10 and hot spare. we set thi
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size
>> in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume
>> will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset
>> raid5 at the tim
Hello,
In EL6 I could well remove /root/anaconda-ks.cfg in %post, but not any more it
seems and I like my installs clean.
Anyone has any idea how to skip creating this file or deleting during install?
I don't want to resort to running scripts upon first boot.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quad
Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit :
What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size
in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume
will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset
raid5 at the time a mount point is created (rai
Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a écrit :
"installer is organized around mount points" is correct, and what gets
mounted on mount points? Volumes, not partitions.
Says who?
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web : ht
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a écrit :
>>
>> md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions
>> has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk?
>
>
> I just spent a few hours experimenting with the CentOS 7 install
Same is true for i386 6.5 and 6.4 minimal. I gave up after seeing the same
thing on 3 ISOs, but it probably follows all the way down to 6.0.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Eckert, Doug
wrote:
> ISO pulled from
>
>
> http://mirror.rackspace.com/CentOS/6.6/isos/i386/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso
ISO pulled from
http://mirror.rackspace.com/CentOS/6.6/isos/i386/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso
# df -h /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/var/ISO/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso
339M 339M 0 100% /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386
#
Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a écrit :
md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has
the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk?
I just spent a few hours experimenting with the CentOS 7 installer in a
VirtualBox guest with four virtual hard disks. I can now
Trying to use "minimal" ISOs
The 64-bit CEL 7.0 and 6.6 look ok so far. but when I try to set up the CEL
6.6 i386, but I get the following
- The initrd could not be found at the specified location:
/var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386/images/pxeboot/initrd.img
It does have the initrd.img file in
Hi James,
Antonio is correct. The default address is used when the destination address
is not on a subnet that is on one of your local interfaces.
Any packet destined for an address on the 192.168.6.0/24 subnet will
automatically be sent with a source
address of 192.168.6.1
Same with any packe
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2015 02:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Are there any tools to help assemble libraries and debuginfo to
>> examine core dumps that happened on another host where the versions
>> don't match? Something like mock but build-version spe
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> We have a host that has multiple IPv4 addresses aliased to eth0. The
> primary address is 216.185.71.x and the alias is 192.168.6.x.
>
> This host connects to devices on both netblocks without problems.
> Only default routing is used an
Hi James,
Simply remove the GATEWAY line from the eth0:192 interface config :D
Then you'll had only one default gateway. And the source IP to all unknown
address
will be the routeable one.
Att.,
Antonio.
- "James B. Byrne" escreveu:
> De: "James B. Byrne"
> Para: centos
CentOS-6.6
We have a host that has multiple IPv4 addresses aliased to eth0. The
primary address is 216.185.71.x and the alias is 192.168.6.x.
This host connects to devices on both netblocks without problems.
Only default routing is used and it looks like this:
#ip route
192.168.6.0/24 dev eth
On 02/17/2015 02:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Are there any tools to help assemble libraries and debuginfo to
> examine core dumps that happened on another host where the versions
> don't match? Something like mock but build-version specific and with
> the debuginfo packages pulled in?
>
I'm
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:29 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, February 17, 2015 15:20, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Are there any tools to help assemble libraries and debuginfo to
>> examine core dumps that happened on another host where the versions
>> don't match? Something like mock but build-v
On Tue, February 17, 2015 15:20, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Are there any tools to help assemble libraries and debuginfo to
> examine core dumps that happened on another host where the versions
> don't match? Something like mock but build-version specific and with
> the debuginfo packages pulled in?
>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:08:52AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> If you have set up an RPM build server then you should have installed
> the rpmbuild and rpmdevtools packages. If you have installed the
> latter then you can use vi (vim/gvim) to automatically create an empty
> spec template file s
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:36:48 +1300
> Jegadeesh Kumar wrote:
>
>> I setup the RPM build server and read some doc to write the spec
>> files. but i did get it clearly. So can you guys please help me
>> to write a new RPM spec.
If you have set up an RPM build server then you should have installed
On Feb 18, 2015 7:43 PM, "Tris Hoar" wrote:
>
> On 18/02/2015 07:17, aditya hilman wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view.
Also
>> already configured the master - slave dns.
>> But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
>> Based o
On 18/02/2015 07:17, aditya hilman wrote:
Hi folks,
I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also
already configured the master - slave dns.
But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip, which i
Am 18.02.2015 um 12:26 schrieb Leon Fauster :
> Am 18.02.2015 um 08:17 schrieb aditya hilman :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also
>> already configured the master - slave dns.
>> But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
>> Based
Am 18.02.2015 um 08:17 schrieb aditya hilman :
> Hi folks,
>
> I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also
> already configured the master - slave dns.
> But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
> Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the pub
i am going to sit the rest of this out and read Michael's "book". ;-)
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6
tc,hago.
g
.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
On 02/18/2015 03:01 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 18/02/2015 09:59, Niki Kovacs a écrit :
>> └─sdd3 8:51 0 76,4G 0 part
>>└─md127 9:127 0 229G 0 raid5 /
>>
>> Any idea what's going on ?
>
> Ooops, just saw it. /dev/sdd3 apparently has the wrong size.
>
> As to why this is so, it'
Hi Niki,
in fact all of the sdX3 partitions are of size 76.4G. Maybe they were created
by the installer as part of a partition scheme and you forget to resize them
when removing other partitions from the scheme? Anyway, it should be fine if
you recreate the partitions with the right size and th
On 02/18/2015 01:23 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 18/02/2015 08:09, Niki Kovacs a écrit :
>>
>> Apparently no spare devices have been created. So why do I only
>> have 226 GB of disk space under CentOS, when I had roughly 650 GB
>> under Slackware?
>
> An idea just crossed my mind. Could it be that
Le 18/02/2015 09:59, Niki Kovacs a écrit :
└─sdd3 8:51 0 76,4G 0 part
└─md127 9:127 0 229G 0 raid5 /
Any idea what's going on ?
Ooops, just saw it. /dev/sdd3 apparently has the wrong size.
As to why this is so, it's a mystery.
I'll investigate further into this. (Since this
Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a écrit :
Hi Niki,
md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has
the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk?
[root@nestor:~] # lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:00 232,9G 0 disk
├─sda1
On 2/17/2015 11:17 PM, aditya hilman wrote:
I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also
already configured the master - slave dns.
But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip, which is
not acc
On 02/18/2015 08:17 PM, aditya hilman wrote:
Hi folks,
I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also
already configured the master - slave dns.
But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip, whi
Hi Niki,
md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has
the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk?
Regards
Michael
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Niki Kovacs"
An: "CentOS mailing list"
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2015 08:09:13
Betreff: [CentOS] CentOS
44 matches
Mail list logo
