Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Pete Travis
On 02/09/2015 11:11 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 16:39, Pete Travis wrote: >> Officially, no, the "Fedora Documentation" bz product isn't there for >> Red Hat guides. If you want to file a bug against a RHEL guide, choose >> your version of RHEL then look for the guide's com

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Pete Travis
On 02/09/2015 11:11 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 16:39, Pete Travis wrote: >> Officially, no, the "Fedora Documentation" bz product isn't there for >> Red Hat guides. If you want to file a bug against a RHEL guide, choose >> your version of RHEL then look for the guide's com

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : create RAID arrays manually using mdadm --create ?

2015-02-09 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 10/02/2015 02:01, Chris Murphy a écrit : It's useful to know what layout you want. The installer will neither create, nor let you use, what it thinks are ill-advised layouts. The main reason I can think of for pre-creating md devices is to use a non-default chunk/strip size. I'd like to be a

Re: [CentOS] Packages installation in CentOs

2015-02-09 Thread Venkateswara Rao Dokku
Really appreciate your help. Will try to install them On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:58 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/9/2015 10:04 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > >> 1. rhpl >> > redhat python libraries have been integrated into other things. > >> 2. mod_perl >> > mod_perl is available in

Re: [CentOS] Packages installation in CentOs

2015-02-09 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/9/2015 10:04 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: 1. rhpl redhat python libraries have been integrated into other things. 2. mod_perl mod_perl is available in epel 3. notification-daemon no idea what this is. 4. vixie-cron cron is installed by default. 5. kudzu obsoleted. 6. re

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On 10 February 2015 at 16:39, Pete Travis wrote: > Officially, no, the "Fedora Documentation" bz product isn't there for > Red Hat guides. If you want to file a bug against a RHEL guide, choose > your version of RHEL then look for the guide's component - these days, > they all start with "doc-",

Re: [CentOS] Packages not available in CentOS 7

2015-02-09 Thread Venkateswara Rao Dokku
Thanks for the reply. I did clean installation of the CentOS 7 and wanted to install the list of packages in the above mail, but couldn't get them installed. Can you please help me in installing the above packages? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:33 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/9/2015 9:57 PM, V

[CentOS] Packages installation in CentOs

2015-02-09 Thread Venkateswara Rao Dokku
Hi, I have a customized CentOS 5.5 kernel. I want it to upgrade it to CentOS 7. The approach I have decided was to take the CentOS 7 and then install the customized packages that are there in the CentOS 5.5. While trying to install the customized packages, I could install most of the packages, bu

Re: [CentOS] Packages not available in CentOS 7

2015-02-09 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/9/2015 9:57 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: I would like to upgrade my customized CentOS 5.5 to CentOS 7. For this I took the latest stable CentOS 7 image and wanted to install the packages that are there in the existing customized version of CentOS 5.5. you can't do that. there's no s

[CentOS] Packages not available in CentOS 7

2015-02-09 Thread Venkateswara Rao Dokku
HI, I would like to upgrade my customized CentOS 5.5 to CentOS 7. For this I took the latest stable CentOS 7 image and wanted to install the packages that are there in the existing customized version of CentOS 5.5. I could install some of the packages, but the following packages I couldn't instal

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Pete Travis
On 02/09/2015 04:25 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Kahlil Hodgson > wrote: >> On 10 February 2015 at 10:15, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >>> Please allow me to make sure I am perceiving this correctly, >>> reports of errors found in RedHat documentation are to be reported

Re: [CentOS] SELinux context for ssh host keys?

2015-02-09 Thread Mark Tinberg
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:27 PM, Robert Nichols > wrote: > > On 02/09/2015 11:14 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> So, I decided to run restorecon -v to >> ... >> restorecon reset /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key_4096 context >> unconfined_u:object_r:sshd_key_t:s0->unconfined_u:object_r:etc_t:s0 >> ... >>

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:10:35PM +, Always Learning wrote: > Keith neither of us know whether or not the Russian man obtained his PDF > copy of the book lawfully. In my book-publishing opinion, the PDF > appears to have originated from the book's publisher, so the original > source must have

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 will not run pre-installation script

2015-02-09 Thread g
On 02/09/2015 05:10 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 02/09/15 14:09, g wrote: >> On 02/09/2015 11:39 AM, Jerome Yanga wrote: >>> Has anyone experienced any difficulties of getting the >>> pre-installation script for CentOS 7 to run? >> >> pre-installation? >> >> hell, i can not get centos 7 to insta

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : create RAID arrays manually using mdadm --create ?

2015-02-09 Thread Chris Murphy
On my first attempt doing this with 2x disk, GPT partition scheme, precreated md devices, and LVM, rebooting, upon entering the installer and choosing a language, I get a crash. Looks like it's this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103452 Chris Murphy __

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : create RAID arrays manually using mdadm --create ?

2015-02-09 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > When installing CentOS 7, is there a way to > > 1. leave the GUI installer and open up a console > 2. create RAID arrays manually using mdadm --create > 3. get back in the GUI installer and use the freshly created /dev/mdX > arrays? > >

[CentOS] CentOS 7 : create RAID arrays manually using mdadm --create ?

2015-02-09 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, When installing CentOS 7, is there a way to 1. leave the GUI installer and open up a console 2. create RAID arrays manually using mdadm --create 3. get back in the GUI installer and use the freshly created /dev/mdX arrays? I tried to do this, but the installer always exits informing me th

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for good CentOS 7 documentation

2015-02-09 Thread Eero Volotinen
and this one: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0133477436/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0133477436&linkCode=as2&tag=pkb13-20&linkId=OOZEPAMTYWRDFX6K -- Eero 2015-02-10 1:21 GMT+02:00 PatrickD Garvey : > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > Le 09/0

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for good CentOS 7 documentation

2015-02-09 Thread Mark LaPierre
On 02/09/15 16:44, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for recommendations for documentation about the > specificities of RHEL/CentOS 7.x. It can be either online or in printed > book format, and I'm fluent in german, french and english. > > I have a good books about 5.x: "RHEL 5 Unleashed"

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 10:15, PatrickD Garvey > wrote: >> Please allow me to make sure I am perceiving this correctly, >> reports of errors found in RedHat documentation are to be reported >> against the Fedora Documentation product type in

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On 10 February 2015 at 10:15, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > Please allow me to make sure I am perceiving this correctly, > reports of errors found in RedHat documentation are to be reported > against the Fedora Documentation product type in the RedHat bugzilla? > and > reports of errors found in Fedora

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for good CentOS 7 documentation

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Le 09/02/2015 23:01, Eero Volotinen a écrit : >> >> How about redhat documentation? > > > Yes, it's OK too. I didn't ask about all the existing documentation out > there. I was just curious about any specific recommendations you can make, > good

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 10:08, Kahlil Hodgson > wrote: >> I think you can simply submit a bug report under fedora documentation. > > Via bugzilla: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20Documentation >

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On 10 February 2015 at 10:08, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > I think you can simply submit a bug report under fedora documentation. Via bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20Documentation ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 will not run pre-installation script

2015-02-09 Thread Mark LaPierre
On 02/09/15 14:09, g wrote: > > > On 02/09/2015 11:39 AM, Jerome Yanga wrote: >> Has anyone experienced any difficulties of getting the >> pre-installation script for CentOS 7 to run? > > pre-installation? > > hell, i can not get centos 7 to install on a bare drive. :-\ > > looks like i am goi

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On 10 February 2015 at 09:53, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > I'd like to know how a member of > the CentOS project submits improvements to something in the RedHat > documentation. Can you provide guidance in that regard? I think you can simply submit a bug report under fedora documentation. Note, the

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: >> > >> Still, there are many knowledgeable people on the list, they may give >> different recommendation, which will create some pool of choices. I asked >> John and Jonathan, I'd like t

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 15:54 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Still, as I stressed in my original suggestion: to get proficient in > anything one has to learn fundamentals, so I would forget about blogs, > web posts, and would begin with a really good book. Unless you are > already an expert in a se

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:28 -0800, Keith Keller wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 11:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> > >> on a site hosted in Russia which appears to be FULL of copyright > >> violations. > On 2015-02-09, Always Learning wrote: > > > > Probably not really a software pirate

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > Still, there are many knowledgeable people on the list, they may give > different recommendation, which will create some pool of choices. I asked > John and Jonathan, I'd like to ask also Les Mikesell and Mr. SilverTip257: > what would yo

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for good CentOS 7 documentation

2015-02-09 Thread Niki Kovacs
Le 09/02/2015 23:01, Eero Volotinen a écrit : How about redhat documentation? Yes, it's OK too. I didn't ask about all the existing documentation out there. I was just curious about any specific recommendations you can make, good books, good online documentation, etc. Niki -- Microlinux -

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for good CentOS 7 documentation

2015-02-09 Thread Eero Volotinen
How about redhat documentation? 9.2.2015 23.45 kirjoitti "Niki Kovacs" : > Hi, > > I'm looking for recommendations for documentation about the specificities > of RHEL/CentOS 7.x. It can be either online or in printed book format, and > I'm fluent in german, french and english. > > I have a good bo

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Mon, February 9, 2015 3:28 pm, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2015-02-09, Always Learning wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 11:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >> >>> On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>> > The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the >>> PDF >>> >

[CentOS] Recommendations for good CentOS 7 documentation

2015-02-09 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, I'm looking for recommendations for documentation about the specificities of RHEL/CentOS 7.x. It can be either online or in printed book format, and I'm fluent in german, french and english. I have a good books about 5.x: "RHEL 5 Unleashed" from Sams, "Foundations of CentOS Linux" and "T

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Mon, February 9, 2015 3:14 pm, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >>> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devot

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Keith Keller
On 2015-02-09, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 11:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: >> > The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >> > shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH.

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: >> >> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. >> Information on other interesting topics too.

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 07:06:11PM +, Always Learning wrote: >> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. >> Information on other in

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 11:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF > > shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. > > Information on other interesting topics t

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Mon, February 9, 2015 1:51 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 10/02/15 04:31, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> UNIX and Linux System Administration Handbook (4th Edition) 2010 by Evi >> Nemeth and Garth Snyder > > Yeah buy this book. Skimping is not acceptable. > +1 Yes, good people have to feed their fami

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Peter Lawler
On 10/02/15 04:31, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > UNIX and Linux System Administration Handbook (4th Edition) 2010 by Evi > Nemeth and Garth Snyder Yeah buy this book. Skimping is not acceptable. I do hope the Niña is found in my lifetime http://nina7.org ___

[CentOS] Gnome-3 - can't drag menu items out

2015-02-09 Thread Les Mikesell
I've mostly been using MATE from epel when I use GUI access on CentOS7 because it works with x2go, but just noticed on a system with Gnome3 that I can't drag items out of the menus to the desktop or top bar for easier access. Is there some way to make the desktop space useful for more than pretty

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Mon, February 9, 2015 1:13 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 07:06:11PM +, Always Learning wrote: >> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. >> Information on other i

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 07:06:11PM +, Always Learning wrote: > The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF > shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. > Information on other interesting topics too. > > Although I have a natural preference

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. Information on other interesting topics too. on a site hosted in Russia which appears to be FULL of copyright

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 will not run pre-installation script

2015-02-09 Thread g
On 02/09/2015 11:39 AM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > Has anyone experienced any difficulties of getting the > pre-installation script for CentOS 7 to run? pre-installation? hell, i can not get centos 7 to install on a bare drive. :-\ looks like i am going to wait a few years for devs to get *all* the

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 11:31 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I guess, this discussion (about security of your system and what affects > it) should be ended by the reference to fundamental book on Unix system > [administration]. One thing I learned: you can not become proficient in > any subject jus

Re: [CentOS] SELinux context for ssh host keys?

2015-02-09 Thread Robert Nichols
On 02/09/2015 11:14 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: So, I decided to run restorecon -v to presumably set the SELinux user correctly for the new keys: But that is not what happened: restorecon -v * restorecon reset /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key_4096 context unconfined_u:object_r:sshd_key_t:s0->unconfined

[CentOS] CentOS 7 will not run pre-installation script

2015-02-09 Thread Jerome Yanga
Has anyone experienced any difficulties of getting the pre-installation script for CentOS 7 to run? Regards, j ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Mon, February 9, 2015 10:55 am, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 2/5/2015 8:20 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 10:50 +1100, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: >> >>> On 6 February 2015 at 10:23, Always Learning >>> wrote: Logically ? 1. to change the permissions on shadow from -r

[CentOS] SELinux context for ssh host keys?

2015-02-09 Thread James B. Byrne
I generated a new host key for one of our systems using: ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096 -f ssh_host_rsa_key_4096 I then ran 'ls -Z on the keys' ll -Z *key* -rw---. root root system_u:object_r:sshd_key_t:s0 ssh_host_dsa_key -rw-r--r--. root root system_u:object_r:sshd_key_t:s0 ssh_host_dsa_ke

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 2/5/2015 8:20 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 10:50 +1100, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: On 6 February 2015 at 10:23, Always Learning wrote: Logically ? 1. to change the permissions on shadow from -rw-x-- or from -- to -rw-r--r-- requires root permissions ? 2. if so,

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread Scott Robbins
For those interested, a ticket has been opened with FESCo. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1412 -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] reboot - is there a timeout on filesystem flush?

2015-02-09 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Charles Polisher wrote: > On Jan 07, 2015 at 01:47:53PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> I see a bunch of entries like: >> ioatdma :00:08.0: Channel halted, chanerr = 2 >> ioatdma :00:08.0: Channel halted, chanerr = 0 >> in the logs and one of these: >> hrt

Re: [CentOS] libguestfs-winsupport

2015-02-09 Thread Steve Clark
On 02/09/2015 09:34 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: On 02/06/2015 07:56 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hello List, Does anyone know why this is not available in CentOS 6.6. I found it in a SL repo but not in CentOS. I opened http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8183 last Friday (Feb 6). You can also use the o

Re: [CentOS] libguestfs-winsupport

2015-02-09 Thread Robert Nichols
On 02/06/2015 07:56 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hello List, Does anyone know why this is not available in CentOS 6.6. I found it in a SL repo but not in CentOS. I opened http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8183 last Friday (Feb 6). You can also use the one in the C6.5-updates vault repository. -- B