On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote:
>> Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install
>> of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than
>> installing Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally
I haven't seen this, but I'm curious if it has something to do with
your configuration. What I would suggest trying is working from a clean
config.
mv ~/.thunderbird ~/.thunderbird.backup
Try it like that. If it starts correctly, then it is your config and
you'll probably have to
On 1/10/2015 9:19 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Yup. It is actually just a way to figure out how to handle this with
easy. But this will be use for a wide spread implementation.
how to handle what? you've never explained what you're trying to do,
except in the most vague terms.
--
john r pierce
El 10/01/2015 a las 11:41 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
D
El 11/01/2015 a las 12:10 a.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 8:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my
work...).
It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's
almost c
On 1/10/2015 8:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my
work...).
It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's
almost certainly not possible to use all of the addresses in such
On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresse
On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my work...).
It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's
almost certainly not possible to use all of the addresses in such a
space, but that's the point. IPv6 is in
On 01/10/2015 07:39 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than installing
Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the time) fail to
start, and the abrt report
El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribió:
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats
1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,
For those who don't know, as of version 21, Fedora has split into 3
streams: workstation, server, and cloud. This addresses many of the
concerns raised in this thread. See https://getfedora.org/ for details. I
gather we'll see the impact of this change with CentOS-8.
Kal
_
I am a newcomer to CentOS and I appreciate the discussion. It would seem to me
- and I am sure I am not the first one to state the obvious - Fedora is
primarily a desktop OS while CentOS is primarily a server OS.
The user needs are very different, the features needed are very, very
different, h
On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install
> of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than
> installing Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the
> time) fail to
> start, and the abrt repo
On 01/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Currently we have a /26 range of IPv4. So we have eth0:1...eth0:59
Interface aliases are deprecated, IIRC. An interface can have multiple
addresses in V4 or V6 managed with the "ip" tool rather than "ifconfig."
We need that same with IPv6 since we h
On Fri, January 9, 2015 17:36, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/9/2015 2:32 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> Enterprise, in the RHEL context, suggests stability or have I
>> misunderstood the USA definition of "Enterprise" ?
>
>
> Enterprise to me implies large business
Enterprise literally means 'undert
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight "Desktop" install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than installing
Thunderbird. Thunderbird will occasionally (10 to 20% of the time) fail to
start, and the abrt report indicates a signal 11 (SIGSEGV). I don't see
On 2015-01-10, Fred Smith
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:12:27PM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> On 2015-01-10, Leon Fauster
>> wrote:
>> > Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith
>> > :
>> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Have you tried differe
I'm not sure how you plan to manage your /48, but this is how I've seen it
done in the past:
1) You are given a single IPv6 address (a /128) for your Internet-facing
router. You are expected to add this address to your untrusted interface.
You are also given the address of a router at your ISP wh
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats
1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,000 individual IPs ?
Or, its 65536 /64 subnets of 18
On 01/10/2015 05:13 AM, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
4. Use pvmove to move all the data from one PV to another.
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/LVM-HOWTO/#sharinglvm1
"The key thing to remember when sharing volumes is that all the LVM
administration must be done on one node only and that all o
El 10/01/2015 a las 03:40 p.m., Gordon Messmer escribió:
On 01/10/2015 10:10 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
But of course I am assuming that like in IPv4 IPADDR_START/END is
implemented.
I don't think so. The START and END bits of ifup-aliases appear to be
v4 specific.
Please give some guidance as
On 01/10/2015 10:10 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
But of course I am assuming that like in IPv4 IPADDR_START/END is
implemented.
I don't think so. The START and END bits of ifup-aliases appear to be
v4 specific.
Please give some guidance as I need this to done already and the hole
/48 must be avai
On 1/10/2015 5:13 AM, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
Looking for some guidance/experience with LVM and pvmove.
I have a LUN/PV being presented from a iscsi SAN. The LUN/PV is presented
to 5 servers as a shared VG they all have LV's they use for data, they are
all connected via iSCSI.
As the SAN I am usi
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 00:13 +1100, Daniel Hoffman wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Looking for some guidance/experience with LVM and pvmove.
>
> I have a LUN/PV being presented from a iscsi SAN. The LUN/PV is presented
> to 5 servers as a shared VG they all have LV's they use for data, they are
> all connect
Hello.
It happens that at the company I'm working decided to start migration of
IPs tech.
So they got a /48 block. I were trying to add it with:
ifcfg-eth0-range1 (0 is already in use with IPv4 range):
IPV6ADDR_START=
IPV6ADDR_END=
CLONENUM_START=0
But of course I am assuming that l
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 01:12:27PM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2015-01-10, Leon Fauster
> wrote:
> > Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith
> > :
> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Have you tried different window manager themes? Some of them have
Hi All.
Looking for some guidance/experience with LVM and pvmove.
I have a LUN/PV being presented from a iscsi SAN. The LUN/PV is presented
to 5 servers as a shared VG they all have LV's they use for data, they are
all connected via iSCSI.
As the SAN I am using is being replaced I need to move o
On 2015-01-10, Leon Fauster
wrote:
> Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith
> :
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you tried different window manager themes? Some of them have
>>> larger grab areas.
>>
>> Which makes me wonder how one modifies a them
Am 10.01.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Fred Smith :
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried different window manager themes? Some of them have larger
>> grab areas.
>
> Which makes me wonder how one modifies a theme... there must be a
> special toolkit for it
29 matches
Mail list logo
