Re: [CentOS] RHEL/CentOS 7 Dual boot with CentOS 5.x/6.x - default boot quick solution/howto

2014-03-22 Thread Cliff Pratt
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 22.03.2014 17:46, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > I have RHEL 7 Beta installed in dual boot with CentOS 6.x. Since RHEL > > 7 > > installed GRUB2, I had problem that RHEL 7 is default boot. > > > > > > My personal solution was to go to /etc/grub.d

Re: [CentOS] RHEL/CentOS 7 Dual boot with CentOS 5.x/6.x - default boot quick solution/howto

2014-03-22 Thread Nux!
On 22.03.2014 17:46, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > I have RHEL 7 Beta installed in dual boot with CentOS 6.x. Since RHEL > 7 > installed GRUB2, I had problem that RHEL 7 is default boot. > > > My personal solution was to go to /etc/grub.d and run command: > mv 10_linux 31_linux > > grub2-mkconfi

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

2014-03-22 Thread Cliff Pratt
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Always Learning > wrote: > > > > > Nothing is easier and simpler than > > > > > > [any-section] > > > parameter1=value1 > > > parameter2=value2 > > On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 18:24 +1300, Cliff Pratt wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Changing isolinux/splash.jpg on custom ISO

2014-03-22 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
On 3/22/14, Digimer wrote: >I want to roll my own ISO and use custom splash.jpg. If I roll the > ISO with the stock splash.jpg, it works. When I save my own 800x600 .jpg > as splash.jpg though, I get a black screen. I made sure the permissions > and ownership was the same. > >Is there a s

Re: [CentOS] Changing isolinux/splash.jpg on custom ISO

2014-03-22 Thread Digimer
On 22/03/14 02:02 PM, Digimer wrote: > Hi all, > > I know I've done this in the past, but I can't seem to get it working > today... > > I want to roll my own ISO and use custom splash.jpg. If I roll the > ISO with the stock splash.jpg, it works. When I save my own 800x600 .jpg > as splash.j

[CentOS] Changing isolinux/splash.jpg on custom ISO

2014-03-22 Thread Digimer
Hi all, I know I've done this in the past, but I can't seem to get it working today... I want to roll my own ISO and use custom splash.jpg. If I roll the ISO with the stock splash.jpg, it works. When I save my own 800x600 .jpg as splash.jpg though, I get a black screen. I made sure the p

[CentOS] RHEL/CentOS 7 Dual boot with CentOS 5.x/6.x - default boot quick solution/howto

2014-03-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
I have RHEL 7 Beta installed in dual boot with CentOS 6.x. Since RHEL 7 installed GRUB2, I had problem that RHEL 7 is default boot. My personal solution was to go to /etc/grub.d and run command: mv 10_linux 31_linux grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg Explanation: - /etc/grub.d is where g

Re: [CentOS] OT: DELL PERC H200

2014-03-22 Thread Eero Volotinen
Yes, its real raid controller, but # slow and crappy card, please avoid it, if possible. 21.3.2014 23.53 kirjoitti : > Does anyone know if a PERC H200 is a real RAID controller? I'm about to > build a box to CentOS 6.5 (it was Windows...) with RAID 6 on Monday, and > this PE R610 has this

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-22 Thread Steve Clark
On 03/21/2014 06:36 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Warren Young wrote: > >> On 3/20/2014 10:33, SilverTip257 wrote: >>> And an interface should only be detected as pXpY if it's a PCI NIC. >>> THOUGH I've seen it already where an onboard NIC in a Lenovo desktop was >>> d

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

2014-03-22 Thread Lamar Owen
On 03/21/2014 08:37 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Possibly because the machines are running programs written by humans that need > to understand what they think they have told the machine to do in order to > determine why it is not doing what they want it to? > At the risk of running further off-to

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

2014-03-22 Thread Always Learning
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > Nothing is easier and simpler than > > > > [any-section] > > parameter1=value1 > > parameter2=value2 On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 18:24 +1300, Cliff Pratt wrote: > That text format is simple. Too simple. If you have multiple similar > su