-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/03/2014 09:34 PM, Alexander wrote:
> I am trying to pipe the output from a process into syslog using the
> logger command. Initially I pipe the output into a separate file,
> but as it happens this filled up the disk when things went wrong.
> S
I am trying to pipe the output from a process into syslog using the logger
command. Initially I pipe the output into a separate file, but as it
happens
this filled up the disk when things went wrong. So I figured I redirect the
output to syslog and let logrotate deal with the roll-over and archive
Hi Kenny,
please follow instructions in given below link;
1.
http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/kb/docDisplay/?spf_p.tpst=kbDocDisplay&spf_p.prp_kbDocDisplay=wsrp-navigationalState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c03871499-1%257CdocLocale%253D%257CcalledBy%253D&javax.portlet.begCa
Incompatible glibc?
On 03/03/2014 10:31 PM, Michel Donais wrote:
> 4gb seg fixup
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Using Firefox 24.3.0 in Centos 5.10 (kernel: 2.6.18-371.3.1.el5xen
This message fill the logs:
4gb seg fixup, process firefox (PID31086), cs:IP73::0805bf49 print K;
message suppressed
Do somebody experienced this problem?
---
Michel Donais
___
CentO
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> What's the right way to assign an IP alias to an ethernet interface
>> that you want to bring up and down manually, not on boot?
>>
>> I tried the old way of making an ifcfg-eth3:0 file and it does work
>> with the ifup, ifdown commands,
On 3/3/2014 4:34 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 04.03.2014 00:24, schrieb Les Mikesell:
>> What's the right way to assign an IP alias to an ethernet interface
>> that you want to bring up and down manually, not on boot?
>>
>> I tried the old way of making an ifcfg-eth3:0 file and it does work
>>
Am 04.03.2014 00:24, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> What's the right way to assign an IP alias to an ethernet interface
> that you want to bring up and down manually, not on boot?
>
> I tried the old way of making an ifcfg-eth3:0 file and it does work
> with the ifup, ifdown commands, but even though I s
What's the right way to assign an IP alias to an ethernet interface
that you want to bring up and down manually, not on boot?
I tried the old way of making an ifcfg-eth3:0 file and it does work
with the ifup, ifdown commands, but even though I specified onboot=no,
it activated at boot-up.
--
On 03/03/2014 05:01 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 03:28 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm having a little bit of a weird issue on my web host. I was just
>> wondering if anyone's seen anything like this before.
>>
>> The problem is that you can't seem to restart apache via the
On 03/03/2014 03:28 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm having a little bit of a weird issue on my web host. I was just
> wondering if anyone's seen anything like this before.
>
> The problem is that you can't seem to restart apache via the stock init
> script that comes with apache:
>
> [root
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm having a little bit of a weird issue on my web host. I was just
> wondering if anyone's seen anything like this before.
>
> The problem is that you can't seem to restart apache via the stock init
> script that comes with apache:
Hey all,
I'm having a little bit of a weird issue on my web host. I was just
wondering if anyone's seen anything like this before.
The problem is that you can't seem to restart apache via the stock init
script that comes with apache:
[root@beta:~] #service httpd restart
Stopping httpd:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Well shoot! Thanks for the link. Definitely explains allot! I'm going to
> update the box with the latest HP SPP and double check the updated driver
> is available.
>
> With this RAID controller and 4x 1TB are there any recommendations on the
>
Well shoot! Thanks for the link. Definitely explains allot! I'm going to
update the box with the latest HP SPP and double check the updated driver
is available.
With this RAID controller and 4x 1TB are there any recommendations on the
best way to install CentOS? Should I skip the controller, c
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/3/2014 11:52 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
>> HP ML350e G8 servers. They use the HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i raid
>> controllers.
>
> those are, I believe, 'fake raid' interfaces, where the actual raid is
> done in the device driver.
>
> you're
On 3/3/2014 11:52 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> HP ML350e G8 servers. They use the HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i raid
> controllers.
those are, I believe, 'fake raid' interfaces, where the actual raid is
done in the device driver.
you're generally better off configuring that sort of interface for JBOD,
That is a software RAID controller, only works if you install HP's
driver first. Or switch to AHCI mode for individual disks.
See this article https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/118133
Thomas
On 03/03/2014 11:57 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Also I have the FBWC module installed to allow R
Also I have the FBWC module installed to allow RAID 5.
--Kenny
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Here is the system.
>
>
> HP ML350e G8 servers. They use the HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i raid
> controllers.
>
> Thanks! --Kenny
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, John R Pi
Here is the system.
HP ML350e G8 servers. They use the HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i raid
controllers.
Thanks! --Kenny
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/3/2014 10:54 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> > OK so what am I doing wrong?? Apparently anaconda is still reading 4
> >
On 3/3/2014 11:28 AM, William Kwan wrote:
> running 6.5 on a HP DL380p with a few logical drive created with the onboard
> RAID
which generation DL380p, there have been 6-8 completely different guts
in that family.
and which onboard raid controller does this one have?
--
john r pierce
Hi all,
running 6.5 on a HP DL380p with a few logical drive created with the onboard
RAID. I see these when the system boot. How can I fix this?
scsi: host 2 channel 0 id 0 lun4194304 has a LUN larger than allowed by the
host adapter
scsi: host 2 channel 0 id 0 lun4194560 has a LUN larger tha
On 3/3/2014 10:54 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> OK so what am I doing wrong?? Apparently anaconda is still reading 4
> independent disk instead of a single 3 TB "disk". How do I get the
> installer to recognize the single RAID disk?
not going to read the whole thread, what sort of raid controller does
- Original Message -
| OK so what am I doing wrong?? Apparently anaconda is still reading 4
| independent disk instead of a single 3 TB "disk". How do I get the
| installer to recognize the single RAID disk?
|
| Thanks --Kenny
Sounds to me like it's a FakeRAID (software RAID). What m
OK so what am I doing wrong?? Apparently anaconda is still reading 4
independent disk instead of a single 3 TB "disk". How do I get the
installer to recognize the single RAID disk?
Thanks --Kenny
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:43 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Kenny Noe
>
> > I can RAID all the disk using the HP Array Config tool.
> > I can load CentOS. The installer sees all 4 disks but the LVM
> recognizes a
> > 3TB volume)
>
> Shouldn't CentOS only see 1 disk (the RAID logical disk made out o
Hi Kenny,
Yes, when you create raid vol over HP array tool. CentOS must get the 1
large hdd/disk. OS doesn't detect what under beneath in this volume and how
many disk they have?
murad
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Kenny Noe
>
> > I can RAID all the disk using the
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Peter Eckel wrote:
> Hi Les,
>
>> Errr, 'unattended jobs' are the main reason for having computers.
>
> I differentiate here between desktop machines and servers ... regarding
> servers you're definitely right, but though I don't have reliable data I'd
> say from
From: Kenny Noe
> I can RAID all the disk using the HP Array Config tool.
> I can load CentOS. The installer sees all 4 disks but the LVM recognizes a
> 3TB volume)
Shouldn't CentOS only see 1 disk (the RAID logical disk made out of your 4
physical disks)?
JD
_
Hi Les,
> Errr, 'unattended jobs' are the main reason for having computers.
I differentiate here between desktop machines and servers ... regarding servers
you're definitely right, but though I don't have reliable data I'd say from
experience that the vast majority of ssh keys are stored on de
Ted, et al,
Thanks for all the input. I'm still struggling with this issue.
Here are the steps I follow:
I can RAID all the disk using the HP Array Config tool.
I can load CentOS. The installer sees all 4 disks but the LVM recognizes a
3TB volume)
CentOS installs fine
I reboot the server after
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Peter Eckel wrote:
>
>> Why not just use authorized_keys with an empty pass phrase?
>
> because every responsible system admin will immediately kill you when you do
> that? :-)
>
> Except in very specific situations, e.g. unattended jobs that copy data or
> execut
Hi Joseph,
> Why not just use authorized_keys with an empty pass phrase?
because every responsible system admin will immediately kill you when you do
that? :-)
Except in very specific situations, e.g. unattended jobs that copy data or
execute commands over ssh connections, it is very unwise t
33 matches
Mail list logo
