On 7/24/2013 7:01 AM, Rock wrote:
> Understood. The Nanobridge M2 may be far more than I need.
> But, it should work as it's advertised to go five miles.
> All I need is a few hundred feet.
note thats 5 miles in open space.
you said the router is in the middle of the house, what all is between
i
On 07/24/2013 10:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> on the router, see if it will accept a fixed IP, rather than one
> assigned by DHCP; if so, you can set it on the laptop. I'd also check
> to see if you need to deal with NetworkManager to do that. I don't
> know - I *loathe* NM, and am majorly a
On 07/24/2013 09:01 AM, Rock wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:03:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> you should be able to get 300 feet of mostly open space with a simple
>> panel antenna
> Understood. The Nanobridge M2 may be far more than I need.
> But, it should work as it's advertised to go fiv
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:04:40 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> In any network subnet, a default gateway is required to talk to any
> other subnet ... this is not a CentOS thing, it is a TCP/IP thing.
I saved your wonderful explanation (so that I may re-read it whenever
I need to make a gateway decisi
Rock wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:03:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> I think my "original" problem was what you guys sensed from
> the start.
>
> It was supremely frustrating having my manually typed eth0
> IP address being wiped out - but - apparently that was what
> Network Manager was suppo
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:03:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> you should be able to get 300 feet of mostly open space with a simple
> panel antenna
Understood. The Nanobridge M2 may be far more than I need.
But, it should work as it's advertised to go five miles.
All I need is a few hundred feet.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:07:30 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> my N600 has great range. mine is a wndr3700v3
Mine is the WNDR3400.
It's in the center of the house and barely makes it to the
front steps.
In contrast, the Nanobridge M2 can go for five miles,
at least according to what I've read.
Thanks a lot...
I think that Gnome 2 is already the best for my desktop, because I like
the Centos OS..therefore I could life with Gnome 2 :-)
Thanks a lot!
cheers
[ Andrew Wyatt - 24.07.2013 08:36:40 ]:
> In addition to building GTK3, they would also have to update glib2, glibc,
> atk, a
In addition to building GTK3, they would also have to update glib2, glibc,
atk, and roughly a dozen or more additional packages to support just
building base GNOME 3.
It would be a monumental change leaving them with a distribution that was
no longer CentOS.
Just adding my $.02 in-case it helps.
On 07/24/2013 12:51 AM, Rock wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 01:09:29 -0400, Darr247 wrote:
>
>> I inferred you wanted to make the laptop talk to the ubiquiti
>> nano through the RJ45 port in order to configure it.
> Well, that is a necessary evil, so, yes, that is the first step,
> to configure it.
On 07/24/2013 06:44 AM, AJH wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a little question:
>
> Exists a way to update the Gnome 2.28.1 out of box at Centos 6.4 to a
> Gnome 3?
>
> And if yes...how does this work?
>
> thanks a lot.
There is no supported way to do this. This would not be easy to
accomplish, but it wo
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Just to give more informations...
Like to test that in my virtual enviroment...and if i am compatible with
Gnome 3...and everything works fine...update my workstation...
cheers ajh
[ Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. - 24.07.2013 07:47:31 ]:
> On 07/24/2013 07:44 AM, AJH wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > ju
On 07/24/2013 07:44 AM, AJH wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a little question:
>
> Exists a way to update the Gnome 2.28.1 out of box at Centos 6.4 to a
> Gnome 3?
>
> And if yes...how does this work?
>
> thanks a lot.
>
> --
>
> thanks + bye ajh
> ___
> CentOS
Hello,
just a little question:
Exists a way to update the Gnome 2.28.1 out of box at Centos 6.4 to a
Gnome 3?
And if yes...how does this work?
thanks a lot.
--
thanks + bye ajh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
Read up on CPU sets
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/cpuset.7.html
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Miraj Mohamed
Sent: 24 July 2013 11:57
To: centos@centos.org
Hi All,
I am using RHEL 6.4 on a Dell Server with 32 cores.
But in the Cpus_allowed_list only 30 cores are available. Why is that?
See the snippet from cat /proc/self/status:
Cpus_allowed: 7fff7fff
Cpus_allowed_list: 0-14,16-30
The allowed list is same for the init process as well (see
From: John Doe
> From: Adrian Sevcenco
>> Hi! Does anyone know where i can find an rrdtool rpm which contains
>> rrdcached? it seems that there is no rrdcached rpm and rrdtool rpms from
>> all known repos (base,epel,rpmforge) dont have rrdcached ...
>
> Google says to check DAG rpms...
To
On Wednesday 03 July 2013 08:03:51 Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> make sure you have rpmdevtools
>
> yum install rpmdevtools
>
> then run
>
> rpmdev-setuptree
>
> to setup the ~/rpmbuild tree structure
>
> Hope this helps
>
> K
>
>
> Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
From: Adrian Sevcenco
> Hi! Does anyone know where i can find an rrdtool rpm which contains
> rrdcached? it seems that there is no rrdcached rpm and rrdtool rpms from
> all known repos (base,epel,rpmforge) dont have rrdcached ...
Google says to check DAG rpms...
JD
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
