On 7/2/2013 8:15 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Ah yes:https://code.google.com/p/arora/downloads/list . The latest
> version is 0.11.0, so again it's by definition something CentOS wouldn't
> support.
if its not in RHEL, it doesnt belong in the CentOS repository, anyways.
packages like these bel
On Tuesday 02 July 2013, Scott Robbins wrote:
> I think the OP means arora, as typed. It's a lightweight, fairly
> simple browser.
Ah yes: https://code.google.com/p/arora/downloads/list . The latest
version is 0.11.0, so again it's by definition something CentOS wouldn't
support.
--
Yves B
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:51:38PM -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 July 2013, Beartooth wrote:
>
> > Are there ways a subtechnoid can run Arora, Dillo, Epiphany,
> > Konqueror, Midori, Kazehakase, Rekonq, Opera, and Pan on this CentOS
> > -- without falling into the bad old pit of
On Tuesday 02 July 2013, Beartooth wrote:
> Are there ways a subtechnoid can run Arora, Dillo, Epiphany,
> Konqueror, Midori, Kazehakase, Rekonq, Opera, and Pan on this CentOS
> -- without falling into the bad old pit of dependency hell?
Wow, I thought I knew many different browsers!
Arora: If
Recently, I put CentOS 6.4 on one of the four PCs I keep behind a
KVM switch. I like it a whole lot in most ways, but Fedora has spoiled
me : I install almost every browser I can, and generally keep half a
dozen or more open, mostly with several tens of tabs open. Iow, I use
browsers
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Tilman Schmidt
wrote:
>
> I only experienced that when a system inadvertently switched between
> RPMforge and EPEL because I hadn't set up the excludes properly and
> the one I didn't want to use updated to a new ClamAV version before
> the other one.
>
> AFAIR RPMf
make sure you have rpmdevtools
yum install rpmdevtools
then run
rpmdev-setuptree
to setup the ~/rpmbuild tree structure
Hope this helps
K
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty Ltd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 02.07.2013 23:34, schrieb John Hinton:
> I very much liked the rpmforge repo for many years. However, clamav
> was one that I wasn't so happy with from them. It seems the
> username would switch back and forth from clam to clamav to clam to
> clamav
The following kernel has been built while waiting for upstream to
release a new kernel that addresses CVE-2013-2224:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/c6kernel/2.6.32-358.11.1.el6.cve20132224/
Please see this upstream bug for details:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979936
=
On CentOS5 I was used to create a simple spec file where at the end I'll
declare files and directories I wan't to package:
--< Snip >--
%files
%dir /opt/myapp
%dir /opt/myapp/bin
%dir /opt/myapp/etc
/opt/myapp/bin/exec01
/opt/myapp/etc/myapp.conf
I'll copy the file in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS a
On 7/2/2013 5:18 PM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 04:02 PM, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
>> Hi,
>> What happened to dag.wieers? There is an update for clamav but the rpm is
>> still not distibuted after 4 weeks or more. :-)
>> What's wrong there?
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>>
> I asked about cla
On 07/02/2013 04:02 PM, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
> Hi,
> What happened to dag.wieers? There is an update for clamav but the rpm is
> still not distibuted after 4 weeks or more. :-)
> What's wrong there?
>
> Adrian
>
>
I asked about clamav on the repoforge list, and apparently there are
s
Hi,
What happened to dag.wieers? There is an update for clamav but the rpm is
still not distibuted after 4 weeks or more. :-)
What's wrong there?
Adrian
--
Adri P. van Bloois
Antonlaan 104 email: adr...@pa0rda.nl
3701 VG Zeist voice: +31-(0
Oops, the dependency repo should read:
http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/5/dependencies/x86_64/
Fat fingered that cut 'n paste ;)
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Scot P. Floess wrote:
>
> Ditto for me - I am using the puppet lab's repo...
>
> What do your repo files look like? I'm using both their dependencie
Ditto for me - I am using the puppet lab's repo...
What do your repo files look like? I'm using both their dependencies repo
as well as their product repo:
http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/5/products/x86_64/
http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/yum.puppetlabs.com/el/5/dependencies/x86_64/
The dependencie
- Original Message -
| Hey,
|
| any puppet user on CentOS 5 using puppet lab's repository...?
| I installed their el5 repository but a puppet install asks for:
| ruby >= 1.8.7
|
| which is only available on CentOS 6...
| Someone using their repo?
| Or do you use the repoforge one...?
|
|
On 7/2/2013 6:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Just so you know, that's not only in the computer industry. Many years ago,
been common practice in the computer industry for a long long time.
The first computer system I learned to program on, and my first full
time job, were on the krufty old IBM
On 07/02/2013 04:14 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> On 01.07.2013 23:13, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> Can somebody contact "Spot" and ask him if Steam for Linux can be
>>> compiled on CentOS 6.x? http://spot.fedorapeople.org/steam/
>>>
>>> or will someone try it from src rpm's (same folder)?
>>>
>
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 03:00 -0700, John Doe wrote:
> Hey,
>
> any puppet user on CentOS 5 using puppet lab's repository...?
> I installed their el5 repository but a puppet install asks for:
> ruby >= 1.8.7
>
> which is only available on CentOS 6...
> Someone using their repo?
> Or do you use the
Nux! wrote:
> On 01.07.2013 23:13, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Can somebody contact "Spot" and ask him if Steam for Linux can be
>> compiled on CentOS 6.x? http://spot.fedorapeople.org/steam/
>>
>> or will someone try it from src rpm's (same folder)?
>>
>> or is someone willing to take over build
James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Mon, July 1, 2013 14:03, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 7/1/2013 10:57 AM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>>> DRM'ed server hardware. Pure evil.
>>
>> why is that evil? why should you pay for features you're not using?
>>
>
> Actually, firmware control of system features has been par
On Monday 01 July 2013 20:21:41 natxo asenjo wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 10:29 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
> > You need a license from HP to access your hard disks... Stupid, but
> > real...
>
> wow, just, wow. If this is true I will advise against buying any HP
> server kit whenever we need to buy n
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:58:34 +0100
Nux! wrote:
> On 01.07.2013 23:13, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > Can somebody contact "Spot" and ask him if Steam for Linux can be
> > compiled on CentOS 6.x? http://spot.fedorapeople.org/steam/
> >
> > or will someone try it from src rpm's (same folder)?
> >
On 07/01/2013 05:13 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Can somebody contact "Spot" and ask him if Steam for Linux can be
> compiled on CentOS 6.x? http://spot.fedorapeople.org/steam/
>
> or will someone try it from src rpm's (same folder)?
>
> or is someone willing to take over building the rpm the
On 01.07.2013 23:13, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Can somebody contact "Spot" and ask him if Steam for Linux can be
> compiled on CentOS 6.x? http://spot.fedorapeople.org/steam/
>
> or will someone try it from src rpm's (same folder)?
>
> or is someone willing to take over building the rpm the ol
On Mon, July 1, 2013 14:03, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/1/2013 10:57 AM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>> DRM'ed server hardware. Pure evil.
>
> why is that evil? why should you pay for features you're not using?
>
Actually, firmware control of system features has been part of HPQ's
business practice fo
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
From: John R Pierce
> On 7/1/2013 10:57 AM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>> DRM'ed server hardware. Pure evil.
>
> why is that evil? why should you pay for features you're not using?
Maybe we are in the end paying the "old full price" for the new limited
features...
And when we want all the nice/ma
Hey,
any puppet user on CentOS 5 using puppet lab's repository...?
I installed their el5 repository but a puppet install asks for:
ruby >= 1.8.7
which is only available on CentOS 6...
Someone using their repo?
Or do you use the repoforge one...?
Thx,
JD
___
Hi,
I hope someone can help me, I cannot seem to get a system's ethernet
interface to correctly work in promiscuous mode...
I have a Centos 6.4 system with 2 bnx2 interfaces on it.
I have set up eth1 in promiscuous mode and am sending traffic to it
using the port mirroring configuration on a N
30 matches
Mail list logo
