Re: [CentOS] Newer SANE packages for 5.9 ??

2013-01-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:33 PM, fred smith wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 04:24:33PM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> - Edit /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules and change Mode from 0644 to 0666 >> >> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device", \ >> PROGRAM="/bin/sh -c 'K=%k; K=$${K#usbdev}; print

Re: [CentOS] Newer SANE packages for 5.9 ??

2013-01-20 Thread fred smith
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 04:24:33PM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Frank Cox > wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:06:08 -0500 > > fred smith wrote: > > > >> I've been messing around with building sane from source, but have not > >> been fully successful, yet, so thought

Re: [CentOS] Sluggish server with big array [SOLVED]

2013-01-20 Thread Guy Boisvert
Le 2013-01-15 10:35, Paul Heinlein a écrit : > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Guy Boisvert wrote: > >> I have a couple of samba shares from the 11 TB array (all of them >> are on the 11TB array). The strange behavior is that if i "ls -al >> /home/data", i have to wait 7-8 seconds to see the output. If

Re: [CentOS] load balancer recommendations

2013-01-20 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 19/1/2013 10:35 μμ, Boris Epstein wrote: > Any advice on what may help us would be greatly appreciated. Some reading that might help in making up your mind: http://www.chinanetcloud.com/blog/load-balancing-haproxy-vs-nginx http://www.techopsguys.com/tag/netscaler/ http://blog.exceliance.fr/20

Re: [CentOS] load balancer recommendations

2013-01-20 Thread Nux!
On 19.01.2013 20:35, Boris Epstein wrote: > Any advice on what may help us would be greatly appreciated. Haproxy. Session-aware, SSL-aware, extremely light and powerful. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] load balancer recommendations

2013-01-20 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 19/1/2013 10:35 μμ, Boris Epstein wrote: > Any advice on what may help us would be greatly appreciated. Have you checked HAProxy (http://haproxy.1wt.eu)? Nick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] load balancer recommendations

2013-01-20 Thread Johnny Tan
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Brian Mathis < brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com> wrote: > Add another vote for HAproxy. It's excellent at what it does, as long > as it meets your requirements. It's main purpose is to load balance > HTTP traffic, and it can maintain session using a cookie. I