On Tuesday, 17. April 2012. 17.40.32 Frank Cox wrote:
> My plan is to have everything that doesn't change (much) on the SSD, such
> as /boot, /lib, /bin and so on. I want to put /tmp and /var and /home on
> the regular hard drive.
>
> Now that I'm at the stage of actually setting this up I have d
On 04/17/2012 11:11 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
> The error message is telling you that you made a typo.
>>> http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html says
>>> "Licence:" is a valid tag. Isnt'it?
> "License:" were a valid tag.
Oh my god, a typo...
t...
Thank you Markus.
--
R
On Apr 17, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> Let me also add that constant spanning tree convergence can cause this
>> too. Make sure your choice of protocol and priority suit your topology
>> and equipment.
>
> Gives me an idea! The switch
On 04/17/2012 06:40 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> I mentioned here the other day that I was planning to set up a Centos 6 system
> using a SSD for the system drive and a regular hard drive for a data drive.
>
> My plan is to have everything that doesn't change (much) on the SSD, such
> as /boot, /lib, /bi
Well, /boot by default, is always a primary partition.
CentOS (and RedHat) like to create a logical volume manager (LVM) on a
separate primary partition, and typically inside the LVM one can create
and modify the rest of the various partitions.
You do have the flexibility to create TWO LVM's.
I mentioned here the other day that I was planning to set up a Centos 6 system
using a SSD for the system drive and a regular hard drive for a data drive.
My plan is to have everything that doesn't change (much) on the SSD, such
as /boot, /lib, /bin and so on. I want to put /tmp and /var and /hom
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Also shot in the dark from me.
> There maybe some IP conflict in the network.
Yes, I thought of that one too. I am in control of all IP's on the
network, so I am sure that nothing changed around the time that the
trouble started. I checked for that a
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Ross Walker wrote:
> Let me also add that constant spanning tree convergence can cause this
> too. Make sure your choice of protocol and priority suit your topology
> and equipment.
Gives me an idea! The switch is under control of different people. I did
have a new VLAN cr
Also shot in the dark from me.
There maybe some IP conflict in the network.
Sent from my iPhone
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Ross Walker wrote:
> Take a look at the NIC and switch port flow control status during an outage,
> they may be paused due to switch load.
> Is there anything else on the network switches that might flood them every
> half hour for a two minute duration?
Unfortunately not.
On Apr 17, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> Just a shot in the dark here.
>
> Take a look at the NIC and switch port flow control status during an outage,
> they may be paused due to switch load.
>
> Is there anything else on the network switches that might flood them every
> half hour
On Apr 17, 2012, at 5:40 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> I have four NFS servers running on Dell hardware (PE2900) under CentOS
> 5.7, x86_64. The number of NFS clients is about 170.
>
> A few days ago, one of the four, with no apparent changes, stopped
> responding to NFS requests for two minutes
I have four NFS servers running on Dell hardware (PE2900) under CentOS
5.7, x86_64. The number of NFS clients is about 170.
A few days ago, one of the four, with no apparent changes, stopped
responding to NFS requests for two minutes every half an hour (approx).
Let's call this "the hang". It h
On 17.4.2012 21:40, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> When trying to rpmbuild
> http://robert.cheramy.net/ipfm/browser/trunk/redhat/ipfm.spec, I do this:
>
>[mihamina@centos6-01 redhat]$ rpmbuild -ba ipfm.spec
>error: line 5: Unknown tag: Licence: GPL
The error message is telling you tha
Hi all,
When trying to rpmbuild
http://robert.cheramy.net/ipfm/browser/trunk/redhat/ipfm.spec, I do this:
[mihamina@centos6-01 redhat]$ rpmbuild -ba ipfm.spec
error: line 5: Unknown tag: Licence: GPL
And I get the error above.
[mihamina@centos6-01 redhat]$ head -n 5 ipfm.spec
Summa
Dear Markus Falb,
This is to update that poller.php can now create rrd files. It was not
creating due to the cause that community was mismatch. there was
community configured in "/etc/smnp/snmpd.conf" community is to specified
in the "settings" on main page after we have login to the cacti th
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Max Pyziur
Sent: 17 April 2012 16:03
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53 on CentOS5
> Much thanks for all of the replies.
>
> My sense, then, from all of the replies
> On 04/17/2012 12:18 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP
>> 5.2
>> minimum.
>>
>> Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7.
>>
>>
>> What are the issues/concerns in upgrading from PHP 5.1 (the current PHP
>> rpms) to
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Benjamin Hackl wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:07:36 +0600
> Arif Hossain wrote:
>
>> I think i've failed to describe what i'm trying to do. So i'm
>> describing it again.
>>
>> The client will send request to the BOX2's IP. BOX1's IP used only for
>> management p
On 04/17/2012 12:18 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP 5.2
> minimum.
>
> Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7.
>
>
> What are the issues/concerns in upgrading from PHP 5.1 (the current PHP
> rpms) to PHP53?
>
We hav
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:07:36 +0600
Arif Hossain wrote:
> I think i've failed to describe what i'm trying to do. So i'm
> describing it again.
>
> The client will send request to the BOX2's IP. BOX1's IP used only for
> management purposes.
You're looking for a bridging firewall, it probably sho
On 04/17/2012 06:27 AM, Steph Gosling wrote:
> (bad form replying to myself)
>
> I've found the issue upstream:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729586
>
> Last comment there saying there are patches in an as yet unreleased
> kernel-2.6.32-229.el6. I've had a quick look at the SRPMS
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:35:07 +0100
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> hi,
>
> Please dont toppost, trim your reply and keep context in your replies.
Apologies (mail sent before coffee this morning!)
> On 04/17/2012 08:04 AM, Steph Gosling wrote:
> > them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f',
hi,
Please dont toppost, trim your reply and keep context in your replies.
On 04/17/2012 08:04 AM, Steph Gosling wrote:
> them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f', not 'b' and so
> on.
And labels dont help here ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter
(bad form replying to myself)
I've found the issue upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729586
Last comment there saying there are patches in an as yet unreleased
kernel-2.6.32-229.el6. I've had a quick look at the SRPMS upstream and
don't see that one yet so a related question:
On 04/17/2012 12:17 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> source packages are stored in the vault.centos.org repo.
Did not find, but I just discovered (by jus reading further with
attention) that the source has a spec file:
http://robert.cheramy.net/ipfm/browser/trunk?order=name
Thank you very much!
--
RM
I think i've failed to describe what i'm trying to do. So i'm describing it
again.
The client will send request to the BOX2's IP. BOX1's IP used only for
management purposes. All request
destined to BOX'2 IP will go through BOX 1. BOX1's IP will not be available
to clients. another thing is the se
On 04/17/2012 04:17 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 04/17/2012 09:14 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have installed the recommended installs from here:
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM
>>
>> I want to build a "ipfm" RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose.
>> I cant imm
On 04/17/2012 09:14 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have installed the recommended installs from here:
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM
>>
>> I want to build a "ipfm" RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose.
>> I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software,
2012/4/17 Mihamina Rakotomandimby :
> Hi all,
>
> I have installed the recommended installs from here:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM
>
> I want to build a "ipfm" RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose.
> I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we're on the
> move...
On 04/17/2012 09:14 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have installed the recommended installs from here:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM
>
> I want to build a "ipfm" RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose.
> I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we'
Hi all,
I have installed the recommended installs from here:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM
I want to build a "ipfm" RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose.
I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we're on the
move...
So:
$ wget
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/st
On 04/16/2012 11:49 PM, dnk wrote:
> I myself am running:
>
>
> httpd-2.2.22
> php-5.2.17
> mysql-server-5.1.58
I want to point out here that 5.2.17 is the last release of the 5.2
branch and that it is NOT being updated for security by php.net any
more. There are already unpatched vulnerabilities
Hi Karanbir,
That's the thing, older (non pv-grub aware kernels) did used to map
them with the old scsi device names, but here now it's still mapping
them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f', not 'b' and so
on.
Upstream seem to have a handful of bugs related to dracut and initramfs
34 matches
Mail list logo
