On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.12.2011 00:53, schrieb Cliff Pratt:
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 08.12.2011 22:04, schrieb Les Mikesell:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
> Am
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/08/2011 08:31 PM, Alan McKay piše:
[...]
>> wondering if anyone has some recommended reading that is concise and to the
>> point, and will give me a good intro.
>
> I read this when got interested:
> http://www.funtoo.org/wiki
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/08/11 11:26 AM, Mikael Fridh wrote:
>> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
>> replication between them.
>
> what zfs replication is that? last I heard, the only supported
> replication was physical block replicat
Am 09.12.2011 00:53, schrieb Cliff Pratt:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 08.12.2011 22:04, schrieb Les Mikesell:
>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Reindl Harald
>>> wrote:
Am 08.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Cliff Pratt:
> It's a good idea NOT to p
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Cliff Pratt:
>> It's a good idea NOT to put stuff in /etc/crontab and NOT to change
>> the existing members of /etc/cron.d. It is a good idea NOT to change
>> root's crontab. Any of these may get overwritten by
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.12.2011 22:04, schrieb Les Mikesell:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 08.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Cliff Pratt:
It's a good idea NOT to put stuff in /etc/crontab and NOT to change
the existi
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> fedora did not overwrite any crontab from FC5 to F15 now because
>>> rpm-packages mark such configurations so the new versions get installed
>>> as .rpmnew
>>
>> Which means the changes those versions would like to have made won't
>> take
Am 08.12.2011 22:04, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 08.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Cliff Pratt:
>>> It's a good idea NOT to put stuff in /etc/crontab and NOT to change
>>> the existing members of /etc/cron.d. It is a good idea NOT to change
>>> r
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Cliff Pratt:
>> It's a good idea NOT to put stuff in /etc/crontab and NOT to change
>> the existing members of /etc/cron.d. It is a good idea NOT to change
>> root's crontab. Any of these may get overwritten by m
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:27 PM, wrote:
>
>
I've always been able to ssh -X to a server, and then run firefox
-no-remote, so that it runs ON THAT SERVER, NOT on my workstation. All
of a sudden, I can't. Is that clearer? AFAIK, my manager hasn't put any
new security in place
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, wrote:
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I've always been able to ssh -X to a server, and then run firefox
>>> -no-remote, so that it runs ON THAT SERVER, NOT on my workstation. All
>>> of a sudden, I can't. Is that clearer? AFAIK, my manage
Am 08.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Cliff Pratt:
> It's a good idea NOT to put stuff in /etc/crontab and NOT to change
> the existing members of /etc/cron.d. It is a good idea NOT to change
> root's crontab. Any of these may get overwritten by maintenance.
/etc/crontab will NEVER get overwritten
to mak
Vreme: 12/08/2011 08:31 PM, Alan McKay piše:
>> My non-tape solution of choice is definitely rsync => box with ZFS,
>> snapshot however often you'd like. => forever incrementals.
>>
>> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
>> replication between them.
>>
>>
>
> Not sure whet
It's a good idea NOT to put stuff in /etc/crontab and NOT to change
the existing members of /etc/cron.d. It is a good idea NOT to change
root's crontab. Any of these may get overwritten by maintenance.
We generally put cron stuff in a locally named and created member in
/etc/cron.d.
Cheers,
Clif
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
>> You can put a crontab file in there. Just don't alter any of the
>> others. Crond automatically runs everything in /etc/cron.d, in
>> /etc/crontab, and in user crontabs.
>>
>
> That's wha
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>> I've always been able to ssh -X to a server, and then run firefox
>> -no-remote, so that it runs ON THAT SERVER, NOT on my workstation. All of
>> a sudden, I can't. Is that clearer? AFAIK, my manager hasn't put any new
>> sec
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, December 7, 2011 17:06, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
firefox -no-remote &
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, this is aggravating: I went to test it, and all our
>>> servers just got the current update last Friday, to eith
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Wed, December 7, 2011 17:06, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> firefox -no-remote &
>>
>>
>> Now, this is aggravating: I went to test it, and all our
>> servers just got the current update last Friday, to either 5.7
>> or 6.x, and on *both* 5.7
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> My non-tape solution of choice is definitely rsync => box with ZFS,
>> snapshot however often you'd like. => forever incrementals.
>>
>> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
>> replication between them.
>>
>>
>
> Not sure
On 12/08/11 11:26 AM, Mikael Fridh wrote:
> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
> replication between them.
what zfs replication is that? last I heard, the only supported
replication was physical block replication of the underlying device(s)
(avs in solaris cluster, drbd
O
>
> The web server is probably only bound to the localhost
> interface as a security measure.
>
> You could launch a remote firefox as mroth suggested, but
> I would use ssh port forwarding instead:
>
> ssh "your_server" -L8080:localhost:80
>
> Then you can open a browser with the url:
> http://
> My non-tape solution of choice is definitely rsync => box with ZFS,
> snapshot however often you'd like. => forever incrementals.
>
> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
> replication between them.
>
>
Not sure whether ZFS now makes this OT - if so, sorry for not putting
On Wed, December 7, 2011 17:10, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/07/11 1:58 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> ssh -X yourserver
>> firefox -no-remote&
>> *Then* http://127.0.0.1/horde,
>> orhttp://localhost/horde, whatever.
>
> if that doesn't work, `yum install xauth`, then log out
> and log in again
>
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
> and here is what I found :
> - amanda
> - bacula
> - BackupPC
> - FreeNAS
>
> Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
> Sto
On Wed, December 7, 2011 17:06, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> firefox -no-remote &
>
>
> Now, this is aggravating: I went to test it, and all our
> servers just got
> the current update last Friday, to either 5.7 or 6.x, and
> on *both* 5.7
> and 6, when I try to run fir
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
>
> I use backuppc, but find that in order to restore one has to be or know the
> admin user password.
> There appears to be no way to open this up to users to directly see and
> restore from the file tree that it manages.
You can delegate
> I use backuppc, but find that in order to restore one has to be or know
> the admin user password.
> There appears to be no way to open this up to users to directly see and
> restore from the file tree that it manages.
>
>
Huh? No. Users can do their own restores from the web interface with
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
and here is what I found :
- amanda
- bacula
- BackupPC
- FreeNAS
You missed rsync.
Rsync is another one-off approach where you have to roll
Anyone have any experience with this, which just came to my attention
http://www.arkeia.com/en/solutions/open-source-solutions
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentO
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>
I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for
backups,
and here is what I found :
- amanda
- bacula
- BackupPC
- FreeNAS
>>>
>>> You missed rsync.
>>
>> Rsync is another one-off approach where you hav
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
>>
>>> I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for
>>> backups,
>>> and here is what I found :
>>> - amanda
>>> - bacula
>>> - BackupPC
>>> - FreeNAS
>>
>> You missed rsync.
>
> Rsync is another one-off approach w
Thanks for all, but I have change apache config to alowed my IP.
Quoting Mitch Patenaude :
> On 12/7/11 1:46 PM, "Weplica" wrote:
>> [...]
>> And I do that:
>> If Apache is running, you must now configure this installation of
>> Horde by visiting:
>> http://127.0.0.1/horde/
>> and then naviga
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
>
>> I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
>> and here is what I found :
>> - amanda
>> - bacula
>> - BackupPC
>> - FreeNAS
>
> You missed rsync.
Rsync is another one-off approach where you have to roll your own
command
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I am against it because it adds clutter that I don't want ... also, if I
> ever need to build anything on a machine with multi-lib it is very hard
> to control what the auto config/compile tools do.
>
> Then there are sometimes issues with the way RH does
Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
> and here is what I found :
> - amanda
> - bacula
> - BackupPC
> - FreeNAS
You missed rsync.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
>
> I'm pretty sure I saw a note on the networker list that 7.6 SP3 works
> with update 27, update 29, and java 7.
>
>
Well we don't have a support contract - is it a free upgrade?
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Foo
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Philippe Naudin
wrote:
>>
>> If you want mostly-online backups with perhaps an occasional tar
>> archive, it will be hard to beat backuppc because of it's storage
>> pooling and ability to run over rsync or smb with no remote agents.
>> For all-tape, I'd probably go
Le jeu 08 déc 2011 09:43:21 CET, Les Mikesell a écrit:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> >
> > Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
> > StorageTek SL24 tape unit backing it all up. OSes are a combination of
> > RHEL and CentOS. The software
On Dec 8, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
>>
>> Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
>> StorageTek SL24 tape unit backing it all up. OSes are a combination of
>> RHEL and CentOS. The software we are us
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
> StorageTek SL24 tape unit backing it all up. OSes are a combination of
> RHEL and CentOS. The software we are using is EMC
>
> NetWorker Management Console version 3.
> NetWorker Management Console version 3.5.1.Build.269
> based on NetWorker version 7.5.1.Build.269
>
> The pickle we are in right now is that this software is Java based, and
> stops working at a very specific release of JRE (1.6.26 or something like
> that). We still have some machine
Hey folks,
I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
and here is what I found :
- amanda
- bacula
- BackupPC
- FreeNAS
Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
StorageTek SL24 tape unit backing it all up. OSes are a combination of
RH
Coming into this late
Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 01:38:04PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 12/08/2011 08:11 AM, Jeff Gordon wrote:
>> > Hi, Folks --
>> >
>> > I'm setting up an Acer Aspire 5250 as a Christmas gift, CentOS 6
>> > netinstall insists on trying to configure
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 01:38:04PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 08:11 AM, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> > Hi, Folks --
> >
> > I'm setting up an Acer Aspire 5250 as a Christmas gift, CentOS 6 netinstall
> > insists on trying to configure wlan0 but I'm using a wired DSL connection,
> > conse
On 12/08/2011 08:11 AM, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> Hi, Folks --
>
> I'm setting up an Acer Aspire 5250 as a Christmas gift, CentOS 6 netinstall
> insists on trying to configure wlan0 but I'm using a wired DSL connection,
> consequently netinstall fails and only offers the option to Retry.
how do you kn
On 12/08/2011 09:28 AM, Bert Koerperich wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> then sorry for this :)
> I have to admit that I up to now only installed other linux-distribs and
> there has been always a way to open a console via alt-f1, or f2 etc pp.
you can do that on CentOS as well! its on VC#2, but only once sta
Vreme: 12/08/2011 10:38 AM, Jeff Gordon piše:
> Hi, John --
>
> Thanks. :-) Looks like it'd be Fn + F3 on this one, but I suspect they set
> it up to work that way with Windows. There's no light to be seen anywhere,
> and pressing it made no difference to CentoOS netinstall.
>
Netinstall will no
Am 08.12.2011 09:30, schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
>> You can put a crontab file in there. Just don't alter any of the
>> others. Crond automatically runs everything in /etc/cron.d, in
>> /etc/crontab, and in user crontabs.
>>
> That's what I though
Vreme: 12/08/2011 10:13 AM, Jeff Gordon piše:
> Hi, Bert --
>
> Thanks. :-) Doesn't seem to be an opportunity or way to open a console
> before this problem comes up, with netinstall. I just scanned to see if
> there might be a kernel parameter for it; doesn't seem to be.
>
> -- Jeff --
>
Jeff
I will be out of the office starting 08/12/2011 and will not return until
14/12/2011.
If you require urgent assistance please contact 01603 630684.
http://www.pacificgroup.co.uk";>http://www.pacificgroup.co.uk
Tel: 01603 630684
Fax: 01603 617930
This email is subject to our email disclaimer
P
>From man 8 cron
Cron searches /var/spool/cron for crontab files which are
named
after accounts ... Cron also
searches for /etc/crontab and the files in the directory, which
are
in a different format (see crontab(5) ).
So cron itself knows about /etc/cron.d and
Hi, John --
Thanks. :-) Looks like it'd be Fn + F3 on this one, but I suspect they set
it up to work that way with Windows. There's no light to be seen anywhere,
and pressing it made no difference to CentoOS netinstall.
-- Jeff --
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:58:08AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
Hi Jeff,
You can use Alt + F3 or Alt + F4 once you're inside the installer to open a
console.
If you disable the wlan0 interface before the network part of the installer you
should be ok.
Regards,
Tom
On 08 Dec 2011, at 10:13, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> Hi, Bert --
>
> Thanks. :-) Doesn't seem t
On 12/08/2011 10:13 AM, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> Hi, Bert --
>
> Thanks. :-) Doesn't seem to be an opportunity or way to open a console
> before this problem comes up, with netinstall. I just scanned to see if
> there might be a kernel parameter for it; doesn't seem to be.
>
> -- Jeff --
>
> On Thu
Hi, Bert --
Thanks. :-) Doesn't seem to be an opportunity or way to open a console
before this problem comes up, with netinstall. I just scanned to see if
there might be a kernel parameter for it; doesn't seem to be.
-- Jeff --
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:53:42AM +0100, Bert Koerperich wrote:
On 12/08/11 12:52 AM, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> Thanks. :-) I removed two screws that seemed to be holding a cover in place
> over the HD-and-memory compartment, but the cover remained pretty tightly in
> place anyway. Dunno what I'm missing -- but if there's a switch in this
> laptop
> I'd figure it
On 12/08/2011 09:34 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 09:11 AM, Jeff Gordon wrote:
>> Hi, Folks --
>>
>> I'm setting up an Acer Aspire 5250 as a Christmas gift, CentOS 6 netinstall
>> insists on trying to configure wlan0 but I'm using a wired DSL connection,
>> consequently netinstall f
Hi, Fabien --
Thanks. :-) I removed two screws that seemed to be holding a cover in place
over the HD-and-memory compartment, but the cover remained pretty tightly in
place anyway. Dunno what I'm missing -- but if there's a switch in this laptop
I'd figure it must be in there. (?) Now what...
On 12/08/2011 09:11 AM, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> Hi, Folks --
>
> I'm setting up an Acer Aspire 5250 as a Christmas gift, CentOS 6 netinstall
> insists on trying to configure wlan0 but I'm using a wired DSL connection,
> consequently netinstall fails and only offers the option to Retry.
>
> How can I g
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> You can put a crontab file in there. Just don't alter any of the
> others. Crond automatically runs everything in /etc/cron.d, in
> /etc/crontab, and in user crontabs.
>
That's what I thought, but /etc/crontab only mention this:
# run-parts
01
You can put a crontab file in there. Just don't alter any of the
others. Crond automatically runs everything in /etc/cron.d, in
/etc/crontab, and in user crontabs.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Who takes care of cronjob in /etc/cron.d ?
> Should
Hi, Folks --
I'm setting up an Acer Aspire 5250 as a Christmas gift, CentOS 6 netinstall
insists on trying to configure wlan0 but I'm using a wired DSL connection,
consequently netinstall fails and only offers the option to Retry.
How can I get it to bypass the wlan0 idea and go straight to eth0.
62 matches
Mail list logo
