On 10/8/11, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Gotta say, centos has been tough to install and get working.
>
> The anaconda installer makes large drive setups horridly tedious
> (especially if reinstalling a lot).
I usually try to speed reinstall up by using small / and not
reformating /home. Not sure if it w
Was working on a project tonight to document CVE fixes applied to servers, and
noted that RedHat has completely jacked up their website.
In the past, I've usually just used their website for links to their CVE list,
as well as links to their Errata to look up specifics for CentOS machines.
It s
here is just a small sample of the errors in the messages log after
initial boot...
I think there is a bug with the video, something to do with grub
according to peeps on the net.
I want to get rid of abrtd but the computer will never start again if I
do..which does not make sense.
errors w
TE DUKES wrote
--
Dd!!
I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I initally installed CentOS
6.0 as a desktop and added from there. After that, I uninstalled the
'fluff'.
-
yea, that is the way I am going to have to go. However, I have done
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hoffman
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 9:14 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 6 is a bear
>
> Gotta say, centos has been tough to install and get working
Gotta say, centos has been tough to install and get working.
The anaconda installer makes large drive setups horridly tedious
(especially if reinstalling a lot).
Package selection seems a bit off...
I did a virtualization package, no custom..did not install qemu,
libvirt, and all attempts to d
James B. Byrne wrote:
> $ ll /sysconfig/networking/profiles/*
> total 24
> -rw-r--r--. 2 root root 158 Oct 7 15:19 hosts
> -rw-r--r--. 2 root root 116 Oct 7 15:19 ifcfg-br0
> -rw-r--r--. 2 root root 238 Oct 7 15:24 ifcfg-eth0
> -rw-r--r--. 2 root root 117 Oct 7 15:19 ifcfg-eth1
> -rw-r--r--. 2
On Friday 07 October 2011 06:25, the following was written:
> In the named.conf, located on main.example.com, I am adding my entire 16
> IP block of addresses along with my localhost
> options {
> allow-recursion { localhost; xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx /29;};
> allow-query { localhost; xxx.xxx
CentOS-5
$ ll /etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/*
total 0
$ ll /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices
total 0
CentOS-6
$ ll /sysconfig/networking/profiles
total 4
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Oct 7 15:19 default
$ ll /sysconfig/networking/profiles/*
total 24
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 158 Oct 7 15:19 h
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
2011/10/7 Jorge Fábregas :
> On 10/07/2011 05:42 AM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
>> How about chrooted sftp in centos 5.* ?
>> If I cannot - do I have to use centos 6.* ?
>
> The stock SSH package in the CentOS 5 series doesn't have the chroot
> functionality. The one in CentOS 6 does.
>
> HTH,
>
Team CentOS,
Just writing to thank you a lot for the CentOS 6.1 packages made
available on the 26th of September.
I haven't gone through what updates exactly you guys released in the cr
repository but I am well impressed with the improvements.
Great timing as my RHEL self-support contract was du
--On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 7:32 AM -0500 Jim Perrin
wrote:
> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/
> Migration_Planning_Guide/index.html
>
> 4.2 Service Initialization ->
>
> "In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, *init* from the sysvinit package has been
> rep
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:19:20AM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> I recently stress tested one of our LDAP servers; it handled 100,000
> simultaneous collections and performed over 24,000 group "memberid"
> searches per second.
Correction; we had 100,000 simultaneous clients; 55,000 bound simultan
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 07:16:45PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 19:10 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > LDAP is slow. nscd, sssd, ldapcachemgr et al are all klduges to work
> > around that fact.
> OpenLDAP is highly optimized and very fast and can search a large DSA
> much qui
On 10/07/2011 05:42 AM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
> How about chrooted sftp in centos 5.* ?
> If I cannot - do I have to use centos 6.* ?
The stock SSH package in the CentOS 5 series doesn't have the chroot
functionality. The one in CentOS 6 does.
HTH,
Jorge
___
Going to test tomorrow after install, but this is what I am thinking may
work
in my example.com, located on main.example.com, /named/db.example.com I
am adding
main2.example.com. IN A xx.xxx.xxx.xxx (this is the second server's ip
address)
in my example.com, located on main.example.com,
/nam
przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
> can I use chroot users in their home directories under centos 5.* using
> standard
> packages ? How about chrooted sftp in centos 5.* ?
for the latter have a look at rssh, it's in repoforge (may be ok
depending on what you call "standard")
__
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Stephen Harris wrote:
> You're missing the point. If the query was sufficiently fast then you
> don't _need_ to worry about caching, and thus cache coherency, speed of
> propagation of changes, inconsistent results between machines etc etc.
>
> Caching is a _kludge_ to hide an
Hello,
can I use chroot users in their home directories under centos 5.* using standard
packages ? How about chrooted sftp in centos 5.* ?
If I cannot - do I have to use centos 6.* ?
Regards
Przemek
Dom pod miastem lub mieszkanie w
I am installing my second server in the datacenter but having problems
getting to the net with it.
I am going to use it as a KVMvirt host and do not want to run bind on
its base OS.
My thought was to just refer to it in the bind zones as an additional
record
(main.example.com is the working ser
Hi
Thank you for your extremely quick (and faster than support from any
company..) reply.
Sorry, can you give more detail ?
>From the look of the error the 'mock centos5' is missing these files :-
/usr/share/aclocal/ltoptions.m4
/usr/share/aclocal/ltsugar.m4
/usr/share/aclocal/ltversion.m4
/usr
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Craig White wrote:
> I would agree with NSCD adding additional mode failures. I try not to
> use it. I know nothing at all about other cache technologies for LDAP.
We'd found the tradeoffs with using nscd with a large centralised
institutional AD directory to be definitely wor
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Steve Rikli wrote:
> Well, somewhat. E.g. my NIS master doesn't need to publish a "passwd"
> map in order to provide "auto.home" map or whatever, and I don't need
> a "lookup" account to get at the required data in the case of NIS.
You could have LDAP that only contained auto
24 matches
Mail list logo
