Re: [CentOS] kickstart: gfx vs. txt mode

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, Eric Sisolak wrote: > This is usually caused by not having enough RAM. I think for el5 you need > either 512 or 768MB and for el6 it is more like 1GB (IIRC). Should be 768MB for EL6 based on my recent EL6 VM installation. It just seem rather silly that the installation requires about

Re: [CentOS] kickstart: gfx vs. txt mode

2011-09-23 Thread Eric Sisolak
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jure Pečar wrote: > I seem to recall from my redhat5/6/7 days that certain installation methods > used for kickstarting only invoked text mode install. Now I read that > graphical install is default in kickstart on el5/6. However, in my test > environment (with o

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Release

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, TE Dukes wrote: > OK, > > So how can we help getting CentOS 6.1 released? This is a "Community" > project. I'm not a programmer, IT person but I do ask a lot of help from > this list. What do we need to do or how can the 'average person' help? Can > you send us some files to test? What

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Yes, I suck at communication. Just ask my 1st wife. Does that mean that the whole dev team are just going to chalk it up to poor communications, shrug and not do anything about the communication channel, despite the existence of the qaweb and that it probably t

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, Lamar Owen wrote: > I don't think you understand. The process is iterative; if QA fails it's > all the way back up to building it again. A package may have existed three > weeks ago in terms of being built; if that package had passed binary testing > and QA it would have been release

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Release

2011-09-23 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:08 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > So how can we help getting CentOS 6.1 released? This is a "Community" > project. I'm not a programmer, IT person but I do ask a lot of help from > this list. What do we need to do or how can the 'average person' help? Can > you send us some files

[CentOS] 6.1 Release

2011-09-23 Thread TE Dukes
OK, So how can we help getting CentOS 6.1 released? This is a "Community" project. I'm not a programmer, IT person but I do ask a lot of help from this list. What do we need to do or how can the 'average person' help? Can you send us some files to test? What? I'd like to help but don't know how.

Re: [CentOS] {SOLVED} Re: PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-23 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 12:47 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:46 PM, wrote: > > Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Lanny Marcus > >> wrote: > >>> I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in > >>> some information, when I receive

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Michel Donais
Two weeks ago I've been in similar situation on an 80 gig sata drive. Found it with 8 partition; boot was there but nothing of the operating system to load Linux 5.6 My recovery solution was to put the disk on a window system as a secondary drive. Just connected to read data For reading I found

Re: [CentOS] ca-certificates in 5.x

2011-09-23 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Fajar, On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 11:30 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Hi all, > Just want to confirm. this RHSA doesn't apply to Centos 5.x does it? > > [Red Hat Linux] [RHSA-2011:1248-01] Important: ca-certificates security update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734381 Seem

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread John R Pierce
how about... find . -depth -execdir mv \{} ${\{}/old/new} \; I do highly recommend test-running this with a "echo " in front of the mv command. I didn't test it. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/23/2011 04:51 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 09/23/2011 09:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 09/23/2011 12:29 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > > [SNIP] > >> >> If there are issues that prevent this then >>> make an announcement to that effect so that people at least know that they

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:47 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote: > > I would like to use a bash script that searches files and > subdirectories name in a directory /var/ww/html/web > for a specific string, and when it finds the search string, replaces > the string (old1) with new string (new1), and so o

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 09/23/2011 09:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/23/2011 12:29 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: [SNIP] > > If there are issues that prevent this then >> make an announcement to that effect so that people at least know that they >> have to take matter in their own hands. Writing such an email

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread Thomas Johansson
On 2011-09-23 19:47, madu...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi > > > I would like to use a bash script that searches files and > subdirectories name in a directory /var/ww/html/web > for a specific string, and when it finds the search string, replaces > the string (old1) with new string (new1), and so on > old

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/23/11 1:51 PM, madu...@gmail.com wrote: > I am planning to have this in 2 stages first -type fthen -type d you likely should use the -depth option that says descend first, even if you do the files seperately if you use -depth, you don't have to do it in two phases. -- john

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Timothy Murphy wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot. >>> If so, would you say how you did it, please. >>> I tried (on an HP MicroServer), >>> but gave up in the end and used a USB stick installation instead. >>> But I'd be very interested t

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread madu...@gmail.com
I am planning to have this in 2 stages first -type fthen -type d pons On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:15 PM, wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:21 PM,   wrote: >> > I realized another question: are you trying to rename files? > yes files and directories too .

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

2011-09-23 Thread Timothy Murphy
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot. >> If so, would you say how you did it, please. >> I tried (on an HP MicroServer), >> but gave up in the end and used a USB stick installation instead. >> But I'd be very interested to know how to do it, for the f

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Paras pradhan
opps thats a typo.. the 3rd partition is yes 1.1TB and not 10GB. sorry. Paras. On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 09/23/11 1:32 PM, Paras pradhan wrote: >> You mean the newer windows will create the partition schema as we are >> seeing it now? And you think its the automa

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/23/11 1:32 PM, Paras pradhan wrote: > You mean the newer windows will create the partition schema as we are > seeing it now? And you think its the automatic partitioning by windows > if somebody has the access to this? i just noticed that 3rd partition is 1.1TB. you had said... > Suddenly

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

2011-09-23 Thread Timothy Murphy
Paul Heinlein wrote: > I really just followed my procedure for netbooting CentOS 5, but > changed the directory paths. > > 0. Set up local http mirror of CentOS 6 > 1. Set up tftp server; make CentOS 6 pxe kernel and initrd.img > available > 2. Use PXE menu to point to right kernel, in

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Craig White
On Sep 23, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Paras pradhan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 09/23/11 12:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Paras pradhan wrote: > Here is o/p John > > Number Start End Size File system Name > Flags >1

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 02:35:40 PM Craig White wrote: >> I moved to Ubuntu on my own server, some of my customers servers as has my >> employer. > > This is not a Ubuntu list. It's not a Red Hat list either, yet you didn't complain when

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Paras pradhan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, John R Pierce > wrote: >> On 09/23/11 12:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Paras pradhan wrote: >  Here is o/p John > >  Number  Start   End     Size   File system  Name >      Flags >    1      17.4kB  134MB   134MB

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

2011-09-23 Thread Timothy Murphy
Jure Pečar wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot. > > Use cobbler, it does all the magic for you and things just work. I've tried cobbler, in fact used it successfully. In my view, it might make sense if one has dozens of machines, but isn

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Paras pradhan
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 09/23/11 12:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Paras pradhan wrote: >>> >  Here is o/p John >>> > >>> >  Number  Start   End     Size   File system  Name >>> >      Flags >>> >    1      17.4kB  134MB   134MB               Microsoft reserve

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Dave Stevens
Quoting Johnny Hughes : > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On 09/23/2011 12:29 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> On 09/23/2011 06:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 09/23/2011 09:06 AM, Stefan Held wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 22.09

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Paras pradhan
This is a SAN drive mounted. I have checked with my storage administrator if this has been re mapped or any similar events and he verified that nothing has happened...(I trust him) Here is one thing I have found. I dd the 1st 134MB partition to an image. and opened it with the hex editor. After

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Craig White
On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 02:35:40 PM Craig White wrote: >> I moved to Ubuntu on my own server, some of my customers servers as has my >> employer. > > This is not a Ubuntu list. > > I have had my share of problems with more than one of the

Re: [CentOS] was, Re: This doesn't make sense, is the apache update

2011-09-23 Thread Craig White
On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > The one thing I don't understand is this: AFAIK, apache release not a > server update, but an update to the certificate chain, yanking Digitar's > CA. This isn't a binary compatibility issue, it's, as we said when I was > programming, just d

Re: [CentOS] was, Re: This doesn't make sense, is the apache update

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Warren Young wrote: > On 9/23/2011 1:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> The one thing I don't understand is this: AFAIK, apache release not a >> server update, but an update to the certificate chain, yanking Digitar's >> CA. > > What, pray tell, are you talking about? > > I assume you mean "DigiNota

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/23/11 12:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Paras pradhan wrote: >> > Here is o/p John >> > >> > Number Start End Size File system Name >> > Flags >> >1 17.4kB 134MB 134MB Microsoft reserved >> > partition msftres >> >2 135MB 134GB 134GB

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:21 PM, wrote: > I realized another question: are you trying to rename files? >>> yes files and directories too .. >>> >> Then different commands - sed for the files, mv for the directories. >> >> This begins to look like a perl script. > >

Re: [CentOS] was, Re: This doesn't make sense, is the apache update

2011-09-23 Thread Warren Young
On 9/23/2011 1:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > The one thing I don't understand is this: AFAIK, apache release not a > server update, but an update to the certificate chain, yanking Digitar's > CA. What, pray tell, are you talking about? I assume you mean "DigiNotar", the defunct Dutch CA? What

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:21 PM, wrote: >>> I realized another question: are you trying to rename files? >>> >> yes files and directories too .. >> > Then different commands - sed for the files, mv for the directories. > > This begins to look like a perl script. > Either way, it's probably a ba

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, September 23, 2011 03:44:58 PM Paras pradhan wrote: > Thanks for your detailed suggestion. Yes thats a GPT .. the o/p is from > parted. Is this a removable or some sort, like USB, firewire, eSATA, hot-plug SCSI, Fibre-channel, or SAS? Could it have been taken out to another machine a

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, September 23, 2011 03:59:17 PM Keith Roberts wrote: > If it's a production box in service, and this has > happened to it, How can it still be running? It's not the boot or root drive. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cen

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Keith Roberts wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us >> Paras pradhan wrote: >>> Here is o/p John >>> >>> Number Start End Size File system Name >>>Flags >>> 1 17.4kB 134MB 134MB Microsoft reserved >>> partition msftres

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, September 23, 2011 03:17:07 PM Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 09/23/2011 07:57 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > Have you pondered the moral implications of knowlingly installing insecure > > software and placing it on the public internet? Oh, wait, it's not a moral > > issue, since there

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Keith Roberts
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > Subject: Re: [CentOS] data recovery > > Paras pradhan wrote: >> Here is o/p John >> >> Number Start End Size File system Name >>Flags >> 1 17.4kB 134MB 134MB Mic

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/23/2011 12:29 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 09/23/2011 06:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 09/23/2011 09:06 AM, Stefan Held wrote: >>> Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2011, 07:28 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes: >>> No matter what we try to do ... some kind of rolling updates for people >>

Re: [CentOS] fax over ip?

2011-09-23 Thread James B. Byrne
On: Mon Sep 12 06:01:43 EDT 2011, Fajar Priyanto fajarpri at arinet.org wrote > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:10 PM, hadi motamedi > wrote: >> I did as : >> #yum search fax > >#yum search sip > > http://www.avantfax.com/install.php > > Don't ask how to install it here. > But if you need help, I beli

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Paras pradhan
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 03:25:10 PM Paras pradhan wrote: >> Here is o/p John >> >> Number  Start   End     Size   File system  Name >>    Flags >>  1      17.4kB  134MB   134MB               Microsoft reserved >> partition  msftres >>  2  

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, September 23, 2011 03:25:10 PM Paras pradhan wrote: > Here is o/p John > > Number Start End Size File system Name >Flags > 1 17.4kB 134MB 134MB Microsoft reserved > partition msftres > 2 135MB 134GB 134GB ntfs Basic data partition

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 06:48:07 PM Paras pradhan wrote: > Suddenly my disk device's geometry has been changed to something that > doesnot make any sense. Its a 1.8TB in size and had only one single > partition. Now I can see 3 partitions sde1, sde2 and sde2 of sizes > 130M, 140GB and 10GB.

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Paras pradhan wrote: > Here is o/p John > > Number Start End Size File system Name >Flags > 1 17.4kB 134MB 134MB Microsoft reserved > partition msftres > 2 135MB 134GB 134GB ntfs Basic data partition > 3 134GB 1100GB 965GB

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Paras pradhan
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Paras pradhan wrote: > *snip* > >> No. This is a production server and nobody logs in. Very >> very restricted. > > Have you checked all your logs? What ports are open? > What CLI tools to format a HDD do you have on the

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Paras pradhan
Here is o/p John Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 17.4kB 134MB 134MB Microsoft reserved partition msftres 2 135MB 134GB 134GB ntfs Basic data partition 3 134GB 1100GB 965GB Basic data partition Thanks Par

[CentOS] was, Re: This doesn't make sense, is the apache update

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
The one thing I don't understand is this: AFAIK, apache release not a server update, but an update to the certificate chain, yanking Digitar's CA. This isn't a binary compatibility issue, it's, as we said when I was programming, just data. Can't that be pushed through, or are there code updates in

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 09/23/2011 07:57 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 01:29:51 PM Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> What you are suggesting here is that people should expect centos systems to >> be insecure and go the RHEL if they want secure systems. > > If the timeliness of security updates is

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Keith Roberts wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us >> Keith Roberts wrote: >>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Paras pradhan wrote: >>> *snip* >>> No. This is a production server and nobody logs in. Very very restricted. >>> >>> Have you checked all your lo

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, September 23, 2011 02:35:40 PM Craig White wrote: > I moved to Ubuntu on my own server, some of my customers servers as has my > employer. This is not a Ubuntu list. I have had my share of problems with more than one of the LTS Ubuntu distributions, more than I have had with CentOS.

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Keith Roberts
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > Subject: Re: [CentOS] data recovery > > Keith Roberts wrote: >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Paras pradhan wrote: >> *snip* >> >>> No. This is a production server and nobody logs in. Very >>> very restricte

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Craig White
On Sep 23, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 01:29:51 PM Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> What you are suggesting here is that people should expect centos systems to >> be insecure and go the RHEL if they want secure systems. > > If the timeliness of security u

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Keith Roberts wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Paras pradhan wrote: > *snip* > >> No. This is a production server and nobody logs in. Very >> very restricted. > > Have you checked all your logs? What ports are open? > What CLI tools to format a HDD do you have on the server? And then there's the othe

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Keith Roberts
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Paras pradhan wrote: *snip* > No. This is a production server and nobody logs in. Very > very restricted. Have you checked all your logs? What ports are open? What CLI tools to format a HDD do you have on the server? > >> >> Also, is it possible for a trojan program to do t

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
madu...@gmail.com wrote: > pons > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:08 PM, wrote: >> madu...@gmail.com wrote: >-type f ?? >>> the string could be a name of file name or subdirectory name >> I realized another question: are you trying to rename files? >> > yes files and directories too .. > Then di

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread madu...@gmail.com
yes files and directories too .. pons On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:08 PM, wrote: > madu...@gmail.com wrote: -type f ?? >> the string could be a name of file name or subdirectory name >> > I hate webmail. After I hit and while it was thinking about going, > I realized another question: are you

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
madu...@gmail.com wrote: >>>-type f ?? > the string could be a name of file name or subdirectory name > I hate webmail. After I hit and while it was thinking about going, I realized another question: are you trying to rename files? mark > Thanks > pons > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:5

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
madu...@gmail.com wrote: >>>-type f ?? > the string could be a name of file name or subdirectory name > No, it can't. You are *not* going to edit directory names this way, and should not. mark > Thanks > pons > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:51 PM, wrote: >> madu...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/22/11 3:48 PM, Paras pradhan wrote: > Hi, > > Need help on data recovery. > > Suddenly my disk device's geometry has been changed to something that > doesnot make any sense. Its a 1.8TB in size and had only one single > partition. Now I can see 3 partitions sde1, sde2 and sde2 of sizes > 130M

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread madu...@gmail.com
>>-type f ?? the string could be a name of file name or subdirectory name Thanks pons On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:51 PM, wrote: > madu...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> I would like to use a bash script that searches files and >> subdirectories name in a directory /var/ww/html/web >> for a specific strin

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, September 23, 2011 01:29:51 PM Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > What you are suggesting here is that people should expect centos systems to > be insecure and go the RHEL if they want secure systems. If the timeliness of security updates is essential/critical you cannt get faster updates

Re: [CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
madu...@gmail.com wrote: > > I would like to use a bash script that searches files and > subdirectories name in a directory /var/ww/html/web > for a specific string, and when it finds the search string, replaces > the string (old1) with new string (new1), and so on > old2 with new2 oldn with ne

Re: [CentOS] {SOLVED} Re: PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

2011-09-23 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:46 PM, wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Lanny Marcus >> wrote: >>> I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in >>> some information, when I received a .pdf file. > >> Adobe Reader is only a "reader" as I assumed i

[CentOS] replace multiple string

2011-09-23 Thread madu...@gmail.com
Hi I would like to use a bash script that searches files and subdirectories name in a directory /var/ww/html/web for a specific string, and when it finds the search string, replaces the string (old1) with new string (new1), and so on old2 with new2 oldn with newn. replace_string.sh #!/bin/

Re: [CentOS] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html - CentOS 6

2011-09-23 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 09/23/2011 07:12 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/23/2011 09:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> On 09/23/2011 04:30 PM, John Hodrien wrote: >>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >>> What are you trying to say? Karanbirs response is three weeks old and AFAICS the 6.0

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, September 23, 2011 12:57:31 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > There is a whole channel of RPMs that we are not allowed to look at from > upstream now. They do not release them on any ISOs and we can't pull > things directly off RHN (the only way to get the optional channel) and > use it. This

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 09/23/2011 06:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/23/2011 09:06 AM, Stefan Held wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2011, 07:28 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes: >> >>> No matter what we try to do ... some kind of rolling updates for people >>> who do not want to wait ... or whatever the next thing is

Re: [CentOS] Building custom installation media

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Darrell Esau wrote: > My company sells hardware appliances with our software pre-loaded. Doing > so requires that we ship an ISO installation media to the hardware > manufacturer who installs it onto the boxes, then ships them out. > > We're currently using a solution that will no longer work for

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Paras pradhan
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Paras pradhan wrote: > >> To: CentOS mailing list >> From: Paras pradhan >> Subject: [CentOS] data recovery >> >> Hi, >> >> Need help on data recovery. >> >> Suddenly my disk device's geometry has been changed to >> so

Re: [CentOS] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html - CentOS 6

2011-09-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/23/2011 09:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 09/23/2011 04:30 PM, John Hodrien wrote: >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> >>> What are you trying to say? >>> Karanbirs response is three weeks old and AFAICS the 6.0/cr repo is still >>> empty on the mirrors so there

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I can tell you that we are building 6.x stuff for QA now and have been > for several weeks. I'm not personally unhappy with the devs over the situation since I pretty much didn't plan on any critical C6 installations until 6.1 comes out. So with just one testing

Re: [CentOS] data recovery

2011-09-23 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Paras pradhan wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: Paras pradhan > Subject: [CentOS] data recovery > > Hi, > > Need help on data recovery. > > Suddenly my disk device's geometry has been changed to > something that does not make any sense. Its a 1.8TB in > size and ha

[CentOS] Building custom installation media

2011-09-23 Thread Darrell Esau
Hi, I'm looking for "the best" way to do a custom installation from CD/DVD media. My company sells hardware appliances with our software pre-loaded. Doing so requires that we ship an ISO installation media to the hardware manufacturer who installs it onto the boxes, then ships them out. We're c

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Johnny - blow all this off. The rest of us, posters and lurkers alike, appreciate the work the team's doing. The *only* thing that I'm interested in, now, is the apache update for the bloody Digitar mess. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@c

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/23/2011 09:06 AM, Stefan Held wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2011, 07:28 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes: > >> No matter what we try to do ... some kind of rolling updates for people >> who do not want to wait ... or whatever the next thing is ... well you >> do not seem to be happy. > > You

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/23/2011 07:50 AM, Alain Péan wrote: > Le 22/09/2011 14:28, Johnny Hughes a écrit : >> No matter what we try to do ... some kind of rolling updates for people >> who do not want to wait ... or whatever the next thing is ... well you >> do not seem to be happy. > > Which rolling updates ? OK f

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.7 SRPMS

2011-09-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/23/2011 11:34 AM, dave baukus wrote: > Are the 5.7 source RPMs going to be mirrored to http://www. mirror>/centos/ 5.7/os/SRPMS/ > and http://www./centos/ 5.7/updates/SRPMS/ as was the > case for the previous releases ? > > Or are they permanently banished to http://vault.centos.org/5.7/ as

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/23/11, Volker Poplawski wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel > 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. > > The device eth0 suddenly stops working i.e. no more networking. When I > do ifconfig from console I get . . . > Bringing down the interface w

[CentOS] CentOS-5.7 SRPMS

2011-09-23 Thread dave baukus
Are the 5.7 source RPMs going to be mirrored to http://www./centos/ 5.7/os/SRPMS/ and http://www./centos/ 5.7/updates/SRPMS/ as was the case for the previous releases ? Or are they permanently banished to http://vault.centos.org/5.7/ as per the readme.txt currently in place on most mirrors ? Th

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 79, Issue 7

2011-09-23 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] kickstart: gfx vs. txt mode

2011-09-23 Thread John Hodrien
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Jure Pečar wrote: On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:00:39 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien wrote: On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Jure Pečar wrote: > Any clues what am I missing? Does it just not like your graphics card? No, it works in gfx mode when installing from cd/usb. That MGA G200 is more t

Re: [CentOS] disk partitioning: 6.0 install to harddrive using liveCD

2011-09-23 Thread Craig White
On Sep 22, 2011, at 7:14 AM, cen...@trodman.com wrote: > Greetings: > > I'm planning to set up a test Centos 6.0 box (has CDROM, but no > DVD) with these partions: > > / 10GB ( no separate mount for /usr ) > /tmp 1GB > /var 10GB > /boot500MB > > T

Re: [CentOS] PostgreSQL database design tool

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, September 23, 2011 08:54:46 AM Steve Campbell wrote: > Open System Architect seemed to fit my demands, but unfortunately, the > installation documents do not exist, at least the links go in a circle > to nowhere. There is a commercially supported version called DataArchitect from The

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

2011-09-23 Thread Volker Poplawski
On 23.09.2011 16:42, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 09/23/2011 04:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Volker Poplawski wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel >>> 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. >>> >>> The device eth0 suddenly stops working

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Timothy Murphy wrote: > Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot. > If so, would you say how you did it, please. > I tried (on an HP MicroServer), > but gave up in the end and used a USB stick installation instead. > But I'd be very interested to know how to do it, for the future. >

Re: [CentOS] How to update CentOS 5.4 to 5.6?

2011-09-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 07:20:15 AM Rudi Ahlers wrote: > surely a few versions of the OS won't take up that much space? 1TB & > 2TB HDD's these day cost a few dollars so I don't think that's the > real reason. And it can't be bandwidth either since the files are > mirrored to many other ser

Re: [CentOS] kickstart: gfx vs. txt mode

2011-09-23 Thread Jure Pečar
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:00:39 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Jure Pečar wrote: > > > Any clues what am I missing? > > Does it just not like your graphics card? No, it works in gfx mode when installing from cd/usb. That MGA G200 is more than capable of running X (have fo

Re: [CentOS] kickstart: gfx vs. txt mode

2011-09-23 Thread John Hodrien
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Jure Pečar wrote: Hello, I seem to recall from my redhat5/6/7 days that certain installation methods used for kickstarting only invoked text mode install. Now I read that graphical install is default in kickstart on el5/6. However, in my test environment (with older HP DL14

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

2011-09-23 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot. Yep. Several times, in fact. > If so, would you say how you did it, please. > I tried (on an HP MicroServer), > but gave up in the end and used a USB stick installation instead. > But I'd be ve

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

2011-09-23 Thread Jure Pečar
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:49:48 +0200 Timothy Murphy wrote: > Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot. Use cobbler, it does all the magic for you and things just work. -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org http://f5j.eu ___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html - CentOS 6

2011-09-23 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 09/23/2011 04:30 PM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > >> What are you trying to say? >> Karanbirs response is three weeks old and AFAICS the 6.0/cr repo is still >> empty on the mirrors so there is no package for that problem available. >> >> If there are

[CentOS] CentOS-6 by PXEboot?

2011-09-23 Thread Timothy Murphy
Has anyone succeeded in installing CentOS-6.0 by PXEboot. If so, would you say how you did it, please. I tried (on an HP MicroServer), but gave up in the end and used a USB stick installation instead. But I'd be very interested to know how to do it, for the future. Unfortunately I didn't keep a p

[CentOS] kickstart: gfx vs. txt mode

2011-09-23 Thread Jure Pečar
Hello, I seem to recall from my redhat5/6/7 days that certain installation methods used for kickstarting only invoked text mode install. Now I read that graphical install is default in kickstart on el5/6. However, in my test environment (with older HP DL140G3) I only get text mode install up,

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

2011-09-23 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 09/23/2011 04:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Volker Poplawski wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel >> 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. >> >> The device eth0 suddenly stops working i.e. no more networking. When I >> do ifconfig from console

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Volker Poplawski wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel > 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. > > The device eth0 suddenly stops working i.e. no more networking. When I > do ifconfig from console I get Do you have either another port on the box, or ca

Re: [CentOS] OT Test

2011-09-23 Thread m . roth
Phil Savoie wrote: > This is a test > > sorry for the noise. Nope, didn't see it. Not a byte, not a nibble. mark "and you'd better delete this before reading it, or the Paradox Police will be after us*" * And they're *way* worse than the swat team that comes through your windows

Re: [CentOS] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html - CentOS 6

2011-09-23 Thread John Hodrien
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > What are you trying to say? > Karanbirs response is three weeks old and AFAICS the 6.0/cr repo is still > empty on the mirrors so there is no package for that problem available. > > If there are problems getting 6.0/cr going then fine but in that

  1   2   >