On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> When I say non-rpm, I mean source packages I compiled such as zoneminder.
>> CentOS ships no non-RPM packaged packages -- look to whoever
>> put those packages on your box without using the packaging
>> system if you feel the need to blame someone
[clea
Am 24.07.2011 02:00, schrieb Thomas Dukes:
> When I say non-rpm, I mean source packages I compiled such as zoneminder.
And even *if* you would be able to upgrade from CentOS 5.x to 6 -
technically and by personal skills - what makes you think that your self
compiled software would not completely
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 09:31:06PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> > Hi listees!
> >
> > Just installed C6 (more or less) permanently on my eeepc.
> >
> > I've enabled rpmfusion non-free, rpmfusion free, elrepo, and epel,
> >
> > prior to this point I've been running fedo
When I say non-rpm, I mean source packages I compiled such as zoneminder.
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of R P Herrold
> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 7:36 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] Upgrading f
_
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Giovanni Tirloni
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 6:54 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrading from CentOS 5.6 to 6.0
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
Help!
Just
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> I use to be able to upgrade by doing a 'yum update'. That doesn't work
> either.
A low skill user was never able to go from 2.1 to 3, nor 3 to
4, nor 4 to 5, and an a minimally skilled will not be able
to go from 5 to 6. This is the policy of the upst
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> Help!
>
> Just ran the installation DVD but there is no option to 'upgrade'. Looked
> at
> the RHEL docs,
>
> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installati
> on_Guide/ch-guimode-x86.html#id4594292 referenced off
Help!
Just ran the installation DVD but there is no option to 'upgrade'. Looked at
the RHEL docs,
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installati
on_Guide/ch-guimode-x86.html#id4594292 referenced off the CentOS Release
notes but the CentOS installation doesn't offer th
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: John R. Dennison
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Why are all repos < 5.6 listed?
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:49:45PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>
>> I might move that repo file to a spare directory, so yum
>> does not pick
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:49:45PM +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
> I might move that repo file to a spare directory, so yum
> does not pick it up again.
You can leave it in /etc/yum.repos.d if you'd like, just rename it
so that it does not end in ".repo".
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Jussi Hirvi
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Why are all repos < 5.6 listed?
>
> On 23.7.2011 21.58, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> I just enabled all repos on my system, to enable me to find
>>> a particular package. This is the
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: John R. Dennison
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Why are all repos < 5.6 listed?
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 08:58:55PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>>
>> Please check how many CentOS-Base files you have in /etc/yum.repos
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 12:26 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/23/11 12:09 PM, Tom H wrote:
> > Even after this explanation I don't understand your objection to
> > helping someone with a firewall and routing issue on a CentOS box. You
> > might have a point if the executables didn't come from p
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 08:58:55PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Please check how many CentOS-Base files you have in /etc/yum.repos.d/
>> Maybe old are not deleted, just disabled.
>
> 269 lines of noise removed.
>
> Can you PLEASE trim your replies? There is abs
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 08:58:55PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> >
> Please check how many CentOS-Base files you have in /etc/yum.repos.d/
> Maybe old are not deleted, just disabled.
269 lines of noise removed.
Can you PLEASE trim your replies? There is absolutely no reason to not
remove
On 23.7.2011 21.58, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I just enabled all repos on my system, to enable me to find
>> a particular package. This is the first time I have noticed
>> all the Centos repos< 5.6 being listed.
>>
>> Is this a new feature, to include all repos pre 5.6 now?
>>
I have these
fred smith wrote:
> Hi listees!
>
> Just installed C6 (more or less) permanently on my eeepc.
>
> I've enabled rpmfusion non-free, rpmfusion free, elrepo, and epel,
>
> prior to this point I've been running fedora on it (f10 thru f14)
> and have always found VLC at rpmfusion.
>
> (but finally
On 07/23/11 12:09 PM, Tom H wrote:
> Even after this explanation I don't understand your objection to
> helping someone with a firewall and routing issue on a CentOS box. You
> might have a point if the executables didn't come from packages in the
> canonical CentOS repo.
"I'm writing my doctoral
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/23/11 10:22 AM, Kristopher Kane wrote:
>>
>> > this sort of thing really belongs on an iproute2/netfilter mail list,
>> > however, as its not at all centos specific.
>>
>> So John, exactly what is CentOS specific? Should I only read th
On 07/23/11 10:22 AM, Kristopher Kane wrote:
>
> > this sort of thing really belongs on an iproute2/netfilter mail list,
> > however, as its not at all centos specific.
> >
>
> So John, exactly what is CentOS specific? Should I only read the
> emails with release speculation?
>
things related to
Keith Roberts wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I just enabled all repos on my system, to enable me to find
> a particular package. This is the first time I have noticed
> all the Centos repos < 5.6 being listed.
>
> Is this a new feature, to include all repos pre 5.6 now?
>
> Here's the output of t
Greetings all.
I just enabled all repos on my system, to enable me to find
a particular package. This is the first time I have noticed
all the Centos repos < 5.6 being listed.
Is this a new feature, to include all repos pre 5.6 now?
Here's the output of the aforementioned yum command - sorry
Hi listees!
Just installed C6 (more or less) permanently on my eeepc.
I've enabled rpmfusion non-free, rpmfusion free, elrepo, and epel,
prior to this point I've been running fedora on it (f10 thru f14)
and have always found VLC at rpmfusion.
(but finally RHEL/Centos have become modern enough
> this sort of thing really belongs on an iproute2/netfilter mail list,
> however, as its not at all centos specific.
>
So John, exactly what is CentOS specific? Should I only read the emails
with release speculation?
-Kris
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, July 22, 2011 02:10:22 PM Tom H wrote:
>>
>> You can use "sudo -u gdm gconftool-2
>> /apps/gdm/simple-greeter/disable_user_list --set --type=boolean true"
>> because the "gdm" user controls the login screen but the above works
>> too
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Jamieson, Stephen CTR Navair,
5.4.4.4 wrote:
>
>> Those options are no longer supported in GDM. I think that they were
>> removed with GDM 2.24 (at the latest, probably 2.22) and C6 is running
>> GDM 2.30.
>
> That is unfortunate... I suppose I will just have to i
On Friday, July 22, 2011 10:55 PM, Jennifer Botten wrote:
> Hi Julio,
>
> -A FORWARD -i eth2.2 -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 10.30.4.28 -p udp -j ACCEPT
>
> -A FORWARD -i eth2.2 -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -p tcp -j ACCEPT
>
> -A FORWARD -i eth1 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -j ACCEPT
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
