Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I whipped up a quick spec to package Zenoss' wmi client and noticed it
> creates a
> libasync_wmi_lib.so.0 and libasync_wmi_lib.so.0.0.1 that their python script
> would
> otherwise copy during its install routine (obviously I wrote a native rpm
> section for
> installa
Browsing the net for one thing unexpectedly brought me to two good and
useful documents:
(1) Guide to the Secure Configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/os/redhat/rhel5-guide-i731.pdf
Revision 4.1
February 28, 2011
(2) Hardening Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
http:/
I whipped up a quick spec to package Zenoss' wmi client and noticed it creates a
libasync_wmi_lib.so.0 and libasync_wmi_lib.so.0.0.1 that their python script
would
otherwise copy during its install routine (obviously I wrote a native rpm
section for
installation).
Anyone know the naming conventi
hi all,
I hope you can help me with a strange quota/nfs/XFS behavior...
I'm using Centos 5.6 on both a nfs server and client. Both are
64-bit, and using a recent kernel:
NFS server:
Linux fs2.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
NFS clien
On 6/24/2011 6:51 AM, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2011-06-21 17:22, Todd Cary wrote:
>> Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups
>> and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in
>> a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory
>> attributes is beco
On Jun 23, 2011, at 9:44 PM, Marian Marinov wrote:
> On Friday 24 June 2011 04:34:20 Smithies, Russell wrote:
>> We have a single 27TB partition (35 x 1TB drives as RAID5+0 in an HP
>> MDS600), just formatted it xfs and had no problems with it so far. It's
>> used as scratch space so not too conc
Daniel De Marco wrote:
> * Keith Roberts [06/24/2011 15:06]:
>> So has anyone actually got FF 5 working OK on CentOS 5.6
>> i686 32 bit yet?
>>
>> If so, is it actually worth taking the trouble to upgrade to
>> FF 5, and what is the recommended way to do this upgrade
>> please?
>
> it seems to
* Keith Roberts [06/24/2011 15:06]:
> So has anyone actually got FF 5 working OK on CentOS 5.6
> i686 32 bit yet?
>
> If so, is it actually worth taking the trouble to upgrade to
> FF 5, and what is the recommended way to do this upgrade
> please?
it seems to work fine here. Just get the binar
So has anyone actually got FF 5 working OK on CentOS 5.6
i686 32 bit yet?
If so, is it actually worth taking the trouble to upgrade to
FF 5, and what is the recommended way to do this upgrade
please?
Kind Regards,
Keith Roberts
-
At Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:17:19 +0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 6/24/11, John Hodrien wrote:
> > /dev/shm's how I would do it.
> >
> > Make a file on /dev/shm and the format it, mount it, export it.
> >
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/shm/export bs=1M count=1000
> > mke2fs -j /dev/shm/export
On 6/24/11, John Hodrien wrote:
> /dev/shm's how I would do it.
>
> Make a file on /dev/shm and the format it, mount it, export it.
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/shm/export bs=1M count=1000
> mke2fs -j /dev/shm/export
> mount -o loop /dev/shm/export /mnt/foo
>
> Then export /mnt/foo
Thanks for this
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has, or does, anyone use dm-cache - specifically for caching SAN based
> > storage locally?
>
> hmmm
>
> >From another list
>
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:38:29 +0200
> From: Rudi Ahlers
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has, or does, anyone use dm-cache - specifically for caching SAN based
> storage locally?
hmmm
>From another list
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:38:29 +0200
From: Rudi Ahlers
To: xen-users
Subject: xen-u] anyone using dm-cache?
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 24.06.2011 14:24, schrieb Steve Campbell:
>> I've done a little research, and can't really find out why it happens,
>> but on one server I have built, I get the old fashion /dev/sda1,
>> /dev/sda2 type partitions and on another server I get the /dev/mapper
>> style p
Hi,
Has, or does, anyone use dm-cache - specifically for caching SAN based
storage locally?
I'm looking for a way to speed up SAN based storage on a CentOS 5.6 +
XEN Hypervisor which uses iSCSI mounted SAN storage. dm-cache seems
like it do the trick, but I've never heard of it before until someo
At Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:24:57 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I've done a little research, and can't really find out why it happens,
> but on one server I have built, I get the old fashion /dev/sda1,
> /dev/sda2 type partitions and on another server I get the /dev/mapper
> style partitio
On 2011-06-21 17:22, Todd Cary wrote:
> Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups
> and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in
> a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory
> attributes is becoming a pain.
>
> I understand the fundamentals
Hi Steve,
The change of /etc/sysconfig/ldap did the trick, thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Sebastiaan.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Sebastiaan Koetsier | proserve wrote:
> I've changed the settings and I'm waiting until the sessions to ldap
> grow, I will keep you posted on this.
You can:
cat /proc//limits
to check what the actual open file limit is in the running server.
Steve
___
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:02 +0100, Colin Coles wrote:
> University of Kent mirror has DVD isos:
> ftp://mirrorservice.org/sites/mirror.centos.org/5.6/isos/x86_64
> ftp://mirrorservice.org/sites/mirror.centos.org/5.6/isos/i386
Brilliant. Thank you very Colin. Much appreciated.
--
With best r
Am 24.06.2011 14:24, schrieb Steve Campbell:
> I've done a little research, and can't really find out why it happens,
> but on one server I have built, I get the old fashion /dev/sda1,
> /dev/sda2 type partitions and on another server I get the /dev/mapper
> style partitions. Both machines are h
I've done a little research, and can't really find out why it happens,
but on one server I have built, I get the old fashion /dev/sda1,
/dev/sda2 type partitions and on another server I get the /dev/mapper
style partitions. Both machines are hardware raided (before the install)
and both machine
Hi Steve,
> Setting it for the ldap user in /etc/security/limits.conf will not have any
> effect, since it is root that starts the ldap server (so, the setting should
> be >for root, not ldap).
I've changed the settings and I'm waiting until the sessions to ldap grow, I
will keep you posted on
On Thursday 23 Jun 2011 08:54:21 Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> > AFAIK, account does not need to have a password at all for cron to work.
> >
> > Apart from that if you're going to automatically reset root's password
> > you may as well just avoid expiring it at all.
>
> In /var/log/cron I see this whe
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Sebastiaan Koetsier | proserve wrote:
> I've been growing a large headache on this one, i have a number of LDAP
> servers behind loadbalancing, since 2 days i constantly get the error:
> Too many open files. Although I'm not a newbie with linux I'm unable to
> resolve this,
Hi All,
I've been growing a large headache on this one, i have a number of LDAP servers
behind loadbalancing, since 2 days i constantly get the error: Too many open
files. Although I'm not a newbie with linux I'm unable to resolve this, I have
took the following stept:
Changed the /proc/sys/fs
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> I'm trying to do some network transfer test using NFS. The problem is
> when I try to eliminate the possibility of the hard disks being the
> bottleneck. I am unable to export /dev/shm as a NFS share. Initially
> there was an error about fsid or wro
I'm trying to do some network transfer test using NFS. The problem is
when I try to eliminate the possibility of the hard disks being the
bottleneck. I am unable to export /dev/shm as a NFS share. Initially
there was an error about fsid or wrong filesystem.
If I use a symbolic such as /home/test -
On 6/24/11, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Try ElRepo driver and please report if that helps. I would like to know
> your experience with ElRepo driver.
The ElRepo driver appears to work, I don't get an error when
increasing the MTU but I'll need to solve another problem before I can
really test a
On Friday, June 24, 2011 05:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Friday, June 24, 2011 02:33 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>>> On 6/24/11, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2011 01:20 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> First bottleneck was discovering
Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2011 02:33 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> On 6/24/11, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> On Friday, June 24, 2011 01:20 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
First bottleneck was discovering the max MTU allowed on these is 7K
instead of 9K but googling se
On Friday 24 June 2011 01:23, Always Learning wrote:
> Currently running 5.6 and would like a two set DVD of that version.
> However none of the mirrors offer pure DVDs only Torrent versions which
> involve the possibility of bits being tampered with and things leaving
> my servers without explicit
On Friday, June 24, 2011 02:33 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/24/11, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Friday, June 24, 2011 01:20 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>>> First bottleneck was discovering the max MTU allowed on these is 7K
>>> instead of 9K but googling seems to indicate that the RTL81
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Alain Péan
wrote:
> Le 24/06/2011 03:44, Marian Marinov a écrit :
>> On Friday 24 June 2011 04:34:20 Smithies, Russell wrote:
>>> We have a single 27TB partition (35 x 1TB drives as RAID5+0 in an HP
>>> MDS600), just formatted it xfs and had no problems with it so
Le 24/06/2011 03:44, Marian Marinov a écrit :
> On Friday 24 June 2011 04:34:20 Smithies, Russell wrote:
>> We have a single 27TB partition (35 x 1TB drives as RAID5+0 in an HP
>> MDS600), just formatted it xfs and had no problems with it so far. It's
>> used as scratch space so not too concerned a
35 matches
Mail list logo
