>
>
> >
> > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
> > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ?
> >
> > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would
> > take no more than 1 month ?
>
> Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake.
>
>
>
>
On 05/10/2011 08:12 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Alain Péan wrote:
>> > The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL
>>> 6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for
>>> C6.0, and it will be better
Mathieu Baudier wrote on 05/11/2011 04:59 PM:
>> nothing and apparently today's target date has slipped, and 2) until
>> CentOS admits that there is a problem, nothing will actually change.
>
> Apparently they did admit and it does change:
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_
Steve Clark wrote on 05/11/2011 04:12 PM:
...
> Thanks, but I am already using that kernel. I want to get a vanilla
> kernel.org 2.6.32.xx kernel running
> on 6.0.
>
> In fact following AY directions I was able to rebuild the srpms for
> kernel-2.6.32-71.29.2, but again that
> is not the generic ke
2011/5/11 Rainer Traut :
> You could also ask on the elrepo mailinglist.
> There was a request not too long ago.
>
> http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2011-April/000637.html
>
> So maybe you can install centos 5.4, then install their newer aacraid
> driver and then you can update the kernel
On 5/11/2011 2:08 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region,
On 05/12/2011 12:48 AM, Craig White wrote:
> Anyone have recommendations for a highly reliable datacenter located in
> Holland?
Global Switch is a good one. Lots of carriers too. Contact info here:
http://www.globalswitch.com/en/locations/amsterdam-data-center
If you need "100% uptime" and got t
Anyone have recommendations for a highly reliable datacenter located in Holland?
Thanks
--
Craig White ~~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com
1.800.869.6908 ~~~ www.ttiassessments.com
Need help communicating between generations at work to achieve your de
I had a rather strange problem last week with one of our 8 core
servers. The users complained the performance was "slow" so I checked
the basic things, processes on top, vmstat for memory and context
switching, i/o stats for internal disk I/O, netstat for any network
issues and other things like ne
On 11/05/11 19:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 12:32 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>> Hello Steve,
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>>I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>>
>>>
> nothing and apparently today's target date has slipped, and 2) until
> CentOS admits that there is a problem, nothing will actually change.
Apparently they did admit and it does change:
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=31347&forum=53
___
[drifting farther off-topic]
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 04:34:49 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 3:18 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > And you must not use PostgreSQL, which won't painlessly upgrade on
> > anything.
>
> Automatically doing the dump/load (and magically finding the space f
On 5/11/2011 3:18 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 01:51:08 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I've always been a fan of the
>> coordination they have among the additional repositories that is lacking
>> in yum/rpm equivalents and was impressed when my 9.0.4 installs
>> painlessly upgraded
Hello Everyone,
Thanks for all your suggestions. I have gone with iptables and blocked
off the necessary region ip blocks in my firewall. If anyone is
interested i'll send the list.
Thanks again.
Dave.
On 5/11/11, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Robert Spangler wrote:
>> On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 01:51:08 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> I've always been a fan of the
> coordination they have among the additional repositories that is lacking
> in yum/rpm equivalents and was impressed when my 9.0.4 installs
> painlessly upgraded themselves to 10.0.4.
You must not have
On 05/11/2011 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
Just checking now and still don'
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>
>> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I missing something?
>
Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
>> the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
>
> iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -s x.x.x.x/24 -j DROP
I do not consider /24 subnet a "region subnet". You would need to use
something like sop
Dne 11.5.2011 18:58, David Mehler napsal(a):
> With regards blocking ip's and fail2ban, which method is better in
> terms of system resources, blocking via iptables as in the case of
> sshd or blocking via hosts.deny as in the case of postfix?
>
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/HOWTO_use_geo
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 12:58, the following was written:
> I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
> postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
> the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
> and was wondering instead
On 5/11/2011 12:32 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>
>> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I
On 5/11/2011 8:53 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> In my case, I have essentially three choices:
> 1.) Use SL 6;
> 2.) Wait on C6;
> 3.) Buy RHEL6.
>
> All of the three have costs, visible and hidden. 3 obviously has monetary
> costs, but both 1 and 2 have time and risk costs, since neither SL nor CentO
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>
> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I missing something?
The fact that 6.0 hasn't been released ye
Hello,
I'm running fail2ban on my centos machine. It's handling sshd and
postfix, and is working quite well. From the reports I'm seeing all
the atempts are from a certain registrar's region, I won't name it,
and was wondering instead of blocking individual ip's if there was a
way I could block wit
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
At Wed, 11 May 2011 07:31:37 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> At 01:35 PM 5/7/2011, you wrote:
> >On 07/05/11 20:32, David wrote:
> > >
> > > I got two recommendations:
> > > a) Used 'alsamixer' to unmute all channels. The were, as a responder
> > > suggested, muted.
> > > b) Installed kmo
At 01:35 PM 5/7/2011, you wrote:
>On 07/05/11 20:32, David wrote:
> >
> > I got two recommendations:
> > a) Used 'alsamixer' to unmute all channels. The were, as a responder
> > suggested, muted.
> > b) Installed kmod-alsa from elrepo. It produced a bunch of warnings
> > which I ignored.
> > c) I
On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 09:17:39 PM Craig White wrote:
> Upstream released exactly 6 months ago and still
> nothing and apparently today's target date has slipped, and 2) until
> CentOS admits that there is a problem, nothing will actually change.
Please read the CentOS-devel list and IRC channe
Steve Clark wrote:
>On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
>>> to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
>>> hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
>>>
>>> http
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
check out
Steve Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
> to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
> hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
check out the elrepo-kernel repo:
http://elrepo.org/
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu fami
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu fami
> If you take a look on google for "CentaurHauls i686" you will see that
> this CPU/chipset SAYS it fully supports i686 but it really does not.
> All of EL6 is i686 and not i586 (which CentaurHauls really
> fully supports).
>
> I think you are going to have issues with this CPU and EL6 forever.
>
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
>> VIA Eden Processor?
>>
>> cat /proc/cpuinfo
>> processor : 0
>> vendor_id : CentaurHauls
>> cpu family : 6
>> model
On 11/05/11 02:52, Dag Wieers wrote:
> If you finished your dd_rescue/ddrescue copy, you may want to look into
> the testdisk utility to see if somehow the partition-table was not
> tampered with. testdisk can provide you with different layouts based on
> filesystem patterns.
I've had good luck wit
Hi,
Am 11.05.2011 08:32, schrieb Maciej Jan Broniarz:
>
> Wiadomość napisana przez John R Pierce w dniu 2011-05-11, o godz. 01:51:
>
>> On 05/10/11 3:46 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
>>> I am sure it doesn't. I have booted 5.5 and 5.6 in linux dd mode. Then I
>>> have loaded the drivers from: aa
37 matches
Mail list logo
