On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Most likely because of the increasing number of noobs that delete/remove
> parts of the panels and then whine helplessly for someone to help them
> revert it back to default state.
But there's nothing to keep them removing the Notifi
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> forums. Perhaps it is possible to give a heads up about such breakage
> via the CentOS general or announce mailing list before such a broken
> package is released i
- Original Message
> From: Mark Baumwell
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Sun, April 17, 2011 12:30:31 PM
> Subject: [CentOS] Did you ID this spam? what does it do? Does it have a name?
>
>
>
> Steven Vishoot writes:
>
> >
> > Sorry, hopefully fixed account and computer that sta
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:06:59 -0500
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Patrick Lists
> wrote:
> > On 04/16/2011 06:34 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> without success. Is there a configuration file I can change or a
> >> configuration program I can run to customize this
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:07:39 -0700
Florin Andrei wrote:
> I'm a Thunderbird user almost since day one, but now I'm looking for
> something else.
A hearty vote for sylpheed from me - http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/ ...
or anything else that uses MH-style mailboxes instead of the monolithic
mbox o
I have a script I put in /etc/cron.fiveminutes
graphs.sh
#!/bin/sh
env LANG=C mrtg
/home/admin/domains/my---server.com/public_html/traffic/load/mrtg.cfg
--logging /dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1
env LANG=C mrtg
/home/admin/domains/my---server.com/public_html/traffic/eth0/mrtg.cfg
--logging /dev/null >/
Leonard den Ottolander wrote on 04/17/2011 01:37 PM:
>...It's a general request that if people are aware of
> breakage in upcoming updates to report it to this list.
Agree. I would advocate posting it to this list and making it part of
the Announcement post as well. This issue was discussed on
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Most likely because of the increasing number of noobs that delete/remove
> parts of the panels and then whine helplessly for someone to help them
> revert it back to default state.
Yeah, but I wish that wouldn't result in penalizing those that
actually have a clu
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Lars Hecking
> wrote:
>>> I realize it's not a huge deal, but it's an irritant. Why does Gnome
>>> want to limit the ability to customize?
>> Check out Gnome3 then. And weep.
>
> Hopefully Red Hat (and CentOS) will continue using Gnome 2.x.x
Mark Baumwell wrote:
>
> Steven Vishoot writes:
>
>> Sorry, hopefully fixed account and computer that started this.
>> Damn
>>
>> - Original Message
>>> From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
>>> To: CentOS mailing list
>>> Sent: Sun, April 10, 2011 6:29:15 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subje
Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:54:23PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 04/15/11 2:38 PM, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
>>> Hi there --
>>>
>>> I am running a server with the 5.6 64-bit distribution, and I am
>>> looking for an unrar rpm package.
>>> I have several repositories set
Steven Vishoot writes:
>
> Sorry, hopefully fixed account and computer that started this.
> Damn
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Sent: Sun, April 10, 2011 6:29:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subject)
> >
> > Steven Vishoo
Hello Rainer,
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 19:08 +0200, Rainer Traut wrote:
> Please don't take it wrong but Akemi gave you the link because not
> everyone reads the forums and the issue was discussed there.
Which is highly appreciated, but it happened *after* I reported these
issues, so it hardly coun
- Original Message -
> From: "Eero Volotinen"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 8:27:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
>
> 2011/4/17 Leonard den Ottolander :
> > Hi Akemi,
> >
> > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Am 17.04.2011 16:52, schrieb Leonard den Ottolander:
> Hi Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> See also:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
>
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> forums. Perh
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hi Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> See also:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
>
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> f
Hello Eero,
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 18:27 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Does this also affects grub? if so, then this is very critical, it can
> trash my rhel installations :/
Well I am not sure, it could be a coincidence, but on my Sempron (i686)
system I had to fix a broken grub (hanging at "GRU
2011/4/17 Leonard den Ottolander :
> Hi Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> See also:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
>
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> forums. Perhaps it is possible
Hi,
Reading
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37 I
noticed a warning about an upcoming bugged update
xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1
I would advise everyone to add
exclude=xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1
to their updates repo config.
Regards,
Leonar
Hi Akemi,
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> See also:
>
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
forums. Perhaps it is possible to give a heads up about such breakage
via the
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:16AM -0700, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
> I don't think it's a "distro related" issue, so i'm posting it here too:
>
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/11289/how-to-install-fedoraubuntu-with-encrypted-vgs-on-one-disk
>
> what am i missing?
>
> why doesn't GRUB
On 03/31/2011 02:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> For such leading edge features not yet integrated into typical kernel
> and system support, you'll have far more success advancing and getting
> it tested than working inside the fundamentlaly 4 year old
> architecture of the available CentOS 5.5.
I don't think it's a "distro related" issue, so i'm posting it here too:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/11289/how-to-install-fedoraubuntu-with-encrypted-vgs-on-one-disk
what am i missing?
why doesn't GRUB offer the 2 distros@boot, why is it only offering only 1?? why
doesn't it sees th
On 04/16/11 9:47 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> 16 Apr 19:46:13 ntpdate[1968]: step time server 204.235.61.9 offset
> 14408.651330 sec
14400 seconds is 4 hours. not sure the significance of that, but...
the commonest issue with messed up time zones is whether the BIOS CMOS
clock is set to UTC or lo
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:55:08PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:40 PM, Brandon Ooi wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> > >
> > > One was a hardware raid over fibre channel, which silently corrupted
> > > itself. System checked out fine, raid ar
25 matches
Mail list logo
