Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this > site.  They are using our name without permission. Attribution goes to EliteMoly: CentALT repository not ready for mirroring, rpms not signed. EPEL is must have to be

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:39 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> Joe, Randy and James are my mentors of 15, 5 and 5 years, >> respectively, and all said the same thing, namely "nuke and repave, be >> sure to be current on BIND" since it is a purpose-built box (ns1). > > Perhaps is it a difference in la

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:39 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> With 20/20 hindsight, it is clear that I shouldn't have posted the >> original post asking the list for help and hopefully informing other >> potential targets of the risk (read: there were no responses to the >> original post, therefore i

Re: [CentOS] openoffice & command line printing

2011-02-18 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >On 18/02/2011, at 2:29 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >> Everyone, >> >> I am trying to print some *.doc files from the command line with >> openoffice on centos 5.5 with using cups as the print server. >> >> I can open the file from the command lin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-18 Thread Anthony
On 18/02/11 20:49, Michael Gliwinski wrote: > > Try adding 'nohup' before 'java'. Closing SSH session closes the shell which > sends HUP to its children. I religiously use 'screen' when logging in remotely to do any work. Not only has saved me from interrupted work the connection breaks, but i

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread James Hogarth
> > Joe, Randy and James are my mentors of 15, 5 and 5 years, > respectively, and all said the same thing, namely "nuke and repave, be > sure to be current on BIND" since it is a purpose-built box (ns1). > Perhaps is it a difference in language and what you mean by mentor and where I would mean ol

Re: [CentOS] openoffice & command line printing

2011-02-18 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 19/02/2011, at 3:30 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Cameron, > > Thanks for your suggestion > > On my system that command results in printing the document on the > desired printer, but does not return back to the shell prompt. If I add > -terminate_after_init so that the command line is

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:37 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > Your mentor? What do you mean by that? The same thing Wikipedia says, namely: a trusted friend, counselor or teacher, usually a more experienced person. Some professions have "mentoring programs" in which newcomers are paired with more ex

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 18:32 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, February 18, 2011 04:15:28 pm Always Learning wrote: > > Don't understand what you mean by 'within our /19'. > I think I do; he's an ISP, and apparently someone inside his address block > ... has hacked in some way the zone file(

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread James Hogarth
> > I think I do; he's an ISP, and apparently someone inside his address block > (the CIDR notation /19; his actual block is publicly found by doing a quick > nslookup of his domain name, noting the IP address of the DNS server(s) > listed, and then a whois of the IP address of the DNS server(s)

Re: [CentOS] We haven't had a lot of demand for Fedora...people seem okay with CentOS!

2011-02-18 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> Larry, I suggest you leave this group while it's still safe todo so. >> >> What do you have against CentOS & FOSS > > This was posted as a compliment to the CentOS Team and to the Cen

Re: [CentOS] We haven't had a lot of demand for Fedora...people seem okay with CentOS!

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Larry, I suggest you leave this group while it's still safe todo so. > > What do you have against CentOS & FOSS Absolutely nothing to the purity of Ivory soap :) 26 of our favorite servers run CentOS. Having read what Lamar wrote, namel

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, February 18, 2011 04:15:28 pm Always Learning wrote: > > From: Larry Vaden > > Our site running Centos 4.8 and 5.5 name servers was hacked with > > the result that www.yahoo.com is now within our /19 and causing > > some grief. > > Don't understand what you mean by 'within our /19'.

Re: [CentOS] request for a learning moment

2011-02-18 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Can you please stop this, finally? Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] We haven't had a lot of demand for Fedora...people seem okay with CentOS!

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Larry, I suggest you leave this group while it's still safe todo so. > > What do you have against CentOS & FOSS This was posted as a compliment to the CentOS Team and to the CentOS Community. Should the vendor be asked for a less ambiguo

Re: [CentOS] We haven't had a lot of demand for Fedora...people seem okay with CentOS!

2011-02-18 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Larry, I suggest you leave this group while it's still safe todo so. What do you have against CentOS & FOSS On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: > That just in from chunkhost.com, where you help them beta test Xen for $FREE > :) > > regards/ldv/va...@texoma.net > __

[CentOS] We haven't had a lot of demand for Fedora...people seem okay with CentOS!

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
That just in from chunkhost.com, where you help them beta test Xen for $FREE :) regards/ldv/va...@texoma.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > I don't see the mock config or build scripts, however; perhaps I'm not > looking in the right place. THANKS for a very helpful post. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cento

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread James Hogarth
> > Our network consists of aaa.bbb.ccc.0/19.  That's CIDR notation for > 8,192 addresses. > But what has that got to do with "www.yahoo.com moved into our /19" your comment is pretty unclear. > > IMHO, fully updated purpose-built servers running 4.8 should have more > or less the same vulne

Re: [CentOS] OT - simple CAD program to design electronic circuits with

2011-02-18 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Keith Roberts wrote: > To: CentOS mailing list > From: Keith Roberts > Subject: [CentOS] OT - simple CAD program to design electronic circuits with > > Is there an electronic circuit design CAD package > available for Centos 5.5 please? Thanks for all the replies and sugge

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> From: Larry Vaden >> Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:03 PM >> Subject: sources of bind-9.7.2-P3 rpms for Centos 4.8 and 5.5? > > >> Our site running Centos 4.8 and 5.5 name servers was hacked with >> the result that www.yahoo.com is now with

Re: [CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Always Learning wrote: > Don't understand what you mean by 'within our /19'. Have your IP ranges > changed?  If your Bind date is corrupt, why not re-install Centos and > then restore the domains data from one of your regular backups? Our network consists of aaa.b

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server ldap://127.0.0.1

2011-02-18 Thread Tim Alberts
On 2/18/2011 11:05 AM, Tim Alberts wrote: > I found a helpful page: > http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxTutorialLDAP.html approximately > 2/3 down the page, section titled 'Notes: LDAP on Red Hat/Fedora > distribution:' An example database recovery command as follows: > > /usr/sbin/slapd_db_

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, February 18, 2011 01:39:48 pm Farkas Levente wrote: > and please don't ask me to why. just to mention some very basic thing > where is the mock config files? and i can ask dozens of such questions > (what is did previously and i'm the only only one who send detail > description how to re

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread Eero Volotinen
2011/2/18 John Hinton : > On 2/18/2011 3:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote: >> >>> I haven't spoken with the hackerguardian people yet but it would be >>> nice if I could just say "I'm using CentOS 5.5" and have them factor >>> that into their report so that I can focus on any real issues. Are >>> there

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread John Jasen
On 02/18/2011 03:09 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: > Hackerguiardian is a commercial service (it's actually "COMODO CA > Limited"). Their scan looks thorough. Obviously they're just matching > up version numbers with CVE notices but I have a feeling most of these > guys are going to be doing the same

[CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

2011-02-18 Thread Always Learning
> From: Larry Vaden > Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:03 PM > Subject: sources of bind-9.7.2-P3 rpms for Centos 4.8 and 5.5? > Our site running Centos 4.8 and 5.5 name servers was hacked with > the result that www.yahoo.com is now within our /19 and causing > some grief. Don't understand what you

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
John Hinton wrote: > On 2/18/2011 3:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote: >> >>> I haven't spoken with the hackerguardian people yet but it would be >>> nice if I could just say "I'm using CentOS 5.5" and have them factor >>> that into their report so that I can focus on any real issues. Are >>> there vulne

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, February 18, 2011 03:36:58 pm Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Obviously always exceptions but as you alluded to, "know your > audience" is a good rule of thumb. Public Speaking 101. Also 'Linux Distribution 101' in reality; the CentOS audience consists largely of those wanting as close

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread John Hinton
On 2/18/2011 3:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote: > >> I haven't spoken with the hackerguardian people yet but it would be >> nice if I could just say "I'm using CentOS 5.5" and have them factor >> that into their report so that I can focus on any real issues. Are >> there vulnerability scanning services

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread David Brian Chait
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R. Dennison Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:43 PM To: Always Learning Cc: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6? On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:19:16PM +,

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > Larry, please take my advice and get help or, at the very least, talk to > someone about the matters troubling you. It is bad to hold everything > inside you. Please share your problems with someone you can relate to. > It is for your own

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/18/2011 12:39 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 14:13, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree >

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Always Learning
There are lots of people in similar circumstances to Larry. He has a recognised medical syndrome. People get problems. Some do not know how to effectively tackle their major problem so stress increases to a significant and detrimental extent. Often the person is never fully aware of high stress

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread John R. Dennison
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:19:16PM +, Always Learning wrote: > > Larry, please take my advice and get help or, at the very least, talk to > someone about the matters troubling you. It is bad to hold everything > inside you. Please share your problems with someone you can relate to. > It is for

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 03:25:23PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, February 18, 2011 02:54:38 pm Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > In an industry where one-man companies are not uncommon, you learn to > > never read too much into titles. :) > > True enough. > > While my title is 'CIO' it probably s

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
Dr. Ed Morbius wrote: > on 14:20 Fri 18 Feb, Michael B Allen (iop...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> Can someone recommend a good vulnerability scanning service? I just >> need the minimum for PCI compliance (it's a sort of credit card >> processing certification). > I'd suggest you educate yourself on th

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, February 18, 2011 02:54:38 pm Ray Van Dolson wrote: > In an industry where one-man companies are not uncommon, you learn to > never read too much into titles. :) True enough. While my title is 'CIO' it probably should be 'IT Department' as I only have a consultant and a group of volun

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread Brian Mathis
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone recommend a good vulnerability scanning service? I just > need the minimum for PCI compliance (it's a sort of credit card > processing certification). > > I got a free scan from https://www.hackerguardian.com/ and their

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server ldap://127.0.0.1

2011-02-18 Thread Peter Brady
On 18/02/11 10:11 AM, Tim Alberts wrote: > Checking configuration files for slapd: bdb_db_open: unclean shutdown > detected; attempting recovery. > bdb_db_open: Recovery skipped in read-only mode. Run manual recovery if > errors are encountered. > config file testing succeeded The LDAP database f

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:50 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > He's a manager! Probably wears a tie! PHB alert The guy has problems. His only method of trying to deal with his problems, and getting away from the stress, is posting on here. He needs to seek professional help, medically and oth

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread Dr. Ed Morbius
on 14:20 Fri 18 Feb, Michael B Allen (iop...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone recommend a good vulnerability scanning service? I just > need the minimum for PCI compliance (it's a sort of credit card > processing certification). First: if you're headed down the compliance / certification

Re: [CentOS] request for a learning moment

2011-02-18 Thread Scot P. Floess
Larry, Not to be a smart alec, I'd say it ought to be self evident considering the flow of emails complaining about your posts On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Scot P. Floess wrote: >> >> I'd expect better behavior and conduct from someon

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread Michael B Allen
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:36 PM, wrote: > Hi, there, > > Michael B Allen wrote: >> >> Can someone recommend a good vulnerability scanning service? I just >> need the minimum for PCI compliance (it's a sort of credit card >> processing certification). > > "Sort of"? ROTFL. You need a *serious* sca

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
Scot P. Floess wrote: > > Fair enough - "not only am I the president, but I'm also a client too" :D > > In all seriousness, I'd think representing his own company, he'd be more > professional in that representation... > Yup. There's a small ISP down on the Space Coast in FL, where I spoke to the o

[CentOS] request for a learning moment

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Scot P. Floess wrote: > > I'd expect better behavior and conduct from someone who holds such a > title... Since beauty is in the eye of the beholder(s), please select my most egregious post(s) and let me know said post(s) so that I have the opportunity to better

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Scot P. Floess
Fair enough - "not only am I the president, but I'm also a client too" :D In all seriousness, I'd think representing his own company, he'd be more professional in that representation... > In an industry where one-man companies are not uncommon, you learn to > never read too much into titles.

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Scot P. Floess wrote: > > > > What is really sad, if one searches Larry's name on Linked In, he appears > > to be the CEO Internet Texoma, Inc. > > > > I'd expect better behavior and conduct from someone who holds such a > > title.

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
Scot P. Floess wrote: > > What is really sad, if one searches Larry's name on Linked In, he appears > to be the CEO Internet Texoma, Inc. > > I'd expect better behavior and conduct from someone who holds such a > title... > He's a manager! Probably wears a tie! PHB alert mark > >> E

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Mathieu Baudier
> Anyway, listmaster, I vote to kick him off the list. As others have already pointed out, by definition of the CentOS project this list is very vulnerable to trolling around releases of new versions. A troll (maybe not the right term, but that's what comes to my mind) just has to come and ask TH

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Scot P. Floess
What is really sad, if one searches Larry's name on Linked In, he appears to be the CEO Internet Texoma, Inc. I'd expect better behavior and conduct from someone who holds such a title... > Enough. Larry Vaden seems to get his jollies by working at provoking > flamewars and other irritations,

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
Hi, there, Michael B Allen wrote: > > Can someone recommend a good vulnerability scanning service? I just > need the minimum for PCI compliance (it's a sort of credit card > processing certification). "Sort of"? ROTFL. You need a *serious* scan, commercially done AFAIK. The *minimum* qualificatio

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread Baird, Josh
We use Qualys for PCI vulnerability scanning. Josh -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael B Allen Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:20 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Sca

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
Enough. Larry Vaden seems to get his jollies by working at provoking flamewars and other irritations, while contributing actually nothing to the topic of the list. Wonder if, 16 or so years ago, his idea of "fun" was cascades of "I love Mentos" threads in newsgroups who he had no interest in. Any

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server ldap://127.0.0.1

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
Tim Alberts wrote: > On 2/18/2011 10:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Tim Alberts wrote: >>> Hello, I have a problem... >>> >>> Unfortunately a couple weeks ago, we had a power outage. Ever since, I >>> am having continuous problems with authentication to the server. I see >>> in /var/log/messag

[CentOS] Recommendation for a Good Vulnerability Scanning Service?

2011-02-18 Thread Michael B Allen
Hi, Can someone recommend a good vulnerability scanning service? I just need the minimum for PCI compliance (it's a sort of credit card processing certification). I got a free scan from https://www.hackerguardian.com/ and their scan reported a number of "Fail" results. I haven't checked them all

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server ldap://127.0.0.1

2011-02-18 Thread Tim Alberts
On 2/18/2011 10:11 AM, Tim Alberts wrote: > > Update, using Webmin to restart the server, I see the following: > Stopping slapd: [ OK ] > Stopping slurpd: [ OK ] > Checking configuration files for slapd: bdb_db_open: unclean shutdown > detected; attempting recovery. > bdb_db_open: Recovery ski

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: >        Can you please keep the conspiracy nonsense to yourself? > > > > >                                                        John > > -- > Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give > offense. Rather, i

Re: [CentOS] openoffice & command line printing

2011-02-18 Thread Bill Campbell
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >On 18/02/2011, at 2:29 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >> Everyone, >> >> I am trying to print some *.doc files from the command line with >> openoffice on centos 5.5 with using cups as the print server. >> >> I can open the file from the command lin

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Farkas Levente
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 14:13, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree >>> either. >>> >> >> So CentOS6 cannot be released,

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server ldap://127.0.0.1

2011-02-18 Thread Tim Alberts
On 2/18/2011 10:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Tim Alberts wrote: >> Hello, I have a problem... >> >> Unfortunately a couple weeks ago, we had a power outage. Ever since, I >> am having continuous problems with authentication to the server. I see >> in /var/log/messages > > Have you resynched

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server ldap://127.0.0.1

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
Tim Alberts wrote: > Hello, I have a problem that I'm really having trouble figuring out. I > run CentOS Linux 5.5. I have three servers. All have been setup and > running with LDAP authentication for a couple years with absolutely no > problems. > > Unfortunately a couple weeks ago, we had a po

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server ldap://127.0.0.1

2011-02-18 Thread Tim Alberts
On 2/18/2011 9:13 AM, Tim Alberts wrote: > Hello, I have a problem that I'm really having trouble figuring out. I > run CentOS Linux 5.5. I have three servers. All have been setup and > running wi.. Update, using Webmin to restart the server, I see the following: Stopping slapd: [ OK ] Stopp

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Farkas Levente
On 02/18/2011 04:35 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/18/2011 09:29 AM, Ned Slider wrote: >> On 18/02/11 15:12, Larry Vaden wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hug

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > On 02/18/2011 11:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: > > I personally don't see how the RH team could > have ... a conspiracy to harm CentOS or any other rebuilding effort. Can you p

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Robert Heller
At Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:06:50 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > On 02/18/2011 11:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: > > > >> I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and > >> omitted SRPMs from the mani

[CentOS] nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server ldap://127.0.0.1

2011-02-18 Thread Tim Alberts
Hello, I have a problem that I'm really having trouble figuring out. I run CentOS Linux 5.5. I have three servers. All have been setup and running with LDAP authentication for a couple years with absolutely no problems. Unfortunately a couple weeks ago, we had a power outage. Ever since, I

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Steve Clark
On 02/18/2011 11:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and omitted SRPMs from the manifest, but I certainly believe they did according to reports. At some point d

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread John R. Dennison
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: > > I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and > omitted SRPMs from the manifest, but I certainly believe they did > according to reports. At some point do you think perhaps you can learn how to trim

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 18/02/11 15:12, Larry Vaden wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughes  wrote: >>> On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Red Hat still has

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID Level 1, smartd and changing dev numbers

2011-02-18 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:05:41PM -0500, Tom H wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:09 PM, compdoc wrote: >> >> >> In Ubuntu and Fedora, UUID's the default replacement of "/dev/sdXY" >> devices, but md and lvm devices are referred to in mor

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/18/2011 09:29 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 18/02/11 15:12, Larry Vaden wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Red Hat still has not put se

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Ned Slider
On 18/02/11 15:12, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree ei

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree >>> either. >>> >> >> So CentOS6 cannot be released

Re: [CentOS] openoffice & command line printing

2011-02-18 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On 18/02/2011, at 2:29 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > I am trying to print some *.doc files from the command line with > openoffice on centos 5.5 with using cups as the print server. > > I can open the file from the command line with open office and then > print it manually from th

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-18 Thread m . roth
Martin Hewitt wrote: > It's strange how one can wake up and suddenly notice a pattern... > > Looking through the straces, and the disconnect timestamps of the SSH > sessions, it seems that the processes are dying as soon as, or shortly > after the SSH session is closed. > > My command is something

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree >> either. >> > > So CentOS6 cannot be released, or even built completely before > those missing src.rpms are

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-18 Thread Martin Hewitt
On 18 February 2011 09:49, Michael Gliwinski wrote: > On Friday 18 Feb 2011 09:53:39 Martin Hewitt wrote: >> My command is something along the lines of: >> >> java -cp /path/to/shared/libs/*:/path/to/class/directory/ >> path.to.MyApp > out.log 2>&1 & >> >> Does anyone have an idea as to why this p

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-18 Thread Michael Gliwinski
On Friday 18 Feb 2011 09:53:39 Martin Hewitt wrote: > My command is something along the lines of: > > java -cp /path/to/shared/libs/*:/path/to/class/directory/ > path.to.MyApp > out.log 2>&1 & > > Does anyone have an idea as to why this process is closing when the > SSH window that started it clo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-18 Thread Martin Hewitt
It's strange how one can wake up and suddenly notice a pattern... Looking through the straces, and the disconnect timestamps of the SSH sessions, it seems that the processes are dying as soon as, or shortly after the SSH session is closed. My command is something along the lines of: java -cp /pa

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death

2011-02-18 Thread Martin Hewitt
Hi Cameron, On 18 February 2011 04:33, Cameron Kerr wrote: > > On 17/02/2011, at 9:35 PM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: > >>> I've been running our apps as purely as I can (java -cp >>> /path/to/libs/* path.to.the.App) and they're still being send SIGHUP >>> signals for reasons I can't understand. >> >

Re: [CentOS] Authentication Problems

2011-02-18 Thread James Bensley
No --James. (This email was sent from a mobile device) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

2011-02-18 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree > either. > So CentOS6 cannot be released, or even built completely before those missing src.rpms are released? > > CentOS releases our source on exactly th