I've started building a JBOD out of a Supermicro case for expanding
the available storage on my home network. So I have a few comments
about what I learned so far about using Supermicro as JBODs.
Supermicro has several multi bay chassis as part of their current
product line but I'm looking to do t
On 02/14/11 11:05 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> subscription model, no. donations, yes.
as a small cog in a fairly large multinational company, I can say its a
lot easier to get approval for a 'subscription' or 'service' than it is
to donate money.
___
2011/2/15 R - elists :
>
>
>>
>> I never ask, and never complain, since I don't feel this
>> totally free product owes me anything... As a matter of fact,
>> we owe the project...
>
> Scott,
>
> yes, we all owe the CentOS project in some way...
>
> thing is, IDFR if we have ever been fully updated
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 09:00 PM, robert mena wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
>> either versions regarding the current status.
>
> I just finished pushing through the 5.6 distro tree's into
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 06:18:02PM -0800, R - elists wrote:
>
> professionally, we desire to see a small fee subscription model for support
> of all the people/project overhead...
Who is this "we" you speak of?
John
--
Power alw
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 18:18 -0800, R - elists wrote:
>
> >
> > I never ask, and never complain, since I don't feel this
> > totally free product owes me anything... As a matter of fact,
> > we owe the project...
>
> Scott,
>
> yes, we all owe the CentOS project in some way...
>
> thing is,
>
> I never ask, and never complain, since I don't feel this
> totally free product owes me anything... As a matter of fact,
> we owe the project...
Scott,
yes, we all owe the CentOS project in some way...
thing is, IDFR if we have ever been fully updated on the Open Letter
problem(s) with
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:00:43PM -0400, robert mena wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
>> either versions regarding the current status.
>>
>> So, what is the current status of both
rpmforge
在 2011-2-15 上午8:08，"Larry Vaden" 写道：
> thanks/ldv
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists
thanks/ldv
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 14:24 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> I suppose the CentOS devs have other minor duties like feeding families,
> taking children to ball games and dance recitals, helping with homework,
> etc...
Don't forget all the jobs that need doing in and around the house AND
finding time
On 02/14/2011 11:08 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
>> either versions regarding the current status.
>
> I just finished pushing through the 5.6 distro tree's into the distro
where 'just' ~ 12 mnutes back..
- KB
On 02/14/2011 09:00 PM, robert mena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
> either versions regarding the current status.
I just finished pushing through the 5.6 distro tree's into the distro
builders ( so isos get built etc and moved to qa ). Wa
> Anyway, it's an alternative method if you don't need hoards of
> horsepower but if reliability is most important. As always, watch the
> rating of any seller. I've had good luck over the years.
I really like Dell iDrac remote management and really good linux
support on hardware like omsa.
Fujit
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 2/14/2011 1:50 PM Morten P.D. Stevens spake the following:
>> 2011/2/14 robert mena :
>>> Hi,
>>> Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
>>> either versions regarding the current status.
>>> So, what is the c
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 18:17 -0400, robert mena wrote:
> Heretic! You've caused a turbulence on the force. The Gods of Kobol
> won't answer your requests anymore!!
stop top posting your the one causing the disturbance
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens
> wrote:
>
on 2/14/2011 1:50 PM Morten P.D. Stevens spake the following:
> 2011/2/14 robert mena :
>> Hi,
>> Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
>> either versions regarding the current status.
>> So, what is the current status of both versions? (like 60%)
>
> I wonder for
Heretic! You've caused a turbulence on the force. The Gods of Kobol won't
answer your requests anymore!!
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens <
mstev...@imt-systems.com> wrote:
> 2011/2/14 robert mena :
> > Hi,
> > Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Drew wrote:
>> Recently a discussion around server
>> specifications were floated with mention
>> of routines to stress the configurations.
>>
>> Do these stress suites exist for server
>> testing?
>
> http://www.stresslinux.org/
>
> IMHO, contains one of the best
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:01 -0800, Bazooka Joe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:28 +, Keith Beeby wrote:
> >> Also seeing this issue with CentOS 5.4 and 5.5 with NFS shared
> >> storage, according the the VMware knowledge base
2011/2/14 robert mena :
> Hi,
> Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
> either versions regarding the current status.
> So, what is the current status of both versions? (like 60%)
I wonder for a long time why there is no detailed information about the release
sta
On 02/12/2011 04:57 PM, Peter Ivanov wrote:
> actually the line
> ln -s /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.15 /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.15
> solved my problem
Your earlier "rpm -ql" and "rpm -V" output indicated that
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/mysql-x86_64.conf was present and correct, so you
probably
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:00:43PM -0400, robert mena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
> either versions regarding the current status.
>
> So, what is the current status of both versions? (like 60%)
Your request just moved it back b
2011/2/14 compdoc :
>>last value is 0, on both drives.
>
> Looks to me like Smart thinks the drives are fine. Are they over-heating?
Hard to say, system is about 4++ years old :)
>
> What drives are they? Have a model number?
maybe it just wise to install new server..
--
Eero
__
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:28 +, Keith Beeby wrote:
>> Also seeing this issue with CentOS 5.4 and 5.5 with NFS shared
>> storage, according the the VMware knowledge base article this should
>> have been resolved in v5.1 update??.
>> D
Hi,
Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
either versions regarding the current status.
So, what is the current status of both versions? (like 60%)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
>last value is 0, on both drives.
Looks to me like Smart thinks the drives are fine. Are they over-heating?
What drives are they? Have a model number?
Ever run memtest86+ on the system?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.o
2011/2/14 compdoc :
>> Value is 0, on both drives.
>
> It's still possible to have a bad sector, but not have it show up in the
> Reallocated Sector Count.
>
> What does this line say:
>
> Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
>
> Is the last value greater than zero?
last va
Hi all,
I get the following in my logs, seems like its benign but wanted to
get any thoughts.
nm-system-settings:ifcfg-rh: parsing /etc/sysconfig/network-
scripts/ifcfg-bond0 ...
nm-system-settings:ifcfg-rh: error: Missing or invalid IP4
prefix '0'
I get this for all 4 nics in m
>I notice that any VMs running under it only have access to Realtek RTL8139C
at 100 Mbps nics.
In kvm, you have the option to use e1000 or the pv drivers. You can probably
specify another nic in xen, but you'll have to research which it supports.
Just make sure you retain the mac addres
> Value is 0, on both drives.
It's still possible to have a bad sector, but not have it show up in the
Reallocated Sector Count.
What does this line say:
Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
Is the last value greater than zero?
__
I've got xen-3.0.3-105.el5_5.5 running on Centos 5.5 and all is running smooth
but I notice that any VMs running under it only have access to Realtek RTL8139C
at 100 Mbps nics.
We have 4 x 1G nics configured in a port channel so I'd really like to be able
to give my VMs 1000Mbps nics.
Does anyon
2011/2/14 compdoc :
>> end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 451792231
>
> You should run: smartctl -a /dev/sda
>
> Look for something like this line:
>
> Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail Always - 0
>
> If that last value is greater than 0, replace the drive...
Value is 0, o
> end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 451792231
You should run: smartctl -a /dev/sda
Look for something like this line:
Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail Always - 0
If that last value is greater than 0, replace the drive...
___
> Recently a discussion around server
> specifications were floated with mention
> of routines to stress the configurations.
>
> Do these stress suites exist for server
> testing?
http://www.stresslinux.org/
IMHO, contains one of the best collection of linux based stress
testing & verification to
>> It's certainly possible that the error I was receiving was a different
>> reason, though similar symptoms. We started seeing filesystems go
>> read-only, and only rebooting would clear it up.
>
> I use that setting on the "Host OS" for VMWare to prevent a whole vm
> from getting killed.
>
> That
take a closer look at the message it states:
end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 451792263
this usually indicates there is corruption on the disk.
the meaning is quite simple, you have a problem with your first disk
/dev/sda , and you need to investigate it further.
first of all run a smartc
At Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:13:31 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> What this means?
>
> md: syncing RAID array md0
> md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 1000 KB/sec/disc.
> md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than
> 20 KB/sec) for reconstruct
On 02/14/2011 07:31 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 12:08 +, Keith Beeby wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> So the 'fix' is applied directly to the host os,
>>
>> no, to the *guest* OS instances. [please, do not top-post].
>>
>>> i
Recently a discussion around server
specifications were floated with mention
of routines to stress the configurations.
Do these stress suites exist for server
testing?
--Hal.
--
Hal Davison
Observe Goal, Set the course, Burn the map
Davison Consulting
This correspondence was composed using
D
Hi List,
What this means?
md: syncing RAID array md0
md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 1000 KB/sec/disc.
md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than
20 KB/sec) for reconstruction.
md: using 128k window, over a total of 2096384 blocks.
md: md0: sync done.
RAID
> probably due to the fact that centos 5.6 hasn't been released yet, any
> packages released by RH in 5.6 and afterwards aren't in centos yet.
Looks like you are correct -- I didn't realize RH5.6 had been released.
Thanks for that.
___
CentOS mailing
James Chase wrote:
> According to the RH5 Errata, the most recent package for
> scsi-target-utils is scsi-target-utils-1.0.8-0.el5.x86_64.rpm
>
> However the latest update via yum on CentOS is labeled
> scsi-target-utils-0.0-6.20091205snap.el5_5.3
probably due to the fact that centos 5.6 hasn't be
On 2/14/2011 10:53 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Nico-Garcia wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampen
>> wrote:
>>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in
t
According to the RH5 Errata, the most recent package for
scsi-target-utils is scsi-target-utils-1.0.8-0.el5.x86_64.rpm
However the latest update via yum on CentOS is labeled
scsi-target-utils-0.0-6.20091205snap.el5_5.3
Additionally, the package info says it is not compatible with iSCSI yet,
wh
On 2/14/2011 9:53 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> This system was initially commissioned after burn in, in late 2004 - An
> Intel mb. It started with RH9, then went FC3, then CentOS5.
> As mentioned the ECC memory has warned me when things are not well and
> allowed me to take remedial action before anyt
Nico-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in
the ssytem components on servers upon their first bootup
LinuxBoot is now CoreBoot at http://www.coreboot.org/
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Trust me, it's a pain in the keister in production. If the standard is
now enabled, good: I haven't had my hands inside a server in a year, I
admit it. (My current role doesn't call for it.) It *didn't* used to
be standard. Are you sure it is?
I bu
On 2/14/11 7:57 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> I just had this idea of exploring eSATA since most machines already
>> have an eSATA port. So if I don't get this working, it's not a big
>> deal. But, I think it could be a cheap alternative to SAS / FC
>> interconnect.
>
> Then take the supermicro chass
On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 02/13/11 1:21 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> I'm trying to build a dense
On 2/14/11 5:43 AM, erikmccaskey64 wrote:
>
> http://www.filehippo.com/download_sandboxie/
>
> It's a great application [ for windows... :\ ]
>
> Are there any programs under CentOS, that has the ~same features?
>
> To be specific: The user could launch a program [e.g.: Google Chrome] inside
> this
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 12:08 +, Keith Beeby wrote:
>> Hi,
>> So the 'fix' is applied directly to the host os,
>
> no, to the *guest* OS instances. [please, do not top-post].
>
>> is this the correct thing to do?
>> sysctl -w vm.min_
Hi Mathieu,
On 14 Feb 2011, at 12:17, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> When I package a "Runnable JAR" using the Eclipse Export wizard, in
>> the manifest file, the main-class is given as
>> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.jarinjarloader.JarRsrcLoader, which I presume
>> is a little bit of code to redirect the
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:49 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> But the accumulated costs of the higher end motherboard, memory,
>> shortage of space for upgrades in the same unit, the downtime at the
>> BIOS to reset the "disabled by default" ECC settings
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 12:08 +, Keith Beeby wrote:
> Hi,
> So the 'fix' is applied directly to the host os,
no, to the *guest* OS instances. [please, do not top-post].
> is this the correct thing to do?
> sysctl -w vm.min_free_kbytes = 8192
No space(s) I believe.
sysctl -w vm.min_free_kbyt
> When I package a "Runnable JAR" using the Eclipse Export wizard, in
> the manifest file, the main-class is given as
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.jarinjarloader.JarRsrcLoader, which I presume
> is a little bit of code to redirect the main method to the main method
> of my actual application. This is
Hi,
On 02/14/2011 11:43 AM, erikmccaskey64 wrote:
> Are there any programs under CentOS, that has the ~same features?
I dont use or know about windows, but doing chroots - even for specific
user cases isnt hard. If you are going to be doing lots of them, make
sure there is a local mirror and yu
Hi,
So the 'fix' is applied directly to the host os, is this the correct thing to
do?
sysctl -w vm.min_free_kbytes = 8192
Keith
On 14 Feb 2011, at 10:36, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
> wrote:
> em and force a check with "fsck -f" and
occasio
Hi Mathieu,
> Can you please give more details about this "additional" code? How did
> you find out?
When I package a "Runnable JAR" using the Eclipse Export wizard, in
the manifest file, the main-class is given as
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.jarinjarloader.JarRsrcLoader, which I presume
is a little
http://www.filehippo.com/download_sandboxie/
It's a great application [ for windows... :\ ]
Are there any programs under CentOS, that has the ~same features?
To be specific: The user could launch a program [e.g.: Google Chrome] inside
this sandbox, and when he/she exits Google Chrome, all t
> I added in as many try...catch blocks as I could and got no useful
> output, but it occurred to me that the Eclipse loader is adding in
> another level of code between my application and the kernel.
Can you please give more details about this "additional" code? How did
you find out?
Do you mean
Hi Mark,
Over the weekend I've been testing the environment under various
circumstances, and it seems that the kill issue is not confined to one
app - it's afflicting all jars I've packaged with Eclipse.
I added in as many try...catch blocks as I could and got no useful
output, but it occurred to
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
em and force a check with "fsck -f" and
>> > occasionally find errors.
>> http://communities.vmware.com/message/245983
>> The setting we used to resolve was vm.min_free_kbytes = 8192
>> Previous to this we were seeing the error pop up eve
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> But the accumulated costs of the higher end motherboard, memory,
> shortage of space for upgrades in the same unit, the downtime at the
> BIOS to reset the "disabled by default" ECC settings in the BIOS, and
> the system monitoring to detect and mana
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:21 -0700, compdoc wrote:
>
>>> ECC allows for single bit errors to be corrected and multiple bit
>>> errors to be noticed.
>
>> I know what it is and I've used it in the past, but I just don't see many
>> errors going on in d
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 07:40 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> But I'm looking at http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/6.0/, and I'm
> not even seeing hooks for RHEL 4. Is it worth pursuing compatibility
> with that OS? Are other people using it?
Well all the source rpms are there. If they will bu
67 matches
Mail list logo
