On 01/19/11 8:35 PM, Cameron Kerr wrote:
> Have a look at the GLibc manual regarding profiling tools.
>
> Of course, that depends on what exactly you mean by 'performance' here, as
> that can be measured in a number of different ways.
indeed, since glibc is merely a collection of a few 100 core f
Have a look at the GLibc manual regarding profiling tools.
Of course, that depends on what exactly you mean by 'performance' here, as that
can be measured in a number of different ways.
On 20/01/2011, at 4:46 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
> I was wondering, how does one measure the performance of glibc? A
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 19 January 2011 06:09, Agnello George wrote:
>> is there a way i can verify or write a script to check each file that is in
>> the SVN is same as that in the dev environment .
> find . -type f | grep -v .svn | xargs md5sum
>
> then diff
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Agnello George
wrote:
> HI
>
> i have currently started to deploy code into our production environment
> from the the dev environment, we deploy code on to the production from the
> svn , ( i do a svn export ) , some times not code is checked into the svn
> and
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mike McCarty
wrote:
> Nataraj wrote:
>> There's always ncftp which has the ability to resume an interrupted file
>> transfer, though I regularly transfer DVD images with both http and ftp
>> without any errors.
>
> wget
"rsync --partial", baby, "rsync --partial"!!
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:04 PM, wrote:
> I'm trying to update a workstation, and it wants to update mpeg2-utils.
> But that has a dependency of libmpeg2-0.5.1-3, for i386. epel doesn't have
> it, and I tried looking on rpmfusion.org, and I can only find a very few
> packages there. Anyone have a
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/19/2011 9:13 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> I do think CentOS gets unreasonably knocked as a desktop OS. I definitely
>> don't use it on desktops *because* I run it on servers.
>>
>
> The difference is that open source server software has
I was wondering, how does one measure the performance of glibc? Are
there any tools? I am planning to compile my own version of glibc for
educational purposes and I was simply curious.
TIA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2011, at 02:16, "aurfal...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>> is any one aware quotas not working in 5,5? I'm using XFS as a
>> file system.
>
> They work just fine; first hit on Google, http://linux.die.net/man/8/xfs_quota
That had s
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> I have after you pointed out he's a leech (my wording, not
> yours) above and I was reminded of his past antics here. Again
> my apologies to you and the list for mentally blocking him out
> and not putting 2
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:36:53PM -0800, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
> >> Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
> >
> > Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how
On 1/19/2011 4:42 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>
>> You could also get the DVD:
>> http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
>
> This DVD is having KDE or GNOME desktop? As I want KDE one?
It should have both and you can custom-select packages during the
install or
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:38:36PM -0800, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> >
> > The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
> > 100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
>
> The problem is that none of his questions i
On 1/19/2011 1:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> That's not the point. You've had years to learn how to make a computer
>> work like a slightly smarter typewriter, and for a long time that was
>> about all they could do and everyone was happy with it. But that's not
>> what someone starting tod
On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Mark wrote:
> This is a fellow who routinely asks extremely general questions that
> so strongly resemble first-year student homework questions that I, and
> others, have taken the path of not helping him. I'm not here to do
> anyone's homework for them.
You can gene
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>
>> The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
>> 100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
>
> The problem is that none of his questions is ever 100% g
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
> 100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
The problem is that none of his questions is ever 100% germane to the
various lists to which he posts.
More l
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:44:45PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:09:25 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Yeah - I hate the Fedora way. Why not *ask* where you want to install the
> > liveCD? Why force it into /boot, when until now, *everyone* has kept boot
> > at about 1
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
>> Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
>
> Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
> not about CentOS?
>
If that's true, why does
On 01/19/2011 02:58 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz
> wrote:
>> On 01/19/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> On 01/19/2011 11:46 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
wrote:
>>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> On 01/19/2011 11:46 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>>> --On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
>>> wrote:
>>>
Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new funct
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 05:09:25 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Yeah - I hate the Fedora way. Why not *ask* where you want to install the
> liveCD? Why force it into /boot, when until now, *everyone* has kept boot
> at about 100M or so?
The last one I did from LiveCD was prior to the need for
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:07 PM, wrote:
> You could also get the DVD:
> http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
This DVD is having KDE or GNOME desktop? As I want KDE one?
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
Making the simple complicated is commonplace, making the co
On 01/19/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 11:46 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>> --On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new functionality.
>>> RHEL 5.6 is the current version of RHEL5.
>> Which
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 04:26:57 pm Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:00:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce
>> wrote:
>> > > the LiveCD will not install the operating system. It is purely for
>> > >
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 04:26:57 pm Robert Heller wrote:
> At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:00:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > > the LiveCD will not install the operating system. It is purely for
> > > demo or diagnostic purposes
Am 19.01.2011 22:30, schrieb Jason S-M:
>
>>> I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
>>> apache22_http_accept_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
>>> exists on CentOS 5.
>>>
>>> Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
>>
>> man chk
2011/1/19 Jason S-M :
>
>>> I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
>>> apache22_http_accept_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
>>> exists on CentOS 5.
>>>
>>> Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
>>
>> man chkconfig
>>
>> chkcon
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:40:40PM +, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> You are kidding, right?
No.
> I do my accounts on CentOS - does that make this a suitable venue to
> discuss my tax returns?
Please conflate more.
> The SNR of this list is shocking and encouraging the above doesn
On 01/19/2011 11:46 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new functionality.
>> RHEL 5.6 is the current version of RHEL5.
> Which has a little bit of new functionality, notably bind and p
>> I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
>> apache22_http_accept_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
>> exists on CentOS 5.
>>
>> Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
>
> man chkconfig
>
> chkconfig service_name on
I don't
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:00:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>
> > the LiveCD will not install the operating system. Â It is purely for
> > demo or diagnostic purposes.
>
> But there comes an option "Install to Hard-disk" after w
2011/1/19 Jason S-M :
> Hi All
>
> I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
> apache22_http_accept_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
> exists on CentOS 5.
>
> Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
man chkconfig
chkconfig service
Hi All
I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved adding
apache22_http_accept_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't think this
exists on CentOS 5.
Can anyone help me decide where to make this change?
-Jason
___
CentOS mail
On 1/19/2011 4:00 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>
>> the LiveCD will not install the operating system. It is purely for
>> demo or diagnostic purposes.
> But there comes an option "Install to Hard-disk" after we see the Live
> CD desktop!
Th
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:04:21PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I'm trying to update a workstation, and it wants to update mpeg2-utils.
> But that has a dependency of libmpeg2-0.5.1-3, for i386. epel doesn't have
> it, and I tried looking on rpmfusion.org, and I can only find a very few
> packa
I'm trying to update a workstation, and it wants to update mpeg2-utils.
But that has a dependency of libmpeg2-0.5.1-3, for i386. epel doesn't have
it, and I tried looking on rpmfusion.org, and I can only find a very few
packages there. Anyone have an idea which of the regular repositories
carries l
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:09 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> the LiveCD will not install the operating system. It is purely for
> demo or diagnostic purposes.
But there comes an option "Install to Hard-disk" after we see the Live
CD desktop!
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
Making the simple complicat
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 15:29 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:18:37PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Sean Hart wrote:
> > > On 1/19/11 11:49 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>
>
> > > I believe that CTRL-ALT-Bksp will restart X, not the computer. On
> > > restart of X you sho
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 17:21 -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>Yesterday I was troubleshooting an issue with a KVM host. I was
> unable to access the DNS service on a KVM virtual machine. After
> verifying that the vm allowed through the DNS ports (53 on UDP/TCP)
> and still being unable to access, I was
On 19/01/11 18:42, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
>> Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
>
> Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
> not about CentOS?
>
>
You are kidding, right?
I do my accounts
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Sorry, but Outlook 2003 and 2007 are huge improvements over earlier
> versions - and lacking tight integration between messaging and
> calendar/scheduling has been one of the places where free software
> really missed the boat.
But then that's partly Mic
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:18:37PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> But the locked screensaver wants the *same* password that you log in with.
> I'm having trouble understanding the problem... or is it that many of the
> users *never* log out?
The locked screensaver will be killed along with th
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:18:37PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Sean Hart wrote:
> > On 1/19/11 11:49 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> > I believe that CTRL-ALT-Bksp will restart X, not the computer. On
> > restart of X you should be welcomed with the login screen.
Note that in later versions of
Sean Hart wrote:
> On 1/19/11 11:49 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
>>>
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This c
On 01/19/11 11:53 AM, Lisandro Grullon wrote:
> Why don't you download the DVD, it give you much more than disc 1.
>
> >>> Parshwa Murdia 01/19/11 1:41 PM >>>
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded the following version:
>
> CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
>
> from the mirror:
>
> http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/c
On 01/19/2011 02:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have seen over the past few months subjects on RHEL 6 and RHEL 5.6
>
> Are these two different builds for Centos to chase or one in the same?
There are substantial differences.
5.6 is the latest update to the 5-series where 6.0 is a fully updat
On 1/19/11 11:49 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
>>
>>> By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
>>> up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each us
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 9:49pm, Rudi Ahlers wrote
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user,
Why don't you download the DVD, it give you much more than disc 1.
>>> Parshwa Murdia 01/19/11 1:41 PM >>>
Hi,
I have downloaded the following version:
CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
from the mirror:
http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/
What I want to ask is that 'Release2' is th
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/19/2011 12:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>>> You are biased by having learned to live with the restrictions of old
>>
>> So, what I like how something works is all "old cruft", and I should get
>> with the program, and not have opinions on what I want and how I want
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
>
>> By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
>> up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
>> can I disable this system-wide?
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 at 11:44am, Bob Eastbrook wrote
> By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
> up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
> can I disable this system-wide? Many of my users forget to do this,
> which results in workstations
--On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:41 PM -0500 Kwan Lowe
wrote:
> Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new functionality.
> RHEL 5.6 is the current version of RHEL5.
Which has a little bit of new functionality, notably bind and php stuff.
I need the newer Ruby, so I have to wait fo
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
can I disable this system-wide? Many of my users forget to do this,
which results in workstations being locked up.
Bob
__
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have seen over the past few months subjects on RHEL 6 and RHEL 5.6
>
> Are these two different builds for Centos to chase or one in the same?
>
Yes, they are very different. RHEL6 has a lot of new functionality.
RHEL 5.6 is the current
I have seen over the past few months subjects on RHEL 6 and RHEL 5.6
Are these two different builds for Centos to chase or one in the same?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Maybe ask what sort of cellphones your family use. If they use and are
happy with old b&w text ones (like me), then by all means pursue the
Linux quest. But if they are up-to-the-minute snappy ones, or if they
hang out for the latest, you are probably buying into headaches.
Remember, Linux is a
Parshwa Murdia writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded the following version:
>
> CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
>
> from the mirror:
>
> http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/
>
> What I want to ask is that 'Release2' is the complete OS and after
> installation we can use 'yum update'.
On 1/19/2011 12:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> You are biased by having learned to live with the restrictions of old
>
> So, what I like how something works is all "old cruft", and I should get
> with the program, and not have opinions on what I want and how I want it
> to work?
That's not t
Nataraj wrote:
> There's always ncftp which has the ability to resume an interrupted file
> transfer, though I regularly transfer DVD images with both http and ftp
> without any errors.
wget
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One W
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
> Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
not about CentOS?
John
--
A man or woman is seld
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Lisandro Grullon
wrote:
> Dear Parshwa,
> I tend to agree with you in some of your points. I migrated my systems from
> ubuntu to centos and I could not be more happy. off course I have been force
> to learn the new places where things are "the redhat way" but not
Hi,
I have downloaded the following version:
CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
from the mirror:
http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/
What I want to ask is that 'Release2' is the complete OS and after
installation we can use 'yum update'. So at first, is it enough (as I
am not going to
Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:35:18 pm Drew Weaver wrote:
> The kernel boots fine, and everything works ok until you unplug the monitor
> from the DVI port on the motherboard.
>
> When you unplug the monitor, that IRQ/ACPI message is displayed, and it
> screws up the USB and the e1000 card i
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:55:19 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> And remember that firefox/openoffice are rare exceptions in RHEL/Centos
> in that they have had major-version updates since the distro release,
> even though they still are far behind 'current' now.
How is Firefox 3.6.13 not curre
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:35:18 pm Drew Weaver wrote:
> The kernel boots fine, and everything works ok until you unplug the monitor
> from the DVI port on the motherboard.
>
> When you unplug the monitor, that IRQ/ACPI message is displayed, and it
> screws up the USB and the e1000 card i
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/19/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> The difference is that open source server software has been 'feature
>>> complete' for ages and the standards processes that change
>>> client/server interactions are very, very slow - so outdated versions
of server
>>> sof
2011/1/19 Les Mikesell
> On 1/19/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >
> >> The difference is that open source server software has been 'feature
> >> complete' for ages and the standards processes that change client/server
> >> interactions are very, very slow - so outdated versions of serve
On 1/19/2011 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> The difference is that open source server software has been 'feature
>> complete' for ages and the standards processes that change client/server
>> interactions are very, very slow - so outdated versions of server
>> software is not a problem as l
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try
booting with the "irqpoll" option)
I spoke too soon, the problem wasn't fixed but I found the cause
of the issue.
The above error occurs when you unplug the video cable from the
onboard video.
As our machines
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try
booting with the "irqpoll" option)
I spoke too soon, the problem wasn't fixed but I found the cause
of the issue.
The above error occurs when you unplug the video cable from the
onboard video.
As our machines
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try booting with the
"irqpoll" option)
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] note_interrupt+0x1af/0x1e8
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] handle_IRQ_event+0x45/0x8c
Jan 16 07:03:23 ser
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/19/2011 9:13 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> CentOS would likely only be used as a desktop OS by people who also run
>>> servers and like everything to be the same. They all assemble
>>> approximately the same set of upstream pa
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:27 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
> And for every bit of juiciness you think you're getting with an upgrade,
> you're getting the disruption of a reinstall or an upgrade, and seemingly for
> everything that's improved there's a bug or a quirk to match. I think the
> negatives
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That's not true for desktop applications and environments. If you don't
> have something current you are missing the improvements that many
> thousands of man-hours of work have made.
But I guess that's the bit I don't /always/ buy into. In the pre-Fed
Hi jason,
Thank you for pointing this out. I am running 5.5 in 5 new boxes suddenly the
boxes would start randomly rebooting. Checking the logs point out to smartd in
all the boxes. I should all of them out except one. In that one I disable and
shutdown smartd and the machine has been running ok
As Rober puts it, sometimes is better to keep "Things...stable and reliable"
rather than in the "bleeding edge..." makes perfect sense.
>>> Robert Heller 01/19/11 10:43 AM >>>
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:13:41 + (GMT) CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>
On 1/19/2011 9:13 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> CentOS would likely only be used as a desktop OS by people who also run
>> servers and like everything to be the same. They all assemble approximately
>> the same set of upstream packages, though, so it is po
Dear Parshwa,
I tend to agree with you in some of your points. I migrated my systems
from ubuntu to centos and I could not be more happy. off course I have
been force to learn the new places where things are "the redhat way" but
not problem since the usual tools continue to exist in both platforms.
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:13:41 + (GMT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > CentOS would likely only be used as a desktop OS by people who also run
> > servers and like everything to be the same. They all assemble approximately
> > the same set of up
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Christopher R Webber
wrote:
> I find that in places where I don¹t have latest and greatest hardware,
> CEntOS makes a much better Desktop OS than Ubuntu. If all I am doing is
> running a web browser for the most part, I use CEntOS.
Means in your opinion, for a st
I find that in places where I don¹t have latest and greatest hardware,
CEntOS makes a much better Desktop OS than Ubuntu. If all I am doing is
running a web browser for the most part, I use CEntOS.
-- cwebber
On 1/19/11 7:13 AM, "John Hodrien" wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> CentOS would likely only be used as a desktop OS by people who also run
> servers and like everything to be the same. They all assemble approximately
> the same set of upstream packages, though, so it is possible to make them
> all do the same things wit
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Agnello George
> wrote:
>
>> i have currently started to deploy code into our production environment
>> from the the dev environment, we deploy code on to the production from
>> the svn , ( i do a svn export ) , some times not code is chec
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>>> I personally would recommend Ubuntu LTS for family members. CentOS is
>>> geared for technical people.
> Ubuntu's focus is usability - that is, making the distribution easy to
> install and use. Fedora may not admit
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Agnello George
wrote:
> i have currently started to deploy code into our production environment
> from the the dev environment, we deploy code on to the production from the
> svn , ( i do a svn export ) , some times not code is checked into the svn
> and it do
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>> I personally would recommend Ubuntu LTS for family members. CentOS is
>> geared for technical people.
>
> Oh I see. But at least work could be done in Fedora too like without
> going into the technical details at least multimedia could be u
Btw, this is the complete error.
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: irq 177: nobody cared (try booting with the
"irqpoll" option)
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] note_interrupt+0x1af/0x1e8
Jan 16 07:03:23 server kernel: [] handle_IRQ_
From: S Mathias
> Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
> Questions:
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
maybe because they did not choose to put it there...?
maybe they have more trust in th
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> Maybe cause it's not part of CentOS, or even Linux? Just a guess?
What has that to do with the OP's questions? No firefox add-on
fits that criteria but yet I suspect everyone is using one or
more.
On 01/19/2011 03:29 AM, S Mathias wrote:
> Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
>
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/faq/
> 2) Did anyon
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:29:12AM -0800, S Mathias wrote:
>
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/faq/ answers this.
> 2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everywhere" code?
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 03:29 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
> Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
> Questions:
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
No clue.
> 2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everyw
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> Ubuntu LTS has a 3 year life cycle overall for desktops, 5 year for servers.
> Ubuntu and Fedora have a new release approx every 6 months but their
> end of life is 18 months. (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS and
> http://fedoraproject.org/w
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:29 PM, S Mathias wrote:
> Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
>
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
>
> 2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everywhere"
Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Questions:
1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everywhere" code?
3) Can someone trust this Add-on? Is it safe to install/use
Parshwa,
On 16 January 2011 20:45, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>> Another option, if you are concerned about the short life cycle of
>> Fedora, would be to look at Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The 'LTS' means "Long Term
>> Support" and will be supported for a fairly long time. 10.04 was
>> released last April, so
> On 19 January 2011 06:09, Agnello George wrote:
>> is there a way i can verify or write a script to check each file that is in
>> the SVN is same as that in the dev environment .
> find . -type f | grep -v .svn | xargs md5sum
Obviously the above will compare the export vs. your dev env. The SVN
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
