-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Franz said the following on 04/01/11 21:42:
> Right up until an update for Perl itself is pushed - and then you will
> find all your packages gone. If you need to tweek, use cpan2rpm to
> generate rpms. I've generally found the issues are t
On 01/04/11 7:29 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:10:46AM +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>> The 1972 in the address kinda made me laugh. Do you think he's posting
>> from his daddies address or just pretending to be more mature than he
>> actually is? ;)
> Not my kid! (AF
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:10:46AM +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>
> The 1972 in the address kinda made me laugh. Do you think he's posting
> from his daddies address or just pretending to be more mature than he
> actually is? ;)
Not my kid! (AFAIK, anyway)
--keith, born in 1972 (and
I've been happily using and deploying Cyrus based systems for over
a decade, so I'll jump in with my $0.02.
> Many people care about storage format.
It was mentioned previously that Cyrus IMAPd uses an internal format.
Well, it happens that that internal format is really just the mail
message it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/04/2011 04:16 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, S Mathias wrote:
>> (...)
>>> WHY?
>> (...)
>>
>> Why you post the same message on different mailing lists? Here at
>> Ubun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/04/2011 07:10 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:16 -0800, Mark wrote:
>>>
>
>> this is how to do one's
>> homework - have someone else on the web do it for you.
>
> The 1972 in the address kinda made me laugh. Do y
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:16 -0800, Mark wrote:
> >
> this is how to do one's
> homework - have someone else on the web do it for you.
The 1972 in the address kinda made me laugh. Do you think he's posting
from his daddies address or just pretending to be more mature than he
actually is? ;)
Leon
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Jerry Geis wrote:
> All - I am running a virtual windows 7 (pro 64) on centos 5.5 x86_64.
> I was hoping to run virtual XP inside windows7 in this configuration.
>
> I get an error about cannot start virtual XP when I try this.
> Do I not have something setup correctly or can
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Santi Saez wrote:
> El 03/01/2011 20:15, Akemi Yagi escribió:
>> You may want to look into the srpms of nx/freenx in the CentOS extras
>> repository. The spec file contains the following:
>>
>> # centos_ver is a number (2,3,4,5). It can be provided in the build sys
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 11:48 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
>> --
>> I am not a Perl expert, but in my experience the packages installed with CPAN
>> and with RPM does not overwrite each other. CPAN stores the libraries in a
>> different directory in which Per
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Lisandro Grullon
wrote:
> Dear CentOS community,
> I have install centos via CD, DVD and Directly off the net via http and FTP.
> Now I want to do a NFS install from a local server and a client. Both,
> client and server are in the same vlan 10.14.10.0/255.255.255.0
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:00 PM, wrote:
> Michael Gliwinski writes:
>
>> Actually, mock can build an SRPM from spec file and dir with sources:
>>
>> $ mock --buildsrpm --spec=/path/to/spec --source=/path/to/src/dir
>>
>> I've been using it at least since 1.0.5, which is definitely in EPEL, not
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0800, ann kok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Which good chat software application to recommend in website?
>
> Thank you
irssi!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all
Which good chat software application to recommend in website?
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Jerry Geis wrote on 01/04/2011 09:21 AM:
> Hey - back to work today and just noticed the last status update for
> release 6 ( http://twitter.com/centos ) was way back on Dec 1.
Closest I have seen to a later status update is at
http://twitter.com/kbsingh
> Everyone have a Great New Year! :)
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Mark wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Mark
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] why is this html looks like this?
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, S Mathias wrote:
>> (...)
>>> WHY?
>> (...)
>>
>> Why you post the same m
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:42 -0500, Lisandro Grullon wrote:
> Anyone out there tried to do an install via NFS using their own local
> NFS server rather than streaming the entire process?
Would it be hard to have a little patience?
"showmount -e hostname" for the server? Try it on another client
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, S Mathias wrote:
> (...)
>> WHY?
> (...)
>
> Why you post the same message on different mailing lists? Here at
> Ubuntu users
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2011-January/237967.html
>
Clearly
Anyone out there tried to do an install via NFS using their own local NFS
server rather than streaming the entire process?
>>> "Lisandro Grullon" 01/04/11 3:48 PM >>>
I tried both way, I mounted the ISO to /test then copy its full content to the
root of my export and even left the ISO there jus
Michael Gliwinski writes:
> Actually, mock can build an SRPM from spec file and dir with sources:
>
> $ mock --buildsrpm --spec=/path/to/spec --source=/path/to/src/dir
>
> I've been using it at least since 1.0.5, which is definitely in EPEL, not
> sure
> if it was available in older versions
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, S Mathias wrote:
(...)
> WHY?
(...)
Why you post the same message on different mailing lists? Here at
Ubuntu users
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2011-January/237967.html
cheers Sven
___
CentOS mailing l
soruce code of the html file:
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6448/sourcey.png
it looks like this in the realiy:
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6448/sourcey.png
WHY?
if i put it in "< pre >", then it's good.
but if it isn't in "< pre >" then the lines ends are random. why dont they end
i
I tried both way, I mounted the ISO to /test then copy its full content to the
root of my export and even left the ISO there just in case. I still see the
error "That directory does not seem to contain a CentOS installation tree", do
I have to dd the ISO I just did a simple cp -rf *
>>> Rudi A
On 01/04/2011 11:48 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> --
> I am not a Perl expert, but in my experience the packages installed with CPAN
> and with RPM does not overwrite each other. CPAN stores the libraries in a
> different directory in which Perl looks for libraries before than looking for
> the libraries
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Lisandro Grullon
wrote:
> Dear CentOS community,
> I have install centos via CD, DVD and Directly off the net via http and FTP.
> Now I want to do a NFS install from a local server and a client. Both,
> client and server are in the same vlan 10.14.10.0/255.255.255.0
On 1/3/2011 1:39 PM, Dave wrote:
>
> So, is it fair to rephrase that as "ignore quotas, pay attention to
> actual usage"?
>
> I agree that some degree of oversubscription is probably desireable,
> and it would be much easier to just add storage whenever it looks to
> be getting fullish. My situatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Silva said the following on 04/01/11 20:06:
> CPAN will just hide the problems, since RPM will NOT know about any CPAN
> packages and will happily overwrite them.
I am not a Perl expert, but in my experience the packages installed with CPAN
and
Dear CentOS community,
I have install centos via CD, DVD and Directly off the net via http and FTP.
Now I want to do a NFS install from a local server and a client. Both, client
and server are in the same vlan 10.14.10.0/255.255.255.0.
The server has a static 10.14.10.15 address and the client
>>
>> Odd that you would mention that, just after saying you
>> shouldn't care...
>> And in fact, some servers (e.g. dovecot) may handle more
>
> Thank you. http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir
>
> I am now going to look for a setup guide of procmail->Maildir->dovecot on
> RHEL/Cen
on 1-3-2011 9:00 PM Luigi Rosa spake the following:
> Matt said the following on 03/01/11 21:39:
>
>> Running yum update on CentOS 4.8 32 bit I keep getting this:
>
>> --> Running transaction check
>> --> Processing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) = 2.024 for
>> package: perl-IO-Compress
>>
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:16 PM, benedict dcunha wrote:
> if you need any more information plsss do ask
Why you have that much names?
. Simon
- Benedict
- Sylvan
The surename seems to be always Dcunha.
cheers Sven
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:39:38 am Dave wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 01/01/2011 05:56 PM, Dave wrote:
> >> Is there a best practice? People have to be doing something!
> >
> > I think that's unlikely. If you don't "oversubscribe" your disk space
> >
All - I am running a virtual windows 7 (pro 64) on centos 5.5 x86_64.
I was hoping to run virtual XP inside windows7 in this configuration.
I get an error about cannot start virtual XP when I try this.
Do I not have something setup correctly or can I not run a "double"
virtual environment?
Than
Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Les Mikesell
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:28
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Converting to maildir
On 1/4/2011 10:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Many people care about storage format.
And they are misguided in doing so. Deta
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:56 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/4/2011 8:14 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Many people care about storage format.
And they are misguided in doing so. Details of message storage is an
internal [server's] problem.
S
Well,
I got bit today.I left the enable=1 of ius and it upgraded automatically
from the 5.2.15 to 5.2.16. After that I stated getting memory allocation
errors.
Anyone is getting that? Since I could not find 5.2.15 again I had to switch
back to 5.2.10 from Testing.
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:28
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Converting to maildir
>
> On 1/4/2011 10:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> >
> Many people care about storage format.
> >>> And they are misguided in doing so. Details of messa
On 1/4/2011 10:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
Many people care about storage format.
>>> And they are misguided in doing so. Details of message storage is an
>>> internal [server's] problem.
>> So how do you suggest solving that problem when it is in fact a problem?
>
> You're missing th
El 03/01/2011 20:15, Akemi Yagi escribió:
> You may want to look into the srpms of nx/freenx in the CentOS extras
> repository. The spec file contains the following:
>
> # centos_ver is a number (2,3,4,5). It can be provided in the build system or
> # via the command line with the following define
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:38:47AM -0600, Jeff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > Looking for a guide on converting to Maildir.
> >
> > Here are our relevant specs.
> >
> > sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 (we may not be able to upgrade this due to too
> > many
> > modific
Dear All,
I had my earlier post sub virtual machine does not start up.. by the way i
did manage to solve my problem . i actually dont know what could be the real
cause but I did reconnect my cd rom drive and voila did come up
let me explain
i have a sun blade server which conects the keyboard ,
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Adam Tauno Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 10:51
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Converting to maildir
>
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:38 -0600, Jeff wrote:
>
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:56 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/4/2011 8:14 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> >> Many people care about storage format.
> > And they are misguided in doing so. Details of message storage is an
> > internal [server's] problem.
> So how do you suggest solving that proble
On January 4, 2011 07:36:27 am Lamar Owen wrote:
> In my case, our primary e-mail server is Scalix, so that dictated the
> storage format. But, honestly, I personally would love to use a
> PostgreSQL backend so that real concurrent access is possible;
dbmail with PostgreSQL works really well. I m
On 1/4/2011 8:14 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
>> Many people care about storage format.
>
> And they are misguided in doing so. Details of message storage is an
> internal [server's] problem.
So how do you suggest solving that problem when it is in fact a problem?
--
Les Mikesell
les
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:38 -0600, Jeff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> And with regard to backup space, it might be time to suck it up and
> tell your users that you need to implement mail quotas. How much are
> you backing up from "Sent" and "Trash" because nobody
On 1/4/2011 9:38 AM, Jeff wrote:
>
>> Here are our relevant specs.
>>
>> sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 (we may not be able to upgrade this due to too
>> many
>> modifications)
>> imap-2002d-14
>> procmail-3.22-10.el3.centos.0
>>
> Regardless of the maildir vs mbox argument, I would be seriously
> ex
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Looking for a guide on converting to Maildir.
>
> Here are our relevant specs.
>
> sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 (we may not be able to upgrade this due to too many
> modifications)
> imap-2002d-14
> procmail-3.22-10.el3.centos.0
>
> To a maildir
On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 09:14:57 am Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:06 +0100, Dominik Zyla wrote:
> > Many people care about storage format.
> And they are misguided in doing so. Details of message storage is an
> internal [server's] problem.
Hmmm, not quite.
When sel
Dominik Zyla wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:14:57AM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:06 +0100, Dominik Zyla wrote:
>> > Mbox is much more slower during
>> > operations on it. It's because it's operate on single file,
>>
>> Correct, but who cares? If the server p
On Thursday 30 Dec 2010 14:11:20 Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:51 AM, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but
> > looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock
> > essentially rebuilds srpms so to u
On 01/04/2011 06:14 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:06 +0100, Dominik Zyla wrote:
>> Many people care about storage format.
> And they are misguided in doing so. Details of message storage is an
> internal [server's] problem.
>
No. They are being eminently practical. mbo
Yup, Cyrus was rock solid for us for years with Thunderbird as the
client. We were forced into an Exchange replacement (Scalix) and now
Google mail because 'Thunderbird is clunky (read: follows all of the
user interface guidelines) and Outlook is cool (read: actually forces
overrides on windows
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:14:57AM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:06 +0100, Dominik Zyla wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:52:23AM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:17 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > > > Looking for a guide on converti
Hey - back to work today and just noticed the last status update for
release 6
( http://twitter.com/centos ) was way back on Dec 1.
I know, I know, its ready when its ready and I'm fine with that
just thought it was curious that Dec 1 was the last update.
Everyone have a Great New Year! :)
Je
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:07 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
> wrote:
> > There are numerous IMAP servers that support maildir, and scripts to
> > import MBOX files - that is how I would approach it. [But then I
> > wouldn't use Maildir; I mean, really,
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:06 +0100, Dominik Zyla wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:52:23AM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:17 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > > Looking for a guide on converting to Maildir.
> > > Here are our relevant specs.
> > > sendmail-8.12.11-4.RH
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:05 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:17 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > > Looking for a guide on converting to Maildir.
> > > Here are our relevant specs.
> > > sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 (we may not be able to upgrade
> > this due to
> > > too many
>
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:17 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> Looking for a guide on converting to Maildir.
>> Here are our relevant specs.
>> sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 (we may not be able to upgrade this due to too
>> many
>> modifications)
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Adam Tauno Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 8:52
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Converting to maildir
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:17 -0500, Jason Pyeron wr
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:52:23AM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:17 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > Looking for a guide on converting to Maildir.
> > Here are our relevant specs.
> > sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 (we may not be able to upgrade this due to too
> > many
>
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:17 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Looking for a guide on converting to Maildir.
> Here are our relevant specs.
> sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 (we may not be able to upgrade this due to too many
> modifications)
> imap-2002d-14
> procmail-3.22-10.el3.centos.0
> To a maildir setu
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:55 PM, George wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did some google searches but could not find anyone raising a similar
> issue immediatly but perhaps there is already somewhere a bugreport
> upstream about this I did overlook ...
>
> When you disable notices in /etc/php.ini:
> error_re
63 matches
Mail list logo
