ext4 better then ext3 !
you can install ext4 by yum
see:
https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Howto#Compatibility
2010/12/23
> Matt wrote:
> > Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
> > great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
> > e
On 12/22/2010 11:39 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Right, which AFAIK, doesn't work with the new US federal PIV-II cards.
> Certainly, I can't add the card when it's inserted in the reader with just
> that.
OK. Well, that's more or less what I meant when I asked if there was
something non-standar
Antonello Piemonte wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have read that under Solaris one can use DTrace to get I/O request
> size distribution on a global scale (also on a per process/pid basis).
> See for example
>
> http://prefetch.net/articles/observeiodtk.html
>
> Can anyone recommend an alternative to get
Matt wrote:
> Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a
> great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then
> ext3 for it?
Before committing to ext4 on a production server, it
would be good to consider the comments made in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>
> She's far more likely to outlive me than I her; so I want to
> install something requiring a lot less maintenance on her machine, so
> that she'll have it and be used to it, years ahead of need.
>
> I'm thinking CentOS 6, wheneve
Thank you sir for replying..
Given below is my system's status after 'ifconfig'...
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 44:87:FC:68:5E:33
inet addr:192.168.100.168 Bcast:192.168.100.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::4687:fcff:fe68:5e33/64 Scope:Link
UP BROAD
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Aravindh Ramaswamy
wrote:
> Sir/Madam,
>
> This is Aravindh,final year student of Anna University India.We are carrying
> on research in Cloud Computing and using Open Nebula toolkit for that;for
> which we need strong network connectivity. The problem i am facing
Aravindh,
Tell us a little bit about your current server hardware, are your NICs showing
using ifconfig, what about your gateway sing route. It would be good to know a
little bit about your current configuration, including if you are using IPv6.
Please elaborate so we can help you further. Lisan
Sir/Madam,
This is Aravindh,final year student of Anna University India.We are carrying
on research in Cloud Computing and using Open Nebula toolkit for that;for
which we need strong network connectivity. The problem i am facing is that i
am not able to ping continuously to other nodes in the netw
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/22/10 2:24 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> If you're running sendmail, put an alias in /root/.forward. That gets
>> *all* root email forwarded to the appropriate account, not just cron
>> jobs. It also doesn't require editing of system
see cis rhel 5.5 documentation and latest version of it for configuration
examples. or use compensative controls.
is it really sampled? usually no ;)
eero,
rhce
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/22/2010 5:40 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>
> Most people wanting SSL on their website see it as a business
> requirement and most of those sites are running on shared or VPS
> hosting.
The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the
browser to find the matching certificate,
On 22/12/10 11:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> It's the easiest way to do it. If you allow someone else to hold your
> SSL keys, they can do interesting things to act as your front end to
Where in the original post did it mention using a system that's not
under their control? The question wa
On 12/22/2010 4:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/22/10 2:24 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> If you're running sendmail, put an alias in /root/.forward. That gets
>> *all* root email forwarded to the appropriate account, not just cron
>> jobs. It also doesn't require editing of system files such
On 12/22/10 2:24 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> If you're running sendmail, put an alias in /root/.forward. That gets
> *all* root email forwarded to the appropriate account, not just cron
> jobs. It also doesn't require editing of system files such as
> /etc/aliases.
that's a borderline bizarre r
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
> sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
>
> It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which bounces, but I hav
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Antonello Piemonte wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Antonello Piemonte
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] I/O size distribution?
>
> Thanks for all the suggestions.
>
> I had a look at systemtap but I have the feeling that in it's current
> state it is aimed more at kernel dev
hey list
I'm doing a PCI audit for my company. One of the requirements is to
specify a lockout duration of 30 minutes after 6 failed login
attempts:
For a sample of system components, obtain and insp 8.5.14
rd parameters system configuration settings to verify that passwo
ed out, it are set
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I had a look at systemtap but I have the feeling that in it's current
state it is aimed more at kernel developers rather than average admins
like me :-)
Still, I'll keep an eye on it also give the fact that there seem to be
now new documentation being written about
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
*snipped*
> And, there may be other interesting/critical mail coming to root.
>
Good point.
I always have root's email sent to my own user account.
That's one of the things my ALI scripts sets up for me.
echo
echo "Processing /etc/aliases config file"
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 10:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2010 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Not with PIV-II cards
>>>
>>> Why? Do they use a non-standard SSH agent?
>>
>> pkcs11. opensc. NOT COOLKEY.
>
> I'm not really sure wha
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 December 2010 16:51:02 Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
>> >> I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message,
>> >> and reading pm.log I discovered t
On 12/22/2010 12:58 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
/etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
>>>
>>> Or you can edit
>>>
>>> /etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
>>>
>>> and change line 64
>>>
>>> $Confi
>>> If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
>>> /etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
>>
>> Or you can edit
>>
>> /etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
>>
>> and change line 64
>>
>> $Config{'mailto'} = "root";
> Exactly what I did earlier.
I
> On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 10:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
>> /etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
>
>
> Or you can edit
>
> /etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
>
> and change line 64
>
>
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 18:35:29 Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > # /etc/procmailrc
> > >
> > > DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
> >
> > Interesting. I don't have an /etc/procmailrc. Are there other things
> > you'd recommend to place there?
>
> That's all I put i
On 12/21/2010 10:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 12/17/2010 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>>> Not with PIV-II cards
>>
>> Why? Do they use a non-standard SSH agent?
>
> pkcs11. opensc. NOT COOLKEY.
I'm not really sure what that has to do with anything. Yo
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > # /etc/procmailrc
>
> > DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
>
> Interesting. I don't have an /etc/procmailrc. Are there other things
> you'd recommend to place there?
That's all I put in there. It may be worthwhile to take a peek at the
"Environment variable def
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 17:39:56 Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >> > /var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well.
> >>
> >> There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be
> >
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
>>
>> > /var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well.
>>
>> There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be
>> "Delivered to command /usr.bin/procmail" which of course is
>> co
On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> > /var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well.
>
> There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be
> "Delivered to command /usr.bin/procmail" which of course is correct. The
> only messages affected are thos which sh
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 16:51:02 Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
> >> I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message,
> >> and reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
>> I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message,
>> and reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had
>> been allocated to /var/mail/anne, despite procmailrc
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 10:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> If you are running the default sendmail, put an alias for root in
> /etc/aliases and restart sendmail or run 'newaliases'.
Or you can edit
/etc/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl
and change line 64
$Config{'mailto'} =
Hi
you have to add the record to /etc/aliases:
root: y...@adress.tld
and then run: newaliases
Pavel
Dne 22.12.2010 17:17, Always Learning napsal(a):
>
> On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 08:12 -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>
>
>> I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily
The question was:
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:53 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
>> http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
>> "# Set up SSL protection on your website."
>> is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
>> address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
and one reply asseted:
On 12/22/2010 10:12 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
> sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
>
> It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which bounces, but I have a catch a
>> I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
>> sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
> Its LOGWATCH what is doing it. It will be scheduled in / ETC / CRONTAB
Thanks Paul, I found it!
-Jason
__
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 08:12 -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not
> sure how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
>
> It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which bounces, but I have a catc
Hi All,
I installed a new CentOS 5.5 box and I am getting a daily e-mail (I am not sure
how this was triggered) with XNTPD logs, HTTP Error and Disk Space).
It is being sent to r...@www.6colors.co which bounces, but I have a catch all
so it does get to me.
How do I change where this e-mail is
On December 22, 2010 02:05:26 am Tony Mountifield wrote:
> The thing you CAN'T do is to have name-based virtual hosting with multiple
> domains on a single IP address, with more than one of them using SSL.
> Name-based virtual hosting relies on the HTTP Host: header to identify
> which virtual host
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 13:44 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> The patch shown in
> http://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/16625
>
> prompted me to try a
>
> $ grep -r "\=\ \%s\"" *
>
> in the web root of a WordPress installation. The matches are a bunch of
> possible SQL injections. Haven
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>>
>
> hmm..
>
> scp :/etc/passwd :/etc/passwd
> ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups, /etc/gshadow
>
> YMMV
>
> Regards
>
> Rajagopal
> _
Anyone know ORACLE support ext4 file system or not?
--- 10/12/21 (二)，Kevin C 寫道：
> 寄件者: Kevin C
> 主旨: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 64bit
> 收件者: "CentOS mailing list"
> 日期: 2010年12月21日,二,下午3:57
> Yes, We use it for 4 months on our
> backup server, we no issue at the
> moment. We have a lot
Mag Gam wrote:
> I am interested in fscache module. I know where to get the userland
> tools (http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/fscache/) but I am not sure
> where to obtain its module. Moreover, I am not sure once I get the
> source code how I can compile it for Centos 5.2.
>
> Has anyone compile
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote:
> I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message, and
> reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had been
> allocated to /var/mail/anne, despite procmailrc telling it that
>
> MAILDIR=/home/anne/Maildir/
>> http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
>> "# Set up SSL protection on your website."
>> is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
>> address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
>
> Yes.
>
> Reverse DNS has to be working.
Why is that? I have several ssl sites, and many
On 12/22/10 4:26 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Eero Volotinen
> wrote:
>> 2010/12/22 Rajagopal Swaminathan:
>>>
>>> scp:/etc/passwd:/etc/passwd
>>> ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups, /etc/gshadow
>>
>> It's possibly better way only to cp&paste no
I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message, and reading
pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had been allocated to
/var/mail/anne, despite procmailrc telling it that
MAILDIR=/home/anne/Maildir/
Any idea what might have caused this? It seems to have been wo
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:53 AM, S Mathias wrote:
> http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
>
> "# Set up SSL protection on your website."
>
> is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
> when i want to use ssl on my domain?
>
> thank you
>
> happy Christmas! :)
It's
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:53 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
> http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
> "# Set up SSL protection on your website."
> is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
> address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
Yes.
Reverse DNS has to be working.
I am interested in fscache module. I know where to get the userland
tools (http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/fscache/) but I am not sure
where to obtain its module. Moreover, I am not sure once I get the
source code how I can compile it for Centos 5.2.
Has anyone compiled, fscache before?
TIA
___
On 22.12.2010 11:05, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article
> <133721.39495.qm-j4irtxk+zdtuqs8rmknbopow+3bf1jufvpnb7ypn...@public.gmane.org>,
> S Mathias wrote:
>> http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
>>
>> "# Set up SSL protection on your website."
>>
>> is it an inescapable requirement to have a
Greetings,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/12/22 Rajagopal Swaminathan :
>>
>> scp :/etc/passwd :/etc/passwd
>> ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups, /etc/gshadow
>
> It's possibly better way only to cp&paste normal usernames, not
> internal daemons and so on.
>
I did no
2010/12/22 Rajagopal Swaminathan :
> Greetings,
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>
> hmm..
>
> scp :/etc/passwd :/etc/passwd
> ditto /etc/gshadow,/etc/groups, /etc/gshadow
It's possibly better way only to cp&paste normal usernames, not
internal daemons and so
In article <133721.39495...@web121405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>,
S Mathias wrote:
> http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
>
> "# Set up SSL protection on your website."
>
> is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
> when i want to
> use ssl on my domain?
Not exactly.
2010/12/22 S Mathias :
> http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
>
> "# Set up SSL protection on your website."
>
> is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address,
> when i want to use ssl on my domain?
delicated port (443) is needed per ssl host. you can also use wildcard
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010 09:57:52 pm Kevin C wrote:
> Yes,
Well "works for you" may be more correct then. Hard to call it "stable"
especially in the context of an enterprise dist when it's officially a
"technology preview".
/Peter
> We use it for 4 months on our backup server, we no issue
58 matches
Mail list logo
