On 12/01/2010 11:11 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
>
> I've had Broadcom NICs just go off into their own little world requiring the
> machine to be physically powered down and back up again before they'd start
> working again. Replaced with an Intel quad port board (igb driver) and all
> was decidedly we
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> Well, Realcrap is known to be crap everywhere. Ask the OpenBSD guys. ;)
>
> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an
> internal design glitch.
I've
On 12/1/2010 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>>
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
are some Intel
On 12/1/2010 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>>
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
are some Intel
On 12/1/2010 2:12 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with
> Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details:
>
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224
>
> So now my question is, what PCI 1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:19:51AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> It does not. I don't know why the OP is even trying to do it this way.
My guess: school work.
--
rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailma
On 12/01/2010 06:07 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 12/01/2010 11:17 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>>
>>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
>>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames du
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 11:17 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>
>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an
>> internal design glitch.
>
> Specifically
On 12/01/2010 11:17 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an
> internal design glitch.
Specifically the 82573 chipsets, which are still fairly common on
motherboa
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 07:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/1/2010 5:44 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Christopher
>> Chan wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi all
Anyone can help to let me know how to
l
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Thanks. Looks good.
>
> I just looked around - looks like manufacturers tend not to list the
> chipset in their NIC specifications (like here, for instance:
> http://www.trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=140_TEG-PCITXR&cat=14
> )
In
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 07:50 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Christopher
> Chan wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>>
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; ho
Hi all,
Any one have success with Openswan and IPSEC VPN?
Having some issues.
Wondering if any would mind posting there configs; ipsec.conf.
Also open to any IPSEC client.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
>
> Um, do you ever log out, or close firefox? For that matter, do you have it
> set to empty trash when done? Or do you ever manually compress
> folders/empty trash?
>
> mark "or just leave it running for a year at a time?"
>
>
NO - your correct I dont log out it's got messages in there f
On 12/1/2010 5:44 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Christopher
> Chan wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Anyone can help to let me know how to
>>>
>>> ls -1 | lsattr
>>
>> lsattr `ls -1`
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ls -al /folder | awk '{
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>
>>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
>>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle J
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> Anyone can help to let me know how to
>>
>> ls -1 | lsattr
>
> lsattr `ls -1`
>
>>
>>
>> ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
>>
>
>
> for i in `ls -al /f
On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Scot P. Floess wrote:
>> Well - really isn't it all in what tool makes the most sense for the job
>> at hand? If one doesn't need the latest and greatest - CentOS as a
>> desktop is super stable...
>>
>> Don't get me wrong, I like Fedora...
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>
>>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
>>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I just ran into something odd,
> I have x86_64 5.5 running with Thunderbird.
>
> I am getting a message about can delete the email as Trash is FULL.
>
> The file size is 4G. Whats up with that
Um, do you ever log out, or close firefox? For that matter, do you have it
set to
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an
>> internal design glitch.
>
> Seconded.
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Anyone can help to let me know how to
>
> ls -1 | lsattr
lsattr `ls -1`
>
>
> ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
>
for i in `ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $8}'`; do lsattr /folder/$i; done
Scot P. Floess wrote:
> Well - really isn't it all in what tool makes the most sense for the job
> at hand? If one doesn't need the latest and greatest - CentOS as a
> desktop is super stable...
>
> Don't get me wrong, I like Fedora...but still :)
>
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Alan Hodgson wrote:
>
>
I just ran into something odd,
I have x86_64 5.5 running with Thunderbird.
I am getting a message about can delete the email as Trash is FULL.
The file size is 4G. Whats up with that
I have the 64 bit executable running.
file /usr/lib64/thunderbird-2.0.0.24/thunderbird-bin
/usr/lib64/thunder
Well - really isn't it all in what tool makes the most sense for the job
at hand? If one doesn't need the latest and greatest - CentOS as a
desktop is super stable...
Don't get me wrong, I like Fedora...but still :)
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On December 1, 2010, "Scot P. Floe
Hi all
Anyone can help to let me know how to
ls -1 | lsattr
ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On December 1, 2010, "Scot P. Floess" wrote:
> I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :)
> I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version
> of KDE (4.3 specifically) - and this is on a laptop -> its great ;)
>
Until a year from now. When
>> Is there a list somewhere out there listing what card features what
>> chipset?
>>
>> It definitely looks like it is best to just stick to the better
>> chipsets - might be a little more expensive but definitely worth the
>> money.
>
> You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb t
Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Been googling about this matter.
> Afraid I am now confused.
> Too many options..: for/against/whatever.
> Some is years ago.
>
> Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3
> please.
> Thanks
> Johan
>
> __
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:32:40PM -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
>
> For my VMs I definitely use CentOS for anything graphical - like a
> desktop... Of course, my bare metal box @ home is running F14...
Which just shows how flexible, in many ways, it is. I'm the exact
opposite, though my worksta
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this
>> morning,
>> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots*
>> of
>> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at
On 12/01/2010 08:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>>
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
are some Inte
Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with
> Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details:
>
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224
>
> So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapte
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste
wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>
>>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
>>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an
>> internal design glitch.
>
> Seconded. I have a load of In
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an
> internal design glitch.
Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been
no iss
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
> re
On 12/01/2010 08:12 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with
> Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details:
>
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224
>
> So now my question is, what PCI
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:04:58 am Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3
> please.
The Fluendo MP3 decode plugin for gstreamer is no-cost, and is fully licensed
for MP3 playback. It should work for any gstreamer-enabled player.
Hello listmates,
As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with
Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224
So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I
use under CentOS? If y
Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
reasonable speed.
Thanks to the folks who got this one. I *really* needed to
If you use the rpmforge repo you can also get VLC too and between
Mplayer and VLC I have not found an audio format they wont play.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:15:30 -0500
"Brunner, Brian T." wrote:
>
> http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/news.html
>
> Step-by-step mp3 play
>
> http://ftp.freshrpms.net
cybernet wrote:
> centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that
> use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops
>
Why? We use it a lot, here where I work, and I use it at home - a) I like
real stability, and b) I don't want to have to think about the differe
For my VMs I definitely use CentOS for anything graphical - like a
desktop... Of course, my bare metal box @ home is running F14...
I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :)
I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version
of KDE (4.3 s
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of cybernet
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:20 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
>> centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops,
Says who? Says where?
I think the
On 12/01/2010 07:19 PM, cybernet wrote:
> centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that
> use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops
Sorry, but this is nonsense. I myself run CentOS on my workstation at
the office (heaviest duty network admin, I wouldn'
centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that
use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops
From: Johan Scheepers
To: centos
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 5:04:58 PM
Subject: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
Good day,
Bee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/01/2010 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> On this thread, I'm speaking with my manager, and the other admin comes
> in, ranting about selinux, and that he's going to file a bug against it
> with RH Seems he installed RHEL6, and had the misf
On 12/1/2010 11:14 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: hadi motamedi
>
>> On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote:
>>> Ok, last try...
>>> Did you copy/pasted my code?
>>> Did you type it?
>>> Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used
>>> does
>>> not help...
>> Please find below th
Thanks. I'll do it later tonight.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 11:54 AM, robert mena wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production
> > environment for more than six months without any problem. I am
> > wondering i
From: hadi motamedi
> On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote:
> > Ok, last try...
> > Did you copy/pasted my code?
> > Did you type it?
> > Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used
> > does
> > not help...
> Please find below the code that I tried :
> cat Edit3 | tr -d "
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Been googling about this matter.
> Afraid I am now confused.
> Too many options..: for/against/whatever.
> Some is years ago.
>
> Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3
> please.
Install mplayer. There are a number of front-en
On this thread, I'm speaking with my manager, and the other admin comes
in, ranting about selinux, and that he's going to file a bug against it
with RH Seems he installed RHEL6, and had the misfortune of having an
older Sun keyboard, and may have hit the key when entering the
root password...
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/news.html
Step-by-step mp3 play
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/dag/packages/xmms/
Also works
You may try
rpm -Uhv
http://apt.sw.be/packages/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1.el5.
rf.i386.rpm
Then
yum install xmms xmms-skins xmms-mp3
yum install gstreamer
Good day,
Been googling about this matter.
Afraid I am now confused.
Too many options..: for/against/whatever.
Some is years ago.
Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3
please.
Thanks
Johan
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
James Pearson wrote:
>
> I think your problem is that you did 'chkconfig --del syslog' - as the
> man page states:
>
> --del name
> The service is removed from chkconfig management, and any sym-
> bolic links in /etc/rc[0-6].d which pertain to it are removed.
>
> Note
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:50 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> All these vulnerabilities except for the last one
> (https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2010-3870.html /
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49687) are fixed in PHP-5.2.14. For this
> one issue you might need to use the patch
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Adam Tauno Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:14 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] tmpfs says "No space left on device"
>
> I have a server where we use tm
On 1 December 2010 14:13, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary files used
> by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs thinks it is full
> when it isn't.
>
> [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file
> touch: cannot touch `file': No space lef
I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary files used
by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs thinks it is full
when it isn't.
[r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file
touch: cannot touch `file': No space left on device
[r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# df -k
Filesystem
This is wonderful! Thank you very much!
Rob
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/12/1 Rob Del Vecchio :
> > Since the "SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!" thread is
> deep
> > in heated discussion, I decided not to derail to ask a simple question.
> > I fo
2010/12/1 Nico Kadel-Garcia :
>> Anyone willing to contribute funds (or time) to such a study? It would be
>> educational experience and good PR, at the least.
>
> Oh, I know the holes and which would be straightforward to get to.
> There's generally enough lower hanging fruit with NFS stored
> p
Dne 1.12.2010 13:17, Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
> If you file an issue request at bugs.centos.org; i'll investigate
>
> - KB
I'd say the bigger issue is 5.1.6 C4Plus php, which is not maintained
together with C4Plus pecl/pear modules. C4Plus php is installed on many
boxes over the world.
DH
__
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 07:54 -0400, robert mena wrote:
> I am wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and
> if the recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security update affects the
> 5.2.10 that is in testing.
Red Hat just put out this security alert concerning multiple PHP
vulne
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
I would guess no one knows. But all of my CentOS installs are OOB as
concerning SELinux, except the two scalix installs, which have some
custom
'stuff' thanks to the scalix instance naming.
>>>
>>> All I know is at the last
On 12/01/2010 11:54 AM, robert mena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production
> environment for more than six months without any problem. I am
> wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the
> recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security u
Hi,
I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production environment
for more than six months without any problem. I am wondering if/when we are
going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the recently disclosure of a
5.1.6 security update affects the 5.2.10 that is in testing.
_
On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote:
>
> Ok, last try...
> Did you copy/pasted my code?
> Did you type it?
> Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used
> does
> not help...
>
> JD
>
>
Sorry to forget to mention that I have copied your code from your
message into a text file a
On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote:
>
> Ok, last try...
> Did you copy/pasted my code?
> Did you type it?
> Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used
> does
> not help...
>
> JD
>
Please find below the code that I tried :
cat Edit3 | tr -d "\r" | while read LINE; do
echo "$
From: hadi motamedi
>I even tried to make it as an script file and made it executable
> but still getting the following error:
> 'syntax error near unexpected token 'done'
Ok, last try...
Did you copy/pasted my code?
Did you type it?
Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, John Kennedy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:59, Matt wrote:
>> Have a CentOS 4.x 32 bit server running on a single 500M SATA drive.
>> What is easiest way to convert too RAID 1 on it? Anyone have a link?
>> Would be open to hardware or software just do no
Hi Keith,
Looks like the Swapping will happen once the PC memory is exhausted
1) So your point of placing SWAP place in another spare disk is a good
decision
but we still have the Paging happening which cant be avoided :)
2) Again moving the /var/log is another good part
but there are some locati
73 matches
Mail list logo
