On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:58 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Dear All
> I have captured a file in my centos showing logs captured from many
> modules concurrently. Please find attached a sample of the file. As
> you see, there are logs from individual modules that have been
> captured concurrently. Fo
Dear All
I have captured a file in my centos showing logs captured from many
modules concurrently. Please find attached a sample of the file. As
you see, there are logs from individual modules that have been
captured concurrently. For example, there are logs from
IPTR,SNMP,HLR,TCAP,XAPP,and SCCP m
On 11/28/10 5:29 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> I wouldn't know the typical ratio itself as a number, but I can tell you it is
> surely less than one. I had three identical systems compromised at the same
> time (one of the users had a weak password, and he used the same password on
> all three mac
> I have rebuilt samba3x SRPM in Centos 5.5. The resultings RPM's are
> nearly in triple size of the original RPMs. I have installed and
> checked the binary files are stripped. What can result in such
> difference in RPM sizes?
Debugging information not removed from binaries?
___
On Monday, November 29, 2010 04:15 AM, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have rebuilt samba3x SRPM in Centos 5.5. The resultings RPM's are
> nearly in triple size of the original RPMs. I have installed and checked
> the binary files are stripped. What can result in such difference in RPM
> sizes?
May
On 11/28/2010 7:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bob McConnell
> wrote:
>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> On Sunday 28 November 2010 13:15:24 Bob McConnell wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Y
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Sunday 28 November 2010 13:15:24 Bob McConnell wrote:
>>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> You forgot "take on becoming the SELinux integration manag
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:50 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:14:43PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I think it is easier/cheaper to use hardware firewalls and idp systems
>>> to protect servers than fight with selinux on each server.
>>>
>>> SELinux tuning migh
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:16 -0500, bluethundr wrote:
> That DID it!!! thanks and I agree.. god? root? what's the difference!! :)
Actually, there IS a difference.
God doesn't have to log in. ;^>
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:35 -0500, b
>
> This is where, as a sysadmin, you need to invest just a little time and
> effort learning the system. Honestly, the vast majority of issues are
> trivial to solve if you just spend a few hours reading the docs/guides,
> and even if you really can't be bothered there are kind folks on this
> lis
That DID it!!! thanks and I agree.. god? root? what's the difference!! :)
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:35 -0500, bluethundr wrote:
>> Hello list
>>
>> I am attempting to manage my key logins with ssh-agent. However EVERY
>> time I try to ssh I ha
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, William Hooper wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:00 PM, ken wrote:
>>> You need to take a closer look at what yum is trying to install. This
>>> message is telling you yum won't update the package because it will
>>> break a dependency on another installed packa
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:00 PM, ken wrote:
>> You need to take a closer look at what yum is trying to install. This
>> message is telling you yum won't update the package because it will
>> break a dependency on another installed package.
>
> yum's trying to install gmime20. This doesn't exist
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:35 -0500, bluethundr wrote:
> Hello list
>
> I am attempting to manage my key logins with ssh-agent. However EVERY
> time I try to ssh I have to go through the same exact routing and it's
> getting a little old...
>
> [bluethu...@lcent01:~]#ssh sum3
> Enter passphrase fo
Hello list
I am attempting to manage my key logins with ssh-agent. However EVERY
time I try to ssh I have to go through the same exact routing and it's
getting a little old...
[bluethu...@lcent01:~]#ssh sum3
Enter passphrase for key '/home/bluethundr/.ssh/id_rsa':
[bluethu...@lcent01:~]#exec ssh
On 11/28/2010 01:58 PM William Hooper wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, ken wrote:
>> # yum update
>> ...
>> --> Running transaction check
>> --> Processing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos for package:
>> gmime-sharp
>> ---> Package gmime20.i386 0:2.2.26-1.el5.rf set to be updated
Hi,
I have rebuilt samba3x SRPM in Centos 5.5. The resultings RPM's are nearly
in triple size of the original RPMs. I have installed and checked the binary
files are stripped. What can result in such difference in RPM sizes?
I have not changed anything on built and install sections of spec file.
On 11/28/10 1:06 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>
> There has been a lot of progress with SELinux lately. I think you should
> reconsider your position and perhaps give it a try on the upcoming CentOS 6
> where the targeted policy is much matured.
SELinux has been around many years now. Are there any
1,000 pardons for aggressively trimming this post,
sorry if I have harmed the flow by being selective.
Bob McConnell wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > Bob McConnell wrote:
> >> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> >>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Hypothetical: one admins a vended suite of applications that com
On Sunday 28 November 2010 13:31:28 Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Worse - it doesn't always log what it is doing in a way that you can figure
> out. Occasionally not at all.
SELinux does have some rate-limiting capabilities built-in to avoid a flood of
identical messages...so the "triggering-event to
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, ken wrote:
> # yum update
> ...
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Processing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos for package:
> gmime-sharp
> ---> Package gmime20.i386 0:2.2.26-1.el5.rf set to be updated
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> gmime-sharp-2.
Hello CentOS:
Thanks for your input..
> As mentioned in my previous mail, there is no need to specify
> >TLSCACertificateFile in slapd.conf unless your server will request client
> >certificate for authentication. Nor is there any point in trying multiple
> >files, you can concatenate the CA
On 11/27/2010 02:52 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 18:57:50 Benjamin Franz wrote:
>> On 11/26/2010 05:17 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
>>> What's with people recommending to turn off SELinux?! That's just bad
>>> advice and like recommending people keep their doors unlocked at
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 28 November 2010 13:15:24 Bob McConnell wrote:
>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
You forgot "take on becoming the SELinux integration manager for that
project with every single update".
>>> Every
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:14:43PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> >
> > I think it is easier/cheaper to use hardware firewalls and idp systems
> > to protect servers than fight with selinux on each server.
> >
> > SELinux tuning might work on companies with unlimited resources like
> > NSA .. or
On 11/28/2010 8:15 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:21 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
You run it in Permissive mode, you deal with the exceptions as
they arise whil
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:21 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>>You run it in Permissive mode, you deal with the exceptions as
>>>they arise while the software is running in its normal
>>>e
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 07:22 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> You forgot "take on becoming the SELinux integration manager for that
>> project with every single update". I've done that several times now
>
> In commercial service production, wasted time also costs money.
>
> I think it is easier/
On 11/27/2010 04:38 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/27/10 12:44 PM, ken wrote:
>> This would seem like a bug... or why is yum trying to install package
>> versions which are already installed?
>
> this most frequently happens when you mix dependencies of different yum
> repositories.I noted .
> You forgot "take on becoming the SELinux integration manager for that
> project with every single update". I've done that several times now
In commercial service production, wasted time also costs money.
I think it is easier/cheaper to use hardware firewalls and idp systems
to protect servers
30 matches
Mail list logo
