On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:45 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> Try a yum clean all && yum upgrade
Thanks James,
I edited /etc/yum.repos.d/Centos-Base and I change from baseline to
mirrorlist. It works.
Somehow
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
Try a yum clean all && yum upgrade
- Original Message -
| Hi all,
| cat /etc/redhat-release
| CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
|
| When I check update, yum says not update. What do I miss? Thank you.
|
| yum update
| Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
| Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
|
Hi all,
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
When I check update, yum says not update. What do I miss? Thank you.
yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update
_
Hi all,
I need some advise on how best manage a share folder.
We have a 2TB samba share. Inside there is individual user sub-folder,
and also there are team's folders.
We use one shared account for all users.
The problem is:
The user abuse the space usage.
My thought:
- Implement quota for each u
(2010/09/05 9:18), ganu MailList wrote:
>How can I check which package is not installed?
Yum tells you related pkg list for gnome-screensaver.
Tsuyoshi.
# mkdir /tmp/gs
# rpm --root /tmp/gs --initdb
# rpm --nodeps --root=/tmp/gs -ivh centos-release-5-5.el5.centos.i386.rpm
# yum --installroot=/t
embarrassing, but it turned out to be a bad nic. I found a full os
install cd and did a complete OS install. the nic would not come
alive. I popped the drive out of that box along with the ram and put
it into another box just like it and everything started working. sorry
for the wild goose chase
O
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say
> two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1
> (for an alias ip)
>
> I just want to know if it's possible and reliable
Yes to both. I have been doing this
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Gabriel Tabares
wrote:
> On 05/09/2010 18:33, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>> Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say
>> two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1
>> (for an alias ip)
>>
>> I just want to know if
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 12:22 -0700, Chuck wrote:
>
> Yea but that isn't the 64-bit.. I can download fast and w/o issues.. I
> can't get the _64bit_ DVD ISO. I can get the 64bit cdrom images 1
> -7... but not the DVD ISO __via the torrent__.
>
---
Ok problem solved see [1]. You need [2]. I know i
At Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:22:20 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
>
>
> Yea but that isn't the 64-bit.. I can download fast and w/o issues.. I can't
> get the _64bit_ DVD ISO. I can get the 64bit cdrom images 1 -7... but not
> the DVD ISO __via the torrent__.
Did you look at my whole message? I
Yep.. I've tried numerous speed test and at my slowest it was 19m down and
768k up.
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Robert wrote:
> On 09/05/2010 05:01 PM, Chuck informed us:
> >
> > I've been trying for 2 weeks to download the dvd iso torrent... Shows
> > a ton of seeders, few leechers, but ve
Yea but that isn't the 64-bit.. I can download fast and w/o issues.. I can't
get the _64bit_ DVD ISO. I can get the 64bit cdrom images 1 -7... but not
the DVD ISO __via the torrent__.
I get smoking downloads of unrelated torrents. Smoking downloads from
various vendor sites. (ie: Oracle 11g in ~90
Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey there, and thanks!
>
> But it looks like my settings are correct:
I guess you need to check the log files on the server for any clues
Also, check the installer logs via ALT-F3 and/or ALT-F4 for any other clues.
James Pearson
__
On 09/05/2010 05:01 PM, Chuck informed us:
>
> I've been trying for 2 weeks to download the dvd iso torrent... Shows
> a ton of seeders, few leechers, but very poor performance.. (I'm
> correctly setup for torrents and get fast downloads normally) Only
> like 4% downloaded and crawling. I've tri
On 05/09/2010 18:33, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say
> two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1
> (for an alias ip)
>
> I just want to know if it's possible and reliable
>
Possible and seems to be quite s
This reminded me of a recent issue doing just what you are asking about. I
had an issue with sending traffic out an aliased interface on a bonded
interface a few weeks ago. I needed certain traffic to look like it was from
the aliased interfaces IP so the ACL on the receiving side would allow
post
16 matches
Mail list logo
