Thanks Cornel.
Thanks
Jatin
On 4/2/2010 11:22 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
2010/4/2 Jatin Davey mailto:jasho...@cisco.com>>
Ok, i figured out the issue , Did some google on it and found this
useful link on usage of proxy.
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-set-proxy-environme
2010/4/2 Jatin Davey
> Ok, i figured out the issue , Did some google on it and found this
> useful link on usage of proxy.
>
> http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-set-proxy-environment-variable/
>
> or even better:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/yum/sn-yum-proxy-server.html
--
Among
Ok, i figured out the issue , Did some google on it and found this
useful link on usage of proxy.
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-set-proxy-environment-variable/
Thanks Kwan , Thanks kwan for questioning me on the proxy usage.
Thanks
Jatin
On 4/2/2010 10:51 AM, Jatin Davey wrote:
> Hi
Hi Kwan
I executed the following on the host that was having problem:
[r...@localhost yum.repos.d]# wget http://www.google.com
--22:14:25-- http://www.google.com/
Resolving www.google.com... 74.125.19.105, 74.125.19.99, 74.125.19.106, ...
Connecting to www.google.com|74.125.19.105|:80... failed:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Jatin Davey wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wanted to download and install the net-snmp package. Usually on my
> other CentOS boxes i use the following command to do it:
>
> yum install net-snmp
>
> I was able to successfully install net-snmp on 4 of my CentOS boxes but
> not on
These are my contents of the CentOS-Base.repo file:
[r...@localhost yum.repos.d]# vi CentOS-Base.repo
#released updates
[updates]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates
mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=updates
#baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$rel
Hi
I wanted to download and install the net-snmp package. Usually on my
other CentOS boxes i use the following command to do it:
yum install net-snmp
I was able to successfully install net-snmp on 4 of my CentOS boxes but
not on one of them. It reports me the following error message:
[r...@lo
MHR wrote:
> but I just don't like to do it. 30 systems? Yoik!
Out of ~300 ..
> As for moving from 4 to 5, that's not a trivial thing at all - and
> it's not an "upgrade" per se unless you have LOTS of faith in the
> process. I always reinstall across releases, and that's a royal pain
> (thoug
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 17:25 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Will the below config allow me to push using slurp... to the d that is;
>
> primary ldap slapd.conf;
> replica uri=ldap://ldap.dns.name:389
> binddn="cn=replicauser,dc=domain,dc=name" bindmethod=simple
> credentials
Hi Craig,
Will the below config allow me to push using slurp... to the d that is;
primary ldap slapd.conf;
replica uri=ldap://ldap.dns.name:389
binddn="cn=replicauser,dc=domain,dc=name" bindmethod=simple
credentials=passofreplicauser
secondarie{s} ldap slapd.conf;
updatedn cn=replicauser,dc=
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> CentOSPlus has the firewire drivers...
>
I asked about this a little while back, and I'm pretty sure the
firewire drivers are ok in the non-plus CentOS.
Or did I get that one wrong?
mhr
___
Cen
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:44 AM, nate wrote:
>
> You might be surprised how many outages it takes to co-ordinate
> such an upgrade in a medium-large environment(and nobody including
> me likes to take *everything* down at once though we did have
> such an outage a few weeks ago to move a storage a
slurpd is a push technology and yes, I have multiple 'slaves' on slurpd.
Craig
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:50 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Craig,
>
> Do you have multiple secondary LDAPs using slurpd?
>
> Its is pushing or pulling?
>
> I may just use that.
>
> - Brian
> On Apr 1, 2
On 4/1/2010 1:35 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
>>
Thanks Craig,
Do you have multiple secondary LDAPs using slurpd?
Its is pushing or pulling?
I may just use that.
- Brian
On Apr 1, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 10:36 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> From what I gather, OpenLDAP on Centos 5.x pulls
On 4/1/2010 8:06 AM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> dear all,
>
> i can't count the times that webmin came to my rescue.
> whenever i face a dead end in doing something through CLI i always turn to
> webmin..
> though at the moment i wanna learn how to do things through cli instead of
> relying on webm
At Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:29:26 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 4/1/2010 12:08 PM, R-Elists wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
> >> upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
> >> still seems like it was a good move even if most of t
On 4/1/2010 1:12 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ryan Manikowski wrote:
>> If you have your own account on each of the boxes the ssh key method is
>> the best.
>>
>> 1) Create ssh keys for YOUR unprivileged user account.
>>
>> 2) Add YOUR account to /etc/sudoers by adding:
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 10:36 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From what I gather, OpenLDAP on Centos 5.x pulls LDAP changes from
> central LDAP server to a secondary LDAP server.
>
> So in other words, you can have your second LDAP server pull the db
> based on either;
>
> type=re
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ryan Manikowski wrote:
> If you have your own account on each of the boxes the ssh key method is
> the best.
>
> 1) Create ssh keys for YOUR unprivileged user account.
>
> 2) Add YOUR account to /etc/sudoers by adding: user ALL=NOPASSWD:
> /bin/su -
>
> Then fr
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> As the number of hosts increases, it's getting harder to keep track of what
> packages have been installed on each host using yum or rpm.
>
> So I am wondering if there's an existing application that helps you keep
> track of what p
On 4/1/2010 12:32 PM, Yungwei Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the number of hosts increases, it's getting harder to keep track of
> what packages have been installed on each host using yum or rpm.
>
> So I am wondering if there's an existing application that helps you keep
> track of what packages install
MHR wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, nate wrote:
>>
>> I *just* finished upgrading to CentOS 5.4 6 days ago.
>>
>
> How many people got trampled in the rush?
You might be surprised how many outages it takes to co-ordinate
such an upgrade in a medium-large environment(and nobody including
Hi,
From what I gather, OpenLDAP on Centos 5.x pulls LDAP changes from
central LDAP server to a secondary LDAP server.
So in other words, you can have your second LDAP server pull the db
based on either;
type=refreshOnly
which mean the pull interval will happen when ever you specify or;
t
Hi,
As the number of hosts increases, it's getting harder to keep track of what
packages have been installed on each host using yum or rpm.
So I am wondering if there's an existing application that helps you keep track
of what packages installed on each host. Thanks.
__
On 4/1/2010 12:08 PM, R-Elists wrote:
>
>>
>> I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
>> upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
>> still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
>> problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
>> many years el
>
> I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
> upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
> still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
> problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
> many years elapsing between releases, skipping a vers
> >
> > RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May
> 31, 2009).
> >
> > RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
> >
> > RHEL4 will go out of support Feb 29, 2012
>
> Since the world will end in 2012, your version 5 installs
> will be just fine!!!
>LOL
>
Scott,
hehe
on 4-1-2010 6:42 AM Benjamin Franz spake the following:
> Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>> On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
>>> Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
>>> to reduce the life cycle from 7
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, nate wrote:
>
> I *just* finished upgrading to CentOS 5.4 6 days ago.
>
How many people got trampled in the rush?
;^)
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable system was "too
> conservative", given the somewhat outdated software. I told him not to
> mind, since Debian is bleeding edge compared to my OS of choice.
Maybe your friend needs another distro, of course everyone knows
On 4/1/2010 9:11 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Mathieu Baudier a écrit :
>>> Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
>>
>> Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
>> that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
>>
>
> Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable
On 4/1/2010 10:14 AM, R-Elists wrote:
>
>
>> They won't change the cycle for existing releases (they would
>> get into contract liability if they did).
>>
>> RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May 31, 2009).
>>
>> RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
>>
>> RHEL4 will go o
If you have your own account on each of the boxes the ssh key method is
the best.
1) Create ssh keys for YOUR unprivileged user account.
2) Add YOUR account to /etc/sudoers by adding: userALL=NOPASSWD:
/bin/su -
Then from there you can use clusterssh to connect to all the boxes
simultaneous
> They won't change the cycle for existing releases (they would
> get into contract liability if they did).
>
> RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May 31, 2009).
>
> RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
>
> RHEL4 will go out of support Feb 29, 2012
>
> RHEL5 will
On Apr 1, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Bazy wrote:
>>
>> Short of finding some remotely exploitable vulnerability, you'll have
>> to visit each server and login. Imagine if you *could* create IDs
>> without root authority? :D
>>
>> Are the servers identically configured?
>>
>> If you can login remotely as r
Mathieu Baudier a écrit :
>> Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
>
> Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
> that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
>
Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable system was "too
conservative", given the somewh
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
> ...
>
>> Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
>> Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
>> to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
>> the same EL major r
Hey
As you all might know the new Newsletter is now online [1].
I just want to thank all the people that have helped and contributed
again. This is what makes the C in CentOS :)
Cheers Didi
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/Latest
--
Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger
http://contact.ribalba.de
__
From: Roland RoLaNd
> i can't count the times that webmin came to my rescue.
> whenever i face a dead end in doing something through CLI i always
> turn to webmin..
> though at the moment i wanna learn how to do things through
> cli instead of relying on webmin as i said..
> especially "System a
> Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
I guess that they are well informed, so this supports the idea that
Fedora 12 will be the basis for RHEL 6.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/arc
Having list issues..sorry.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Am 31.03.2010 18:47, schrieb MHR:
> Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
> team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
> it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
> so I have to wonder.
>
> I didn't see anything j
>
> Short of finding some remotely exploitable vulnerability, you'll have
> to visit each server and login. Imagine if you *could* create IDs
> without root authority? :D
>
> Are the servers identically configured?
>
> If you can login remotely as root you can automate some of them via
> expect. Wh
I'm not surprised at the "delay" for RHEL 6. Consider 2.x is still
supported this means they are supporting 4 different RHEL versions right
now. I would actually wait until at least 2.x dies..if not maybe 3.x
before spitting out another version.
On 4/1/2010 7:16 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 0
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
> SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
> Care to give a glimpse of the code?
> Thank you.
Personally, I'd use the default Centos install of sendmail because it's there,
it's easy, and
dear all,
i can't count the times that webmin came to my rescue.
whenever i face a dead end in doing something through CLI i always turn to
webmin..
though at the moment i wanna learn how to do things through cli instead of
relying on webmin as i said..
especially "System and Server Status"
the
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Bazy wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not have
> centralized authentication or sudo or the same room password. I tried
> doing this with expect and "su -" but the script fails or acts funny.
> Please advise me or t
Bazy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
> wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Bazy wrote:
>>> Hello folks,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not
>> have you checked man newusers?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rajagopal
>
On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
...
> Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
> Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
> to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
> the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I m
On 03/31/2010 09:19 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
...
> Yeah.. and with a fast internet connection it takes LONGER to build up
> the new rpms from the deltarpms compared to just downloading the new rpms
> as full packages :)
I've noticed that too on my eee 901 with a slow flash disk.
yum remove yum
Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Bazy wrote:
>
> Thanks Raja. My problem is connecting to those 200 servers and su-ing
> in, they all have different root passwords.
If you have _that_ kind of infrastructure you are better off using a
Directory server too.
If you have telnet, you can t
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Bazy wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not
>
> have you checked man newusers?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajagopal
Thanks Raja. My problem is
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
>> Yes, the CUPS Manual says:
>> "Multiple Listen directives can be provided to
>> listen on multiple addresses"
> Well, did that... and no joy, from another box, I can still
> telnet to the server on one of the virtual IPs, port 631.
> I can't really play around much,
Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Bazy wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not
have you checked man newusers?
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.o
Hello folks,
Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not have
centralized authentication or sudo or the same room password. I tried
doing this with expect and "su -" but the script fails or acts funny.
Please advise me or tell me where I need to look...
Thanks and regards,
Baz
http://www.rdpslides.com/webresources/FAQ00035.htm
--
Regards,
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks John.
Actually had to use "yum clean all" and then used yum to install the
net-snmp package and it worked great.
Good to go with my testing.
Appreciate your help in this regard.
Thanks
Jatin
On 4/1/2010 11:39 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Jatin Davey wrote:
>
>> http://centos.corenetwo
58 matches
Mail list logo
