Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
>
> It's going to have an accident, pretty soon, pretty
> soon.
>
> Steve
aah!... does anybody smell a BOFH here ;)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/odds/bofh/
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
Jatin Davey wrote:
> http://centos.corenetworks.net/5.3/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno
> 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found
> ...
odd that its using /5.3/ in the path, it should be just /5/
try
yum clean
then try again.
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 12:04 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
> SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
I use this:
http://www.cleancode.org/projects/email
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvi
>Hi all,
>Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
>SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
>Care to give a glimpse of the code?
>Thank you.
But of course, just cause the smtp server you are pointed at initially
is local, interpret that as 127.0.0.1. So point to
Hi
I am new to CentOS and been into Linux for about 3 months now. I first
started off with fedora and also trying my hands on CentOS now.
Basically i used yum to download softwares on the fedora box. I mainly
require the snmp agent for my linux boxes so as to test my network
management product
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
> SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
> Care to give a glimpse of the code?
One approach
step 1: make sure packages 'expect' and 'telnet' are installed
step 2: read: man a
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:04:10PM +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
> SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
> Care to give a glimpse of the code?
> Thank you.
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=send+email+via+python
;-)
Hi all,
Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
Care to give a glimpse of the code?
Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 01/04/2010 03:41, David Goldsmith wrote:
> Went to [1] - got this:
>
> * Newsletter
> * 1002
>
> You are not allowed to view this page.
>
> Link to prior post works - http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1001
Yes, I am sorry. This is just for the editors I sent it to the wrong
list.
On 3/31/2010 10:30 PM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
> Hey
>
> Could everyone please proofread and add last changes to the Newsletter[1].
>
> Cheers Didi
>
> [1] http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1002
Went to [1] - got this:
* Newsletter
* 1002
You are not allowed to view this page.
Hey
Could everyone please proofread and add last changes to the Newsletter[1].
Cheers Didi
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1002
--
Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger
http://contact.ribalba.de
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> If the accident accidentally involves a circular saw, a YouTube link
> would be really cool! :-)
You know you use Reddit too much when you look for an upvote button.
;)
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-2
On 31/03/10 17:11, Ned Slider wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
>>> And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5.
> Stay up to date on progress here:
>
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?to
>I run Fedora on servers at home without any issues.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Well all valid, I always laugh when I see posts in Fedora list about people
> setting up Fedora as servers at work.
>
> I can't imagine such a practice. I use at home only on my desktop for the
> bleeding
> edge support, but given the pub
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> Well all valid, I always laugh when I see posts in Fedora list about people
> setting up Fedora as servers at work.
Well, I love to make people laugh so I'll chime in here.
I do use Fedora for some hosting, and I'm very happy with it for
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:18:17PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> When something works right there's not much need to change it. I still
> have an RH 7.3 box running that's had a couple of 4-year uptime spans
I hope there's very little internet exposure on that box; even ssh has had
remote exploi
On 3/31/2010 4:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
>
> Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
> Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
> to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
> the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I mean, c
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
> Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
> Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
> to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
> the same EL major release for more than 5 years
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
>
>> I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than
>> a year ago?
>
> Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse
> is that it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), a
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 01:27:25 pm Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:18:40PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Centos 5 box with dom0 and several domUs and one of them is
> > not runnable. I ran updates several days ago and the update included a
> > kernel u
Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
>
>
>> I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a
>> year ago?
>>
>
> Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse is that
> it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this i
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
> I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a
> year ago?
Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse is that
it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this is the latest version that
will run on it. An
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:14 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> It's about time someone did that. I completely gave up on Fedora
> after version 6 and unsubscribed from the mail list because they were
> only interested in changing things and adding features, not making
> anything work. Has it become us
Spiro Harvey wrote:
>> Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
>> team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
>> it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
>> so I have to wonder.
>>
>
>
> I vaguely recollect tha
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:18:40PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Centos 5 box with dom0 and several domUs and one of them is
> not runnable. I ran updates several days ago and the update included a
> kernel update so I used virt-manager to reboot. But it won't book. It
> show
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
We use F12 headless, so I can't comment on desktop issues, but I
really like the deltarpm stuff. It really cuts down on bandwidth
requirements on a frequently updated distro like Fedora.
Yeah.. and with a fast internet connection it takes LONGER to b
Hi,
I have a Centos 5 box with dom0 and several domUs and one of them is
not runnable. I ran updates several days ago and the update included a
kernel update so I used virt-manager to reboot. But it won't book. It
shows as not running and when I try to run it I get a dialog box with
this:
> Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
> team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
> it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
> so I have to wonder.
I vaguely recollect that RH mentioned pushing out the (tota
Bob McConnell wrote:
> Not unless it had some additional hardware assistance. The 8080 can only
> address 64K.
>
indeed.There were exceptions, but yes, this involved 'additional
hardware assistance' in the form of bank switching, or bank mapping.
Altos Computers and others made Z80 sy
On 3/31/2010 2:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> A lot of the work after Fedora 6 seemed to revolve around making
>> single-user desktop type access more convenient at the expense of more
>> general purpose server concepts - and making it boot quickly which isn't
>> a big priority on boxes that run
>A lot of the work after Fedora 6 seemed to revolve around making
>single-user desktop type access more convenient at the expense of more
>general purpose server concepts - and making it boot quickly which isn't
>a big priority on boxes that run all the time. And some things even
>when not tec
On 3/31/2010 2:19 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
> Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
> >>> Has it become usable again?
> >>
> >> Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
> >> Mint on my
On 3/31/2010 1:58 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
>>>
>>> Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
>>> Mint on my desk and laptop's.
>>
>> I
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
>>> Has it become usable again?
>>
>> Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
>> Mint on my desk and laptop's.
>
> I use F12 on my laptop. I have to say it runs very wel
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:43:38PM -0400, Tait Clarridge wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
> > > Has it become usable again?
> >
> > Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
> > Mint on my desk and laptop's.
> > _
Paul Stuffins a écrit :
> Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Here's some fresh info:
http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/3873916/Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux-55-Released-RHEL-6-Coming-Soon.htm
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cen
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
> > Has it become usable again?
>
> Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
> Mint on my desk and laptop's.
> _
I use F12 on my laptop. I have to say it runs very well (definite
At Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:22:05 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> > Has it become usable again?
>
> Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
> Mint on my desk and laptop's.
*I* gave up on Fedora Core after FC2: I installed it on a dual Pentium
Pro 200 box with a pair
> Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 3/31/2010 12:48 PM, Paul Stuffins wrote:
>> thus Paul Stuffins spake:
>>> Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
>>
>> Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
>> public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
>> Hat Summit in June).
>
> I didn't think
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Paul Stuffins
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:49 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Release 6?
>
> > thus Paul Stuffins spake:
> >> Has RedHat even released RHEL6
> thus Paul Stuffins spake:
>> Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
>
> Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
> public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
> Hat Summit in June).
I didn't think they had, hence no CentOS6.
I have actually just bee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
> Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
Hat Summit in June).
Timo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I didn't see anything jump out at me on the Red Hat site, so - anyon
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
>> And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5.
>> Please be patient :)
>
> Is it ready yet?
>
> *grins, ducks and runs*
>
> (patient? me?)
>
"Pati
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:09 PM, ken wrote:
>>> # rpm -qi gmime gmime-sharp|grep URL
>>> URL : http://spruce.sourceforge.net/gmime/
>>> URL : http://spruce.sourceforge.net/gmime/
>>
>> The URL file generally just describes where the original source comes
>> from, not what repo is
Any one aware of some type of looping macro for rpmbuild instead of
creating an outside script to loop on something like rpmbuild -b[STAGE].
Or anything like a Debugger Stepthrough
John
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
>> And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5.
>> Please be patient :)
>
> Is it ready yet?
>
> *grins, ducks and runs*
>
> (patient? me?)
>
Stay up to date on progress here:
On 03/31/2010 08:18 AM William Hooper wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:30 AM, ken wrote:
>> Available Packages
>> gmime.i386 2.2.25-1.el5
>> epel
>> gmime-devel.i386 2.2.25-1.el5
>> epel
>
> The newer version of gmime is coming from the ep
> From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
>> Hmmm, didn't see that one. Do you know if you can have more than
>> one IP - I mean, it should listen on loopback, also.
>
> Yes, the CUPS Manual says: "Multiple Listen directives can be provided to
> listen on multiple addresses"
Well, did that... and no joy, from a
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5.
> Please be patient :)
Is it ready yet?
*grins, ducks and runs*
(patient? me?)
--
rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mai
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> "[rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5 GA Announcement":
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2010-March/msg00147.html
>
Hmm, that should be:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2010-March/ms
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
> Hmmm, didn't see that one. Do you know if you can have more than
> one IP - I mean, it should listen on loopback, also.
Yes, the CUPS Manual says: "Multiple Listen directives can be provided to
listen on multiple addresses"
JD
___
Hello list,
"[rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5 GA Announcement":
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2010-March/msg00147.html
And:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.5/html/Release_Notes/
And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentO
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:39 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Janez Kosmrlj
> >On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Janez Kosmrlj <
> postnali...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>Hi, i have some old IBM USB touchscreens, that insist on not working
> correctly under CentOS. I tried to use the 3m driver and th
JD wrote"
> From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
>> I've got a server with multiple virtual interfaces. Now, I only want
>> CUPS to advertise on *one* - eth0, not eth0:1 or eth0:gad
>> Looking at the CUPS manual, and cuppsd.conf man page,
>> I see BrowseAllow, but the entries are not
>> clear enough for m
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
> I've got a server with multiple virtual interfaces. Now, I only want
> CUPS to advertise on *one* - eth0, not eth0:1 or eth0:gad
> Looking at the CUPS manual, and cuppsd.conf man page,
> I see BrowseAllow, but the entries are not
> clear enough for me to understan
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
>
> I rebuilt my xen host with the 64-bit OS and am in the process of recreating
> the guests, both 32 and 64 bit. I use a kickstart installation with
> virt-install, and so far none of the installation attempts has completed.
>
> Anaconda indicates inst
I've got a server with multiple virtual interfaces. Now, I only want CUPS
to advertise on *one* - eth0, not eth0:1 or eth0:gad
Looking at the CUPS manual, and cuppsd.conf man page, I see BrowseAllow,
but the entries are not clear enough for me to understand what they mean.
(Yeah, I know the do
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 14:41 +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
> JohnS ha scritto:
> > ---
> > scsi_dev_flags SCSI black/white list.
> > scsi_dev_flags=vendor:model:flags
> > This option lets the user add entries to the SCSI black/white list for
> > a specific vendor and model of device.
> >
> > Dug
I rebuilt my xen host with the 64-bit OS and am in the process of recreating
the guests, both 32 and 64 bit. I use a kickstart installation with
virt-install, and so far none of the installation attempts has completed.
Anaconda indicates installation should take about 2-3 minutes, but when it
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
> i have 2 servers in a datacenter and each of them has 2 virtual machines
> one is linux the other is windows of wirtual machines.
> when i want to transfer my ip addresses between theese servers , for ex:
> let me say
> main server 1' guest windows : A
> main server 1' gue
JohnS ha scritto:
> ---
> scsi_dev_flags SCSI black/white list.
> scsi_dev_flags=vendor:model:flags
> This option lets the user add entries to the SCSI black/white list for
> a specific vendor and model of device.
>
> Dug it up from my notes. This goes on the kernel boot line.
>
For what I unders
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:58 +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
> 2010/3/30 nate :
> > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> do you know if there is a way at boot time do disable specific LUN's on a
> >> SCSI
> >> bus of a particular controller?
> >
> > What do you need to do this for?
> >
> > How
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:30 AM, ken wrote:
> Available Packages
> gmime.i386 2.2.25-1.el5
> epel
> gmime-devel.i386 2.2.25-1.el5
> epel
The newer version of gmime is coming from the epel repo, which doesn't
appear to package gmime-sharp.
>
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 23:59 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>
> No, 512 Byte. Here's one similar :
>
> http://www.computermuseum-mannheim.de/images/pic_g/siemens_8080_1g.jpg
>
> The thing had to be programmed in Assembler using a hex keyboard.
>
> My dad worked at a lab at Siemens and brought one o
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 12:23 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently configuring Squid and Squidguard for filtering web access
> in a public computer room. So far, everything works fine.
>
> I know how to configure Firefox to use a proxy, but there's no way to
> protect that config
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:21:32AM -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> I remember some 6502-based systems that used bank switching to access
> separate 32K windows... Used it mainly for RAM disks.. Was pretty
> impressive to see apps load within a second when 1 to 2 minutes was
> the usual wait time.
The B
From: Niki Kovacs
> I'm currently configuring Squid and Squidguard for filtering web
> access in a public computer room. So far, everything works fine.
> I know how to configure Firefox to use a proxy, but there's no way to
> protect that configuration, e. g. a more knowledgeable user might
> c
On 03/30/2010 09:56 PM Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 08:13 AM, ken wrote:
>> --> Running transaction check
>> --> Processing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos for package:
>> gmime-sharp
>> ---> Package gmime.i386 0:2.2.25-1.el5 set to be updated
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
On 03/30/2010 09:05 PM William Hooper wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:13 PM, ken wrote:
>
> Without the full yum output it is a bit hard to be sure (you might
> want to paste the full output to pastebin.centos.org, but it looks
> like:
>
>> ---> Package gmime.i386 0:2.2.25-1.el5 set to be up
Hi,
I'm currently configuring Squid and Squidguard for filtering web access
in a public computer room. So far, everything works fine.
I know how to configure Firefox to use a proxy, but there's no way to
protect that configuration, e. g. a more knowledgeable user might
circumvent this configur
It seems that all the problem was caused by selinux.
I booted all the nodes with the kernel option selinux=0 and now I can
mount GFS partitions without problems.
Thanks,
Sandra
sandra-llistes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not a GFS expert either :-)
> In fact, I erased all the configuration of the cluste
Tom H a écrit :
I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
like on ubuntu with the sudo
>
>
I tried su - and su -l root on my CentOS server but
it doesn't work
how should I do ?
>
>
sorry for the disturbance I'm ne
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Bob McConnell wrote:
dn't mean 512K RAM?)
>
> Not unless it had some additional hardware assistance. The 8080 can only
> address 64K.
>
:D
I remember some 6502-based systems that used bank switching to access
separate 32K windows... Used it mainly for RAM disks..
>>> I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
>>> like on ubuntu with the sudo
>>> I tried su - and su -l root on my CentOS server but
>>> it doesn't work
>>> how should I do ?
>>> sorry for the disturbance I'm new in RH Linux distro
>> Sounds like you have your solution...
> there's no way to use su without installing new packages ?
>
sudo is different from su.
su is definitely in the base installation, though sudo may need to be
specifically installed.
You can use su without installing any extra packages, but you'll be
given the user the root password to use su.
> Simply plugging in my older Microsoft MultiMedia Keyboad 1.0A and some
> crappy old mouse, both of which are wired with PS/2 connectors, resulted
> in the problem going away. This kind of sucks because I like using my
> keyboard and mouse and I dont intend to leave these old things connected
> to
Kwan Lowe a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Georghy wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>> I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
>> like on ubuntu with the sudo
>>
>> I tried su - and su -l root on my CentOS server but
>> it doesn't work
>> how should I do ?
>>
>> sorry fo
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Georghy wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
> like on ubuntu with the sudo
>
> I tried su - and su -l root on my CentOS server but
> it doesn't work
> how should I do ?
>
> sorry for the disturbance I'm new in RH Linu
Hi guys,
I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
like on ubuntu with the sudo
I tried su - and su -l root on my CentOS server but
it doesn't work
how should I do ?
sorry for the disturbance I'm new in RH Linux distro
--
Cordialement, / Greetings,
Georghy FUSCO
Les Mikesell a écrit :
> On 3/30/2010 10:13 AM, Georghy wrote:
>
>> Les Mikesell a écrit :
>>
>>> Georghy wrote:
>>>
>>>
Kwan Lowe a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Georghy wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> The server hardware is
85 matches
Mail list logo
