Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Wade Hampton wrote: > Try the Dallas/Maxim 1-wire system. They have serial port > controllers with an RJ11 jack so you can use a phone cable > to the sensor. I got one of their temp sensors and a cheap > RJ11 jack from Radio Shack and had a remote temp sensor. > > They use a simple serial protoco

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

One example of many http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ jobst -Original Message- From: Bowie Bailey Reply-to: CentOS mailing list To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Temperature sensor Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:00:21 -0500 Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Saturday, February 27, 2010 06:46 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote: >> On 26/02/2010 15:32, Brian Mathis wrote: >> >>> Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying >>> cars or found the monolith on the moon yet, but at least we can have >>> pr

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote: > On 26/02/2010 15:32, Brian Mathis wrote: > >> Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying >> cars or found the monolith on the moon yet, but at least we can have >> proportional fonts with word wrap and basic formatting like bold and

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On 26/02/2010 15:32, Brian Mathis wrote: > Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying > cars or found the monolith on the moon yet, but at least we can have > proportional fonts with word wrap and basic formatting like bold and > italics. If your mail reader can't ha

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Try the Dallas/Maxim 1-wire system. They have serial port controllers with an RJ11 jack so you can use a phone cable to the sensor. I got one of their temp sensors and a cheap RJ11 jack from Radio Shack and had a remote temp sensor. They use a simple serial protocol and some of the controllers a

Re: [CentOS] SMARTD (?)

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:27 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Ok, I saw more sectors on a drive yesterday, so this morning, no one was > >> running on it, and I took it out of use, then bounced it onto a DVD, and > >> ran fsck -c (check for bad blocks). It finished. I

Re: [CentOS] SMARTD (?)

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 15:23 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > > I recommend to replace that disc ASAP. When they start having to > reallocate more sectors, they are in a pending complete failure state. I second that. I had a SATA drive that showed a few bad sectors in 2008 sometime. I got the vendor

Re: [CentOS] SMARTD (?)

> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Ok, I saw more sectors on a drive yesterday, so this morning, no one was >> running on it, and I took it out of use, then bounced it onto a DVD, and >> ran fsck -c (check for bad blocks). It finished. I bounce the server. >> >> And SMARTD reports the sectors as "current

Re: [CentOS] SMARTD (?)

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Ok, I saw more sectors on a drive yesterday, so this morning, no one was > running on it, and I took it out of use, then bounced it onto a DVD, and > ran fsck -c (check for bad blocks). It finished. I bounce the server. > > And SMARTD reports the sectors as "currently unr

[CentOS] good centos/rhel source for latest spamassassin?

On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/2/25 R P Herrold : >> I have a full sources solution at: >>        ftp://ftp.owlriver.com/pub/mirror/ORC/spamassassin/ >> including all side modules needed for some wierd stuff not in >> other packaging sets > Looks good, but is the final version

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Dominik Zyla wrote: > You have right. While you checking sensors from few machines, you can > see the trend. Gotta think about changing the way of temperature monitoring > here. Myself I wouldn't rely on internal equipment sensors to try to extrapolate ambient temperature from their readings. Mo

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:41:00PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Dominik wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:27:59PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> On 2/26/2010 12:11 PM, Dominik Zyla wrote: > >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:57:52AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> >> Dominik Zyla wrote: > >>

Re: [CentOS] mod_proxy and html rewriting

On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> mod_substitute is included in later Apache's and does a great job. I >> actually like it better than mod_proxy_html, since the latter has a >> tendency to rewrite a _lot_ of stuff to make it "valid" HTML/XHTML. >> >> Not that that's necessarily a te

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Dominik wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:27:59PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 2/26/2010 12:11 PM, Dominik Zyla wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:57:52AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> Dominik Zyla wrote: >> >>> But it'll not give information about temperature in server room. >> >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:27:59PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 2/26/2010 12:11 PM, Dominik Zyla wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:57:52AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Dominik Zyla wrote: > >>> But it'll not give information about temperature in server room. > >>> > >> > >> actually, it

[CentOS] rkhunter doesn't remove temp suspscan files in /dev/shm

Alle, I know this is off-topic, so I apologize in advance, but we have installed rkhunter from EPEL (because it has the current version, 1.3.6 vice the 1.3.4 rpmforge version) on our CentOS machine and find that it does not remove the files in /dev/shm it uses for the SUSPSCAN test, this t

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On 2/26/2010 12:11 PM, Dominik Zyla wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:57:52AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >> Dominik Zyla wrote: >>> But it'll not give information about temperature in server room. >>> >> >> actually, it sorta can. find the lowest reading sensor on the >> system, probably one

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:57:52AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > Dominik Zyla wrote: > > But it'll not give information about temperature in server room. > > > > actually, it sorta can. find the lowest reading sensor on the > system, probably one on the mainboard...use a manual thermom

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Dominik Zyla wrote: > But it'll not give information about temperature in server room. > actually, it sorta can. find the lowest reading sensor on the system, probably one on the mainboard...use a manual thermometer to read the intake air temp and calculate the delta. i think you'll

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On 2/26/2010 10:46 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > >>> Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know if the server roo

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Bowie Bailey wrote: > Benjamin Franz wrote: > >> Bowie Bailey wrote: >> >> >>> Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with >>> Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple >>> sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to l

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:00:21AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple > sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know > if the server roo

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Dominik Zyla wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:00:21AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> >>> Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with >>> Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 18:34 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > You can make it really cheap if you have some soldering skills ;) > > what is solution for people without soldering skills? ;) Learn it or find someone who can OR if all else fails, buy complete products :) Regards, Mi

Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS

On 2/26/2010 2:20 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > >>> epel is the best large 3rd party repo in terms of avoiding conflicts >>> with the base. >>> >> >> Yeah, I noticed that with rpmforge. I was just under the impression that >> epel was a bit "dodgy" as repos come. Never too late to be enlightened >> th

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > >> I'm looking for room temperature, not case temperature. >> > > Some hardware provides SNMP-addressable information on the temperature > of inbound air, not just case temperature. I realize that inbound > temperature is

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Benjamin Franz wrote: >> Bowie Bailey wrote: >> >>> Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with >>> Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a >>> simple sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring serv

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

>> You can make it really cheap if you have some soldering skills ;) > > what is solution for people without soldering skills? ;) > And you call yourself a sysadmin?! Or, for that matter, (ObFullInfo: yes, they are friends of mine).

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Dale Dellutri wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Bowie Bailey > wrote: > > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a > simple > sensor that I can conne

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Benjamin Franz wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > >> Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with >> Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple >> sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know >> if the server room is gett

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

> You can make it really cheap if you have some soldering skills ;) what is solution for people without soldering skills? ;) -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Bowie Bailey wrote: > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple > sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know > if the server room is getting hot. I don't know what your

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Suzie wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Ross Walker wrote: >> On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Susan Day >> wrote: >> >> I've not done this before. Here's what I did. Please see if this looks >> correct: >> >> You didn't create a body to your email! >> >> The proper way to send an email thr

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Hi, On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 17:18 +0100, Dominik Zyla wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:13:56AM -0800, Benjamin Franz wrote: > > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > > > Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simpl

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Dominik Zyla > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:00:21AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: > >> Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > >> Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appl

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

2010/2/26 Bowie Bailey : > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > Linux?  I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple > sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know > if the server room is getting hot. http://www.akcp.co

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple > sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know > if the server room is g

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Dominik Zyla wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:00:21AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with >> Linux?  I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple >> sensor that I can connect to one

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:13:56AM -0800, Benjamin Franz wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > > Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple > > sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to l

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:00:21AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple > sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know > if the server roo

Re: [CentOS] Temperature sensor

Bowie Bailey wrote: > Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with > Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple > sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know > if the server room is getting hot There is a good chance th

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Hi Sue, > From: Susan Day >> [root]# telnet mail.mydomain.com 25 >> Trying 209.216.9.56... >> Connected to mail.mydomain.com. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> 220 mail.mydomain.com ESMTP >> HELO mail.mydomain.com >> 250 mail.mydomain.com >> MAIL FROM su...@mydomain.com >> 250 ok >> RCPT TO suziepr

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Susan Day wrote: > > > I've not done this before. Here's what I did. Please see if this looks > correct: > > [root]# telnet mail.mydomain.com 25 > Trying 209.216.9.56... > Connected to <

Re: [CentOS] Bandwith limiting

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> wrote: >> > But I do not know how to persist this. >> >> perhaps in the rc.local file? >> > > I am sure there is a proper file for this. Just like iptables, routing, etc. I am not so sure. You could make your own init script, like these gu

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:33:17 +0800: > Fair question. But we don't have to imply certain things. Some people > are just touchy not lazy. Hard to deal with the first and bring out the > cane for the second when proven. Well, just didn't want to see another qmail

[CentOS] Temperature sensor

Does anyone know of a cheap temperature sensor that will work with Linux? I don't need a fancy monitoring appliance, I just want a simple sensor that I can connect to one of my monitoring servers to let me know if the server room is getting hot. -- Bowie _

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

From: Susan Day >[root]# telnet mail.mydomain.com 25 >Trying 209.216.9.56... >Connected to mail.mydomain.com. >Escape character is '^]'. >220 mail.mydomain.com ESMTP >HELO mail.mydomain.com >250 mail.mydomain.com >MAIL FROM su...@mydomain.com >250 ok >RCPT TO suzieprogram...@gmail.com >250 ok >DAT

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Brian Mathis wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla > wrote: > > > And please, stop send mails with html encoding. > > No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding. > > Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have > flyin

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla > wrote: > >> And please, stop send mails with html encoding. >> > > No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding. Yes, *DO* stop. > > Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying > cars or found the monolith on th

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:34AM -0400, Susan Day wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis wrote: >> Why? >>> That is a good question - I "guess" that google's email system thinks >>> you're >>> sending them spam. If you want your mail to be acc

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Brian Mathis wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla wrote: > >> And please, stop send mails with html encoding. >> >> -- >> Dominik Zyla >> > > No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding. > > Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying > car

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:34AM -0400, Susan Day wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis wrote: > > > > Why? > > > > That is a good question - I "guess" that google's email system thinks > > you're > > sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accepted you may need to > >

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:01:28 +0800: > >> Programmers always have a hard time picking up on the >> system admin side of things. > > Still they should be able to find the best avenue for their questions, or > not? > Fair question. But we d

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla wrote: > > And please, stop send mails with html encoding. > > -- > Dominik Zyla > No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding. Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying cars or found the monolith on the moon y

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:01:28 +0800: > Programmers always have a hard time picking up on the > system admin side of things. Still they should be able to find the best avenue for their questions, or not? Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Susan Day wrote: I've not done this before. Here's what I did. Please see if this looks correct: [root]# telnet mail.mydomain.com 25 Trying 209.216.9.56... Connected to mail.mydomain.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail.mydomain.com ESMTP HELO mail.mydomai

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:32:46PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:21:01 -0400: > > > [root qmail-send]# tail current > > Hello, I would appreciate if you could stop to send all your software > problems to this list. Most of your problems seem to be qmail-rela

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:57 AM, wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Susan Day > > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis wrote: > >> > >>> > Why? > >>> > >>> That is a good question - I "guess" that google's email system thinks > >>> you're sending them spam. If

Re: [CentOS] question on kvm

Jerry Geis wrote: > I had used and old kvm-87 on centos 5.4 x86_64 > > I was wanting ot update that and use the newer qemu-kvm-0.12.3 > I downloaded that and everything was good there - but the kernel > modules are not included. > > So I downloaded (or started to download) kvm-kvod something... bu

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Susan Day > wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis wrote: >> >>> > Why? >>> >>> That is a good question - I "guess" that google's email system thinks >>> you're sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accepted you may >>> need to have i

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

2010/2/26 Susan Day : > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Susan Day > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis wrote: >>> >>> > Why? >>> >>> That is a good question - I "guess" that google's email system thinks >>> you're >>> sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accept

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Susan Day wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis wrote: > >> > Why? >> >> That is a good question - I "guess" that google's email system thinks >> you're >> sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accepted you may need to >> have >> impleme

[CentOS] question on kvm

I had used and old kvm-87 on centos 5.4 x86_64 I was wanting ot update that and use the newer qemu-kvm-0.12.3 I downloaded that and everything was good there - but the kernel modules are not included. So I downloaded (or started to download) kvm-kvod something... but there is nothing there for

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis wrote: > > Why? > > That is a good question - I "guess" that google's email system thinks > you're > sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accepted you may need to > have > implemented SPF and domainkeys. Oh, lovely. As if I didn't have eno

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

> Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400: >> >>> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list >>> __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. >> >> Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the >> impression tha

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400: > >> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list >> __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. > > Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the impression > that you

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Dear Susan, Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-02-26: > Here's my question > again: > > The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never > does reach their destination: That's not a correct statement - your email does reach google as can be seen from your qmail log > > [root

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400: > Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list > __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the impression that you are mostly asking very basic que

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: >>> postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary >>> developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as >>> many other postfix experts. >>> >>> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html >> >> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experien

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

>> postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary >> developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as >> many other postfix experts. >> >> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html > > > Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list > __last_w

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list > __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. Same with > cr.yp.to's list. No. If they worked I'd be there. Here's my question again: > The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does > reach t

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

2010/2/26 Susan Day : > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen > wrote: >> >> qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should >> migrate your system to postfix. > > postfix isn't supported either. At least I have some experience with qmail. > Susan Postfix is under active

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jeff wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Susan Day > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen > > wrote: > >> > >> qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should > >> migrate your system to postfix. > > > > postfix isn't

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

B.J. McClure wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:57 -0400, Susan Day wrote: > > > >> With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say >> there don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers >> that are active. I'm desperate to get this working. >> TIA, >> Suzie

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Susan Day wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > >> 2010/2/26 Susan Day : >>> Hi; >>> The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does >>> reach their destination: >>> >>> [root qmail-send]# tail current >>> >>> @40004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Susan Day wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen > wrote: >> >> qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should >> migrate your system to postfix. > > postfix isn't supported either. At least I have some experience with qmail. po

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:57 -0400, Susan Day wrote: > With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say > there don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers > that are active. I'm desperate to get this working. > TIA, > Suzie How about qmail-h...@list.cr.

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should > migrate your system to postfix. > postfix isn't supported either. At least I have some experience with qmail. Susan ___ CentOS m

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

2010/2/26 Susan Day : > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen > wrote: >> >> 2010/2/26 Susan Day : >> > Hi; >> > The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does >> > reach their destination: >> > >> > [root qmail-send]# tail current >> > >> > @40004b87b3d3392c

Re: [CentOS] Bandwith limiting

> -Original Message- > From: Rajagopal Swaminathan > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 4:12 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Bandwith limiting > > Greetings, > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jason Pyeron > wrote: > > > > [r...@mirrors html]# tc qdisc add dev eth1

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/2/26 Susan Day : > > Hi; > > The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does > > reach their destination: > > > > [root qmail-send]# tail current > > > > @40004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462 > > > > @40

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:21:01 -0400: > [root qmail-send]# tail current Hello, I would appreciate if you could stop to send all your software problems to this list. Most of your problems seem to be qmail-related, please go to a qmail list for these. Thanks. Kai -- Get your web

Re: [CentOS] Email Problem

2010/2/26 Susan Day : > Hi; > The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does > reach their destination: > > [root qmail-send]# tail current > > @40004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462 > > @40004b87b3d3392cc5ac info msg 97881462: bytes 531 from > qp 23629 uid 508 > >

[CentOS] Email Problem

Hi; The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does reach their destination: [root qmail-send]# tail current @40004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462 @40004b87b3d3392cc5ac info msg 97881462: bytes 531 from < suzieprogram...@gmail.com> qp 23629 uid 508 @40004b87

Re: [CentOS] getaddrinfo problem

From: Susan Day > A problem occurred in a Python script. > code undefined, msg = 'getaddrinfo returns an empty list', Did you check that your mail server is listening? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailm

Re: [CentOS] Bandwith limiting

Greetings, On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > [r...@mirrors html]# tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 1 > default_index 0 > [r...@mirrors html]# tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 2:0 parent 1:0 tbf burst > 2048 > limit 2048 mtu 1514 rate 3200bps Gee Thanks! :)

[CentOS] Bandwith limiting

I found out how to limit all traffic on a give nic: [r...@mirrors html]# tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 1 default_index 0 [r...@mirrors html]# tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 2:0 parent 1:0 tbf burst 2048 limit 2048 mtu 1514 rate 3200bps But I do not know how to persist this.

Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS

>> epel is the best large 3rd party repo in terms of avoiding conflicts >> with the base. >> > > Yeah, I noticed that with rpmforge. I was just under the impression that > epel was a bit "dodgy" as repos come. Never too late to be enlightened > though. ;-) > the following is my opinion,

Re: [CentOS] good centos/rhel source for latest spamassassin?

2010/2/25 R P Herrold : > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Eero Volotinen wrote: > >> Is there any good rpm source for latest spamassassin for centos/rhel ? >> >> Currently using from dag's, but is is a bit old version nowdays. > > I have a full sources solution at: >        ftp://ftp.owlriver.com/pub/mirror/O